Abortion Debate Forum - Question on personhood for the unborn page 4
medical questions | health forums log in    

Question on personhood for the unborn

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Question on personhood for the unborn
Author Message
diamondsz

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 3332
Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159

Posted: 07-02-08 15:50pm

"pro-life america."

I almost want to spit in disgust, how much BS is there...........

I am atill going to say in my eyes anniek is one exceptional pro-life person.

I will not change my views and they are spurring supreme court is trying to upturn abortion "my rear end."

The best one I read was planned parenthood trying to convince someone to lie about their age to get an abortion, that is absurd. They call planned parenthood the abortion machine, when in fact planned parenthood helped me with one of my pregnancies, to keep it and to follow through.

~coughs~
|
Reptar

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 389
Thanks: 44
Thanked:13

Posted: 07-02-08 16:31pm

Best thing I've read on PLA that shows exactly what kind of people they are is "As for the reasons women have abortions, that’s irrelevant. If the unborn are not living human beings, no justification for abortion is necessary. If they are living human beings, no justification for abortion is possible. " They have do not have the ability to sympathize or empathize with a woman with an unwanted pregnancy at ALL. A woman could be held at gun point and they would refuse to see her need to have an abortion. But I'm no longer surprised at anything that comes out of that place. The majority of people at that place disgust me.
|
Jincks013

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 1180
Location: ,
Thanks: 23
Thanked:13

Posted: 07-02-08 17:16pm

meblonde01 wrote:
Darkmoon wrote:
I'm getting really tired of the prolifers that subscribe to the "willful igonorance" philosophy and are thus inflicted with the disease of ignorance.

A fetus cannot survive without the use of a woman's body. That alone makes it inferior. You can try to honeycoat it as your like but the truth is that prolife groups as a whole only care about the unborn. They don't care about the child rape victim or her feelings. The last article I read biased to prolifers was absolutely sickening and made me conclude that the majority of prolifers are composed of rapists looking for reasons to assault women and get away with it. They want females to be horribly used and then forced to give birth to demon spawn put in them by rapists.

If I said half of what I would like to say here, I'll get banned. Rest assured that there's a lovely terrorist site for prolifers to band together and blatantly threaten prochoicers with death simply for existing. Hell, try even being an average prolifer on this site. I dare you. Look up "prolife America" in google if you don't believe me when I say that prolifers need to be restricted to a deserted island.


Rolling Eyes


sleep Would you find this so hohum if you were someone whom these nutcases have directly threatened? Perhaps the idea of Faithman posting he wants to shoot me for being prochoice appeals to you? Do you support killing people for thier beliefs on social issues?
By condoning their actions with sarcasm at someone who brings up a legitimate point you are supporting them.
So I see finally, my life isn't important at all to you, it is ok to threaten to kill me but its not ok for me to control my own body and choices.

Nice touch Blonde. I didn't think you'd ever admit it.
|
Darkmoon

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 434
Location: ,
Thanks: 98
Thanked:55

Posted: 07-02-08 17:24pm

Exactly, Jincks. That's why I recommended PLA for prolifers here to take a look at. They need to see how serious other people flying their flag are about killing people in order to force their views. I don't think any of the currently registered prolifers here are that bad, but they constantly ask for evidence that their "side" is more violent.

Read Faithman, Joe, Sander and NancyU's posts for examples of how violent radical prolifers are and watch in amazement as most other prolifers defend them for their advocation of terrorism. Even fellow prolifers are treated as enemies there and most of those nuttcases have blatantly said they wanted to see a prochoice or "not prolife enough" person die.
|
Users who thank Darkmoon for this post: diamondsz 
Darkmoon

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 434
Location: ,
Thanks: 98
Thanked:55

Posted: 07-02-08 17:30pm

I should probably add that "Faithman" has several sockpuppets. NancyU is one of them but he tends to mess around with fake PC posters too. Proof that his position is so weak he has to make up defenders for it as well as blatant lies. That man would be a fascinating vivisection specimen. I'm very interested in how multiple personalities work in a permissive online atmosphere.

Odd that one of his most vehement objectors happens to be a sock-puppet addict.
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 07-03-08 07:29am

Jincks013 wrote:
meblonde01 wrote:
Darkmoon wrote:
I'm getting really tired of the prolifers that subscribe to the "willful igonorance" philosophy and are thus inflicted with the disease of ignorance.

A fetus cannot survive without the use of a woman's body. That alone makes it inferior. You can try to honeycoat it as your like but the truth is that prolife groups as a whole only care about the unborn. They don't care about the child rape victim or her feelings. The last article I read biased to prolifers was absolutely sickening and made me conclude that the majority of prolifers are composed of rapists looking for reasons to assault women and get away with it. They want females to be horribly used and then forced to give birth to demon spawn put in them by rapists.

If I said half of what I would like to say here, I'll get banned. Rest assured that there's a lovely terrorist site for prolifers to band together and blatantly threaten prochoicers with death simply for existing. Hell, try even being an average prolifer on this site. I dare you. Look up "prolife America" in google if you don't believe me when I say that prolifers need to be restricted to a deserted island.


Rolling Eyes


sleep Would you find this so hohum if you were someone whom these nutcases have directly threatened? Perhaps the idea of Faithman posting he wants to shoot me for being prochoice appeals to you? Do you support killing people for thier beliefs on social issues?
By condoning their actions with sarcasm at someone who brings up a legitimate point you are supporting them.
So I see finally, my life isn't important at all to you, it is ok to threaten to kill me but its not ok for me to control my own body and choices.

Nice touch Blonde. I didn't think you'd ever admit it.

megafon bla bla bla! Jink. all you are if full of hateful words. right along with darkmoon you guys can’t get your points across without saying nasty little comments. that is why I rolled my eyes. I never saw the post from faithman you speak of. Your hateful words show such lack of intelligent. Iggie time. wave bye bye. Very
Happy
|
diamondsz

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 3332
Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159

Posted: 07-03-08 09:17am

Actually I did a little reserach myself, I was provided with a number 1-800-848-LOVE (for hope and healing after abortion.)

I told the woman I need counselling because I was attentding an abortion and she provided me another number. The number she provided me was 1-877-467-3463 (Rachel vinyard) and well I was told that I would be provided two years of counselling in two and a half days.

What really irked me is that they provide christian masses and prayer, they dont necessarily go down to a complete counselling level. I told the lady I spoke with I was non-religious but she still recommended it.

A Rachel’s Vineyard weekend retreat is a chance to get away from daily pressures and to look at the painful past through a supportive and nurturing process. The time away provides an opportunity to enter the grieving process and identify all the ways abortion may have affected you. Pain and suffering are then transformed through a spiritual process using rituals, meditations, a memorial service and Mass of Resurrection. Sorrow, remorse and anger ultimately give way to peace and acceptance.

It is part of Project Rachel...
|
diamondsz

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 3332
Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159

Posted: 07-03-08 09:21am

An article I read

Marketers Of The Preven 'Morning After Pill,' Are Engaged In Re- Defining Pregnancy

by Celeste McGovern

There's nothing new about the "new" "morning after pill," Preven. It's just the old birth control pill in super-high doses wrapped up in a box with an image of a carefree '90s woman, a pregnancy home-test, instructions and a price tag of $25 to $35. Even the spokesman for the drug company that makes it says, "it's really just repackaging and re- marketing." What is new, however, is the definition of pregnancy that marketing strategists and Preven promoters are using to sell very early abortion as pregnancy prevention.

Doctors have given women fearing unwanted pregnancy concentrated birth control hormones within 72 hours of sex ever since Albert Yuzpe observed their effect on the endometrium (lining of the womb) in the 1970s: the hormones make the womb a hostile environment for a newly fertilized egg. For all these years, the use of the drugs has been unofficial, little known and called the Yuzpe regimen.

Like the Yuzpe regimen, Preven makes women vomit, bleed, feel sick and dizzy and, 75% of the time (according to optimistic website advertising), if she is pregnant (and no one can be sure if she is), shed an unwanted fertilized egg.

Jennifer Kessell, spokeswoman for Roberts Pharmaceuticals, the Oakville, Ont., Canadian manufacturer of the drug, sells Preven as though it were a new shade of eyeliner. "They're not sure of the ins and outs of it," she says. "But it's thought to work two main ways." First, by delaying ovulation, and second, by preventing implantation of a fertilized egg into the women's uterus. More often it would prevent implantation, she confirms. Ms. Kessell offers Preven as an alternative to abortion which "ends the life that is already implanted." She also calls it "emergency contraception" that prevents pregnancy.

But isn't Preven for women who believe they are already pregnant? Is this a new definition of pregnancy? "There's different definitions [of pregnancy] depending on where you live," offers Ms. Kessell. "Most doctors would say pregnancy begins at implantation," she continues. Only "anti- abortionists" would say life begins "when the sperm meets the egg. Period." Pregnancy begins when a woman is "comfortable" with it beginning, she adds . "It depends on your own personal views and what you want to believe."

"Biologically, physically, genetically, embryologically, pregnancy begins at conception," counters Calgary pharmacist Maria Bizecki, who belongs to Concerned Pharmacists for Conscience, an Alberta group that is lobbying for pharmacists' right to refuse to dispense abortifacients. "The public is being lied to about the way this works. Preven terminates a pregnancy in its very early stages," she emphasizes.

Planned Parenthood is promoting "Preven moments" for "non-consensual sex," " condom breakage," "birth control failure" or "moments of passion." It would like to see the drug available without a prescription. Alberta Pro- Life's Joanne Hatton is especially concerned about the effect this would have on young women and girls who may be pressured by boyfriends into taking the drug and exposed repeatedly to its unknown toxic effects.

Asked about the effects of repeat exposure to Preven, Ms. Kessell's answer is not entirely reassuring: "There's nothing known yet."


Now I know the morning after pill is brith control in a stronger dosasge but these idiots are just being ignorant, sorry for being rude and Im not dissing all pro-life but where do they get this stuff?
|
aochriss

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 712
Thanks: 93
Thanked:173

Posted: 07-03-08 10:56am

meblonde01 wrote:
Your hateful words show such lack of intelligent. (sic)


ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
perfect10 covereyes
|
Snug

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Dec 2007
Posts: 151
Location: In the jacuzzi, silly.
Thanks: 21
Thanked:0

Posted: 07-04-08 13:04pm

NeutralUsername wrote:


I really don't know why no one is understanding me. You just told me something I already know.

In some places it is called double homicide on the death of a pregnant woman. So, if an 8 month pregnant woman is killed along with her fetus, it would be considered illegal homicide on the woman and fetus.

That same fetus could be aborted for the health of the mother or because it has an extreme deformity. But, it won't be called legal homicide even though it would be considered ILLEGAL homicide for the fetus in the scenerio above. The fetus still dies. It is still being killed by someone. It's just that now it would be LEGAL. But, it would only be considered an abortion, a medical procedure. Not legal homicide. Why?

And why is it ever considered homicide when someone kills a viable fetus anyway? Because the viable fetus was apparently wanted by the woman? The fetus isn't a person, so why is the term homicide used? Doesn't anyone see the hypocrisy in this?



It's not hypocrisy so much as legal inconsistency. In some states, at some stages, under some circumstances, embryos and fetuses are protected by the homicide statutes.

That's just dumb, and is most of the reason that I oppose feticide laws.
|
NeutralUsername

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 354
Location: , United States
Thanks: 16
Thanked:2

Posted: 07-06-08 15:43pm

Darkmoon wrote:
I'm getting really tired of the prolifers that subscribe to the "willful igonorance" philosophy and are thus inflicted with the disease of ignorance.

A fetus cannot survive without the use of a woman's body. That alone makes it inferior. You can try to honeycoat it as your like but the truth is that prolife groups as a whole only care about the unborn. They don't care about the child rape victim or her feelings. The last article I read biased to prolifers was absolutely sickening and made me conclude that the majority of prolifers are composed of rapists looking for reasons to assault women and get away with it. They want females to be horribly used and then forced to give birth to demon spawn put in them by rapists.

If I said half of what I would like to say here, I'll get banned. Rest assured that there's a lovely terrorist site for prolifers to band together and blatantly threaten prochoicers with death simply for existing. Hell, try even being an average prolifer on this site. I dare you. Look up "prolife America" in google if you don't believe me when I say that prolifers need to be restricted to a deserted island.


So, have you been to more than one PRO-CHOICE only forum on the internet? They can get pretty nasty in some of those groups, too. Like, saying they wished pro-lifers were aborted, judging women who actually mourn for the death of their unborn, make dead fetus jokes (who cares about those who miscarry wanted babies, right?) etc. And don't get me started on what happens to those pro-lifers who have the guts to join the groups.

ALL biased groups have a mob mentality. That's common sense. Everyone wants to stick together. Some may be too scared to stop the nastiness from their own side. They don't want to be attacked by their "own kind" and that includes pro-choicers so they keep their mouth shut. It doesn't mean they actually agree with what the person is saying. Stop seeing what you want to see. I've seen nastiness and ignorance from both sides. No side is better than the other.
|
Users who thank NeutralUsername for this post: meblonde01  nightangel73 
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 07-06-08 16:00pm

NeutralUsername wrote:
Darkmoon wrote:
I'm getting really tired of the prolifers that subscribe to the "willful igonorance" philosophy and are thus inflicted with the disease of ignorance.

A fetus cannot survive without the use of a woman's body. That alone makes it inferior. You can try to honeycoat it as your like but the truth is that prolife groups as a whole only care about the unborn. They don't care about the child rape victim or her feelings. The last article I read biased to prolifers was absolutely sickening and made me conclude that the majority of prolifers are composed of rapists looking for reasons to assault women and get away with it. They want females to be horribly used and then forced to give birth to demon spawn put in them by rapists.

If I said half of what I would like to say here, I'll get banned. Rest assured that there's a lovely terrorist site for prolifers to band together and blatantly threaten prochoicers with death simply for existing. Hell, try even being an average prolifer on this site. I dare you. Look up "prolife America" in google if you don't believe me when I say that prolifers need to be restricted to a deserted island.


So, have you been to more than one PRO-CHOICE only forum on the internet? They can get pretty nasty in some of those groups, too. Like, saying they wished pro-lifers were aborted, judging women who actually mourn for the death of their unborn, make dead fetus jokes (who cares about those who miscarry wanted babies, right?) etc. And don't get me started on what happens to those pro-lifers who have the guts to join the groups.

ALL biased groups have a mob mentality. That's common sense. Everyone wants to stick together. Some may be too scared to stop the nastiness from their own side. They don't want to be attacked by their "own kind" and that includes pro-choicers so they keep their mouth shut. It doesn't mean they actually agree with what the person is saying. Stop seeing what you want to see. I've seen nastiness and ignorance from both sides. No side is better than the other.


thumbsup agree!
|
NeutralUsername

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 354
Location: , United States
Thanks: 16
Thanked:2

Posted: 07-06-08 16:10pm

meblonde01 wrote:
NeutralUsername wrote:
Darkmoon wrote:
I'm getting really tired of the prolifers that subscribe to the "willful igonorance" philosophy and are thus inflicted with the disease of ignorance.

A fetus cannot survive without the use of a woman's body. That alone makes it inferior. You can try to honeycoat it as your like but the truth is that prolife groups as a whole only care about the unborn. They don't care about the child rape victim or her feelings. The last article I read biased to prolifers was absolutely sickening and made me conclude that the majority of prolifers are composed of rapists looking for reasons to assault women and get away with it. They want females to be horribly used and then forced to give birth to demon spawn put in them by rapists.

If I said half of what I would like to say here, I'll get banned. Rest assured that there's a lovely terrorist site for prolifers to band together and blatantly threaten prochoicers with death simply for existing. Hell, try even being an average prolifer on this site. I dare you. Look up "prolife America" in google if you don't believe me when I say that prolifers need to be restricted to a deserted island.


So, have you been to more than one PRO-CHOICE only forum on the internet? They can get pretty nasty in some of those groups, too. Like, saying they wished pro-lifers were aborted, judging women who actually mourn for the death of their unborn, make dead fetus jokes (who cares about those who miscarry wanted babies, right?) etc. And don't get me started on what happens to those pro-lifers who have the guts to join the groups.

ALL biased groups have a mob mentality. That's common sense. Everyone wants to stick together. Some may be too scared to stop the nastiness from their own side. They don't want to be attacked by their "own kind" and that includes pro-choicers so they keep their mouth shut. It doesn't mean they actually agree with what the person is saying. Stop seeing what you want to see. I've seen nastiness and ignorance from both sides. No side is better than the other.


thumbsup agree!


Thank you!
|
diamondsz

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 3332
Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159

Posted: 07-06-08 16:48pm

NeutralUsername wrote:

So, have you been to more than one PRO-CHOICE only forum on the internet? They can get pretty nasty in some of those groups, too. Like, saying they wished pro-lifers were aborted, judging women who actually mourn for the death of their unborn, make dead fetus jokes (who cares about those who miscarry wanted babies, right?) etc. And don't get me started on what happens to those pro-lifers who have the guts to join the groups.

ALL biased groups have a mob mentality. That's common sense. Everyone wants to stick together. Some may be too scared to stop the nastiness from their own side. They don't want to be attacked by their "own kind" and that includes pro-choicers so they keep their mouth shut. It doesn't mean they actually agree with what the person is saying. Stop seeing what you want to see. I've seen nastiness and ignorance from both sides. No side is better than the other.


One side is better choice, no offense but if you want to be pro-life please do so but do not inflict your views on others....... You made a choice to be pro-life and remember that.

why should you care what I do with my body, especially if you don't know me? why should you own or control my body? That is slavery!!!

You dont care about the kids that die but you care about a fetus, its sickening and disturbs me more, its like caring for a ghost, its not here but it is.
|
nightangel73

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Nov 2005
Posts: 2729
Location: ,
Thanks: 19
Thanked:17

Posted: 07-06-08 20:01pm

diamondsz wrote:


One side is better choice, no offense but if you want to be pro-life please do so but do not inflict your views on others....... You made a choice to be pro-life and remember that.

why should you care what I do with my body, especially if you don't know me? why should you own or control my body? That is slavery!!!

You dont care about the kids that die but you care about a fetus, its sickening and disturbs me more, its like caring for a ghost, its not here but it is.




This is example of the mob mentality described by neutralusername
|
diamondsz

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 3332
Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159

Posted: 07-06-08 22:59pm

nightangel73 wrote:
diamondsz wrote:


One side is better choice, no offense but if you want to be pro-life please do so but do not inflict your views on others....... You made a choice to be pro-life and remember that.

why should you care what I do with my body, especially if you don't know me? why should you own or control my body? That is slavery!!!

You dont care about the kids that die but you care about a fetus, its sickening and disturbs me more, its like caring for a ghost, its not here but it is.




This is example of the mob mentality described by neutralusername


Do you mean the fact, that you MADE THE CHOICE to be pro-life?

Its my body, not yours, not the governments mine, thats why I have rights, thats right Im arguing with the devil itself.
|
NeutralUsername

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 354
Location: , United States
Thanks: 16
Thanked:2

Posted: 07-07-08 13:44pm

diamondsz wrote:
NeutralUsername wrote:

So, have you been to more than one PRO-CHOICE only forum on the internet? They can get pretty nasty in some of those groups, too. Like, saying they wished pro-lifers were aborted, judging women who actually mourn for the death of their unborn, make dead fetus jokes (who cares about those who miscarry wanted babies, right?) etc. And don't get me started on what happens to those pro-lifers who have the guts to join the groups.

ALL biased groups have a mob mentality. That's common sense. Everyone wants to stick together. Some may be too scared to stop the nastiness from their own side. They don't want to be attacked by their "own kind" and that includes pro-choicers so they keep their mouth shut. It doesn't mean they actually agree with what the person is saying. Stop seeing what you want to see. I've seen nastiness and ignorance from both sides. No side is better than the other.


One side is better choice, no offense but if you want to be pro-life please do so but do not inflict your views on others....... You made a choice to be pro-life and remember that.

why should you care what I do with my body, especially if you don't know me? why should you own or control my body? That is slavery!!!

You dont care about the kids that die but you care about a fetus, its sickening and disturbs me more, its like caring for a ghost, its not here but it is.


Then stop inflicting YOUR views on pro-lifers. Seriously, if you don't like pro-lifers expressing THEIR view or don't like the fact that they believe abortion is wrong, then don't go to DEBATE groups. Stay in pro-choice groups where you can whine about how we are taking your rights away. You think your side is always right anyway and it doesn't matter what pro-lifers have to say.

I do care about kids. Look at you, believing in the stereotype that pro-lifers only care about fetuses.

For you and other pro-choicers like you, PROVE to me that only pro-choicers adopt, help kids in need, donate, mentor, help pregnant women, etc. Last time I checked, people from both sides do these kind of things. Apparently, to people like you, pro-lifers don't have the ability to "multi-task" and actually care about OTHER humans besides the unborn!
|
diamondsz

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 3332
Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 98
Thanked:159

Posted: 07-07-08 14:48pm

NeutralUsername wrote:
diamondsz wrote:
NeutralUsername wrote:

So, have you been to more than one PRO-CHOICE only forum on the internet? They can get pretty nasty in some of those groups, too. Like, saying they wished pro-lifers were aborted, judging women who actually mourn for the death of their unborn, make dead fetus jokes (who cares about those who miscarry wanted babies, right?) etc. And don't get me started on what happens to those pro-lifers who have the guts to join the groups.

ALL biased groups have a mob mentality. That's common sense. Everyone wants to stick together. Some may be too scared to stop the nastiness from their own side. They don't want to be attacked by their "own kind" and that includes pro-choicers so they keep their mouth shut. It doesn't mean they actually agree with what the person is saying. Stop seeing what you want to see. I've seen nastiness and ignorance from both sides. No side is better than the other.


One side is better choice, no offense but if you want to be pro-life please do so but do not inflict your views on others....... You made a choice to be pro-life and remember that.

why should you care what I do with my body, especially if you don't know me? why should you own or control my body? That is slavery!!!

You dont care about the kids that die but you care about a fetus, its sickening and disturbs me more, its like caring for a ghost, its not here but it is.


Then stop inflicting YOUR views on pro-lifers. Seriously, if you don't like pro-lifers expressing THEIR view or don't like the fact that they believe abortion is wrong, then don't go to DEBATE groups. Stay in pro-choice groups where you can whine about how we are taking your rights away. You think your side is always right anyway and it doesn't matter what pro-lifers have to say.

I do care about kids. Look at you, believing in the stereotype that pro-lifers only care about fetuses.

For you and other pro-choicers like you, PROVE to me that only pro-choicers adopt, help kids in need, donate, mentor, help pregnant women, etc. Last time I checked, people from both sides do these kind of things. Apparently, to people like you, pro-lifers don't have the ability to "multi-task" and actually care about OTHER humans besides the unborn!


Prove to me that pro-life adopts...

Taken from world vision
9.7 million children die before the age of five (explain this please, if they were adopted we ouldnt be having this issue.

Adoption needs arent being met, there isnt enough people adopting or they are only adopting kids under the age of two.

How am I shoving my opinions don your throat...

You did make a choice to be pro-life, hwo does that make you different then me because you could make the choice not to be pro-life.

I still dont understand why you should have an rights over my body, my stomachs gone to hell and back do you care about that? Without sympathy do you actually care, it is part of me.
|
Birch

Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4146
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16

Posted: 07-07-08 15:01pm

NeutralUsername wrote:

No side is better than the other.


Except that prochoice advocacy embraces a empathetic philosophy leaving morality and spirituality to the individual, as well as respecting a woman's inherent intelligence and leaving medical decisions to her as well.

All things that which vehement prolife advocates cannot lay claim. There are many reasons to despise the prolife philosophy, and that easily transfers over to actual individuals who strongly adhere to the philosophy and are outspoken online. Especially when they take photographs of women entering clinics, post them online, threaten with harm, claim that women who obtain abortions are promiscuous, slander women, make judgements and claims about their character, use false propaganda to further their cause, and often claim a spiritual belief as superior to all others.
|
Users who thank Birch for this post: diamondsz 
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 07-07-08 16:51pm

Birch wrote:
NeutralUsername wrote:

No side is better than the other.


Except that prochoice advocacy embraces a empathetic philosophy leaving morality and spirituality to the individual, as well as respecting a woman's inherent intelligence and leaving medical decisions to her as well.

All things that which vehement prolife advocates cannot lay claim. There are many reasons to despise the prolife philosophy, and that easily transfers over to actual individuals who strongly adhere to the philosophy and are outspoken online. Especially when they take photographs of women entering clinics, post them online, threaten with harm, claim that women who obtain abortions are promiscuous, slander women, make judgements and claims about their character, use false propaganda to further their cause, and often claim a spiritual belief as superior to all others.


Lets not put all pro-life people in the same category based on some. Just like one should not single out Pro-choice people and put them into a category who would abort a late term pregnancy. Or have multiple abortions as a form of birth control. Not all Pro-life people do the radical thing that we hear of. Just like not all Pro-choice people would do some things other pro-choice people would do or agree with.
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
New Topic   Reply



Page 4 of 8
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.