|
oopoopoop
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 1512 Location: ,
Thanks: 78
Thanked:5
|
Posted: 05-06-04 00:28am
|
|
|
|
Name-calling! Name-calling!
Well, you're an extremist nutcase!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
purple333
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Dec 2003 Posts: 1420 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: 05-06-04 00:55am
|
|
|
|
|
One girl & her baby with serious
health issues.
One girl & her baby with serious
health issues.
Two people who decide what to do - have
the baby & keep it?
- have the baby & adopt it
out?
- have an abortion?
One fact, one reality both girls had
options, they both had choices, no-one had
the power to force them to do something.
I had had 3 miscarriages & my daughter
when I was faced with exactly this
situation, I chose abortion & I would
do so again in an instant given the same
situation. Do I think that another person
has the right to make a different choice -
most definitely - but that is the point -
we should have the right to make the
decisions that we believe are right for
us, perhaps also for our family & also
I believe the ones that we believe are
right for the unborn baby.
Just as we have the right to choose
whether or not to breast feed (i didn't)
to work or stay at home (i worked p/t then
f/t then was medically retired when my
kids were 4 & 10).
Choices that is what a free society grants
us.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
zilbucks
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Apr 2004 Posts: 210 Location: NY
|
Posted: 05-06-04 03:06am
|
|
|
|
|
You know the conversation between you two-
samie and poopoo- started off actually
really good guys- you both were
understanding of how one may choose one
choice over the other, the choices for
both of these people were good choices:)
and its wonderful that a child who had all
these medical dilemas was kept, and was
very loved, it would be great if
everything went that smoothly with
everyone, and they had the support systems
that this person had to care for the
child, but not everyone does. See samie
you can get your point across and we can
sympathize and uinderstand. And you were
starting to sympathize with poopoo and her
point- not necesarily agreeing , but being
understanding- but then your ego came in
and you started with the whole name
calling crap- nazi? Cme on now- this is
why we don't like your discussions- your
rude
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
samie
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Apr 2004 Posts: 665
|
Posted: 05-06-04 21:14pm
|
|
|
|
|
Well, poo said our andrew should have been
killed to allow a more healthy baby to
come into existance now this really upset
me, our andrew although he couldnt
interact he certainly knew he was loved as
we knew he loved us. Now for someone to
say he should have been killed to allow a
"fully functoning" person to come into
existance is awful, offensive and
reminisant of the nazi's. I was deeply
offeneded that anyone should even think
this let alone suggest it.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
oopoopoop
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 1512 Location: ,
Thanks: 78
Thanked:5
|
Posted: 05-06-04 21:22pm
|
|
|
|
|
You are so sure that he enjoyed his brief,
inert life? Maybe he was in there, hating
you all.
Your sister's decision to carry to term
was hers, as was my sister's. You think
my sister is a mur derer. I find that
offensive.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
samie
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Apr 2004 Posts: 665
|
Posted: 05-06-04 21:24pm
|
|
|
|
|
You awful hateful person, how dare you.
This is my last post to you, you nasty
peice of work.
I dont think your sister is a mur derer I
said I could understand why she did it -
rot in hell
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
zilbucks
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Apr 2004 Posts: 210 Location: NY
|
Posted: 05-06-04 21:33pm
|
|
|
|
|
Not to start an argument- cause we know
how that will turn it...I'll win- just
kidding---
samie, I don't think poopoo meant it like
that. I'm sure shes happy that andrew was
kept alive- whether or not he felt he had
a great life, only he knew, i'm sure he
did he sounded very loved- I think atleast
what I took from her statement was,
"wasn't it nice she had the choice"-
meaning nothing was forced on her- to have
to keep andrew- *glad she did- or abort,
due to his conditions. On the other hand
isn't it also great, poopoos sister had
the choice as well, although it was
abortion- given her medical condition, the
babys medical conditions and just the
whole situation- both has a choice, I
think that was her point, and you
miconstrued it to say your cousin made the
wrong choice- just go back and read it and
try to to see her point a little clearer-
poopoo feel free to correct me, if this
isnt what you meant
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
samie
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Apr 2004 Posts: 665
|
Posted: 05-06-04 21:41pm
|
|
|
|
|
I think there certainly needs to be a
place where these kids can be looked after
24/7 by social services or something -
giving people like poo's sister no reason
to abort - no offence to poo's sister more
of an attack on the system
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
JanetBee
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Posts: 332
|
Posted: 05-06-04 21:58pm
|
|
|
|
|
I think people who make a decision to
bring a life into the world are taking a
lot of responsibility on themselves.
Anytime you have a baby you are saying
that you are promising the world is an
okay place, and you are making a promise
their life will be worth living. If you
think they won't have a happy life, you
don't have the right to bring them into
the world. I know the anti-choice people
don't agree, they will say you shouldnt
get pregnant in the first place, but
sometimes it's not that easy, and if you
think that a deformed baby will only have
misery, then how can you bring it into the
world?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
zilbucks
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Apr 2004 Posts: 210 Location: NY
|
Posted: 05-06-04 22:02pm
|
|
|
|
|
"i can understand your sisters decision
and dont judge her for it "
thats what you said samie, I thought you
were being understanding, but now its
pretty obvious you contradict what you say
becasue
you are judging her sister for it- your
just sugaring it up a bit,
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
zilbucks
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Apr 2004 Posts: 210 Location: NY
|
Posted: 05-06-04 22:05pm
|
|
|
|
|
If my sister had the condition poopoos
had, and not to mention the condition of
the baby and the whooolle damn situation
just sucked and she decided to abort, i'd
be 100% behind her, becasue I love my
sister, and god forbid anything happen to
her becasue of that- if she chose to keep
it, i'd be behind her too, not becasue I
want her to have complications, but
becasue I love her
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
zilbucks
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Apr 2004 Posts: 210 Location: NY
|
Posted: 05-06-04 22:07pm
|
|
|
|
|
"nice that she had the choice. "
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
oopoopoop
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 1512 Location: ,
Thanks: 78
Thanked:5
|
Posted: 05-06-04 22:34pm
|
|
|
|
|
That's absolutely right zil -- having the
choice is the important part. Because if
you do decide to keep it, maybe you are
hoping the doctor's are wrong, for
example, it helps to know it was your own
decision and that you have the support of
your family. If you are forced to carry
on, dreading every day that goes by, that
is not the same for the end result.
No two women's circumstances are going to
be the same.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
samie
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Apr 2004 Posts: 665
|
Posted: 05-10-04 20:36pm
|
|
|
|
|
Surely the most important part is weather
or not the unborn are human beings or not
and weather they should be granted
protection if they are in fact not human
beings then the womans right to choose is
obviously the most important part
however if the unborn are human beings
(which they are from conception according
to science) then we must recognise that
the right to life supersedes all other
rights and grant protection for the
unborn.
In many states there are many cases of
women being incarcerated and prosecuted
for using controlled drugs etc while
pregnant one woman was charged with
administering controlled substances to a
minor and another charged with child
endangerment and recently a women has been
sent to prison for the manslaughter of
her unborn child. In these states it is
illegal to harm your living unborn baby
and rightly so but in these very same
states it would have been quite lawful and
respectable for these women to have killed
their unborn child through abortion. If
drugs and the such are harmful to your
baby then what is abortion?
A pro life advocate was stopped by police
in the car with him was the tiny remains
of an aborted fetus when discovered by the
officer the policemen charged him with
transporting human remains across state
lines without a permit. When the pro life
advocate realised this would mean going to
court and the state (which allows
abortion) having to argue that the unborn
are infact human beings he welcomed the
charge the state dropped the charges.
How can a state allow abortion if they
recognise the fact that the unborn are
human beings (let alone prove it in a
court of law) since abortion is directly
killing i.E homicide ing those human
beings
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
JanetBee
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Posts: 332
|
Posted: 05-10-04 23:33pm
|
|
|
|
|
You are the one always saying that the law
is irrelevent to your argument, it is
funny that now you think it is important.
And in china they force you to have
abortions if you already have a child
under their one-child policy, so that is
the law, even though they also execute
people for homicide there. Well, here's
another law -- that you have to destroy
unwanted embryos from fertility treatment,
so obviously the the law is that those
arent persons.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
samie
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Apr 2004 Posts: 665
|
Posted: 05-11-04 20:04pm
|
|
|
|
|
The law does not make something morally
correct so is irrelevant to the abortion
argument however if the law is morally
incorrect changing it is
Last edited by samie on 05-11-04 20:17pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
oopoopoop
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 1512 Location: ,
Thanks: 78
Thanked:5
|
Discussion of Morality
Posted: 05-11-04 20:09pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
samie
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Apr 2004 Posts: 665
|
Posted: 05-11-04 22:17pm
|
|
|
|
|
Ok then why should abortion be legal in
the .U.S since just 12 days prior to roe
ve wade 77% of the voters voted against
legalized abortion - doesnt seem it is
societies moral value to allow abortion to
me
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
oopoopoop
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 1512 Location: ,
Thanks: 78
Thanked:5
|
Posted: 05-11-04 22:20pm
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I don't really care what americans
vote for.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
samie
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Apr 2004 Posts: 665
|
Posted: 05-12-04 20:43pm
|
|
|
|
|
You dont really care about anyone but
yourself
|
|
|
|
|