|
Sandbox Party
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 7276
|
Pro-Life and the Morning After Pill
Posted: 12-12-07 13:44pm
|
|
|
|
i dont see a problem with the morning
after pill, and im PL.
It doesnt kill babies.. it keeps anything
from implanting to START becoming a baby.
sheesh.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Becky
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 6225 Location: London, England
Thanks: 0
Thanked:7
|
Posted: 12-12-07 13:46pm
|
|
|
|
|
I was having a go at pro-lifers Sandy- I
was having a go at the ones who stand
outside protesting. The last thing someone
needs to see when they're just going for
contraception is posters of dead fetuses
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sandbox Party
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 7276
|
Posted: 12-12-07 13:50pm
|
|
|
|
|
| beckster
wrote: | | I was having a go at
pro-lifers Sandy- I was having a go at the
ones who stand outside protesting. The
last thing someone needs to see when
they're just going for contraception is
posters of dead
fetuses |
agreed.
Theres a time and place for everything..
and people shouldnt be forcing their
opinions so rudely towards people. I dont
mind them trying to spread the word, but
do it in a civilized manner.. and dont be
so crass about it, u know?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Becky
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 6225 Location: London, England
Thanks: 0
Thanked:7
|
Posted: 12-12-07 14:16pm
|
|
|
|
|
I meant to say wasn't having a go at
prolifers lol
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
yellow ribbon
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Dec 2005 Posts: 5554 Location: FL
|
Posted: 12-12-07 15:39pm
|
|
|
|
|
i agree with sandy and im against
abortion. its not a baby yet its a sperm
attacking an egg. quick kay defend those
eggs from the evil sperm!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
musikmaker
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 1757 Location: Chicago, US
Thanks: 10
Thanked:2
|
Posted: 12-12-07 18:27pm
|
|
|
|
|
People are going to be mad at me but I
have to say I see it as an abortion when
you use the morning after pill. Sorry,
it's my opinion and if you are entitled to
speak yours then I can speak mine.
Why it is wrong for pro-lifers to hold up
signs in front of an abortion clinic but
it's okay to hold up signs of what smoking
does to people in front of tobacco
companies.
I think that is called double standards.
Don't make fun of people for standing up
for things. It's not fair for you guys to
do that whenever they can't defend
themselves.
I have seen some psycho anti-war
demonstrators-standing in front of
soldier's funerals no less- and I never
hear you talking negative about them.
I tell you, this country is getting
screwier by the minute.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ingi
Supporter
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 8910 Location: Grinning like a Cheshire Cat,
Thanks: 172
Thanked:197
|
Posted: 12-12-07 19:39pm
|
|
|
|
|
No one is mad when you have an opinion and
you stand by it.
By the way, just for reference to anyone
who does not know this, the morning after
pill does not 'abort' anything - what it
does is prevent a woman from ovulating. It
alters a woman's normal cycle and can
delay her period. What it also does is
irritate the lining of the uterus.
The morning-after pill reduces the chance
of getting pregnant; it does NOT cause an
abortion.
That isn't meant to debate your beliefs. I
am just offering the information so people
can be informed.
I don't believe anyone should stand in
front of a soldier's funeral and protest!
I think it is wrong. I do believe the
anti-war demonstrators are protesting that
soldier's death - much like pro-life
protestors believe they are protesting
against lost lives too. I'm sure that
would be how they would argue that point.
Again, not to debate. Just to inform.  You have every
right to your beliefs. Everyone does. 
|
|
|
|
|
 |
musikmaker
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 1757 Location: Chicago, US
Thanks: 10
Thanked:2
|
Posted: 12-12-07 22:12pm
|
|
|
|
|
| Ingi
wrote: | No one is mad when you have
an opinion and you stand by it.
By the way, just for reference to anyone
who does not know this, the morning after
pill does not 'abort' anything - what it
does is prevent a woman from ovulating. It
alters a woman's normal cycle and can
delay her period. What it also does is
irritate the lining of the uterus.
|
I have no problem if it only stopped
ovulation. What happens if you already
ovulated though and then take it.
If it irritates the lining then the
fertilized egg won't implant. I believe
that life begins at conception so I think
that is aborting the baby.
Enough said though, this is not the
abortion debate forum.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sandbox Party
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 7276
|
Posted: 12-12-07 22:15pm
|
|
|
|
|
yes, ladies.. PERFECT thread for Abortion
Debate 
|
|
|
|
|
 |
tdr
Supporter
Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 1535 Location: Somewhere else...not here., PA USA
Thanks: 6
Thanked:7
|
Posted: 12-12-07 22:16pm
|
|
|
|
|
A fetus doesn't have a detectable
heartbeat until 18 days after conception.
And it's not even easily detected at that
stage. Can it truly be considered life
without a heartbeat?
I personally have no problem with the
morning after pill when used once as
emergency contraception. "Repeat
offenders," however, are another story
entirely.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CaNdItAs CrAzY LaNd
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 3063 Location: like anyone cares, phhht
Thanks: 6
Thanked:0
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Jincks013
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 1174 Location: ,
Thanks: 22
Thanked:9
|
Posted: 12-12-07 22:54pm
|
|
|
|
|
| musikmaker
wrote: | | People are going to be mad
at me but I have to say I see it as an
abortion when you use the morning after
pill. Sorry, it's my opinion and if you
are entitled to speak yours then I can
speak mine. |
No. Not really. It is after all your
opinion and certainly you are entitled to
it. As long as you don't want to control
my body with it I see no problem.
| musikmaker
wrote: | | Why it is wrong for
pro-lifers to hold up signs in front of an
abortion clinic but it's okay to hold up
signs of what smoking does to people in
front of tobacco companies.
|
Why don't they hold those signs up in
front of the stores that sell the tobacco
products? The major problem I have with
those signs is that often they are
innaccurate, photoshopped and frankly I
think its terrible to expose young
children riding in the car driving by to
them.
| musikmaker
wrote: | | I think that is called
double standards. Don't make fun of people
for standing up for things. It's not fair
for you guys to do that whenever they
can't defend
themselves. |
I don't think its a double standard at
all. I think there are more acceptable
ways to spread misinformation though. Its
one thing to stand up for what you believe
in: writing letter to elected officials is
a good idea; exposing my two year old
daughter to a gory photoshopped sign so
she has nightmares isn't it.
| musikmaker
wrote: | | I have seen some psycho
anti-war demonstrators-standing in front
of soldier's funerals no less- and I never
hear you talking negative about
them. |
Possibly because this is an abortion
debate not a debate about the war?
| musikmaker
wrote: | | I tell you, this country is
getting screwier by the
minute. |
Who exactly is forcing you to live here??
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
amethyst eyes
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 1339
|
Posted: 12-12-07 23:32pm
|
|
|
|
|
This was a split topic from Pregnancy
Community Chat
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 12-13-07 00:19am
|
|
|
|
|
As Ingi attempted to explain, the Morning
After Pill is not in fact any more of an
abortionofenic than normal birth control
pills.
Someone said the MAP irritates the lining
of the uterus to prevent implantation. Yes
it does this, but that is NOT THE PRIMARY
FUNCTION. The MAP is SUPPOSED to prevent
ovulation first and foremost, just like
birth control pills. However, just like
birth control pills, the MAP has other
effects. Birth control pills thin the
lining of the uterus, thicken the mucous
plug at the cervix, and can indeed make
the uterus a hostile environment for both
sperm AND a fertilized egg.
This doesn't happen often, but because the
lining of the uterus is so thin, it is
possible for the pills to not prevent
ovulation, and an egg gets fertilized.
Then, it goes into the uterus... but has
no where to land. Thus, the birth control
pills just aborted a pre-implantation
embryo.
THIS IS RARE, just as it is rare for the
MAP to cause abortion. It PRIMARILY
prevents ovulation.
So if you're going to complain about the
MAP, then complain about normal birth
control pills too.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
tigresacanela24
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 5261 Location: Treat your children well, eventually they'll choose your nursing home.
|
Posted: 12-13-07 01:32am
|
|
|
|
|
All this because I'm taking the morning
after pill and don't want to have to beat
my way through hordes of mind-numbingly
antagonistic pro-lifers to pick it up?

I'm not getting an abortion, I'm buying
birth control.
*edited to add to my rant*
I've said before and I'll say again that
I'm pro-life when it comes to myself but
pro-choice when it comes to everyone else.
No one has the right to tell anyone what
to do with their own body. No one has the
right to force someone into something that
they don't want to do. Here's another
shocking little secret I've been
considering what will happen if these
pills don't work. I was told that I have
up to five days but they're most effective
within the first 72 hours. If I wind up
pregnant anyway I will seriously consider
an abortion. I love my son to death but I
don't know if I can go through all of this
all over again. I had a terrible
pregnancy with him and I'm not exactly
sure that I'm willing to repeat it.
Passing out, falling down, having my blood
pressure sky rocket until I start feeling
numb and blackout is not my idea of a good
time. I chafed at the pro-choice
description of a fetus as a parasite until
I got pregnant. I felt like my body had
been taken over by an alien who was slowly
but surely sucking the lifeblood out of
me. Having said that, up until this
little scare with the condom coming off
inside me I had little rosy visions of
having another baby. The kind of crap you
see on the hallmark channel. All romantic
and dreamy, but that's just it, it was a
dream. Not something that I ever want to
see again in reality. The depression and
the panic that I felt when I found out
that the beeping condom had come off
proved that to me, the panic and
depression that I'm still feeling waiting
around to see if my period shows. And if
I wind up pregnant after all and have an
abortion not a single soul has the right
to say anything to me about it. That's
why I will fight the in your face
pro-lifers with everything that I have in
me. Because up until today, I took it all
for granted. But never again, I will
fight so that I will have the choice if I
ever decide I want to make it and I will
fight for everyone else to have that same
freedom.
*rant over*
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Becky
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 6225 Location: London, England
Thanks: 0
Thanked:7
|
Posted: 12-13-07 02:45am
|
|
|
|
|
Yikes sorry for making it go this far.
I'm just pro-choice all the way. I know
eactly how you feel Kay. I had rosy
visions of having another baby but now I
have totally changed my mind. I ad my coil
refitted and when they thought it may of
displaced they said there was a chance
that I could get pregnant. i told my
partner straightaway that if that was the
case I would have an abortion.
My partner was shocked that I could change
my mind from wanting a baby so bad to
suddenly contemplating abortion but when I
finally made up my mind not to have a baby
the relief that washed over me was immense
and i figured that was the same relief
somone gets when they end an unwanted
pregnancy
So yeah I am totally pro-choice for me and
others. In a few years I plan to get
sterilised. When my doctor will let me

|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ingi
Supporter
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 8910 Location: Grinning like a Cheshire Cat,
Thanks: 172
Thanked:197
|
Posted: 12-13-07 09:28am
|
|
|
|
|
| Eiri
wrote: | As Ingi attempted to
explain, the Morning After Pill is not in
fact any more of an abortionofenic than
normal birth control pills.
Someone said the MAP irritates the lining
of the uterus to prevent implantation. Yes
it does this, but that is NOT THE PRIMARY
FUNCTION. The MAP is SUPPOSED to prevent
ovulation first and foremost, just like
birth control pills. However, just like
birth control pills, the MAP has other
effects. Birth control pills thin the
lining of the uterus, thicken the mucous
plug at the cervix, and can indeed make
the uterus a hostile environment for both
sperm AND a fertilized egg.
This doesn't happen often, but because the
lining of the uterus is so thin, it is
possible for the pills to not prevent
ovulation, and an egg gets fertilized.
Then, it goes into the uterus... but has
no where to land. Thus, the birth control
pills just aborted a pre-implantation
embryo.
THIS IS RARE, just as it is rare for the
MAP to cause abortion. It PRIMARILY
prevents ovulation.
So if you're going to complain about the
MAP, then complain about normal birth
control pills
too. |
Thanks. I honestly think more people
believe this is a pill to induce abortions
and it is not anything like that. 
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Emma2
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 May 2006 Posts: 4406 Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 12-13-07 10:17am
|
|
|
|
|
I have done extensive research on ECP and
found that the primary mechanism is indeed
suppression of ovulation . The secondary
they "believe" to be altering the uterine
lining making impossible for the egg to
implant. However, that is not been proven
100% ! I don't see the difference with BC
or ECP...they are both against the natural
process so one should not be discussed or
disapproved of , if they both ultimately
do the same thing, prevent pregnancy!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
tigresacanela24
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 5261 Location: Treat your children well, eventually they'll choose your nursing home.
|
Posted: 12-13-07 11:20am
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure what the rationale is, Ingi.
I know you're talking about people
confusing the map for an abortion but I'm
talking about being "pro-life" in general.
I can't honestly say that I've ever
entirely understood the rationale behind
the entire pro life stance.... I've gone
along with it for myself for my own
conscience but I don't think I've ever
really understood why. The only thing
that really makes sense to me is that it
should be an individual's choice.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 12-13-07 13:13pm
|
|
|
|
|
If you believe it should be the
individual's choice then you're not really
pro-life at all, you're pro-choice.
|
|
|
|
|