Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 3332 Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159
Posted: 07-02-08 15:50pm
"pro-life america."
I almost want to spit in disgust, how much
BS is there...........
I am atill going to say in my eyes anniek
is one exceptional pro-life person.
I will not change my views and they are
spurring supreme court is trying to upturn
abortion "my rear end."
The best one I read was planned parenthood
trying to convince someone to lie about
their age to get an abortion, that is
absurd. They call planned parenthood the
abortion machine, when in fact planned
parenthood helped me with one of my
pregnancies, to keep it and to follow
through.
~coughs~
|
Reptar
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 389
Thanks: 44
Thanked:13
Posted: 07-02-08 16:31pm
Best thing I've read on PLA that shows
exactly what kind of people they are is
"As for the reasons women have abortions,
that’s irrelevant. If the unborn are
not living human beings, no justification
for abortion is necessary. If they are
living human beings, no justification for
abortion is possible. " They have do not
have the ability to sympathize or
empathize with a woman with an unwanted
pregnancy at ALL. A woman could be held at
gun point and they would refuse to see her
need to have an abortion. But I'm no
longer surprised at anything that comes
out of that place. The majority of people
at that place disgust me.
|
Jincks013
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 1180 Location: ,
Thanks: 23
Thanked:13
Posted: 07-02-08 17:16pm
meblonde01
wrote:
Darkmoon
wrote:
I'm getting really tired of
the prolifers that subscribe to the
"willful igonorance" philosophy and are
thus inflicted with the disease of
ignorance.
A fetus cannot survive without the use of
a woman's body. That alone makes it
inferior. You can try to honeycoat it as
your like but the truth is that prolife
groups as a whole only care about the
unborn. They don't care about the child
rape victim or her feelings. The last
article I read biased to prolifers was
absolutely sickening and made me conclude
that the majority of prolifers are
composed of rapists looking for reasons to
assault women and get away with it. They
want females to be horribly used and then
forced to give birth to demon spawn put in
them by rapists.
If I said half of what I would like to say
here, I'll get banned. Rest assured that
there's a lovely terrorist site for
prolifers to band together and blatantly
threaten prochoicers with death simply for
existing. Hell, try even being an average
prolifer on this site. I dare you. Look
up "prolife America" in google if you
don't believe me when I say that prolifers
need to be restricted to a deserted
island.
Would you find
this so hohum if you were someone whom
these nutcases have directly threatened?
Perhaps the idea of Faithman posting he
wants to shoot me for being prochoice
appeals to you? Do you support killing
people for thier beliefs on social issues?
By condoning their actions with sarcasm at
someone who brings up a legitimate point
you are supporting them.
So I see finally, my life isn't important
at all to you, it is ok to threaten to
kill me but its not ok for me to control
my own body and choices.
Nice touch Blonde. I didn't think you'd
ever admit it.
|
Darkmoon
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Dec 2007 Posts: 434 Location: ,
Thanks: 98
Thanked:55
Posted: 07-02-08 17:24pm
Exactly, Jincks. That's why I recommended
PLA for prolifers here to take a look at.
They need to see how serious other people
flying their flag are about killing people
in order to force their views. I don't
think any of the currently registered
prolifers here are that bad, but they
constantly ask for evidence that their
"side" is more violent.
Read Faithman, Joe, Sander and NancyU's
posts for examples of how violent radical
prolifers are and watch in amazement as
most other prolifers defend them for their
advocation of terrorism. Even fellow
prolifers are treated as enemies there and
most of those nuttcases have blatantly
said they wanted to see a prochoice or
"not prolife enough" person die.
I should probably add that "Faithman" has
several sockpuppets. NancyU is one of
them but he tends to mess around with fake
PC posters too. Proof that his position
is so weak he has to make up defenders for
it as well as blatant lies. That man
would be a fascinating vivisection
specimen. I'm very interested in how
multiple personalities work in a
permissive online atmosphere.
Odd that one of his most vehement
objectors happens to be a sock-puppet
addict.
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2132 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 07-03-08 07:29am
Jincks013
wrote:
meblonde01
wrote:
Darkmoon
wrote:
I'm getting really tired of
the prolifers that subscribe to the
"willful igonorance" philosophy and are
thus inflicted with the disease of
ignorance.
A fetus cannot survive without the use of
a woman's body. That alone makes it
inferior. You can try to honeycoat it as
your like but the truth is that prolife
groups as a whole only care about the
unborn. They don't care about the child
rape victim or her feelings. The last
article I read biased to prolifers was
absolutely sickening and made me conclude
that the majority of prolifers are
composed of rapists looking for reasons to
assault women and get away with it. They
want females to be horribly used and then
forced to give birth to demon spawn put in
them by rapists.
If I said half of what I would like to say
here, I'll get banned. Rest assured that
there's a lovely terrorist site for
prolifers to band together and blatantly
threaten prochoicers with death simply for
existing. Hell, try even being an average
prolifer on this site. I dare you. Look
up "prolife America" in google if you
don't believe me when I say that prolifers
need to be restricted to a deserted
island.
Would you find
this so hohum if you were someone whom
these nutcases have directly threatened?
Perhaps the idea of Faithman posting he
wants to shoot me for being prochoice
appeals to you? Do you support killing
people for thier beliefs on social issues?
By condoning their actions with sarcasm at
someone who brings up a legitimate point
you are supporting them.
So I see finally, my life isn't important
at all to you, it is ok to threaten to
kill me but its not ok for me to control
my own body and choices.
Nice touch Blonde. I didn't think you'd
ever admit
it.
bla bla bla! Jink.
all you are if full of hateful words.
right along with darkmoon you guys
can’t get your points across without
saying nasty little comments. that is why
I rolled my eyes. I never saw the post
from faithman you speak of. Your hateful
words show such lack of intelligent. Iggie
time. bye bye.
|
diamondsz
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 3332 Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159
Posted: 07-03-08 09:17am
Actually I did a little reserach myself, I
was provided with a number 1-800-848-LOVE
(for hope and healing after abortion.)
I told the woman I need counselling
because I was attentding an abortion and
she provided me another number. The
number she provided me was 1-877-467-3463
(Rachel vinyard) and well I was told that
I would be provided two years of
counselling in two and a half days.
What really irked me is that they provide
christian masses and prayer, they dont
necessarily go down to a complete
counselling level. I told the lady I
spoke with I was non-religious but she
still recommended it.
A Rachel’s Vineyard weekend retreat is a
chance to get away from daily pressures
and to look at the painful past through a
supportive and nurturing process. The time
away provides an opportunity to enter the
grieving process and identify all the ways
abortion may have affected you. Pain and
suffering are then transformed through a
spiritual process using rituals,
meditations, a memorial service and Mass
of Resurrection. Sorrow, remorse and anger
ultimately give way to peace and
acceptance.
It is part of Project Rachel...
|
diamondsz
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 3332 Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159
Posted: 07-03-08 09:21am
An article I read
Marketers Of The Preven 'Morning After
Pill,' Are Engaged In Re- Defining
Pregnancy
by Celeste McGovern
There's nothing new about the "new"
"morning after pill," Preven. It's just
the old birth control pill in super-high
doses wrapped up in a box with an image of
a carefree '90s woman, a pregnancy
home-test, instructions and a price tag of
$25 to $35. Even the spokesman for the
drug company that makes it says, "it's
really just repackaging and re-
marketing." What is new, however, is the
definition of pregnancy that marketing
strategists and Preven promoters are using
to sell very early abortion as pregnancy
prevention.
Doctors have given women fearing unwanted
pregnancy concentrated birth control
hormones within 72 hours of sex ever since
Albert Yuzpe observed their effect on the
endometrium (lining of the womb) in the
1970s: the hormones make the womb a
hostile environment for a newly fertilized
egg. For all these years, the use of the
drugs has been unofficial, little known
and called the Yuzpe regimen.
Like the Yuzpe regimen, Preven makes women
vomit, bleed, feel sick and dizzy and, 75%
of the time (according to optimistic
website advertising), if she is pregnant
(and no one can be sure if she is), shed
an unwanted fertilized egg.
Jennifer Kessell, spokeswoman for Roberts
Pharmaceuticals, the Oakville, Ont.,
Canadian manufacturer of the drug, sells
Preven as though it were a new shade of
eyeliner. "They're not sure of the ins and
outs of it," she says. "But it's thought
to work two main ways." First, by delaying
ovulation, and second, by preventing
implantation of a fertilized egg into the
women's uterus. More often it would
prevent implantation, she confirms. Ms.
Kessell offers Preven as an alternative to
abortion which "ends the life that is
already implanted." She also calls it
"emergency contraception" that prevents
pregnancy.
But isn't Preven for women who believe
they are already pregnant? Is this a new
definition of pregnancy? "There's
different definitions [of pregnancy]
depending on where you live," offers Ms.
Kessell. "Most doctors would say pregnancy
begins at implantation," she continues.
Only "anti- abortionists" would say life
begins "when the sperm meets the egg.
Period." Pregnancy begins when a woman is
"comfortable" with it beginning, she adds
. "It depends on your own personal views
and what you want to believe."
"Biologically, physically, genetically,
embryologically, pregnancy begins at
conception," counters Calgary pharmacist
Maria Bizecki, who belongs to Concerned
Pharmacists for Conscience, an Alberta
group that is lobbying for pharmacists'
right to refuse to dispense
abortifacients. "The public is being lied
to about the way this works. Preven
terminates a pregnancy in its very early
stages," she emphasizes.
Planned Parenthood is promoting "Preven
moments" for "non-consensual sex," "
condom breakage," "birth control failure"
or "moments of passion." It would like to
see the drug available without a
prescription. Alberta Pro- Life's Joanne
Hatton is especially concerned about the
effect this would have on young women and
girls who may be pressured by boyfriends
into taking the drug and exposed
repeatedly to its unknown toxic effects.
Asked about the effects of repeat exposure
to Preven, Ms. Kessell's answer is not
entirely reassuring: "There's nothing
known yet."
Now I know the morning after pill is brith
control in a stronger dosasge but these
idiots are just being ignorant, sorry for
being rude and Im not dissing all pro-life
but where do they get this stuff?
|
aochriss
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 Apr 2008 Posts: 712
Thanks: 93
Thanked:173
Posted: 07-03-08 10:56am
meblonde01
wrote:
Your hateful words show such
lack of intelligent. (sic)
ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Snug
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Dec 2007 Posts: 151 Location: In the jacuzzi, silly.
Thanks: 21
Thanked:0
Posted: 07-04-08 13:04pm
NeutralUsername
wrote:
I really don't know why no one is
understanding me. You just told me
something I already know.
In some places it is called double
homicide on the death of a pregnant woman.
So, if an 8 month pregnant woman is killed
along with her fetus, it would be
considered illegal homicide on the woman
and fetus.
That same fetus could be aborted for the
health of the mother or because it has an
extreme deformity. But, it won't be called
legal homicide even though it would be
considered ILLEGAL homicide for the fetus
in the scenerio above. The fetus still
dies. It is still being killed by someone.
It's just that now it would be LEGAL. But,
it would only be considered an abortion, a
medical procedure. Not legal homicide.
Why?
And why is it ever considered homicide
when someone kills a viable fetus anyway?
Because the viable fetus was apparently
wanted by the woman? The fetus isn't a
person, so why is the term homicide used?
Doesn't anyone see the hypocrisy in
this?
It's not hypocrisy so much as legal
inconsistency. In some states, at some
stages, under some circumstances, embryos
and fetuses are protected by the homicide
statutes.
That's just dumb, and is most of the
reason that I oppose feticide laws.
|
NeutralUsername
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 May 2008 Posts: 354 Location: , United States
Thanks: 16
Thanked:2
Posted: 07-06-08 15:43pm
Darkmoon
wrote:
I'm getting really tired of
the prolifers that subscribe to the
"willful igonorance" philosophy and are
thus inflicted with the disease of
ignorance.
A fetus cannot survive without the use of
a woman's body. That alone makes it
inferior. You can try to honeycoat it as
your like but the truth is that prolife
groups as a whole only care about the
unborn. They don't care about the child
rape victim or her feelings. The last
article I read biased to prolifers was
absolutely sickening and made me conclude
that the majority of prolifers are
composed of rapists looking for reasons to
assault women and get away with it. They
want females to be horribly used and then
forced to give birth to demon spawn put in
them by rapists.
If I said half of what I would like to say
here, I'll get banned. Rest assured that
there's a lovely terrorist site for
prolifers to band together and blatantly
threaten prochoicers with death simply for
existing. Hell, try even being an average
prolifer on this site. I dare you. Look
up "prolife America" in google if you
don't believe me when I say that prolifers
need to be restricted to a deserted
island.
So, have you been to more than one
PRO-CHOICE only forum on the internet?
They can get pretty nasty in some of those
groups, too. Like, saying they wished
pro-lifers were aborted, judging women who
actually mourn for the death of their
unborn, make dead fetus jokes (who cares
about those who miscarry wanted babies,
right?) etc. And don't get me started on
what happens to those pro-lifers who have
the guts to join the groups.
ALL biased groups have a mob mentality.
That's common sense. Everyone wants to
stick together. Some may be too scared to
stop the nastiness from their own side.
They don't want to be attacked by their
"own kind" and that includes pro-choicers
so they keep their mouth shut. It doesn't
mean they actually agree with what the
person is saying. Stop seeing what you
want to see. I've seen nastiness and
ignorance from both sides. No side is
better than the other.
I'm getting really tired of
the prolifers that subscribe to the
"willful igonorance" philosophy and are
thus inflicted with the disease of
ignorance.
A fetus cannot survive without the use of
a woman's body. That alone makes it
inferior. You can try to honeycoat it as
your like but the truth is that prolife
groups as a whole only care about the
unborn. They don't care about the child
rape victim or her feelings. The last
article I read biased to prolifers was
absolutely sickening and made me conclude
that the majority of prolifers are
composed of rapists looking for reasons to
assault women and get away with it. They
want females to be horribly used and then
forced to give birth to demon spawn put in
them by rapists.
If I said half of what I would like to say
here, I'll get banned. Rest assured that
there's a lovely terrorist site for
prolifers to band together and blatantly
threaten prochoicers with death simply for
existing. Hell, try even being an average
prolifer on this site. I dare you. Look
up "prolife America" in google if you
don't believe me when I say that prolifers
need to be restricted to a deserted
island.
So, have you been to more than one
PRO-CHOICE only forum on the internet?
They can get pretty nasty in some of those
groups, too. Like, saying they wished
pro-lifers were aborted, judging women who
actually mourn for the death of their
unborn, make dead fetus jokes (who cares
about those who miscarry wanted babies,
right?) etc. And don't get me started on
what happens to those pro-lifers who have
the guts to join the groups.
ALL biased groups have a mob mentality.
That's common sense. Everyone wants to
stick together. Some may be too scared to
stop the nastiness from their own side.
They don't want to be attacked by their
"own kind" and that includes pro-choicers
so they keep their mouth shut. It doesn't
mean they actually agree with what the
person is saying. Stop seeing what you
want to see. I've seen nastiness and
ignorance from both sides. No side is
better than the
other.
agree!
|
NeutralUsername
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 May 2008 Posts: 354 Location: , United States
Thanks: 16
Thanked:2
Posted: 07-06-08 16:10pm
meblonde01
wrote:
NeutralUsername
wrote:
Darkmoon
wrote:
I'm getting really tired of
the prolifers that subscribe to the
"willful igonorance" philosophy and are
thus inflicted with the disease of
ignorance.
A fetus cannot survive without the use of
a woman's body. That alone makes it
inferior. You can try to honeycoat it as
your like but the truth is that prolife
groups as a whole only care about the
unborn. They don't care about the child
rape victim or her feelings. The last
article I read biased to prolifers was
absolutely sickening and made me conclude
that the majority of prolifers are
composed of rapists looking for reasons to
assault women and get away with it. They
want females to be horribly used and then
forced to give birth to demon spawn put in
them by rapists.
If I said half of what I would like to say
here, I'll get banned. Rest assured that
there's a lovely terrorist site for
prolifers to band together and blatantly
threaten prochoicers with death simply for
existing. Hell, try even being an average
prolifer on this site. I dare you. Look
up "prolife America" in google if you
don't believe me when I say that prolifers
need to be restricted to a deserted
island.
So, have you been to more than one
PRO-CHOICE only forum on the internet?
They can get pretty nasty in some of those
groups, too. Like, saying they wished
pro-lifers were aborted, judging women who
actually mourn for the death of their
unborn, make dead fetus jokes (who cares
about those who miscarry wanted babies,
right?) etc. And don't get me started on
what happens to those pro-lifers who have
the guts to join the groups.
ALL biased groups have a mob mentality.
That's common sense. Everyone wants to
stick together. Some may be too scared to
stop the nastiness from their own side.
They don't want to be attacked by their
"own kind" and that includes pro-choicers
so they keep their mouth shut. It doesn't
mean they actually agree with what the
person is saying. Stop seeing what you
want to see. I've seen nastiness and
ignorance from both sides. No side is
better than the
other.
agree!
Thank you!
|
diamondsz
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 3332 Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159
Posted: 07-06-08 16:48pm
NeutralUsername
wrote:
So, have you been to more than one
PRO-CHOICE only forum on the internet?
They can get pretty nasty in some of those
groups, too. Like, saying they wished
pro-lifers were aborted, judging women who
actually mourn for the death of their
unborn, make dead fetus jokes (who cares
about those who miscarry wanted babies,
right?) etc. And don't get me started on
what happens to those pro-lifers who have
the guts to join the groups.
ALL biased groups have a mob mentality.
That's common sense. Everyone wants to
stick together. Some may be too scared to
stop the nastiness from their own side.
They don't want to be attacked by their
"own kind" and that includes pro-choicers
so they keep their mouth shut. It doesn't
mean they actually agree with what the
person is saying. Stop seeing what you
want to see. I've seen nastiness and
ignorance from both sides. No side is
better than the
other.
One side is better choice, no offense but
if you want to be pro-life please do so
but do not inflict your views on
others....... You made a choice to be
pro-life and remember that.
why should you care what I do with my
body, especially if you don't know me?
why should you own or control my body?
That is slavery!!!
You dont care about the kids that die but
you care about a fetus, its sickening and
disturbs me more, its like caring for a
ghost, its not here but it is.
|
nightangel73
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Nov 2005 Posts: 2729 Location: ,
Thanks: 19
Thanked:17
Posted: 07-06-08 20:01pm
diamondsz
wrote:
One side is better choice, no offense but
if you want to be pro-life please do so
but do not inflict your views on
others....... You made a choice to be
pro-life and remember that.
why should you care what I do with my
body, especially if you don't know me?
why should you own or control my body?
That is slavery!!!
You dont care about the kids that die but
you care about a fetus, its sickening and
disturbs me more, its like caring for a
ghost, its not here but it
is.
This is example of the mob mentality
described by neutralusername
|
diamondsz
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 3332 Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159
Posted: 07-06-08 22:59pm
nightangel73
wrote:
diamondsz
wrote:
One side is better choice, no offense but
if you want to be pro-life please do so
but do not inflict your views on
others....... You made a choice to be
pro-life and remember that.
why should you care what I do with my
body, especially if you don't know me?
why should you own or control my body?
That is slavery!!!
You dont care about the kids that die but
you care about a fetus, its sickening and
disturbs me more, its like caring for a
ghost, its not here but it
is.
This is example of the mob mentality
described by
neutralusername
Do you mean the fact, that you MADE THE
CHOICE to be pro-life?
Its my body, not yours, not the
governments mine, thats why I have rights,
thats right Im arguing with the devil
itself.
|
NeutralUsername
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 May 2008 Posts: 354 Location: , United States
Thanks: 16
Thanked:2
Posted: 07-07-08 13:44pm
diamondsz
wrote:
NeutralUsername
wrote:
So, have you been to more than one
PRO-CHOICE only forum on the internet?
They can get pretty nasty in some of those
groups, too. Like, saying they wished
pro-lifers were aborted, judging women who
actually mourn for the death of their
unborn, make dead fetus jokes (who cares
about those who miscarry wanted babies,
right?) etc. And don't get me started on
what happens to those pro-lifers who have
the guts to join the groups.
ALL biased groups have a mob mentality.
That's common sense. Everyone wants to
stick together. Some may be too scared to
stop the nastiness from their own side.
They don't want to be attacked by their
"own kind" and that includes pro-choicers
so they keep their mouth shut. It doesn't
mean they actually agree with what the
person is saying. Stop seeing what you
want to see. I've seen nastiness and
ignorance from both sides. No side is
better than the
other.
One side is better choice, no offense but
if you want to be pro-life please do so
but do not inflict your views on
others....... You made a choice to be
pro-life and remember that.
why should you care what I do with my
body, especially if you don't know me?
why should you own or control my body?
That is slavery!!!
You dont care about the kids that die but
you care about a fetus, its sickening and
disturbs me more, its like caring for a
ghost, its not here but it
is.
Then stop inflicting YOUR views on
pro-lifers. Seriously, if you don't like
pro-lifers expressing THEIR view or don't
like the fact that they believe abortion
is wrong, then don't go to DEBATE groups.
Stay in pro-choice groups where you can
whine about how we are taking your rights
away. You think your side is always right
anyway and it doesn't matter what
pro-lifers have to say.
I do care about kids. Look at you,
believing in the stereotype that
pro-lifers only care about fetuses.
For you and other pro-choicers like you,
PROVE to me that only pro-choicers adopt,
help kids in need, donate, mentor, help
pregnant women, etc. Last time I checked,
people from both sides do these kind of
things. Apparently, to people like you,
pro-lifers don't have the ability to
"multi-task" and actually care about OTHER
humans besides the unborn!
|
diamondsz
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 3332 Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159
Posted: 07-07-08 14:48pm
NeutralUsername
wrote:
diamondsz
wrote:
NeutralUsername
wrote:
So, have you been to more than one
PRO-CHOICE only forum on the internet?
They can get pretty nasty in some of those
groups, too. Like, saying they wished
pro-lifers were aborted, judging women who
actually mourn for the death of their
unborn, make dead fetus jokes (who cares
about those who miscarry wanted babies,
right?) etc. And don't get me started on
what happens to those pro-lifers who have
the guts to join the groups.
ALL biased groups have a mob mentality.
That's common sense. Everyone wants to
stick together. Some may be too scared to
stop the nastiness from their own side.
They don't want to be attacked by their
"own kind" and that includes pro-choicers
so they keep their mouth shut. It doesn't
mean they actually agree with what the
person is saying. Stop seeing what you
want to see. I've seen nastiness and
ignorance from both sides. No side is
better than the
other.
One side is better choice, no offense but
if you want to be pro-life please do so
but do not inflict your views on
others....... You made a choice to be
pro-life and remember that.
why should you care what I do with my
body, especially if you don't know me?
why should you own or control my body?
That is slavery!!!
You dont care about the kids that die but
you care about a fetus, its sickening and
disturbs me more, its like caring for a
ghost, its not here but it
is.
Then stop inflicting YOUR views on
pro-lifers. Seriously, if you don't like
pro-lifers expressing THEIR view or don't
like the fact that they believe abortion
is wrong, then don't go to DEBATE groups.
Stay in pro-choice groups where you can
whine about how we are taking your rights
away. You think your side is always right
anyway and it doesn't matter what
pro-lifers have to say.
I do care about kids. Look at you,
believing in the stereotype that
pro-lifers only care about fetuses.
For you and other pro-choicers like you,
PROVE to me that only pro-choicers adopt,
help kids in need, donate, mentor, help
pregnant women, etc. Last time I checked,
people from both sides do these kind of
things. Apparently, to people like you,
pro-lifers don't have the ability to
"multi-task" and actually care about OTHER
humans besides the
unborn!
Prove to me that pro-life adopts...
Taken from world vision
9.7 million children die before the age of
five (explain this please, if they were
adopted we ouldnt be having this issue.
Adoption needs arent being met, there isnt
enough people adopting or they are only
adopting kids under the age of two.
How am I shoving my opinions don your
throat...
You did make a choice to be pro-life, hwo
does that make you different then me
because you could make the choice not to
be pro-life.
I still dont understand why you should
have an rights over my body, my stomachs
gone to hell and back do you care about
that? Without sympathy do you actually
care, it is part of me.
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4146 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
Posted: 07-07-08 15:01pm
NeutralUsername
wrote:
No side is better than the
other.
Except that prochoice advocacy embraces a
empathetic philosophy leaving morality and
spirituality to the individual, as well as
respecting a woman's inherent intelligence
and leaving medical decisions to her as
well.
All things that which vehement prolife
advocates cannot lay claim. There are
many reasons to despise the prolife
philosophy, and that easily transfers over
to actual individuals who strongly adhere
to the philosophy and are outspoken
online. Especially when they take
photographs of women entering clinics,
post them online, threaten with harm,
claim that women who obtain abortions are
promiscuous, slander women, make
judgements and claims about their
character, use false propaganda to further
their cause, and often claim a spiritual
belief as superior to all others.
Except that prochoice advocacy embraces a
empathetic philosophy leaving morality and
spirituality to the individual, as well as
respecting a woman's inherent intelligence
and leaving medical decisions to her as
well.
All things that which vehement prolife
advocates cannot lay claim. There are
many reasons to despise the prolife
philosophy, and that easily transfers over
to actual individuals who strongly adhere
to the philosophy and are outspoken
online. Especially when they take
photographs of women entering clinics,
post them online, threaten with harm,
claim that women who obtain abortions are
promiscuous, slander women, make
judgements and claims about their
character, use false propaganda to further
their cause, and often claim a spiritual
belief as superior to all
others.
Lets not put all pro-life people in the
same category based on some. Just like
one should not single out Pro-choice
people and put them into a category who
would abort a late term pregnancy. Or have
multiple abortions as a form of birth
control. Not all Pro-life people do the
radical thing that we hear of. Just like
not all Pro-choice people would do some
things other pro-choice people would do or
agree with.