Georgia59
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 5542 Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 89
Thanked:31
|
The dangers of illegal abortion
Posted: 06-04-08 13:21pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Lilly Ivy
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 1542 Location: Newell, WV
Thanks: 49
Thanked:85
|
Posted: 06-04-08 16:44pm
|
|
|
|
|
wow. That actually made me sick. Those are
the reasons I'm pro-choice, I can't
imagine woman going through that. Imagine
how many woman's lives have been saved
because of Roe vs. Wade!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
AyaMiyaki
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jun 2006 Posts: 8246 Location: Floating on a cloud, United States
Thanks: 168
Thanked:14
|
Posted: 06-04-08 17:31pm
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-life will probably argue that these
women shouldn't have attempted the illegal
abortion in the first place and put
themselves in such situations. "Just suck
it up and stay pregnant."
This is one of the main reasons why I'm
pro-choice. Every woman has the right to
have PROPER medical treatment and not be
forced to put themselves at risk to avoid
an unwanted pregnancy.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
diamondsz
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 3173 Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 74
Thanked:104
|
Posted: 06-04-08 18:26pm
|
|
|
|
|
Just suck and stay pregnant is like saying
well you spread your legs open.........
What they forgot to say is the guys WHOS
PENIS WENT IN THERE........
sorry for being blunt.
I am pro-choice because I believe that
everything we do in life is a choice to be
made whether good or bad but that is for
us to make men or woman. I believe in
Freedom and womans rights!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
cmyked
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 294
Thanks: 50
Thanked:4
|
Posted: 06-04-08 18:32pm
|
|
|
|
|
But you're killing a human being. I don't
think it's just so simple as "I believe a
woman has the choice"! I tried that for
years. It rings so untrue the more and
more I think about it.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
diamondsz
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 3173 Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 74
Thanked:104
|
Posted: 06-04-08 18:49pm
|
|
|
|
|
| cmyked
wrote: | | But you're killing a human
being. I don't think it's just so simple
as "I believe a woman has the choice"! I
tried that for years. It rings so untrue
the more and more I think about
it. |
How so??
I know in Canadian human rights and
charter that we have freedom of choice, so
although we have a choice to fight or not
some people would rather not, I work with
French people so I dont really know about
other places.
How is it that it rings untrue, if society
emplaces more value on men than woman why
should it be allowed? No offense because
I am to both sides for rights not just
woman.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
AyaMiyaki
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jun 2006 Posts: 8246 Location: Floating on a cloud, United States
Thanks: 168
Thanked:14
|
Posted: 06-04-08 19:25pm
|
|
|
|
|
| cmyked
wrote: | | But you're killing a human
being. I don't think it's just so simple
as "I believe a woman has the choice"! I
tried that for years. It rings so untrue
the more and more I think about
it. |
I see it this way. If a woman could have a
z/e/f removed safely from her uterus and
have it still survive once outside of her
body, I would advocate for that. The death
of the z/e/f is unfortunate, but as
science stands right now, it's
unavoidable.
The rights of the mother to control her
own body must prevail. When science has
reached the point of safely removing these
unborn children without causing them harm
and death, I think both sides will be
satisfied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
diamondsz
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 3173 Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 74
Thanked:104
|
Posted: 06-04-08 20:47pm
|
|
|
|
|
| AyaMiyaki
wrote: | | cmyked
wrote: | | But you're killing a human
being. I don't think it's just so simple
as "I believe a woman has the choice"! I
tried that for years. It rings so untrue
the more and more I think about
it. |
I see it this way. If a woman could have a
z/e/f removed safely from her uterus and
have it still survive once outside of her
body, I would advocate for that. The death
of the z/e/f is unfortunate, but as
science stands right now, it's
unavoidable.
The rights of the mother to control her
own body must prevail. When science has
reached the point of safely removing these
unborn children without causing them harm
and death, I think both sides will be
satisfied. |
Well phrased I think that is an
wicked point!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 3963 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 129
Thanked:12
|
Posted: 06-04-08 21:42pm
|
|
|
|
|
| cmyked
wrote: | | But you're killing a human
being. I don't think it's just so simple
as "I believe a woman has the choice"! I
tried that for years. It rings so untrue
the more and more I think about
it. |
What about, "I am not able to make this
choice for someone else"?
That's what I think, at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
aochriss
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 Apr 2008 Posts: 447
Thanks: 73
Thanked:121
|
Posted: 06-05-08 06:59am
|
|
|
|
|
| cmyked
wrote: | | But you're killing a human
being. I don't think it's just so simple
as "I believe a woman has the choice"! I
tried that for years. It rings so untrue
the more and more I think about
it. |
It doesn't matter what YOU think. What
matters is what the woman with the
unwanted pregnancy is thinking. Abortions
have always and will always occur when
there are unwanted pregnancies. The
question is, do we let women perforate
their intestines and die of massive
infections, letting their born child
become orphans, or do we treat them in a
medical setting like a civilized society?
| Quote: |
tr> It is important
to remember that Roe v. Wade did not mean
that abortions could be performed. They
have always been done, dating from ancient
Greek days.
What Roe said was that ending a pregnancy
could be carried out by medical personnel,
in a medically accepted setting, thus
conferring on women, finally, the full
rights of first-class citizens — and
freeing their doctors to treat them as
such. |
|
|
|
|
|
Users who thank aochriss for this post:
Georgia59
|
 |
Darkmoon
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Dec 2007 Posts: 380 Location: ,
Thanks: 72
Thanked:43
|
Posted: 06-05-08 07:07am
|
|
|
|
|
But women are meant to be breeding fodder
for the potential people, so they really
don't count (at least as far as
pro"lifers" are concerned).
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
aochriss
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 Apr 2008 Posts: 447
Thanks: 73
Thanked:121
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Snug
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Dec 2007 Posts: 151 Location: In the jacuzzi, silly.
Thanks: 21
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 06-05-08 10:03am
|
|
|
|
|
| AyaMiyaki
wrote: | | cmyked
wrote: | | But you're killing a human
being. I don't think it's just so simple
as "I believe a woman has the choice"! I
tried that for years. It rings so untrue
the more and more I think about
it. |
I see it this way. If a woman could have a
z/e/f removed safely from her uterus and
have it still survive once outside of her
body, I would advocate for that. The death
of the z/e/f is unfortunate, but as
science stands right now, it's
unavoidable.
The rights of the mother to control her
own body must prevail. When science has
reached the point of safely removing these
unborn children without causing them harm
and death, I think both sides will be
satisfied. |
One might also hope that by the time
"rehoming" the embryo is an option, birth
control choices will have improved to the
point where unplanned pregnancies are an
exceedingly rare event.
Of course, that also takes educating
people, and making those options
accessible. But if science can find a way
to relocate embryos, surely to god they
can come up with enough highly effective
birth control choices that nobody who
doesn't want to be ends up pregnant in the
first place.
Maybe medical science is just too busy
inventing pills that give old men
erections to bother with something as
mundane as that, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Georgia59
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 5542 Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 89
Thanked:31
|
Posted: 06-05-08 10:38am
|
|
|
|
|
This is the part I thought was the most
interesting...
"It is important to remember that Roe v.
Wade did not mean that abortions could be
performed. They have always been done,
dating from ancient Greek days.
What Roe said was that ending a pregnancy
could be carried out by medical personnel,
in a medically accepted setting, thus
conferring on women, finally, the full
rights of first-class citizens — and
freeing their doctors to treat them as
such. "
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Georgia59
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 5542 Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 89
Thanked:31
|
Posted: 06-05-08 10:42am
|
|
|
|
|
The point is, it's going to happen, it's
always happened, and we can't stop it. We
can only make it safe. That's where
women's rights come into play.
|
|
|
|
|
Users who thank Georgia59 for this post:
Darkmoon
|
 |
|
cmyked
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 294
Thanks: 50
Thanked:4
|
Posted: 06-05-08 13:47pm
|
|
|
|
|
| Darkmoon
wrote: | | But women are meant to be
breeding fodder for the potential people,
so they really don't count (at least as
far as pro"lifers" are
concerned). |
I don't think most pro-lifers feel all
women are "meant" to give birth. Is that
what out basic function is? Yes. All
living beings are made to procreate and
spread, that's the basic function of life.
As sentient beings, we do have the ability
to make a conscious choice to not do so,
but that does not change the fact that
having sex is like playing with a loaded
gun: the body is there, and its goal is to
become pregnant.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
cmyked
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 294
Thanks: 50
Thanked:4
|
Posted: 06-05-08 13:48pm
|
|
|
|
|
I just don't view illegal abortion is
making women second class citizens. I've
never understood the connection. I've seen
plenty of people preach it, so no, I don't
want your sources about it. I just
disagree with it.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Georgia59
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 5542 Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 89
Thanked:31
|
Posted: 06-05-08 13:57pm
|
|
|
|
|
Because it would be denying women the
right to a safe alternative?
I think the idea is that a man and a woman
both made the choice to have sex- and the
women are put in danger because of that
choice, and then denied a safe
alternative.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
cmyked
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 294
Thanks: 50
Thanked:4
|
Posted: 06-05-08 14:01pm
|
|
|
|
|
Women women women. Abortion is not just
about the woman, that's my point. Some
pro-choicers want you to forget about the
fetus as a human; they call it a parasite,
a cancer. Ignore it, cut it out, it just
looks like an alien doesn't it? It's only
a centimeter long! Kill it, it's not a
person, or even human. Not really.
It can't think, it's not a baby, it's not
really alive, it doesn't matter at all.
It's attacking her, it's raping her, it's
removing her rights. It's sick,
disgusting, unnatural!
It's all fake. I'm sick of hearing it.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Georgia59
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 5542 Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 89
Thanked:31
|
Posted: 06-05-08 14:07pm
|
|
|
|
|
| aochriss
wrote: | | cmyked
wrote: | | But you're killing a human
being. I don't think it's just so simple
as "I believe a woman has the choice"! I
tried that for years. It rings so untrue
the more and more I think about
it. |
It doesn't matter what YOU think. What
matters is what the woman with the
unwanted pregnancy is thinking. Abortions
have always and will always occur when
there are unwanted pregnancies. The
question is, do we let women perforate
their intestines and die of massive
infections, letting their born child
become orphans, or do we treat them in a
medical setting like a civilized society?
| Quote: |
tr> It is important
to remember that Roe v. Wade did not mean
that abortions could be performed. They
have always been done, dating from ancient
Greek days.
What Roe said was that ending a pregnancy
could be carried out by medical personnel,
in a medically accepted setting, thus
conferring on women, finally, the full
rights of first-class citizens — and
freeing their doctors to treat them as
such. |
|
<
span class="postbody">
Just to reiterate.
|
|
|
|
|