|
krystineM
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 11 Oct 2007 Posts: 1355 Location: mississauga, ontario Canada
Thanks: 29
Thanked:15
|
Just Came Back From An Ultrasound
Posted: 12-24-07 11:14am
|
|
|
|
so i had my first ultra sound today, and
found out that i am actually 3-4 weeks
pregnant and not 6 weeks like the doctors
i've been seeing have said...has this
happened to anyone before??
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 12-24-07 12:10pm
|
|
|
|
|
What questions did the other doctors ask
you? How did they determine how far along
you were? Did they ask you when your last
period was? Did they do an ultrasound?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Dannzibelle
Supporter
Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 3775 Location: South East, England
Thanks: 27
Thanked:11
|
Posted: 12-24-07 13:32pm
|
|
|
|
|
It does happen sometimes, although it
would have been rare for you to get a +
test so early. My sister went for her 12
week scan and was 7 weeks and my friend
went for her 12 week scan and was 8 weeks
|
|
|
|
|
 |
ilovemyfishies81
Supporter
Joined: 13 Jul 2007 Posts: 1557 Location: Raleigh, NC
Thanks: 6
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 12-24-07 15:48pm
|
|
|
|
|
sometimes it can happen but as already
stated i dont think a positive test would
have shown up
|
|
|
|
|
 |
rosejackson
Supporter
Joined: 23 Dec 2005 Posts: 4351 Location: hertfordshire, england
Thanks: 7
Thanked:11
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
young Girl
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007 Posts: 13932 Location: everythings better in, texas USA
|
Posted: 12-24-07 22:14pm
|
|
|
|
|
but a positive hpt test wouldnt have shown
up if youre only 3-4 weeks along :/
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
young Girl
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007 Posts: 13932 Location: everythings better in, texas USA
|
Posted: 12-24-07 22:17pm
|
|
|
|
|
why does your profile say "i love acid"
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
young Girl
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007 Posts: 13932 Location: everythings better in, texas USA
|
Posted: 12-24-07 22:20pm
|
|
|
|
|
ok in your im pregnant post you posted on
the 18th and said last monday (tthe 10th)
you took a test and it was positive. if
you took the test then it wouldnt have
came up pos because by then youd barely be
a week preg if you say your only 3-4
weeks now? you wouldnt even be a full week
pregnant
the test wouldnt have came up positive
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 12-24-07 22:31pm
|
|
|
|
|
gf, I didn't think of that. You are right.
Something's wrong with one of those
doctor's calendars.
Also, I don't think an ultrasound can see
anything at that stage:
It is possible
to detect a pregnancy of 5 ½ weeks
gestation on ultrasound
. A tiny sac can be seen, but the baby and
their heart beat may not be detected yet.
Be aware that while it is possible to see
a pregnancy this small, in many cases the
pregnancy may not be detected, because the
sac is so tiny. You may need to have
another ultrasound a week or so later to
detect the pregnancy, if you still feel
you are pregnant and/or your blood HCG
levels are rising.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
young Girl
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007 Posts: 13932 Location: everythings better in, texas USA
|
Posted: 12-24-07 22:37pm
|
|
|
|
|
yes the dates atre mixed up or something
because this doesnt add up
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 12-25-07 19:55pm
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder why she has different doctors?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
young Girl
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007 Posts: 13932 Location: everythings better in, texas USA
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Moo
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1066 Location: London
Thanks: 21
Thanked:111
|
Posted: 12-26-07 07:07am
|
|
|
|
|
Can happen, my first us showed I was 2
weeks behind my dates but only 3-4 weeks
pregnant?? Hmm
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
young Girl
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007 Posts: 13932 Location: everythings better in, texas USA
|
Posted: 12-26-07 15:56pm
|
|
|
|
|
| Moo
wrote: | | Can happen, my first us
showed I was 2 weeks behind my dates but
only 3-4 weeks pregnant??
Hmm |
but if she took an hpt which she said was
on the 10th she would only barely be a
week pregnant
an hpt WILL NOT show a week pregnant
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Altari
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Nov 2007 Posts: 127 Location: Chicago, IL USA
|
Posted: 12-26-07 17:48pm
|
|
|
|
|
It could depend on how they're measuring
pregnancy. Maybe the fetus is 4 weeks old?
It could also be a lie.
But yes, I had a very early positive with
my youngest.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 12-26-07 18:39pm
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know if I actually thought it was
a lie, but rather someone misunderstanding
something.
How early was your earliest ultrasound,
Altari?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Altari
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Nov 2007 Posts: 127 Location: Chicago, IL USA
|
Posted: 12-27-07 23:40pm
|
|
|
|
|
My first ultrasound was at 5 or 6 weeks,
about a month after my positive stick. The
doctors thought I was at 8-9 weeks, and I
started bleeding. The regular ultrasound
showed nothing so they had to do a
vaginal, which revealed how early the
pregnancy really was.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 12-28-07 19:59pm
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Altari. I haven't seen anywhere
on the web where it says ultrasounds are
used at 3 to 4 weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
jessamyn
Moderator
Joined: 18 Aug 2004 Posts: 4107 Location: San Diego, CA
Thanks: 11
Thanked:3
|
Posted: 12-31-07 17:43pm
|
|
|
|
|
Not to be the bearer of bad news, I always
try to get along with everyone... but
hasnt she been here before with similar
posts?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
futuredaddy
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 04 Nov 2007 Posts: 24
|
Posted: 01-02-08 04:51am
|
|
|
|
|
She made a topic talking about her having
implantation bleeding 11 / 8 / 2007.
By now she would be about 6 - 8 weeks
pregnant.
This topic is a lie and should be
closed...
|
|
|
|
|