By this age the neuro-anatomic structures
are present. What is needed is (1) a
sensory nerve to feel the pain and send a
message to (2) the thalamus, a part of the
base of the brain, and (3) motor nerves
that send a message to that area. These
are present at 8 weeks. The pain impulse
goes to the thalamus. It sends a signal
down the motor nerves to pull away from
the hurt.
Give an example.
Try sticking an infant with a pin and you
know what happens. She opens her mouth to
cry and also pulls away.
Try sticking an 8 week old human fetus in
the palm of his hand. He opens his mouth
and pulls his hand away.
A more technical description would add
that changes in heart rate and fetal
movement also suggest that intrauterine
manipulations are painful to the fetus.
Volman & Pearson, "What the Fetus
Feels," British Med. Journal, Jan. 26,
1980, pp. 233-234.
O.K., that is activity that can be
observed, but is there other evidence of
pain? After all, the fetal baby can’t
tell us he hurts.
Pain can be detected when nociceptors
(pain receptors) discharge electrical
impulses to the spinal cord and brain.
These fire impulses outward, telling the
muscles and body to react. These can be
measured. Mountcastle, Medical Physiology,
St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, pp. 391-427 "Lip
tactile response may be evoked by the end
of the 7th week. At 11 weeks, the face and
all parts of the upper and lower
extremities are sensitive to touch. By 13
1/2 to 14 weeks, the entire body surface,
except for the back and the top of the
head, are sensitive to pain." S. Reinis
& J. Goldman, The Development of the
Brain C. Thomas Pub., 1980
Give me more proof.
In 1984 President Reagan said: "When the
lives of the unborn are snuffed out, they
often feel pain, pain that is long and
agonizing." President Ronald Reagan to
National Religious Broadcasters, New York
Times, Jan. 31, 1984
This provoked a public reaction from
pro-abortion circles and a response from
an auspicious group of professors,
including pain specialists and two past
presidents of the American College of
Obstetrics and Gynecology.
They strongly backed Mr. Reagan and
produced substantial documentation.
Excerpts of their letter (2/13/84) to him
included:
"Real time ultrasonography, fetoscopy,
study of the fetal EKG (electrocardiogram)
and fetal EEG (electroencephalogram) have
demonstrated the remarkable responsiveness
of the human fetus to pain, touch, and
sound. That the fetus responds to changes
in light intensity within the womb, to
heat, to cold, and to taste (by altering
the chemical nature of the fluid swallowed
by the fetus) has been exquisitely
documented in the pioneering work of the
late Sir William Lily — the father of
fetology."
We state categorically that no finding of
modern fetology invalidates the remarkable
conclusion drawn after a lifetime of
research by the late Professor Arnold
Gesell of Yale University. In The
Embryology of Behavior: The Beginnings of
the Human Mind (1945, Harper Bros.), Dr.
Gesell wrote, "and so by the close of the
first trimester the fetus is a sentient,
moving being. We need not speculate as to
the nature of his psychic attributes, but
we may assert that the organization of his
psychosomatic self is well under way."
Mr. President, in drawing attention to the
capability of the human fetus to feel
pain, you stand on firmly established
ground. Willke, J & B, Abortion:
Questions & Answers, Hayes, 1991,
Chpt. 10
What of The Silent Scream?
A Realtime ultrasound video tape and movie
of a 12- week suction abortion is
commercially available as, The Silent
Scream, narrated by Dr. B. Nathanson, a
former abortionist. It dramatically, but
factually, shows the pre-born baby dodging
the suction instrument time after time,
while its heartbeat doubles in rate. When
finally caught, its body being
dismembered, the baby’s mouth clearly
opens wide — hence, the title (available
from Heritage House '76 at
http:www.heritagehouse76.com).
Proabortionists have attempted to
discredit this film. A well documented
paper refuting their charges is available
from National Right to Life, 419 7th St.
NW, Washington, DC 20004, $2.00 p.p. A
short, 10-minute video showing the
testimony of the doctor who did the
abortion in Silent Scream definitely
debunks any criticism of Silent Scream’s
accuracy. The Answer, Bernadel, Inc., P.O.
Box 1897, Old Chelsea Station, New York,
NY, 10011.
Pain? What of just comfort?
"One of the most uncomfortable ledges that
the unborn can encounter is his mother’s
backbone. If he happens to be lying so
that his own backbone is across hers [when
the mother lies on her back], the unborn
will wiggle around until he can get away
from this highly disagreeable position."
M. Liley & B. Day, Modern Motherhood,
Random House, 1969, p. 42
But isn’t pain mostly psychological?
There is also organic, or physiological
pain which elicits a neurological response
to pain. P. Lubeskind, "Psychology &
Physiology of Pain," Amer. Review
Psychology, vol. 28, 1977, p. 42
But early on there is no cerebral cortex
for thinking, therefore no pain?
The cortex isn’t needed to feel pain.
The thalamus is needed and (see above) is
functioning at 8 weeks. Even complete
removal of the cortex does not eliminate
the sensation of pain. "Indeed there seems
to be little evidence that pain
information reaches the sensory cortex."
Patton et al., Intro. to Basic Neurology,
W. B. Saunders Co. 1976, p. 178
How about during an abortion?
This really hit the fan during the 1996
debate in the U.S. Congress over a law to
ban partial birth abortions.
Pro-abortionists had claimed that the
anaesthetic had already killed the fetal
baby. Top officials of the U.S.
Society for Obstetric Anaesthesia &
Perinatology vigorously denied this
explaining that usual anaesthesia did not
harm the baby. D. Gianelli,
Anaesthesiologists Question Claims in
Abortion Debate, Am. Med. News, Jan. 1,
’96
This brought the issue of fetal pain into
the news, and testimony was given to the
Subcommittee on the Constitution of the
U.S. House of Representatives.
"The fetus within this time frame of
gestation, 20 weeks and beyond, is fully
capable of experiencing pain. Without
doubt a partial birth abortion is a
dreadfully painful experience for any
infant. R. White, Dir. Neurosurgery &
Brain Research, Case Western Univ.
Also, "Far from being less able to feel
pain, such premature newborns may be more
sensitive to pain"...that babies under 30
weeks have a "newly established pain
system that is raw and unmodified at this
tender age." P. Ranalli, Neuro. Dept.,
Univ. of Toronto
Give me more research data.
Data in the British Medical Journal,
Lancet, gave solid confirmation of such
pain. It is known that the fetal umbilical
cord has no pain receptors such as the
rest of the fetal body. Accordingly, they
tested fetal hormone stress response
comparing puncturing of the abdomen and of
the cord.
They observed "the fetus reacts to
intrahepatic (liver) needling with
vigorous body and breathing movements, but
not to cord needling. The levels of these
hormones did not vary with fetal age." M.
Fisk, et al., Fetal Plasma Cortisol and
B-endorphin Response to Intrauterine
Needling, Lancet, Vol. 344, July 9, 1994,
Pg. 77
Another excellent British study commented
on this:
"It cannot be comfortable for the fetus to
have a scalp electrode implanted on his
skin, to have blood taken from the scalp
or to suffer the skull compression that
may occur even with spontaneous delivery.
It is hardly surprising that infants
delivered by difficult forceps extraction
act as if they have a severe headache."
Valman & Pearson, "What the Fetus
Feels," British Med. Jour., Jan. 26, 1980
|
jkdhf
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Jan 2008 Posts: 1
Posted: 01-08-08 23:13pm
I didnt post anything wrong just
information. She said provided they dont
feel I was informing with facts that they
have everything needed to feel at 9 weeks.
|
young Girl
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007 Posts: 13932 Location: everythings better in, texas USA
Posted: 01-08-08 23:16pm
jkdhf
wrote:
I didnt post anything wrong
just information. She said provided they
dont feel I was informing with facts that
they have everything needed to feel at 9
weeks.
no they dont
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2121 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 01-09-08 08:36am
reminder.. this is the POR-LIFE Forum...
|
Jules
Moderator
Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 3743 Location: Merrie Englande, UK
Thanks: 72
Thanked:65
Posted: 01-09-08 08:42am
Blondie, I think this was moved from the
pro-choice forum so that's why it's got
some choicer's posts
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2121 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 01-09-08 09:30am
AWW OK..
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 01-09-08 17:39pm
*mod note: I removed my own post, sorry
about that!*
|
Lilly Ivy
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 1514 Location: Moorefield, WV
Thanks: 45
Thanked:80
Posted: 02-10-08 18:59pm
I'm not trying to start anything, but I
would like to add something.
I HEARD (IOW, don't quote me, I'm not a
doctor) that yes, it is true they have
everything to feel pain, but it is not all
connected, there's a gap between the
spinal cord and brain. Too big to have any
type of pain to register. I can have all
the parts to a car, but that doesn't mean
I can drive it if it's not all put
together.
|
Superman12
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Jul 2008 Posts: 2
Pro Life Posted: 07-10-08 04:40am
I am Pro-Life. However, I am not 100%
pro-life. The reason for this is that not
all women who get pregnant have the chance
to decide they want to. Women that are
raped and are impregnated have no choice
in the matter. They should have the right
to choose. Also those women whose live
are in danger from the pregnancy or whose
unborn child's life is in danger also I
believe have the right to choose. The
irresponsible who want to have all the fun
and not deal with the cosequences should
not have the right to choose. They didn't
think or were in too big of a hurry to
care. Those people should have to deal
with the effects of their actions. There
are many alternatives to keeping the
child. There are many people who can't
have kids but want them so badly. I just
don't see how anyone can be so strong one
way or the other for or against abortion
who can't see there can be extenuating
circumstances either way. There was a 10
year old girl in Idaho raped by her
mother's boyfriend. She was locked up for
nine months until she went into labor. I
would not have faulted her if she would
have had an abortion. I don't think any
caring person could have. The danger such
a young girl was put in was tremendous
also the danger the baby was in. The baby
was in the NICU for a number of weeks with
complications and will have them for life.
For these reasons I cannot be 100%
against abortion. I am against it when
someone doesn't want to accept
consequences for their actions but when
someone is raped or in danger I believe it
is up to them. This is just my opinion.