Abortion Debate Forum - Is Having Children a Right?
Medical questions     Health forums     Help     log in    

Is Having Children a Right?

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Is Having Children a Right?
Medical Questions
Author Message
Georgia59

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 5542
Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 89
Thanked:31
Is Having Children a Right?
Posted: 10-30-07 16:40pm

Does everyone have the equal right to have children? If a couple can't have children, do they have the right to have services like IVF or fertility treatments available to them so they can have children? What about couples who can't afford it?

Just a random thought stemming from the last IVF post I made...
|
Becky

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 6221
Location: London, England
Thanks: 0
Thanked:7

Posted: 10-30-07 16:42pm

Yes I believe so
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 10-30-07 18:27pm

You can only believe so if you are going to pay for poor people to have IVF if they want it. Are you going to do that, Beck?
|
Birch

Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 3960
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 126
Thanked:12

Posted: 10-30-07 22:15pm

People have a right to do what they want with their own money, and if they can afford such priviledges, then I guess it's their right to do so.

How's that?
|
young Girl

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 13932
Location: everythings better in, texas USA

Posted: 10-30-07 22:17pm

haveing children is a CHOICE
|
Becky

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 6221
Location: London, England
Thanks: 0
Thanked:7

Posted: 10-31-07 03:59am

futureshock wrote:
You can only believe so if you are going to pay for poor people to have IVF if they want it. Are you going to do that, Beck?


Well here in the UK 'poor' people are entitled to one free IVF treatment. The waiting list is long and you have to have no other kids but it's still available.
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 10-31-07 06:25am

Thanks for the explanation, Beck. That makes your first assertion absolutely plausible. Smile
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 10-31-07 10:20am

I don't know. On the one hand, I feel it is a choice not a right, because there are people I feel shouldn't have children. On the other hand, I wouldn't want someone telling me I was unfit to have children of my own.
|
Georgia59

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 5542
Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 89
Thanked:31

Posted: 10-31-07 17:56pm

Yeah, I really meant what Future was getting at. If it is a right, does that mean you are entitled to have children even if you don't have the money? (Through government assistance or something)

and what about the fact that rich people will be able to have children and possibly poor people won't? Doesn't that worry anyone?
|
mc4ever02

Supporter
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 3636
Location: Orlando, FL Usa
Thanks: 5
Thanked:2

Posted: 10-31-07 19:24pm

beckster wrote:
futureshock wrote:
You can only believe so if you are going to pay for poor people to have IVF if they want it. Are you going to do that, Beck?


Well here in the UK 'poor' people are entitled to one free IVF treatment. The waiting list is long and you have to have no other kids but it's still available.


I'm moving!

I completely agree with being able to have fertility treatments done in order to conceive. Just as I believe in being able to adopt. (Neither is free) If you have the money for treatment, and that is what you chose to spend it on, what is the problem?
|
Georgia59

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 5542
Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 89
Thanked:31

Posted: 10-31-07 22:00pm

I don't think there's a problem to have ivf or adoption if you have the money for it, my concern is that it's so expensive and (often) not covered by insurance, so only the well-off people can afford it. If having children was really a right, everyone should be able to have it regardless of ability to pay.
|
mc4ever02

Supporter
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 3636
Location: Orlando, FL Usa
Thanks: 5
Thanked:2

Posted: 11-01-07 07:45am

Ok, I see what you're saying, I'm sorry I misuderstood the original question.

Honestly, I don't feel that having children is a right. I think being a parent is a previlege.

Even those who go through IVF and similar proceedures are not gauranteed a child. It only give them an opportunity to become pregnant.

I don't, however, feel that I can give an unbiased opinion on this subject. I will be going to a fertility doctor in December. While the price tag is quite high. (It will be around $700 for the appt. that doesn't include any medications or for anything to actually be 'fixed') I would wonder if having a child would be a good option in my life right now if I wasn't able to afford ttc.
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-01-07 09:42am

Everyone should wonder whether or not to have a child if they cannot afford it. Having a child under those circumstances is selfish and unintelligent.
|
Georgia59

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 5542
Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 89
Thanked:31

Posted: 11-01-07 13:22pm

futureshock wrote:
Everyone should wonder whether or not to have a child if they cannot afford it. Having a child under those circumstances is selfish and unintelligent.


I think the cost of IVF is a lot higher than just normal child raising costs (at least all at once) and insurance doesn't always cover it.

Meaning, I think some people are able (financially) to have children, but not to bear the cost of IVF. I'm really thinking about middle class mostly.
|
Cambion

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Posts: 748
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-01-07 17:00pm

I think people who cannot afford children, are mentally unstable, or who know nothing about child care should not be allowed to have children (I wish people who want to have kids would be required to take extensive parenting classes and must pass in order to obtain a parenting license). I also think IVF should be illegal because it's selfish and disgusting, and anyone retarded enough to spend upwards of $10K on a procedure with a 20 percent success rate shouldn't be allowed to be in charge of another life that requires more care than a house plant.

Also, if you are physically incapable of having kids the natural way, I think you should take it as a sign from nature that you were not meant to have children and you should accept that. When you play with nature with IVF, you will suffer the consequences, such as having preemies, frankenlitters, or defected/malformed/retarded children. But most people who seek IVF are too dumb to see that and then they whine for donations when Junior is born with a plethora of problems and they can't afford the needed surgeries because they sold their house to afford the IVF and are living in a slum.
|
Birch

Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 3960
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 126
Thanked:12

Posted: 11-01-07 21:40pm

"Frankenlitters"...oh my goodness, that post was hysterical.
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-01-07 21:48pm

Did that actually ever happen to anyone you know?
|
mc4ever02

Supporter
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 3636
Location: Orlando, FL Usa
Thanks: 5
Thanked:2

Posted: 11-02-07 08:21am

They actually do very extensive testing to determine if you are qualified for IVF. And the success rate is based directly on the clinic in which you are having the procedure performed.

When does "playing with nature" begin? Hormone treatment? Surgery? Ovulation induction? All of these things can be quite expensive.
|
Rodge

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Posts: 905
Location: , England, UK
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-02-07 16:50pm

Ah, Cambion. Edgy as ever, I see.
|
AyaMiyaki

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 8238
Location: Floating on a cloud, United States
Thanks: 167
Thanked:14

Posted: 11-02-07 20:16pm

Well on the "playing with nature" note, can't you argue that organ donation is playing with nature? Should someone who needs a heart transplant just "take the hint" and give up? What about chemotherapy? Radiation treatments? Why are infertile couples labled as the dumb ones? Has anyone compared the costs of IVF vs. an organ transplant? And why is it any of your business if someone wants to conceive a child this way? Is it any more your business than a woman who decided to abort?
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page 1, 2  Next
New Topic   Reply
Medical Questions -> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Is Having Children a Right?



Page 1 of 2
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.