General Debate Forum - Why do Girls Get Pregnant Before They Are Proposed To?
Medical questions     Health forums     MarketPlace     log in    

Why do Girls Get Pregnant Before They Are Proposed To?

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> General Debate -> Why do Girls Get Pregnant Before They Are Proposed To?
Medical Questions
Author Message
lonestarguy

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 592
Location: , Hoosierland, USA
Thanks: 10
Thanked:1

Posted: 02-25-08 12:55pm

Roberta777 wrote:
Maybe I did misunderstand. However, I like Lonestarguy and his input to this forum.

Oh. I see. marriage is not a necessary option. Maybe not. For me, when I met my true husband, it was love and we had a great life together.

For some, marriage is not a legal/binding option. Why should it ever come down to that? You love a person, or you don't.

Do I believe that same sex marriages should be sactified? Yes. I do. You can not quantify love, and who has the right to it. Then, of course, the legal ramifications that come with homeownership, securities, children and all of it. It is time to give people the equal rights they deserve.


Roberta777:

I can't see that we are that far apart. I agree with your premise that marriage is not for everyone and I have no problem with a relationship like the one Birch is in. They are both adults and they love each other and, in their case, I can't see that a marriage license would change it. Happy now, Birchie?

Just for argument's sake, I personally like Birch and her honest, mature posts, but I have sparred with her in the past about relationships and what marriage brings to it. Remember, this is just my view and doesn't make either of us is right or wrong. She believes that commitment comes without a marriage license and I disagree. To me, the greatest commitment you can make to another person is to propose to spend the rest of your life with them. I can see that some strong relationships can exist without marriage, but, as long as you can leave whenever you want, that strikes me as commitment to a person but not to a union.

However, what I do object to is when a baby is brought into the equation for whatever reason. I think the point futureshock was trying to make was that today living together prior to a marriage commitment is coming to younger and younger partners. Many of these relationships are blessed with a pregnancy even though one or both partners are not mature enough. They sometimes do get married, but in the exact opposite order of marriage, then the baby.

I also agree with sanctifying same-sex marriages because everyone deserves the right to love whomever they want and they deserve equal rights.
|
Birch

Moderator
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4049
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 143
Thanked:13

Posted: 02-25-08 13:00pm

lonestarguy wrote:
Roberta777 wrote:
Maybe I did misunderstand. However, I like Lonestarguy and his input to this forum.

Oh. I see. marriage is not a necessary option. Maybe not. For me, when I met my true husband, it was love and we had a great life together.

For some, marriage is not a legal/binding option. Why should it ever come down to that? You love a person, or you don't.

Do I believe that same sex marriages should be sactified? Yes. I do. You can not quantify love, and who has the right to it. Then, of course, the legal ramifications that come with homeownership, securities, children and all of it. It is time to give people the equal rights they deserve.


Roberta777:

I can't see that we are that far apart. I agree with your premise that marriage is not for everyone and I have no problem with a relationship like the one Birch is in. They are both adults and they love each other and, in their case, I can't see that a marriage license would change it. Happy now, Birchie?

Just for argument's sake, I personally like Birch and her honest, mature posts, but I have sparred with her in the past about relationships and what marriage brings to it. Remember, this is just my view and doesn't make either of us is right or wrong. She believes that commitment comes without a marriage license and I disagree. To me, the greatest commitment you can make to another person is to propose to spend the rest of your life with them. I can see that some strong relationships can exist without marriage, but, as long as you can leave whenever you want, that strikes me as commitment to a person but not to a union.

However, what I do object to is when a baby is brought into the equation for whatever reason. I think the point futureshock was trying to make was that today living together prior to a marriage commitment is coming to younger and younger partners. Many of these relationships are blessed with a pregnancy even though one or both partners are not mature enough. They sometimes do get married, but in the exact opposite order of marriage, then the baby.

I also agree with sanctifying same-sex marriages because everyone deserves the right to love whomever they want and they deserve equal rights.


"Spar" is just a great word. I think I will try to add it into my daily lexicon.

"To me, the greatest commitment you can make to another person is to propose to spend the rest of your life with them." I agree! I agree!
|
lonestarguy

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 592
Location: , Hoosierland, USA
Thanks: 10
Thanked:1

Posted: 02-25-08 13:19pm

Okay, put your dukes up. We're about to spar.

Sorry, I've been out with a chest cold and, remember, I'm old. It takes me a while for my autoimmune system to kick booty on those nasty bacteria.
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0

Posted: 02-25-08 13:33pm

A lot of marriages end in divorce, but the fact is that unmarried couples that live together break up at TWICE THE RATE of married couples.
|
Birch

Moderator
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4049
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 143
Thanked:13

Posted: 02-25-08 14:00pm

futureshock, do you mean couples who lived together before marriage are more likely to divorce?
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0

Posted: 02-25-08 16:50pm

No. I mean people who live together instead of getting married.
|
Roberta777

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 755
Location: ,
Thanks: 109
Thanked:241
Let's Face It
Posted: 02-25-08 20:21pm

You get married, you marry into the whole family, both sides of it. The family is there for good reason. They have themselves walked this path. You hit a bit of patchy ground, a bit of ice on the road, they have been there done that. It comes down to family support, experience getting there and who is to say we can't all use some advice? Who is better to give it to us than somebody who loves us? And, they have a vested interest in your relationship working out.

I believe to make a commitment before the whole nine yards of here comes the baby and oh! we are doing so well and it all may work out! For me it would not.

It is like everything that I know to now. You need a contract, whether it is buying a house, a new car, anything of value usually comes with a condition that you indeed want to be in possession of the item. Don't get mad here. But, frankly, I would like to feel I was worth the other person making that commitment that he was willing to put his name on the line. Otherwise, it is just too easy to walk away when the tough gets tough and the rough gets rough and it is time to get out of Dodge.

Some of you are very young and don't feel you need that commitment. Just the differences in our generations.
|
lonestarguy

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 592
Location: , Hoosierland, USA
Thanks: 10
Thanked:1
I agree
Posted: 02-25-08 21:42pm

Roberta777 wrote:
But, frankly, I would like to feel I was worth the other person making that commitment that he was willing to put his name on the line. Otherwise, it is just too easy to walk away when the tough gets tough and the rough gets rough and it is time to get out of Dodge.


That's exactly the situation I was describing concerning marriage as a legal and binding union. That is real commitment. I'm from your generation and this seems the natural progression of a relationship to me.

And don't call me frankly. J/K
|
Roberta777

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 755
Location: ,
Thanks: 109
Thanked:241
HaHaHa
Posted: 02-25-08 22:33pm

I just love your sense of humor lonestarguy. And, where is the picture of your grey cat? Mine keeps coming around here. Still feral. Everytime I walk out the door he runs from one area or another, he runs to show himself. Have tried to get him to come closer. May be quite a struggle. Have to get Kristy down here. She can tame even the most frightened heart of the beast of little cat lost. Kristy is my beautiful daughter.
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 02-25-08 22:37pm

Hey, I'm from the next generation (what are we calling ourselves these days? Confused, perhaps?) and I think marriage is the logical next step. I wouldn't be fighting for gay-marriage rights if I didn't feel that way.
|
lonestarguy

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 592
Location: , Hoosierland, USA
Thanks: 10
Thanked:1
Hey, Eiri
Posted: 02-25-08 23:35pm

Eiri wrote:
Hey, I'm from the next generation (what are we calling ourselves these days? Confused, perhaps?) and I think marriage is the logical next step. I wouldn't be fighting for gay-marriage rights if I didn't feel that way.


Does your generation even have a name yet? Hopefully, you will be the smart generation and learn from all our mistakes. I don't have any worries about you as an individual at all.

Roberta: Thanks for your kind words. No cat anymore as we got a cute little white dog. I'll try to find a pic and post it.
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
Re: I agree
Posted: 02-26-08 00:04am

lonestarguy wrote:
Roberta777 wrote:
But, frankly, I would like to feel I was worth the other person making that commitment that he was willing to put his name on the line. Otherwise, it is just too easy to walk away when the tough gets tough and the rough gets rough and it is time to get out of Dodge.


That's exactly the situation I was describing concerning marriage as a legal and binding union. That is real commitment. I'm from your generation and this seems the natural progression of a relationship to me.


Ditto. Many people that say they don't need that piece of paper are saying, in reality, that they are not worth the other person committing to them, but it's ok for that non committal person to use them for bearing children.
|
killbill

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Jan 2008
Posts: 425
Thanks: 34
Thanked:35

Posted: 02-26-08 00:17am

who is more non-committal though? the person who won't get married or the person who will walk away from someone because they have a different view of marriage? long term relationships are about constant compromise and negotiation. i understand someone drawing a line but it's not really fair to assume someone is being used because they don't force the other person to either marry or be kicked to the curb.
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 02-26-08 09:51am

Personally? The person who won't get married. If you're too stubborn to sign a piece of paper, then you're not mature enough for marriage and you're not ready.

There wouldn't be a fight for marriage rights if it meant "nothing". Gays and lesbians would technically be perfectly happy if that piece of paper was "worthless". But it's not, as they care, and I care. It's not just the benefits; it's the MEANING of the thing. Maybe it doesn't have meaning to you - fine. But it has a deep meaning, a meaning of equality and worthiness and love and commitment to many other people.
|
Birch

Moderator
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4049
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 143
Thanked:13

Posted: 02-26-08 10:26am

futureshock wrote:
No. I mean people who live together instead of getting married.


Oh, so they may not have even have committed to each other for life.

I wonder if there is such a stat out there for couples who have committed to each other and not gotten married.

Anyways, it's not for everyone.
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0

Posted: 02-26-08 10:57am

Birch wrote:
futureshock wrote:
No. I mean people who live together instead of getting married.


Oh, so they may not have even have committed to each other for life.

I mean the people who say they have committed for life, and even have children together, but one or both of them doesn't want to get married.
Quote:


I wonder if there is such a stat out there for couples who have committed to each other and not gotten married.

Anyways, it's not for everyone.


Do you mean as in how many people do this compared with how many get married? Or how many of them break up compared with marriages ending?

I don't have an answer for the first question, but for the second one I have seen statistics. They range from saying that cohabitating couples break up at twice the rate of marriages ending in divorce, to a much higher percent of cohabitating couples breaking up in comparison to marriages ending.
|
Birch

Moderator
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4049
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 143
Thanked:13

Posted: 02-26-08 11:22am

futureshock wrote:

... They range from saying that cohabitating couples break up at twice the rate of marriages ending in divorce, to a much higher percent of cohabitating couples breaking up in comparison to marriages ending.


I'm really not being obtuse, really, Very
Happy , but do you mean "lifetime commited" cohabitating couples versus just cohabitating couples?

To clarify, I know many folks who cohabitate to 'test the waters', and they have not made a commitment.

I was specifically wondering how many people are out there like my bf and myself - no kids, no contract, and a lifetime commitment. Just curious. I highly doubt stats are kept on this, anyways.

I have read some of the replies on here about marriage contracts. Here is a different perspective to consider:

Why would you commit to someone for life if their word isn't good enough for you-if you need 'backup' from a third party?

Does that make sense?
|
killbill

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Jan 2008
Posts: 425
Thanks: 34
Thanked:35

Posted: 02-26-08 12:03pm

...and marriage doesn't mean the SAME thing to everyone. I know exactly what Birch means about cohabiting couples. There is a huge difference between my relationship and say, my best friend who lived with her boyfriend for 7 years. They were a lot younger at the time and had a lot of growing up to do. They were just starting out in life and by the time the 7 years had passed they realised they had different goals in life and moved on. With me and my partner, we were already old enough to know ourselves and what we want in life and were able to intentionally make a committment to each other in a mature way. We have every intention of being together for life and we have already experienced some of the "richer or poorer" and "in sickness and in health." The only thing that matters is that WE know, not what others looking in think.
|
lonestarguy

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 592
Location: , Hoosierland, USA
Thanks: 10
Thanked:1

Posted: 02-26-08 13:28pm

Birch wrote:
futureshock wrote:

... They range from saying that cohabitating couples break up at twice the rate of marriages ending in divorce, to a much higher percent of cohabitating couples breaking up in comparison to marriages ending.


I'm really not being obtuse, really, Very
Happy , but do you mean "lifetime commited" cohabitating couples versus just cohabitating couples?

To clarify, I know many folks who cohabitate to 'test the waters', and they have not made a commitment.

I was specifically wondering how many people are out there like my bf and myself - no kids, no contract, and a lifetime commitment. Just curious. I highly doubt stats are kept on this, anyways.

I have read some of the replies on here about marriage contracts. Here is a different perspective to consider:

Why would you commit to someone for life if their word isn't good enough for you-if you need 'backup' from a third party?

Does that make sense?


That makes sense in your world, but what do you have against being married legally? If it's "just a piece of paper", then what's the problem? If you are essentially married in the eyes of the community, then why wouldn't you? I was under the (perhaps mistakenly) impression that all women grew up dreaming of their wedding. Was that not important to you personally?

Is there something wrong with a "real" commitment to you? I could ask you the opposite question. Why would you commit to someone for life if they are not willing to put their word on the line for you? Just as a point of reference, when in your relation with Mr. X did you mutually decide that you would be together for the long haul?

You can't deny the fact that two people who are not married, but committed to a long-term relationship, can walk away any time they want with no entanglements. In fact, is a long-term unmarried relationship considered by both partners as a pact for life or just until one or the other decides they have fallen out of love? Do you have the level of interaction and commitment with each other's family? Because when you marry, you really do marry the family also.

What I think futureshock is saying is that a pregnancy changes everything, especially the dynamics of a relationship. Is there still a stigma for a child born out of wedlock today? Is that fair to the child, especially when he or she grows up? Or, are the feelings of the parents more important than that of the child?

As far as you and your partner are concerned, I would personally say that you should be married for the reasons I stated. But, knowing you now and assuming your bf is just as mature, then I would not think less of you if you didn't. I am able to argue a point without forcing my views on others.

I agree with futureshock that it does seem like younger partners, without your level of maturity, are becoming pregnant and then forcing a decision to be made whether they are ready or not.

And, finally, I would also be interested in the statistics of couples in your position. Toodle-loo!
|
Birch

Moderator
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4049
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 143
Thanked:13

Posted: 02-26-08 14:05pm

This isn't personal lonestarguy; but I never know much of the point of responding about this subject. It's difficult to relate to someone else the unique perspectives we have, as well as the healthy relationship we have. I can say that our relationship is unique because we are unusual individuals but then people jump to conclusions about maturity and commitment. Which is fine with me, because they do not know anyone like us.

But I do love you very much and am going to respond anyways. Plus, I don't like my egg drop soup and need to while away my lunch time. Very
Happy

lonestarguy wrote:


That makes sense in your world, but what do you have against being married legally? If it's "just a piece of paper", then what's the problem? If you are essentially married in the eyes of the community, then why wouldn't you? I was under the (perhaps mistakenly) impression that all women grew up dreaming of their wedding. Was that not important to you personally?


A wedding and a marriage, not to mention weddings versus marriage licenses/contractual obligations, are different monsters.

A contractual obligation between two parties to be together changes the dynamic of a relationship. I would rather someone make a choice to be with me everyday than be signed, sealed, and delivered into it.

lonestarguy wrote:
Is there something wrong with a "real" commitment to you? I could ask you the opposite question. Why would you commit to someone for life if they are not willing to put their word on the line for you? Just as a point of reference, when in your relation with Mr. X did you mutually decide that you would be together for the long haul?


This is very interesting. It's kind of exactly what I meant: my word is a "real" commitment.

You did not answer my question. Very
Happy
I do not need someone to be willing to put their word on the line, because that is all about money and material possessions. That signature does not protect anyone's heart.

We mutually decided this over the course of time. It was fairly early on.

lonestarguy wrote:
You can't deny the fact that two people who are not married, but committed to a long-term relationship, can walk away any time they want with no entanglements. In fact, is a long-term unmarried relationship considered by both partners as a pact for life or just until one or the other decides they have fallen out of love? Do you have the level of interaction and commitment with each other's family? Because when you marry, you really do marry the family also.


Yes, I don't deny that.

I would not want someone who were not in love with me to be forced to be with me because of a contractual obligation. That is no way for me to live.

That's my choice; it's not for everyone.

We have as high an interactional level with one another's family as any married couple.

lonestarguy wrote:
lWhat I think futureshock is saying is that a pregnancy changes everything, especially the dynamics of a relationship. Is there still a stigma for a child born out of wedlock today? Is that fair to the child, especially when he or she grows up? Or, are the feelings of the parents more important than that of the child?

As far as you and your partner are concerned, I would personally say that you should be married for the reasons I stated. But, knowing you now and assuming your bf is just as mature, then I would not think less of you if you didn't. I am able to argue a point without forcing my views on others.

I agree with futureshock that it does seem like younger partners, without your level of maturity, are becoming pregnant and then forcing a decision to be made whether they are ready or not.

And, finally, I would also be interested in the statistics of couples in your position. Toodle-loo!


I really agree that if kids are involved, partners should be married for numerous reasons beneficial to their children.

I know it's gone off tack; I just want to reiterate my original post on here: Marriage does not automatically mean that someone is a good parent. Any loon can sign a document.

I hope all that made sense. I wrote it really fast...
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
New Topic   Reply
Medical Questions -> Health Forums -> General Debate -> Why do Girls Get Pregnant Before They Are Proposed To?



Page 3 of 7
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.