Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 3332 Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159
Posted: 06-16-08 13:08pm
leftistdestroyer
wrote:
Lilly Ivy"]
"We have instincts, and we follow them.
Some 13-yr-olds are UNEDUCATED about
everything and DO NOT know the
consequences of those impulses. Blame
whoever you want, but with most people,
sex is gonna happen when that opportunity
is presented to them. People do things on
impulse, it's called being human. "
Again, you are using the worst possible
case scenario to back up your claim. But
the data does not support
that.
Actually mentally teenagers go through
this rebellious phase where they want to
experiment with stuff or even when there
parents or others have told them it is
wrong. Lily makes a very good point of
that actual facts.
Some teens dont but all of us have done
something when we were teenagers that we
shouldn't have done, if you havent then
you your are one of the odd balls.
|
Users who thank diamondsz for this post:
Lilly Ivy
Snug
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Dec 2007 Posts: 151 Location: In the jacuzzi, silly.
Thanks: 21
Thanked:0
Posted: 06-16-08 13:11pm
leftistdestroyer
wrote:
Babies can effect lot's of people in a
very positive way, emotionally, for
example. Where killing is always
negative.
No way, Jose. I've never had need of an
abortion, but if I became pregnant, I'd
have one faster than you could say
"RU-486." And I sure as hell wouldn't
feel negative about it.
Having a baby, on the other hand, would be
the equivalent of an IRS audit, a root
canal, losing my job, and a car accident,
all happening in one day.
"No, I don't "know that". Declining to
allow someone else the use of your blood
is fundamentally no different from a woman
declining to allow a fetus the use of her
blood, organs, digestive system and
tissue, except that donating blood only
takes a few moments and is harmless to you
while incubation takes nine months and can
permanently damage or kill a woman."
It is vastly different. Being pregant and
donating blood to those who need it are in
no way the same thing. Donating blood
helps save lives, abortion takes lives.
"You simply view women as subhuman and
not worthy of the bodily rights that even
dead people have over their own organs."
No, I view you as subhuman and evil. In
pregancy, nobody is forcefully violating
anyones rights. They created the
pregnancy.
"You're threats of violence against
prochoicers have been reported, by the
way."
I have threatened nobody here.
"Go back to that terrorist site you came
from, where woman killers and rapists
belong. PLA is the only place disturbed
people like yourself belong."
LOL I want to save life, and you call ME
a terorist?! Your view of morality is
disgustingly warped.
|
leftistdestroyer
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jun 2008 Posts: 28 Location: ,
Posted: 06-16-08 13:15pm
Darkmoon
"It must be nice to live on such a lofty
pedestal, where laws that target ONLY
female rights will never touch or harm
you. Just admit the truth. You want to
control women's lives."
Neat62 IS a female. The pro life
organizations are filled with free and
independant women. Because, unlike you,
it is not about the women. It is about
saving life.
|
leftistdestroyer
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jun 2008 Posts: 28 Location: ,
Posted: 06-16-08 13:36pm
"AyaMiyaki"]
"I support the woman's right to choose for
herself. That's it. Whatever else happens
is none of my business. I don't know these
women. I don't know their situation. I'm
not going to presume to know better for
them than they do. I've already said that
if there was a way to remove the z/e/f
without killing it, I'd be all for it."
Pro choice IS pro abortion.
"Yes, I said a woman shouldn't have to
suffer through a pregnancy unless she
wants to. Where does that say that I think
unborn babies deserve death?"
Because you support the choice. The
choice to kill the baby or not.
"First of all, I'd like to see your
non-biased source that states 1% of
abortions are caused by rape. Do you have
one?"
Well it may be biased. Biased in pro
choice favor. It is from the Alan
Guttmacher Institute:
"And rape is an ASSAULT, by the way. It's
one of the worst things that can happen to
a woman. The mental and emotional trauma
can affect her for the rest of her life.
Add onto that the discomforts and
potential dangers of pregnancy, and what
are you doing? You're potentially
traumatizing a victim over and over again.
Every wave of nausea, every painful kick
to the ribs... it's a reminder of HOW that
child got in there, what happened to her,
how her body is not under her own control.
Who are you to inflict that on her?"
I am on another pro life site and one of
the women there has a son from a product
of rape. There are many others too. But
it is not all about me, me, me.
"Go live in a cave then. This is the
modern world, sir."
Well, we are moving back that way.
"NFP is a joke. It takes all the
spontaneity out of love-making, limits
when you can have sex, forces you to
basically live with a thermometer in your
mouth, and... oh yeah... IT DOESN'T ALWAYS
WORK. And if it fails and you become
pregnant? Oh well, it's another little
blessing!"
It would be a blessing. It is not a
blessing if you have it killed.
"No, you said something to the affect of
"you pro-choicers are lucky the law is on
your side", which insinuates you wish you
could step over that line and do
something. Why do you hold such hostility
toward people you don't even know, to the
point of wanting to hurt them? You should
seek help."
Yeah, that is exactly what I said. It was
not a threat. Wishing something and
actually doing or planning something, are
totally different. I am angry because
abortion is homicide and the pro choicers
support homicide. Yeah, I'm hostile. I
should seek help? I am not the one
killing lives.
|
leftistdestroyer
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jun 2008 Posts: 28 Location: ,
Posted: 06-16-08 13:46pm
diamondsz
"What do you call oral sex then?"
Let's stay focused here. Oral sex fits
nowhere into the abortion topic.
"So you want to commit an ILLEGAL crime
for something that is morally wrong to
you, that is retarded."
No, I do not want to commit a crime. And
just because it is law, does not make it
moral, or immoral.
"Just because I drive a car doesnt mean I
am a safe driver but should I have the
right to drive?"
And you kill someone while driving, you
may lose your license. There are
consequence to things.
"Actually biology lesson 101 SEX IS ALSO
recreational not just pro-recreational
where did you get that from........I
learned that in highschool 8 years ago!
Orgasm doesnt mean you are pregnant
"
Times changed. The point to sex is
procreation, not something to do on
Saturday night. Recreation was not a "big
thing" thoughout history.
"If ignorance being naieve, blind or
stupid then I guess the ones who are
open-minded just aren't as smart as you
right. "
LOL you ought to know.
|
leftistdestroyer
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jun 2008 Posts: 28 Location: ,
Re: Pro-lifers Posted: 06-16-08 13:50pm
aochriss
"In that same amount of time, over 1 billion
lives were lost through miscarriage and
failure of the fertilized egg to implant,
and
511
million born children under 5 years
old died from starvation, dehydration and
neglect"
Were they all murdered by a selfish
person?
|
Lilly Ivy
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 1685 Location: Newell, WV
Thanks: 65
Thanked:110
Posted: 06-16-08 14:00pm
through out history, procreation was
necessary because there weren't many
people in the world. Now that the Earth is
basically ripping at the seams because
it's so stuffed, any form of population
control is necessary. Times change. Theres
plenty of people out there starving
because we don't have enough land to make
food for everyone. Now who's the ones
suffering? I'd rather kill my 'potential'
offspring before they are even born, than
watch them starve to death in my arms.
|
leftistdestroyer
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jun 2008 Posts: 28 Location: ,
Posted: 06-16-08 14:07pm
diamondsz"]
"No there is a difference between
supporting and telling people to get an
abortion read the definitions."
That is not what she said. She said that
if you are pro choice, which IS pro
abortion, then she is supporting the
deaths of millions. This is factually
true. The right to choose. The right to
chose what? To chose abortion.
|
leftistdestroyer
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jun 2008 Posts: 28 Location: ,
Posted: 06-16-08 14:09pm
Snug
wrote:
leftistdestroyer
wrote:
Babies can effect lot's of people in a
very positive way, emotionally, for
example. Where killing is always
negative.
No way, Jose. I've never had need of an
abortion, but if I became pregnant, I'd
have one faster than you could say
"RU-486." And I sure as hell wouldn't
feel negative about it.
Having a baby, on the other hand, would be
the equivalent of an IRS audit, a root
canal, losing my job, and a car accident,
all happening in one
day.
Do you have any babies?
|
AyaMiyaki
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jun 2006 Posts: 8508 Location: Floating on a cloud, United States
Thanks: 213
Thanked:15
Posted: 06-16-08 14:13pm
leftistdestroyer
wrote:
Pro choice IS pro
abortion.
There is a such thing as pro-abortion.
However, I am not pro-abortion. I don't
like abortion, nor would I get one myself.
But I will not stand in the way of someone
else choosing abortion. It is YOUR OPINION
that pro-choice = pro-abortion. Pro-choice
can also mean pro-pregnancy,
pro-parenting, pro-adoption... but you
don't want to hear that. It's okay, go
live in your little bubble and tell
yourself what you want to hear.
Quote:
tr>
"Yes, I said a
woman shouldn't have to suffer through a
pregnancy unless she wants to. Where does
that say that I think unborn babies
deserve death?"
Because you support the choice. The
choice to kill the baby or
not.
The choice to end the pregnancy, yes. The
death of the unborn is an unfortunate side
effect that I wish could be avoided. Maybe
one day science will advance to that
level. I think it'd be a great day.
Quote:
tr>
"First of all,
I'd like to see your non-biased source
that states 1% of abortions are caused by
rape. Do you have one?"
Well it may be biased. Biased in pro
choice favor. It is from the Alan
Guttmacher Institute:
I am on another
pro life site and one of the women there
has a son from a product of rape. There
are many others too. But it is not all
about me, me,
me.
They made the choice for themselves to
keep their pregnancies. I support their
choice, and yet I recognize that not all
women would feel the same way. A victim
needs to be able to choose for herself
what she wants to do, and whether she is
able to deal with a rape-induced
pregnancy.
Quote:
tr>
"Go live in a
cave then. This is the modern world,
sir."
Well, we are moving back that
way.
Indeed we are, when certain posters here
feel the need to call women down for
daring to enjoy sex, telling them to keep
their legs closed except when their
husband wants some feel-good time, and to
stay at home and feel GRATEFUL to be
surrounded by kids and have another on the
way while the man is out working. I
thought the 1950's were over?
Quote:
tr>
"NFP is a joke.
It takes all the spontaneity out of
love-making, limits when you can have sex,
forces you to basically live with a
thermometer in your mouth, and... oh
yeah... IT DOESN'T ALWAYS WORK. And if it
fails and you become pregnant? Oh well,
it's another little blessing!"
It would be a blessing. It is not a
blessing if you have it
killed.
You're not understanding me. To be
unbothered by another pregnancy is
defeating the purpose of using a birth
control method! Why would you advocate a
birth control method that can fail and
then tell the woman "Oh well, just be
happy"? That makes no sense.
Quote:
tr>
"No, you said
something to the affect of "you
pro-choicers are lucky the law is on your
side", which insinuates you wish you could
step over that line and do something. Why
do you hold such hostility toward people
you don't even know, to the point of
wanting to hurt them? You should seek
help."
Yeah, that is exactly what I said. It was
not a threat. Wishing something and
actually doing or planning something, are
totally different. I am angry because
abortion is homicide and the pro choicers
support homicide. Yeah, I'm hostile. I
should seek help? I am not the one
killing
lives.
You should seek help for your hostility
towards people you don't even know.
Wishing you could harm people that you
disagree with is NOT healthy or normal.
You don't even know me, yet you wish the
laws were different so you could come and
do whatever. That disturbs me. You need
get counseling for your strong emotions so
you can put things into perspective.
Wishing harm on others is not normal. I
disagree very strongly with Antrise and
yet I do not wish him harm. Some pro-life
people have very strange ways of showing
their "compassion" for "life".
|
leftistdestroyer
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jun 2008 Posts: 28 Location: ,
Posted: 06-16-08 14:17pm
Lilly Ivy
wrote:
through out history,
procreation was necessary because there
weren't many people in the world. Now that
the Earth is basically ripping at the
seams because it's so stuffed, any form of
population control is necessary. Times
change. Theres plenty of people out there
starving because we don't have enough land
to make food for everyone. Now who's the
ones suffering? I'd rather kill my
'potential' offspring before they are even
born, than watch them starve to death in
my arms.
The world is not "so stuffed". People are
starving for a whole host of reasons,
mainly political reasons. The entire
population of the planet could fit into
the state of Texas. (just to get visual)
And we do have enough land to feed the
world.
My main point was that sex was not for
recreation AS IT IS today. Point being,
that recreation is taking priority over a
life. And that is selfish and self
centered.
|
leftistdestroyer
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jun 2008 Posts: 28 Location: ,
Posted: 06-16-08 14:17pm
Snug
wrote:
leftistdestroyer
wrote:
Babies can effect lot's of people in a
very positive way, emotionally, for
example. Where killing is always
negative.
No way, Jose. I've never had need of an
abortion, but if I became pregnant, I'd
have one faster than you could say
"RU-486." And I sure as hell wouldn't
feel negative about it.
Having a baby, on the other hand, would be
the equivalent of an IRS audit, a root
canal, losing my job, and a car accident,
all happening in one
day.
Do you have any babies?
|
diamondsz
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 3332 Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159
Posted: 06-16-08 14:20pm
leftistdestroyer
wrote:
Times changed. The point to sex is
procreation, not something to do on
Saturday night. Recreation was not a "big
thing" thoughout history.
"If ignorance being naieve, blind or
stupid then I guess the ones who are
open-minded just aren't as smart as you
right. "
LOL you ought to
know.
Actually cited through history woman were
treated like whores and if they did enjoy
sex even while married they became dirty
or they were called whores. Sex for men
was recreational it always has been, even
in Victorian times when men were
encouraged to sleep with different woman
and to hit their wives. Throughout
history men were told sex is recreational,
they had mistresses, such as King IV and
just about every other kind, their wives
were brought up as prudes and made to feel
bad,dirty or gross should they show
pleasure.
TIMES HAVE CHANGED
Now woman are having sex for fun (even if
they are married)they never were baby
making factories, they were given a gift
to feel, to have emotions when they were
born.
Now that woman can say what they want and
now they can truly voice their opinion
maybe with a little criticize from people
like you, they are realizing they have
just as much freedom as men , which is why
they fight!
Read up on history it is quite
interesting, in the old testament/new
testament, there is many mentions of
abortions being performed way before the
birth of christ, some were even allowed in
front of gods eyes. The egyptian also
performed abortion and they were an
advanced civilization and abortion has
been performed since the beginning of BC,
although was done differently then
(poison, violence, death of a woman,
hangers, etc) and now we get it safe.
IF WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE, then people get
pregnant from masturbation...........
Sex can be had witthout pro-creating, its
simple, people can also get pregnant
without sex such AS IVF!
|
diamondsz
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 3332 Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159
Posted: 06-16-08 14:23pm
leftistdestroyer
wrote:
Snug
wrote:
leftistdestroyer
wrote:
Babies can effect lot's of people in a
very positive way, emotionally, for
example. Where killing is always
negative.
No way, Jose. I've never had need of an
abortion, but if I became pregnant, I'd
have one faster than you could say
"RU-486." And I sure as hell wouldn't
feel negative about it.
Having a baby, on the other hand, would be
the equivalent of an IRS audit, a root
canal, losing my job, and a car accident,
all happening in one
day.
Do you have any
babies?
Do you do drugs?
Would you try the crack to see if you
really get addicted? Or would you make an
educated biases as well as from personal
expierence to understand such a thing.
I HAVE KIDS and shes right thats exactly
what it FEELS LIKE
|
Lilly Ivy
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 1685 Location: Newell, WV
Thanks: 65
Thanked:110
Posted: 06-16-08 14:45pm
Pro-choice does NOT mean pro-abortion. I
personally am disgusted at how abortion
works, and if a woman wants to go through
that, it's her CHOICE. Not mine, not
yours, HER choice to do what SHE wants.
It's that simple.
|
leftistdestroyer
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jun 2008 Posts: 28 Location: ,
Posted: 06-16-08 14:47pm
AyaMiyaki"]
"There is a such thing as pro-abortion.
However, I am not pro-abortion. I don't
like abortion, nor would I get one myself.
But I will not stand in the way of someone
else choosing abortion. It is YOUR OPINION
that pro-choice = pro-abortion. Pro-choice
can also mean pro-pregnancy,
pro-parenting, pro-adoption... but you
don't want to hear that. It's okay, go
live in your little bubble and tell
yourself what you want to hear."
You will not stand in the way of someone
else choosing an abortion. That is
supporting abortion.
[quote]"Yes, I said a woman shouldn't have
to suffer through a pregnancy unless she
wants to. Where does that say that I think
unborn babies deserve death?"
"The choice to end the pregnancy, yes. The
death of the unborn is an unfortunate side
effect that I wish could be avoided. Maybe
one day science will advance to that
level. I think it'd be a great day."
But until then, you support women killing
a life. We see it as more than just a
"side effect". It is taking a life, which
we hold in high regard. You, apparently,
do not, or you would not support choice,
which is, as you said, half abortion.
"Fair enough. Thank you."
You are welcome.
" A victim needs to be able to choose for
herself what she wants to do, and whether
she is able to deal with a rape-induced
pregnancy."
That is how I feel about a baby. Woman
have all the "choice", men and babies have
none.
"Indeed we are, when certain posters here
feel the need to call women down for
daring to enjoy sex, telling them to keep
their legs closed except when their
husband wants some feel-good time, and to
stay at home and feel GRATEFUL to be
surrounded by kids and have another on the
way while the man is out working. I
thought the 1950's were over? "
I know that poster, and that is not what
she is about. She NEVER said that women
shouldn;t enjoy sex. Just that unlimited,
promiscuous sex can be a bad thing. We
see far too much of it today. And it has
had some bad consequences.
"You're not understanding me. To be
unbothered by another pregnancy is
defeating the purpose of using a birth
control method! Why would you advocate a
birth control method that can fail and
then tell the woman "Oh well, just be
happy"? That makes no sense. "
All birth control fails. Condoms fails,
the pill fails, NFP, etc. I am saying
that if it does, it should be accepted.
"You should seek help for your hostility
towards people you don't even know.
Wishing you could harm people that you
disagree with is NOT healthy or normal.
You don't even know me, yet you wish the
laws were different so you could come and
do whatever. That disturbs me. You need
get counseling for your strong emotions so
you can put things into perspective.
Wishing harm on others is not normal. I
disagree very strongly with Antrise and
yet I do not wish him harm. Some pro-life
people have very strange ways of showing
their "compassion" for "life"."
Well, knowing you is not the issue. It is
the ideology, as most wars are about. And
nothing was directed at you, personally,
but the ideology. I have things in
perfect perspective, from my perspective,
lol. It is either life or death. Any
other reason in the US is selfish and self
centered. Their is a bill that will be
signed if Obama is elected President, the
Freedom of Choice Act. It will basically
tell all states, cities, or towns, that
they can never ever pass legislation that
will ban abortion. That essentially ends
the pro life movement, from a legal
perspective. We can never again pass any
kind of law prohibiting any kind of
abortion.
So where does that leave us? It puts our
backs against the wall. That bill was
written and sponsored by pro choicers.
Not pro abortions, but pro choicers. Yet
it is the most domineering bill supporting
abortion ever created. Not supporting
choice, mind you, but supporting abortion.
If we want to end abortion and support
life, where does that leave us? It leaves
us no other option. And I do not
advocate harm, just a different tactic. A
louder, more angry one. A more "in your
face" tactic, just like the pro choice
crowd does.
This is a war. A war in which we, at th
every least, would be happy with some sort
of restriction on abortion. Minors,
parental consent, quantity of abortions,
late term, etc. But they will not even
meet us in the middle. So again, where
does that leave us?
I have not threatend you or anyone, here
or any other place. I do not wish
physical harm on ANYONE. I am enraged,
but I AM NOT a bloody murderous fanatic.
|
leftistdestroyer
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jun 2008 Posts: 28 Location: ,
Posted: 06-16-08 15:08pm
diamondsz
"Actually cited through history woman were
treated like whores and if they did enjoy
sex even while married they became dirty
or they were called whores. Sex for men
was recreational it always has been, even
in Victorian times when men were
encouraged to sleep with different woman
and to hit their wives. Throughout
history men were told sex is recreational,
they had mistresses, such as King IV and
just about every other kind, their wives
were brought up as prudes and made to feel
bad,dirty or gross should they show
pleasure.
TIMES HAVE CHANGED
Now woman are having sex for fun (even if
they are married)they never were baby
making factories, they were given a gift
to feel, to have emotions when they were
born.
Now that woman can say what they want and
now they can truly voice their opinion
maybe with a little criticize from people
like you, they are realizing they have
just as much freedom as men , which is why
they fight!
Read up on history it is quite
interesting, in the old testament/new
testament, there is many mentions of
abortions being performed way before the
birth of christ, some were even allowed in
front of gods eyes. The egyptian also
performed abortion and they were an
advanced civilization and abortion has
been performed since the beginning of BC,
although was done differently then
(poison, violence, death of a woman,
hangers, etc) and now we get it safe."
Like all the feminists lies, they try to
pull off this notion that ALL men and ALL
women fit into these molds, and that is
not true at all. Did it happen? Sure.
Does it happen today? You bet. Will it
always happen? Yep. And abortionis the
engine, the sacrifice, for the feminist
movement.
"in the old testament/new testament, there
is many mentions of abortions being
performed way before the birth of christ,
some were even allowed in front of gods
eyes. "
LOL show me.
|
antrise
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 May 2008 Posts: 123
Posted: 06-16-08 15:12pm
Lilly Ivy
wrote:
Pro-choice does NOT mean
pro-abortion. I personally am disgusted at
how abortion works, and if a woman wants
to go through that, it's her CHOICE. Not
mine, not yours, HER choice to do what SHE
wants. It's that
simple.
a choice is an
inherent ability that cannot be controlled
by external forces. any person has the
ability to choose anything. wether or not
the choices that a person makes can be
acted upon is the only thing that can be
controlled and that is called an action.
you are pro-action and the action you are
referring to to is abortion. you use the
meaningless expression of pro-choice to
brainwash the intellectually inferior to
believe they are somehow supporting some
noble cause "freedom of choice" but
freedom of choice is something we already
have and can never be taken away. only the
availability of things that we are always
free to choose can be controlled.
|
Lilly Ivy
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 1685 Location: Newell, WV
Thanks: 65
Thanked:110
Posted: 06-16-08 15:25pm
I have the choice to inform people of the
FACTS and let them CHOOSE what THEY want
to do.
If you are taken to jail, your right to
choose to walk out the front door has been
taken away.
Pro-lifers are brainwashing people.
Pro-choicers state the facts. Simple as
that.