On the last day of my period (day 7 or 8
of cycle) I had unprotected sex. I took
plan b about 2 or three hours later and
started nuvaring the next day as the
doctor ordered (he said taking the two
together should be fine). Should I be
worried about getting pregnant? I am
freaking out here! Also when's the
earliest I can take a pregnancy test.
|
Mabel
Supporter
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 8958 Location: Grinning like a Cheshire Cat,
Thanks: 179
Thanked:198
Posted: 07-28-08 12:05pm
Two weeks after unprotected sex is the
first a pregnancy test would be accurate.
It is most accurate after you've missed
your period.
Listen to your doctor, and if you are
still concerned about getting pregnant,
use condoms with the nuvaring.
|
lazslo
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Posts: 5
Posted: 07-28-08 12:07pm
does the unprotected sex I had though
before I went on nuvaring give me a good
chance of getting pregnant?
|
Maddie34
Supporter
Joined: 06 Oct 2007 Posts: 1897 Location: ,
Thanks: 104
Thanked:22
Posted: 07-28-08 12:39pm
a good chance? No, you took plan b (very
promptly) and you were probably not really
around the time of ovulation since you
just getting off your period.. There is
always a chance of pregnancy when you have
sex, but in this case I wouldn't really
consider it a good chance.
|
notashamed
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Jul 2008 Posts: 27
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 07-28-08 20:13pm
Maddie34
wrote:
a good chance? No, you took
plan b (very promptly) and you were
probably not really around the time of
ovulation since you just getting off your
period.. There is always a chance of
pregnancy when you have sex, but in this
case I wouldn't really consider it a good
chance.
I just wanted to add that plan b does
definitely have an error rate. Not trying
to scare you (OP) but it failed for me
after taking it the third time in two
years. It even says in the information
portion that repeated usage makes it less
effective. I was worried when taking it
the third time but I was thinking, maybe
that's with people who use it all the
time. So, just putting it out there. I
don't think a lot of people read all that
stuff like I do. I'm not even confident
with plan b. I'm using condoms AND birth
control now.
|
Maddie34
Supporter
Joined: 06 Oct 2007 Posts: 1897 Location: ,
Thanks: 104
Thanked:22
Posted: 07-28-08 20:54pm
Yep, there is an error rate. Pregnancy is
aways a possibility when you have sex.
Plan b isn't really meant to be used all
the time, its only an emergency form of
birth control and should never be relied
on for normal use. Was this the quote you
read?
Quote:
tr>
While repeat use
of Plan B is safe, EC should not be used
as a primary contraceptive method, as it
is less effective than many other
contraceptives, including daily oral
contraceptives and other hormonal
contraceptives.
I've never really heard that the more you
use EC, the less effective it is. What
they mean is that normal birth control is
more effective than just plan b. Plan b,
on it own and used correctly (within first
72 hours after sex) is about 85%
effective. Birth control is about 92-99%
effective. So obviously, the more you rely
on EC, the more risk you have, which is
why it's for emergencies only.
Notashamed, let me know if that's not the
right quote, and if its not, do you think
you could write in what the pack does say?
|
Users who thank Maddie34 for this post:
Sydney123456
Maddie34 did a good job of explaining what
Plan B means by being "less effective."
You're not supposed to rely on it as a
form of birth control; it is EMERGENCY
CONTRACEPTIVE. Therefore, used in the
worst case scenario.
|
wanna_be_mommy
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Posts: 8
Posted: 07-28-08 23:57pm
if you taking the plan b ills you shoudnt
be worried about getting prego because it
kills the cell eve before geting to your
egg .
|
notashamed
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Jul 2008 Posts: 27
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 07-29-08 05:10am
Maddie34
wrote:
Yep, there is an error rate.
Pregnancy is aways a possibility when you
have sex.
Plan b isn't really meant to be used all
the time, its only an emergency form of
birth control and should never be relied
on for normal use. Was this the quote you
read?
Quote:
tr>
While repeat use
of Plan B is safe, EC should not be used
as a primary contraceptive method, as it
is less effective than many other
contraceptives, including daily oral
contraceptives and other hormonal
contraceptives.
I've never really heard that the more you
use EC, the less effective it is. What
they mean is that normal birth control is
more effective than just plan b. Plan b,
on it own and used correctly (within first
72 hours after sex) is about 85%
effective. Birth control is about 92-99%
effective. So obviously, the more you rely
on EC, the more risk you have, which is
why it's for emergencies only.
Notashamed, let me know if that's not the
right quote, and if its not, do you think
you could write in what the pack does
say?
I'm sorry Maddie, I don't have it anymore.
It said it right in the information part.
I don't think that's the quote I read
though. I'm quite certain it said with
repeated use, it becomes less effective.
From what I remember, it wasn't saying
that EC is less effective than birth
control. It said it becomes less
effective with each use. I'm gonna google
and see what I come up with.
|
Maddie34
Supporter
Joined: 06 Oct 2007 Posts: 1897 Location: ,
Thanks: 104
Thanked:22
Posted: 07-29-08 15:34pm
Hm... I'll keep looking too, but I can't
find it saying that anywhere.
Plan b works almost the exact same way as
birth control pills-- only a shorter and
higher dosage of almost the same hormones
(which is why some birth control pills can
actually be used as EC). I've been
looking, but I can't find one instance
where it hints that a woman can acquire
immunity to it-- if that were the case,
then women would grow immune to using just
regular birth control pills too-- which
they don't.
I'm not saying you didn't see it, just
that the wording is probably horrendously
confusing-- which is annoying considering
how much of a panic most women are when
they are taking plan b.
|
notashamed
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Jul 2008 Posts: 27
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 07-29-08 17:28pm
Maddie34
wrote:
Hm... I'll keep looking too,
but I can't find it saying that anywhere.
Plan b works almost the exact same way as
birth control pills-- only a shorter and
higher dosage of almost the same hormones
(which is why some birth control pills can
actually be used as EC). I've been
looking, but I can't find one instance
where it hints that a woman can acquire
immunity to it-- if that were the case,
then women would grow immune to using just
regular birth control pills too-- which
they don't.
I'm not saying you didn't see it, just
that the wording is probably horrendously
confusing-- which is annoying considering
how much of a panic most women are when
they are taking plan
b.
I just googled plan b and repeated usage,
here's what it said:
Emergency contraceptives are not as
effective as routine contraception since
their failure rate,while low based on a
single use, would accumulate over time
with repeated usage.
so, i don't know. i don't think this
wording is horrendously confusing. It
seems simple enough to me. It was an even
easier read on the information packet.
let me know what you think.
|
Maddie34
Supporter
Joined: 06 Oct 2007 Posts: 1897 Location: ,
Thanks: 104
Thanked:22
Posted: 07-29-08 20:16pm
Yes, plan b is not as effective as routine
birth control, so don't use it like it is.
That's what I'm getting out of that.
It's like this (get ready, because I'm
going to pull a hardcore statistic
problem:D):
Say I had four marbles in a bag (one blue,
three black) and I had to draw one marble
and put it back into the bag after each
time.
I have the same chance of picking the blue
ball each time I draw, but the more times
I do it, the more chance I have of
becoming part of the 25% that draws a
blue.
So Plan b is still effective 85% of the
time, but you have more of a chance of
falling in that unlucky 15% each time you
use it. Does that make sense?
|
notashamed
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Jul 2008 Posts: 27
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 07-29-08 22:11pm
Maddie34
wrote:
Yes, plan b is not as
effective as routine birth control, so
don't use it like it is.
That's what I'm getting out of that.
It's like this (get ready, because I'm
going to pull a hardcore statistic
problem:D):
Say I had four marbles in a bag (one blue,
three black) and I had to draw one marble
and put it back into the bag after each
time.
I have the same chance of picking the blue
ball each time I draw, but the more times
I do it, the more chance I have of
becoming part of the 25% that draws a
blue.
So Plan b is still effective 85% of the
time, but you have more of a chance of
falling in that unlucky 15% each time you
use it. Does that make
sense?
I totally understand your scenario with
the marbles. But, I don't interpret it
that way. I understand what I pasted to
say with each use (over time), it becomes
less effective. That obviousy was the
case for me. I've taken it a couple times
in the past year and it didn't work the
last time. I literally took it 9 hours
after my sexual encounter. So, what I
read (& what I pasted here) confirms
that warning. For me at least. Idk, I'm
not saying I'm not reading it wrong but
when accumulating is thrown in there, that
means to me, with repeated usage, it's
less effective.
|
Maddie34
Supporter
Joined: 06 Oct 2007 Posts: 1897 Location: ,
Thanks: 104
Thanked:22
Posted: 07-29-08 22:25pm
Well plan b doesn't always work even when
taken correctly(within the first 72
hours), that's why it's only 85% effective
and not 100%.
You took plan b the first two times and
you fell into the "Yay! It worked!" group,
whereas the last time you took it you fell
into the much smaller "Oh poop, I'm preg"
group.
Your chances were always 85% not pregnant.
You just happen to draw the blue marble
for your last draw and got stuck in the
15% pregnant.
It's like how women become pregnant on
birth control. Was the birth control less
effective even though they've been on it
for 4 years? No. Are they stuck in the
small percentage of women who get pregnant
with perfect use of birth control? If
sucks, but yes.
|
notashamed
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Jul 2008 Posts: 27
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 07-30-08 08:47am
Maddie34
wrote:
Well plan b doesn't always
work even when taken correctly(within the
first 72 hours), that's why it's only 85%
effective and not 100%.
You took plan b the first two times and
you fell into the "Yay! It worked!" group,
whereas the last time you took it you fell
into the much smaller "Oh poop, I'm preg"
group.
Your chances were always 85% not pregnant.
You just happen to draw the blue marble
for your last draw and got stuck in the
15% pregnant.
It's like how women become pregnant on
birth control. Was the birth control less
effective even though they've been on it
for 4 years? No. Are they stuck in the
small percentage of women who get pregnant
with perfect use of birth control? If
sucks, but
yes.
We'll just have to agree to disagree on
how the wording is read. Cuz to me it's
like "yay, it worked" the first two times
but over repeated usage, i'd increasingly
(accumulatingly, not a word but u get my
point, lol!) fall into the "oh poop, im
preg" group." I certainly wasn't saying
"oh poop." Lol. Girl, u should have
heard the words comin out of my mouth.
|
Maddie34
Supporter
Joined: 06 Oct 2007 Posts: 1897 Location: ,
Thanks: 104
Thanked:22
Posted: 07-30-08 12:09pm
lol Obviously that's not what you said..
just some misplaced humor
I could also be wrong, but I just haven't
found anything about someone growing an
immunity to the effects of plan b or birth
control due to repeated usage-- otherwise
people would have to be changing birth
control pills constantly!
I see where you are coming from,
NotAshamed, but your logic is off.
You did A, which caused B to happen. That
is horribly faulty logic. Just becuase you
took it 3 times, and the third time it
didn't work doesn't mean it decreases in
effectiveness the more you use it.
That's like a superstituion. "I had a good
day when I didn't walk under the ladder,
and the one day I do walk under a
ladder...my dog got run over. NEVER WALK
UNDER A LADDER." See? Silly. It's called
post hoc
ergo propter hoc, a VERY common
logical fallacy.
So, just letting you know you are letting
your personal experience hinder the
understanding of the actual thing. Not
attacking you...just letting you know. And
knowing is half the battle.
|
notashamed
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Jul 2008 Posts: 27
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 07-30-08 21:08pm
Sydney123456
wrote:
I see where you are coming
from, NotAshamed, but your logic is off.
You did A, which caused B to happen. That
is horribly faulty logic. Just becuase you
took it 3 times, and the third time it
didn't work doesn't mean it decreases in
effectiveness the more you use it.
That's like a superstituion. "I had a good
day when I didn't walk under the ladder,
and the one day I do walk under a
ladder...my dog got run over. NEVER WALK
UNDER A LADDER." See? Silly. It's called
post hoc
ergo propter hoc, a VERY common
logical fallacy.
So, just letting you know you are letting
your personal experience hinder the
understanding of the actual thing. Not
attacking you...just letting you know. And
knowing is half the battle.
I don't take anything anyone says
personally, but what I do is read and
logic and comprehending come into play
while doing so. My personal experience
has nothing to do with what I read:
Emergency contraceptives are not as
effective as routine contraception since
their failure rate,while low based on a
single use, would accumulate over time
with repeated use (see Warnings).See Table
2 below.
How else can you interpret this besides,
over repeated usage, it's less effective?!
To me, it's just a matter of
comprehending what you read. And, I'm not
attacking you but if you can give me some
input as to how you interpret the word
accumulate anyway other than over time,
I'm open. I agree with ya, knowledge is
half the battle. I know what I read in
the pamphlet supplied with the plan b pill
and all I had to do is google "plan b and
repeated usage" and came up with this. Do
you guys understand the word accumulate?!
Not trying to attack either but it seems
like there's some differences in
comprehension going on here. Lol. My
personal experience comes into play
because the warnings turned out to be
true. Lol.
|
Maddie34
Supporter
Joined: 06 Oct 2007 Posts: 1897 Location: ,
Thanks: 104
Thanked:22
Posted: 07-30-08 22:28pm
I think I know where we are getting mixed
up, but I'll save it for now.
I'm going to the pharmacy tomorrow to pay
off some bills so I'll just copy down your
quote and ask for clarification. They seem
to love helping when it comes to pregnancy
prevention so it won't be a problem.
NotAshamed, gotta say...I am offended that
you question my ability to read and
comprehend. I was not attacking you, but
you blatantly did that to me. I don't
appreciate that in a debate.
To display my knowledge of English, I will
explain my understanding of accumulate: to
build up over time. Ok? Are you
satisfied?
ALL birth control failure rates are
accumulations over a period of a year. It
doens't mean that EACH time you use it,
this is what you have the potential to
fail...it
talks about over the course of a
year.
You know that quote you gave? It tells you
to see Table 2, and the Warnings page.
Table 2 is an incredibly important piece
to understanding this effectiveness piece.
I've supplied the table below, with some
alterations that I will explain:
You'll notice I took the liberty of
circling the title of the table, which is
important. Over the course of a year, this
is the effectiveness of each birth
control. Notice how most BC methods have 3
columns, because it takes into account
repeated use. Right? So, ALL these failure
rates are ALREADY ACCUMULATED (thus giving
the second half to that quote you keep
citing).
The below red circle (also denoted with a
number 2) shows that EC methods are not
really intended to be a primary source of
birth control. They do not have three
columns because they assume people are
using it only when they need to (not
whenever they have sex). The quote you
gave REFERENCES THIS TABLE, which shows
how less effective that routine birth
control is, hence it being less effective
over time (i.e. after time has
accumulated).
Not enough? Go HERE for more
info. Here is the direct quote I want the
readers of this post to note:
Quote:
tr>
So why use it
only as a back-up method?
While repeat use of Plan B is safe, EC
should not be used as a primary
contraceptive method, as it is less
effective than many other contraceptives,
including daily oral contraceptives and
other hormonal contraceptives.10
For example, if a woman used Plan B was as
her primary contraceptive method for a
year, her chances of getting pregnant that
year would be about
20%.11
Plan B does not lose effectiveness. It
simply is NOT as effective as regular use
of birth control pills or a shot. It is
good to use if there is a situation
(broken condom, missed pills, etc) of
unprotected sex, but don't use it as a
reliable source because as time
ACCUMULATES, it is less effective as
regular birth control. The quote you use
assumes that it is understood that ALL
failure rates are accumulated.
Do not make remarks questioning my
intelligence. I did no such thing in my
post to you.
|
Users who thank Sydney123456 for this post:
Maddie34