Teen Pregnancy Forum - Why It Is Better to Delay Childbearing
Medical questions     Health forums     Help    

Why It Is Better to Delay Childbearing

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Teen Pregnancy -> Why It Is Better to Delay Childbearing
Medical Questions
Author Message
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Why It Is Better to Delay Childbearing
Posted: 11-07-07 22:03pm

Why it is Better to Delay Childbearing

http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2001/ 10childrenfamilies_sawhill.aspx

Virtually all of the growth of single-parent families in recent decades has been driven by an increase in births outside marriage. Divorce rates have leveled off or declined modestly since the early 1980s and thus have not contributed to the rising proportion of children being raised by only one parent nor to the increase in child poverty and welfare dependence associated with the rise in single-parent families.

[T]there are at least four reasons to focus on teens:

First, half of first non-marital births are to teens. Thus, the pattern tends to start in the teenage years, and, once teens have had a first child outside marriage, many go on to have additional children out of wedlock at an older age

Second, teen childbearing is very costly: teen childbearing costs taxpayers more than $7 billion a year or $3,200 a year for each teenage birth, conservatively estimated.

Third, although almost all single mothers face major challenges in raising their children alone, teen mothers are especially disadvantaged. They are more likely to have dropped out of school and are less likely to be able to support themselves. Only one out of every five teen mothers receives any support from their child's father, and about 80 percent end up on welfare. Once on welfare, they are likely to remain there for a long time. In fact, half of all current welfare recipients had their first child as a teenager.

Other research documents that teen mothers are less likely to finish high school, less likely to ever marry, and more likely to have additional children outside marriage. Thus, an early birth is not just a marker of preexisting problems but a barrier to subsequent upward mobility. As Daniel Lichter of Ohio State University has shown, even those unwed mothers who eventually marry end up with less successful partners than those who delay childbearing. As a result, even if married, these women face much higher rates of poverty and dependence on government assistance than those who avoid an early birth. And early marriages are much more likely to end in divorce. So marriage, while helpful, is no panacea.

Fourth, the children of teen mothers face far greater problems than those born to older mothers. If the reason we care about stemming the growth of single-parent families is the consequences for children, and if the age of the mother is as important as her marital status, then focusing solely on marital status would be unwise. Not only are mothers who defer childbearing more likely to marry, but with or without marriage, their children will be better off. The children of teen mothers are more likely than the children of older mothers to be born prematurely at low birth weight and to suffer a variety of health problems as a consequence. They are more likely to do poorly in school, to suffer higher rates of abuse and neglect, and to end up in foster care with all its attendant costs.
|
sweet_mom

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 140
Location: , Canada
Thanks: 3
Thanked:2
Re: Why It Is Better to Delay Childbearing
Posted: 11-08-07 00:33am

futureshock wrote:
The children of teen mothers are more likely than the children of older mothers to be born prematurely at low birth weight and to suffer a variety of health problems as a consequence.


I must be the exception then,I had my son when I was 17,he was 3 and a half weeks late and he was over 10lbs.He has no health problems,in fact he just got a cold for the first time last week.
I know you said they were more likely to be born premature to younger mothers,but what's a good age then?
My mother had my brother when she was 30 and he was a month premature and only weighed 4lbs.
Premature birth can happen at any lifestage,I don't think it makes a difference if you are young or an 'experienced' mother(older).
|
littlemus

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 58
Location: Southern California,

Posted: 11-08-07 00:49am

thats interesting about the premature thing im born prematurely, i have stated this before, and i do have a few health problems.

though my weak immune system can be attributed to other things i do believe being premature had something to do with that.

i was also born underweight (obviously for being so early), but i also lost weight after i was allowed to be brought home. (this was very dangerous because i was already so tiny.)


i think there are too many benefits to waiting till you are older to have children, but that doesnt mean you cant have problems then too.

your body is changing so much as a young woman already in your teenage years to put it through such stress has to be difficult and cause some complications....

there are so many reasons waiting is a great idea.

(this should be a very important topic for all of those girls that post "i'm only [insert age here] and i am trying to have a baby! help!" SO LETS HOPE THEY READ IT!)
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Re: Why It Is Better to Delay Childbearing
Posted: 11-08-07 07:52am

sweet_mom wrote:
futureshock wrote:
The children of teen mothers are more likely than the children of older mothers to be born prematurely at low birth weight and to suffer a variety of health problems as a consequence.


I must be the exception then,I had my son when I was 17,he was 3 and a half weeks late and he was over 10lbs.He has no health problems,in fact he just got a cold for the first time last week.
I know you said they were more likely to be born premature to younger mothers,but what's a good age then?
Waiting until you are at least 20 makes a huge difference.
sweet_mom wrote:

My mother had my brother when she was 30 and he was a month premature and only weighed 4lbs.
Premature birth can happen at any lifestage,I don't think it makes a difference if you are young or an 'experienced' mother(older).


It obviously DOES make a difference, or this statement would be false:

futureshock wrote:
The children of teen mothers are more likely than the children of older mothers to be born prematurely at low birth weight and to suffer a variety of health problems as a consequence.
|
rosejackson

Supporter
Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 4351
Location: hertfordshire, england
Thanks: 7
Thanked:11

Posted: 11-08-07 08:02am

i agree with sweet_mom. you can have premature babies no matter what age you are.
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-08-07 08:13am

rosejackson wrote:
i agree with sweet_mom. you can have premature babies no matter what age you are.


Where did anyone say otherwise?
|
rosejackson

Supporter
Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 4351
Location: hertfordshire, england
Thanks: 7
Thanked:11

Posted: 11-08-07 08:18am

i know you didnt mention it, but you were only aiming it at younger mums and that one of the downfalls of being pregnant young is that you're most likey to give birth prematurely or have a low birth weight. in most cases i have seen, it is the older mums who have given birth prematurely and had a low birth weight. i know it is not always the case though
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-08-07 08:22am

So do you think this is false?

"The children of teen mothers are more likely than the children of older mothers to be born prematurely at low birth weight and to suffer a variety of health problems as a consequence"
|
rosejackson

Supporter
Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 4351
Location: hertfordshire, england
Thanks: 7
Thanked:11

Posted: 11-08-07 08:27am

yes i think it is false because i think that it doesn't matter what age you are. anyone can give birth prematurely and have a baby of low birth weight. many people can suffer health problems as a consequence of giving birth. my boyfriends mum suffered loads of problems when she was pregnant with louise and gave birth prematurely to a 5lb baby and she's mid 30s, whereas i gave birth on time to william, over 8lbs. i think the statement could happen in some circumstances but, from my experience, i don't think it's a huge deal.
(sorry i like to debate about this, hope you dont mind Very
Happy)
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
New Topic   Reply
Medical Questions -> Health Forums -> Teen Pregnancy -> Why It Is Better to Delay Childbearing



We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.