|
Gu£st
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 20 Apr 2007
Posts: 675
Location: SUBMERGED IN TRUTH
|
Is Homosexual Sex Right?
Posted: 09-28-07 05:48am
|
|
|
|
If it is right then hetrosexual sex is
wrong
If homosexual sex right then everyone
should have homosexual sex
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Jules
Supporter
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 3752
Location: Merrie Englande, UK
Thanks: 75
Thanked:65
|
Posted: 09-28-07 06:57am
|
|
|
|
|
Why can't homosexual and
heterosexual sex be 'right'? Why does one
being 'right' make the other 'wrong'?
Gu£st, what's it like living in a world
where things are so black and white?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 3962
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 126
Thanked:12
|
Posted: 09-28-07 08:32am
|
|
|
|
|
Why is it your concern what consenting
adults do in their bedrooms?
|
|
|
|
|
|
keys101
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 87
Location: , USA
|
Posted: 09-28-07 08:39am
|
|
|
|
|
well I think that it depends what you mean
by right. no, everyone SHOULDN'T have
homosexual sex because everyone is not a
homosexual. but clearly homosexual sex is
right for gay people becaus ethay're gay.
so why would they act straight if they
weren't? I don't think it's fair to call
it right or wrong because it may be right
for someone and wrong for someone else. I
think the thought of 2 guys getting it on
is gross but I've slept wth both men and
women and it was completely "right" for
me. so why should I call gay men gross
when they were just doing the same for
themselves? to each his own, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCanQuit
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 109
Location: SEATTLE
|
Posted: 09-28-07 08:41am
|
|
|
|
|
Well geez,
Again, if this were the late 1800's or
early 1900's we would be having this same
conversation except instead of asking if
homosexuality sex was right. The question
would be is interracial sex right?
If interracial sex is right, it means
that having sex with the same race is
wrong.
There is no seperation between the two
topics. Homosexual sex is the interracial
topic of it's time.
You say that it says in the bible that
homosexuas having sex in a sin. People
back in the day said that interracial
relationships were a sin and quoted
scripture from the bible to validate their
beliefs.
If this were back inthe day. My wife and
I would be commiting a sin by having an
interracial relationship and then I would
be told that Jesus loves me, but hates the
sin I'm commiting.
I'll say it again. I don't understand
homosexuality. I don't understand how a
man can be attracted to another man or a
woman can be attracted to anoter
woman......well I can understand the
latter a little better  , But I also don't
care one bit.
People want to be happy. That's all we
want. That's my goal at least and if gay
people are happy and in love, well good
for them!! More power to them!!
and I'm so sick of hearin that being gay
is a choice from Christians!!
IT IS NOT A CHOICE!!!!!!!!!!!!
Did anyone choose to be heterosexual?
Did you weigh your options and then decide
to be heterosexual? OF COURSE NOT!!!!!
You're just naturally attracted to the
opposite sex. YOU DID NOT CHOOSE TO BE
STRAIGHT! So to say that they chose to be
gay means that you chose to be straight.
See here is the flaw in your theory that
gay people choose to be gay.
People try to live their lives with using
the path of least resistance. People try
not to add probelms to their lives, BUT to
strip the problems away.
So what kind of sense does it make for a
person to go against their "so called
natural instincts of being attracted to
the opposite sex" so that they can choose
to be gay? It doens't make sense!
Why would anyone put that kind of burden
on their shoulders of being gay and
dealing with bigotry, unless they were
naturally attracted to the same sex?!
Then I'm sure you'll say that they can
be gay as long as they don't practice
being gay. That's like someone back in the
day saying "You can be attracted to a
person of a different race as long as you
don't practice sex with them."
You know there are many more problems in
this world right now that need attention.
Children are starving. Crime is
escalating. Wars are happening etc.
I have no time to worry about if a man
and man or woman and woman are getting
jiggy with it.
Eric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mommy35
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 3165
Location: Vacationland, USA,
|
Posted: 09-28-07 08:43am
|
|
|
|
|
What people do on their own time and in
their own homes is none of my business.
Just because one person doesn't agree with
another person's lifestyle doesn't mean
that they are bad or your lifestyle is
wrong, it just means it isn't how others
may choose to live their lives.
Why would I have homosexual sex? I'm a
heterosexual.
Do you think that sex between two women is
wrong, or just sex between two men? I
know lots of men that think that 2 men
engaging in sexual relations is horrible,
but they would run to the front of the
line to see two women doing it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
keys101
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 87
Location: , USA
|
Posted: 09-28-07 08:45am
|
|
|
|
|
"You know there are many more problems in
this world right now that need attention.
Children are starving. Crime is
escalating. Wars are happening etc."
well said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 09-28-07 09:03am
|
|
|
|
|
Don't be stupid. One is not mutually
exclusive to the other.
ALL forms of sex (we're talking
vagina/anal/oral) between adults of either
or both genders is "right".
No, this does not include bestiality or
pedophelia, don't even go there. Sex is
meant to happen between two consenting
ADULT humans.
What two grown adults do in their bedroom
is none of my concern. I do not cringe
seeing two ladies or men walking down the
street hand in hand. I go "Aww, look,
they've found a soul-mate".
Personally, gay sex is far safer than
straight sex in the sense that there is NO
risk of pregnancy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia59
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 5542
Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 89
Thanked:31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
young Girl
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 13932
Location: everythings better in, texas USA
|
Posted: 09-28-07 12:18pm
|
|
|
|
|
lets all just hush up and leave the poor
gay/lesbian/bi/straight people alone for
god sakes...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia59
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 5542
Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 89
Thanked:31
|
Posted: 09-28-07 12:47pm
|
|
|
|
|
This is a good point though. Some tend to
make the argument that homosexuality is ok
but homosexual sex isn't.
I think that's ridiculous, as part of
being a homosexual is to have sex with
other homosexuals.
That's like saying, it's ok to be blonde,
as long as you dye your hair black. If you
don't dye your hair black, you're sinning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
woops
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Posts: 222
|
Posted: 09-28-07 13:48pm
|
|
|
|
|
What if both hetero and homo sexual sex
are wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia59
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 5542
Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 89
Thanked:31
|
Posted: 09-28-07 16:58pm
|
|
|
|
|
Then I certainly don't like whomever made
the rules.
Sex is great!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
marvel
Supporter
Joined: 09 Sep 2007
Posts: 1096
Location: Toronto, Ontario (but only a private message away)
Thanks: 50
Thanked:8
|
Posted: 09-29-07 13:00pm
|
|
|
|
|
You're improperly dichotomizing sex.
Sex serves two very important functions.
A) Procreation. We need to reproduce.
That's logical.
B) A means of feeling close and creating
an intimate bond that cannot be created
any other way.
Though I think they're both equally as
important, different people have different
opinions on that. Many people see the
procreation side of sex as the important
part... Many fundamentalist Christians for
example, see sex as ONLY a means of
procreation. That's fine.
Others, though, see sex as a means of
intense bonding. I, personally believe in
purpose. I think sex, hormones and
orgasming has a purpose beyond simply
procreating.... it also bonds two people
together. **WE NEED MORE OF THIS INTENSE
BONDING THE WORLD!** Homosexual sex is
filed under this category, and, to me,
therefore, makes it completely ok.
I would like to say, too, that sex is
abused. I do not like the rampant sex I
see in the homosexual and heterosexual
communities alike. When sex does not meet
the standard either for procreation (by
responsible, consenting adults) or
creating an intense bond between two
consenting adults, I believe it is being
misused.
Conclusion: If sex is being responsibly
had by two people who want to create an
intimate bond, or for simply procreation
between two consenting adults, it's right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
woops
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Posts: 222
|
Posted: 09-29-07 16:25pm
|
|
|
|
|
I don't like whoever made the rules
either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gu£st
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 20 Apr 2007
Posts: 675
Location: SUBMERGED IN TRUTH
|
Posted: 09-30-07 11:15am
|
|
|
|
|
"ALL forms of sex (we're talking
vagina/anal/oral) between adults of either
or both genders is "right". "
If all sex is right or that sex in itself
is the right thing to do, does that mean
those who choose to remain chaste should
be victimized and imprisoned?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mommy35
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 3165
Location: Vacationland, USA,
|
Posted: 09-30-07 11:23am
|
|
|
|
|
No it's their choice to not have sex.
You ask some really out there questions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
|
Re: Is Homosexual Sex Right?
Posted: 09-30-07 11:51am
|
|
|
|
|
| Gu£st
wrote: | If it is right then
hetrosexual sex is wrong
If homosexual sex right then everyone
should have homosexual
sex |
Why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 09-30-07 11:53am
|
|
|
|
|
| Georgia59
wrote: | This is a good point though.
Some tend to make the argument that
homosexuality is ok but homosexual sex
isn't.
I think that's ridiculous, as part of
being a homosexual is to have sex with
other homosexuals.
That's like saying, it's ok to be blonde,
as long as you dye your hair black. If you
don't dye your hair black, you're
sinning. |
Excellent analogy!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 09-30-07 12:28pm
|
|
|
|
|
| Gu£st
wrote: | "ALL forms of sex (we're
talking vagina/anal/oral) between adults
of either or both genders is "right". "
If all sex is right or that sex in itself
is the right thing to do, does that mean
those who choose to remain chaste should
be victimized and
imprisoned? |
Nope. Why? Having sex or not having sex,
it's all "right" because none of these
aspects is mutually exclusive of the
other.
That's correct Guest... it's ALL OKAY.
Abstinence is OK. Gay sex is OK. Straight
sex is OK!!! They are NOT mutually
exclusive. Sex and abstinence from sex is
OKAY among consenting adults - and some
teens who are mature enough. I say "adult"
but it's really about maturity, mental and
physical.
|
|
|
|
|
