Abortion Debate Forum - It IS a baby plain and simple.
Medical questions     Health forums     MarketPlace     log in    

It IS a baby plain and simple.

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> It IS a baby plain and simple.
Medical Questions
Author Message
antrise

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 May 2008
Posts: 123

Posted: 06-18-08 02:36am

oopoopoop wrote:
I keep chickens, including a cockerel. The eggs I eat have been fertilised. But they don't actually start developing, i.e. get to the zygote stage, until they are incubated at chicken temperature, either under a broody hen or in the incubator for some hours. I usually bung them in the refrigerator for a couple of hours, which stops any possibility that they will start to develop. Most hens, incidentally, have no interest whatever in sitting on their eggs, fertilised or not.

Some of the eggs we decide to hatch out, which takes 21 days or so. If you crack one open after two weeks, there is a chicken embryo inside. I really don't think you could call it an organism -- once the shell is broken, it dies. It cannot survive outside its womb, i.e. shell.

I think being "born" is a prerequisite for qualifying as an organism.
nobody cares what you think especially not the humans you are so eager to destroy with your definitions. when you kill a man you not only take away everything he has but everything he ever will have.
|
oopoopoop

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 1358
Location: ,
Thanks: 58
Thanked:3

Posted: 06-18-08 04:13am

antrise wrote:
oopoopoop wrote:
I keep chickens, including a cockerel. The eggs I eat have been fertilised. But they don't actually start developing, i.e. get to the zygote stage, until they are incubated at chicken temperature, either under a broody hen or in the incubator for some hours. I usually bung them in the refrigerator for a couple of hours, which stops any possibility that they will start to develop. Most hens, incidentally, have no interest whatever in sitting on their eggs, fertilised or not.

Some of the eggs we decide to hatch out, which takes 21 days or so. If you crack one open after two weeks, there is a chicken embryo inside. I really don't think you could call it an organism -- once the shell is broken, it dies. It cannot survive outside its womb, i.e. shell.

I think being "born" is a prerequisite for qualifying as an organism.
nobody cares what you think especially not the humans you are so eager to destroy with your definitions. when you kill a man you not only take away everything he has but everything he ever will have.


Okay, let's take a vote -- is this the most irrelevant retort ever? Rolling Eyes
|
diamondsz

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 3234
Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 85
Thanked:120

Posted: 06-18-08 07:06am

oopoopoop wrote:
antrise wrote:
oopoopoop wrote:
I keep chickens, including a cockerel. The eggs I eat have been fertilised. But they don't actually start developing, i.e. get to the zygote stage, until they are incubated at chicken temperature, either under a broody hen or in the incubator for some hours. I usually bung them in the refrigerator for a couple of hours, which stops any possibility that they will start to develop. Most hens, incidentally, have no interest whatever in sitting on their eggs, fertilised or not.

Some of the eggs we decide to hatch out, which takes 21 days or so. If you crack one open after two weeks, there is a chicken embryo inside. I really don't think you could call it an organism -- once the shell is broken, it dies. It cannot survive outside its womb, i.e. shell.

I think being "born" is a prerequisite for qualifying as an organism.
nobody cares what you think especially not the humans you are so eager to destroy with your definitions. when you kill a man you not only take away everything he has but everything he ever will have.


Okay, let's take a vote -- is this the most irrelevant retort ever? Rolling Eyes


YES- Your analogy is kick arse

Antrise likes to avoid the main points or questions followed by his analogy of building jets, so no respect for us but were supposed to listen to him... Rolling Eyes


And you my dear Antris takes away everything a woman would ever want, the irony WOMAN can think.
|
Snug

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Dec 2007
Posts: 151
Location: In the jacuzzi, silly.
Thanks: 21
Thanked:0

Posted: 06-18-08 09:26am

oopoopoop wrote:
antrise wrote:
oopoopoop wrote:
I keep chickens, including a cockerel. The eggs I eat have been fertilised. But they don't actually start developing, i.e. get to the zygote stage, until they are incubated at chicken temperature, either under a broody hen or in the incubator for some hours. I usually bung them in the refrigerator for a couple of hours, which stops any possibility that they will start to develop. Most hens, incidentally, have no interest whatever in sitting on their eggs, fertilised or not.

Some of the eggs we decide to hatch out, which takes 21 days or so. If you crack one open after two weeks, there is a chicken embryo inside. I really don't think you could call it an organism -- once the shell is broken, it dies. It cannot survive outside its womb, i.e. shell.

I think being "born" is a prerequisite for qualifying as an organism.


nobody cares what you think especially not the humans you are so eager to destroy with your definitions. when you kill a man you not only take away everything he has but everything he ever will have.


Okay, let's take a vote -- is this the most irrelevant retort ever? Rolling Eyes


You must keep in mind that you're talking to a man who thinks fetuses don't need nutrients to survive. So any Bizarro World replies that he comes up with are not altogether unexpected.

Somehow, I'm discomfited by the notion of a person as ignorant of science as he appears to be building aircraft. But that's just me.
|
aochriss

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 562
Thanks: 82
Thanked:143

Posted: 06-18-08 13:01pm

oopoopoop wrote:
antrise wrote:
oopoopoop wrote:
I keep chickens, including a cockerel. The eggs I eat have been fertilised. But they don't actually start developing, i.e. get to the zygote stage, until they are incubated at chicken temperature, either under a broody hen or in the incubator for some hours. I usually bung them in the refrigerator for a couple of hours, which stops any possibility that they will start to develop. Most hens, incidentally, have no interest whatever in sitting on their eggs, fertilised or not.

Some of the eggs we decide to hatch out, which takes 21 days or so. If you crack one open after two weeks, there is a chicken embryo inside. I really don't think you could call it an organism -- once the shell is broken, it dies. It cannot survive outside its womb, i.e. shell.

I think being "born" is a prerequisite for qualifying as an organism.
nobody cares what you think especially not the humans you are so eager to destroy with your definitions. when you kill a man you not only take away everything he has but everything he ever will have.


Okay, let's take a vote -- is this the most irrelevant retort ever? Rolling Eyes


YES!
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
New Topic   Reply
Medical Questions -> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> It IS a baby plain and simple.



Page 11 of 11
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.