I've already said I understand why it
bothered you.
...but I did say sorry, I did say that's
not how I meant for it to come across.
End of.
|
Ingi
Moderator
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 8907 Location: Grinning like a Cheshire Cat,
Thanks: 172
Thanked:197
Posted: 02-01-08 11:33am
~dani~
wrote:
thats why we have PMs.
my problem was never that the post was to
or about bridget, it was the one line i
quoted. my point was Esme is not the only
baby we have to wait on, not that shes not
important shes just not the only one.
and you just like to start crap ingi,
thats y you had to put a p.s. on sarahs
thread about not hijacking the babies
thread. the OP and I had already gotten
past the issue you had to come say
stuff.
No. Actually SOMEONE DID try to hijack
that thread, Dani. Please re:read it. It
was a thread to WELCOME the new baby. It
wasn't a thread about any one else's
miscarriage. Just like THIS THREAD WAS NOT
ABOUT YOU.
I'm sorry you feel so starved for
attention. I am 100% sure if some made a
thread only about you, you would feel like
you deserved it. I am not the one starting
anything - if everything were taken to PM
there would be no need for a PUBLIC FORUM.
In fact, more than 90% of the posts on
this OFF TOPIC forum could be removed.
I think you need to take a step back and
examine how you feel about this forum and
why you feel so upset that someone else
had a thread written to them. Relax. It is
only a thread.
|
Bridget
Moderator
Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 10821 Location: ,
Thanks: 62
Thanked:42
Posted: 02-01-08 11:52am
um... wow.
thanks again for thinking of me, jerr.
i'll try to post more so people aren't
left wondering about me.
