Views Expressed On This Board Back Up Recent Study Posted: 10-02-07 14:02pm
It is interesting that right here on this
board one can find evidence backing the
findings of the study
done on the differences in brain
functions of liberals and conservatives.
For example, time after time,
conservatives/pro-lifers on this board are
shown evidence illustrating why their
position is wrong. Time after time they
disregard the evidence in favor of
persisting in their incorrect beliefs.
This is exactly what the study showed!
"Across
dozens of behavioral studies,
conservatives
have been found to be more structured and
persistent in their
judgments and approaches to
decision-making, as indicated by higher
average scores on psychological measures
of personal needs for order,
structure and closure1.
Liberals, by contrast, report higher
tolerance of
ambiguity and complexity, and greater
openness to new experiences on
psychological measures."
"This association suggests that a more
conservative orientation is related
to greater persistence in a habitual
response pattern, "
i.e. they will continue to believe their
ingrained, incorrect view...
"despite
signals that
this response pattern should change"
i.e. despite being shown evidence which
clearly shows their view is incorrect.
futureshock
wrote:
But I do have a question for you:
Why do you persist in believing
homosexuality is a choice, after all
you've learned and experienced first hand
about it?
nightangel
wrote:
Like the other poster actually said
correctly homosexuality is unexplained
disorder. Your choice lies in how you act
on it. You are the one who make the choice
of having the sex with either gender. You
decide whether you go have heterosuxal sex
or you go have homosexual sex. So it's a
CHOICE.
jincks
wrote:
Your facts are a bit outdated there
Nightangel.. the actual facts on the
disorder arguement:
Originally thought by the American
Psychological Association (hereafter
referred to as APA) to be a mental
disorder, research into its causes,
origins, and development have consequently
led to its removal by the APA from its
list of diagnoses and disorders
Karen Hooker executed the first
psychological test done to test for
biological determinism in 1957, on a grant
from the National Institute of Mental
Health [2]. The study was meant to explore
the relationship between homosexuality and
psychological development and illness.
Hooker studied both homosexuals and
heterosexuals. Both groups were matched
for age, intelligence quotient (IQ) and
education level, and were then subjected
to three psychological tests. These three
tests, the Rorschach, Thematic
Apperception Test (TAT) and the
Make-A-Picture-Story Test (MAPS), were
then analyzed by psychologists, and the
results were tabulated. The results of
Hooker's experiment yielded no significant
differences in answers on any of the three
tests. Because both groups' answers scored
very similarly, she concluded a zero
correlation between social determinism of
sexuality.
As a result of Hooker's finding, the APA
removed homosexuality from its Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Psychological
Disorders in 1973. In 1975 it then
released a public statement that
homosexuality was not a mental disorder.
In 1994, two decades later, the APA
finally stated, "...homosexuality is
neither a mental illness nor a moral
depravity. It is the way a portion of the
population expresses human love and
sexuality" [2].
No homosexuals don't decide which sex to
sleep with. They frankly don't get turned
on by the opposite sex. To my daughter
sleeping with a man is so unappealing she
thinks it is gross.
Although the APA currently states that
sexual orientation is not a choice, rather
that "...it emerges from most people in
early adolescence with no prior sexual
experience"
Please take a little while to learn the
facts surrounding your agrument before you
post what has long since been thrown out
and disregarded.
You have a bias against homosexuals but
don't let that blind you to the facts of
the situation.
to assist you with gathering relevant
facts of the situation I'll post for you
the link to the exact study.
nightangel
wrote:
jincks thanks for sharing what the
phsycologists have said..I just don't
agree with the
psychologists.
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 10-02-07 20:12pm
Hey NightAngel... the sky is blue you
know...
"No! God says the sky is orange. I believe
God, not you or some dumb scientist."
But... you can go look, it's right out--
"No! Don't try to prove it to me! As long
as I don't look and see for myself, I can
still believe it is orange. You should
believe it is orange too!! You'll go to
hell if you don't."
I... what?
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 10-02-07 20:40pm
But even if she does look and sees that it
is blue, she will persist in her belief
that it is orange.
That is why the conservatives in the study
could not differentiate between the "M"
and the "W" in the task they were doing.
Both groups were supposed to press a
button every time M appeared on a screen.
They were NOT supposed to press the button
when W appeared. The M appeared more
frequently, representing a habit or long
held belief, like "The sky is orange."
The W represented new information, like,
"The sky is blue."
The conservatives just pressed the button
no matter what showed up, M or W.
Meaning, they could not take in new
information and change their behavior or
belief.
They believe the sky is orange.
They are given evidence that clearly shows
the sky is blue.
They persist in their belief that the sky
is orange.
|
Jules
Moderator
Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 3689 Location: Merrie Englande, UK
Thanks: 52
Thanked:57
Posted: 10-03-07 01:01am
Please continue the debate on the
'conservative/liberal mind' thread. I
know the thread that these quotes come
from was locked but that was only because
people seemed to dislike the fact the
discussion had gone off topic. I can't
allow a new thread that is also completely
off topic, especially when there is
already a thread open dealing with the
subject.
The site is not a replacement for professional medical opinion, examination, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of your medical doctor or other qualified health professional before starting any new treatment or making any changes to existing treatment. Do not delay seeking or disregard medical advice based on information written by any author on this site. No health questions and information on eHealth Forum is regulated or evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and therefore the information should not be used to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease without the supervision of a medical doctor. Posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author, and not the administrators, moderators, or editorial staff and hence eHealth Forum and its principals will accept no liabilities or responsibilities for the statements made.
Schizophreniahealth
This page was last updated on June 11, 2008