Abortion Debate Forum - How Can You Apply a Law to Your Own Liking?abortion homicide?
Medical questions     Health forums     Help     log in    

How Can You Apply a Law to Your Own Liking?abortion homicide?

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> How Can You Apply a Law to Your Own Liking?abortion homicide?
Medical Questions
Author Message
diamondsz

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 3157
Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 71
Thanked:98
How Can You Apply a Law to Your Own Liking?abortion homicide?
Posted: 01-05-08 13:17pm

If killing a fetus is homicide than why is not, why is it that even in dictionarys and law books and it is not deemed homicide? anyone up for grabs and no religion BS straight facts..

Defintion of homicide as defined in law, wikipedia and webster dictionary....

homicide is the unlawful killing of a human person (YES HUMAN PERSON READ DEFINITION BELOW)with malice aforethought. homicide is generally distinguished from other forms of homicide by the elements of malice aforethought and the lack of lawful justification. All jurisdictions, ancient and modern, consider it a most serious crime. Most jurisdictions impose a severe penalty for its commission.

Sometimes the term homicide is used by laypersons to describe what is really another form of homicide. homicide is a type of homicide, and relatively few homicides are murders in law. Also, police will often call their investigation into a homicide a homicide investigation in order not to prejudice any findings of the investigation, possible charges that could be laid, or any conviction of an offender. However, the crime will normally be identified as a homicide once there is sufficient evidence to indicate that a homicide is the more likely crime than any other.

Legal Analysis of homicide

To repeat, at common law homicide is defined as the unlawful killing of a human person with malice aforethought. Malice aforethought exists if the defendant acts with any of the following states of mind:

(i) Intent to kill; (ii) Intent to inflict serious bodily harm; (iii) Reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life (abandoned and malignant heart); or (iv) Intent to commit a felony (felony-homicide doctrine).

Under element (i) intent to kill, the deadly weapon rule applies. Thus, if the defendant intentionally uses a deadly weapon or instrument against the victim, such use authorizes a permissive inference of intent to kill. An example of a deadly weapon or instrument is a gun, a knife, or even a car when intentionally used to strike the victim.

Under element (iii) abandoned and malignant heart, the killing must result from defendant's conduct involving a reckless indifference to human life and a conscious disregard of an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily injury.

Under element (iv) felony-homicide doctrine, the felony committed must be an inherently dangerous felony, such as burglary, arson, rape, robbery or kidnapping. Importantly, the underlying felony cannot be a lesser-included offense such as assault, otherwise all homicides would be homicide as all homicides are felonies.
********************************

So if homicide is harming, killing a person with intent or premediated what is a person?

********************************

Defintion of person as defined in law, wikipedia and webster dictionary....







The classical definition of a person is "a human being regarded as an individual."[1] In modern usage, the term "person" is subject to dispute and re-interpretation based on alternate definitions. This is especially so for uses that are not necessarily synonymous with the classical definition of human or human being.

For example, in many jurisdictions a corporation may be treated as a "person" under the law. In the fields of philosophy, theology, and bioethics, the definition of 'person' may exclude human beings who are incapable of certain kinds of thought (such as embryos, fetuses with incomplete brain development, or adult humans lacking higher brain functions).[2][3]

These alternative definitions of what constitutes a "person" include a wide and varying range of alternative defining characteristics, some of which have evolved historically, and continue to shift with time and social context. Some other characteristics used to define a 'person' include personal identity,[4] self-awareness, individuality, and a sense of self that persists through time. Other views centre around the degree to which properties such as agency (both human agency and moral agency) and rights are recognized and acknowledged in society or enforcable by law. The recognition of status as a person is known as personhood.
|
sillyakchick

Supporter
Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 2685
Thanks: 4
Thanked:0

Posted: 01-05-08 14:10pm

I think it's this part:

"human being regarded as an individual"

A fetus is not an individual since it is a part of another being. Also, your definition even states that some human forms do not meet the guidelines for personhood. (think the brain dead and z/e/f or a baby born with anencephaly)

Also, IMO you can't kill what is not yet alive on its own
|
Birch

Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 3699
Location: Bliss
Thanks: 63
Thanked:9

Posted: 01-05-08 14:14pm

Wow, look who's back! Welcome back jess!
|
diamondsz

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 3157
Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 71
Thanked:98

Posted: 01-05-08 14:20pm

hey you~! thanx I missed you guys~!

How are you?
|
diamondsz

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 3157
Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 71
Thanked:98

Posted: 01-05-08 14:21pm

sillyakchick wrote:
I think it's this part:

"human being regarded as an individual"

A fetus is not an individual since it is a part of another being. Also, your definition even states that some human forms do not meet the guidelines for personhood. (think the brain dead and z/e/f or a baby born with anencephaly)

Also, IMO you can't kill what is not yet alive on its own


I'm pro-choice hun I know that~!
|
Kypros

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 372
Location: Leicester
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 01-05-08 15:26pm

Where've you been all this time (I'm probably the minority who doesn't know)!? Welcome back, though.
|
sillyakchick

Supporter
Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 2685
Thanks: 4
Thanked:0

Posted: 01-05-08 15:43pm

diamondsz wrote:
sillyakchick wrote:
I think it's this part:

"human being regarded as an individual"

A fetus is not an individual since it is a part of another being. Also, your definition even states that some human forms do not meet the guidelines for personhood. (think the brain dead and z/e/f or a baby born with anencephaly)

Also, IMO you can't kill what is not yet alive on its own


I'm pro-choice hun I know that~!


I understand that. I thought you were asking for opinions. I was agreeing with you.
|
diamondsz

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 3157
Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 71
Thanked:98

Posted: 01-05-08 17:40pm

Kypros Im been dealing with my own problems just got a hang on them and my kids are driving me mad but besides that nothing new, how are you?
|
sed_grep_awk

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 9
Location: earth

Posted: 01-05-08 20:33pm

Honestly, I think there's a rather blurry line when it comes to deciding what does/doesn't qualify as homicide when it's a fetus. For example, when a woman is pregnant with a wanted baby, and she and the fetus are attacked and killed, the murderer can be charged with two counts of homicide. Yet if a woman is pregnant with an unwanted baby and she chooses to have an abortion, it's not considered homicide. That really doesn't make a lot of sense!
|
msrosie

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 347
Location: Ontario, Canada
Thanks: 0
Thanked:1

Posted: 01-05-08 20:38pm

sed_grep_awk wrote:
Honestly, I think there's a rather blurry line when it comes to deciding what does/doesn't qualify as homicide when it's a fetus. For example, when a woman is pregnant with a wanted baby, and she and the fetus are attacked and killed, the murderer can be charged with two counts of homicide. Yet if a woman is pregnant with an unwanted baby and she chooses to have an abortion, it's not considered homicide. That really doesn't make a lot of sense!


While I don't agree with a charge of homicide (I think the charge should be for a crime against the woman), I do understand the rationale. It's like a pet - you can have your pet euthanised for any reason you want, but if someone kills it against your will, it's a crime.
|
Kypros

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 372
Location: Leicester
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 01-05-08 20:52pm

diamondsz wrote:
Kypros Im been dealing with my own problems just got a hang on them and my kids are driving me mad but besides that nothing new, how are you?


Yeah, I'm doing well Smile I hope your problems get sorted soon and your kids start behaving Cool. Keep up the good work.

Kypros.
|
diamondsz

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 3157
Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 71
Thanked:98

Posted: 01-05-08 21:08pm

Terrible twos man horrible and got two of them in that stage almost want to cry......btw thanx for the welcome I didnt even know I was missed lol
|
sed_grep_awk

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 9
Location: earth

Posted: 01-06-08 13:16pm

msrosie wrote:
sed_grep_awk wrote:
Honestly, I think there's a rather blurry line when it comes to deciding what does/doesn't qualify as homicide when it's a fetus. For example, when a woman is pregnant with a wanted baby, and she and the fetus are attacked and killed, the murderer can be charged with two counts of homicide. Yet if a woman is pregnant with an unwanted baby and she chooses to have an abortion, it's not considered homicide. That really doesn't make a lot of sense!


While I don't agree with a charge of homicide (I think the charge should be for a crime against the woman), I do understand the rationale. It's like a pet - you can have your pet euthanised for any reason you want, but if someone kills it against your will, it's a crime.
I *do* agree with a charge of homicide in the case of a wanted baby killed in utero. And, yep, I'm pro-choice! I just see an unborn baby as...well...an unborn baby.
|
sillyakchick

Supporter
Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 2685
Thanks: 4
Thanked:0

Posted: 01-06-08 13:42pm

diamondsz wrote:
Terrible twos man horrible


Oh dear, I have one as well. I completely sympathize!
|
Kypros

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 372
Location: Leicester
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 01-06-08 13:54pm

sed_grep_awk wrote:
msrosie wrote:
sed_grep_awk wrote:
Honestly, I think there's a rather blurry line when it comes to deciding what does/doesn't qualify as homicide when it's a fetus. For example, when a woman is pregnant with a wanted baby, and she and the fetus are attacked and killed, the murderer can be charged with two counts of homicide. Yet if a woman is pregnant with an unwanted baby and she chooses to have an abortion, it's not considered homicide. That really doesn't make a lot of sense!


While I don't agree with a charge of homicide (I think the charge should be for a crime against the woman), I do understand the rationale. It's like a pet - you can have your pet euthanised for any reason you want, but if someone kills it against your will, it's a crime.
I *do* agree with a charge of homicide in the case of a wanted baby killed in utero. And, yep, I'm pro-choice! I just see an unborn baby as...well...an unborn baby.


I would disagree totally. There should definitely be punishment, but not murdering a foetus. That's proposterous and it is not cohesive wih my pro-choice opinions and views regarding the value of a foetus.
|
sed_grep_awk

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 9
Location: earth

Posted: 01-06-08 15:53pm

I don't--I mean I DEFINITELY don't!--want to start sounding like an anti-choicer, but the fact of the matter is that a late-term fetus is a human baby that just hasn't come out yet. And I think killing it should be a crime. That's all. My grandchild was just born two days ago, and he had to be delivered a week early due to complications; he came in at over 9 pounds, and he was definitely a baby BEFORE the doctor pulled him out! And I'd like to think that if something had happened to him prior to birth, he would've been granted the same considerations under the law that any other person would.
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2098
Location: ,
Thanks: 5
Thanked:1

Posted: 01-06-08 16:01pm

sed_grep_awk wrote:
I don't--I mean I DEFINITELY don't!--want to start sounding like an anti-choicer, but the fact of the matter is that a late-term fetus is a human baby that just hasn't come out yet. And I think killing it should be a crime. That's all. My grandchild was just born two days ago, and he had to be delivered a week early due to complications; he came in at over 9 pounds, and he was definitely a baby BEFORE the doctor pulled him out! And I'd like to think that if something had happened to him prior to birth, he would've been granted the same considerations under the law that any other person would.


Me too.. I don't undersatnd why once it is born it's NOT ok to kill it, but before it is.. Doesn't make sense to me..
|
yodavater

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 818

Posted: 01-06-08 16:16pm

sillyakchick wrote:

A fetus is not an individual since it is a part of another being.

"Individual" in that context simply means "one".
Main Entry: individual Function: noun1 a : a particular being or thing as distinguished from a class, species, or collection: as (1) : a single human being as contrasted with a social group or institution (2) : a single organism as distinguished from a group http://www.m-w.com /cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va =individual&x=0&y=0

sillyakchick wrote:

Also, IMO you can't kill what is not yet alive on its own

You can kill anything that is alive. Independence has no bearing.
|
yodavater

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 818

Posted: 01-06-08 16:20pm

msrosie wrote:
It's like a pet - you can have your pet euthanised for any reason you want, but if someone kills it against your will, it's a crime.

So you believe you "own" your unborn children like you own a pet?
|
lucy315

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 116
Location: New Jersey, USA
Thanks: 9
Thanked:4

Posted: 01-06-08 16:27pm

yodavater wrote:
msrosie wrote:
It's like a pet - you can have your pet euthanised for any reason you want, but if someone kills it against your will, it's a crime.

So you believe you "own" your unborn children like you own a pet?


I know you were not responding to me, but I would answer yes to your question. The unborn is growing inside my body, therefore I own it.
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
New Topic   Reply
Medical Questions -> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> How Can You Apply a Law to Your Own Liking?abortion homicide?



Page 1 of 3
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.