Abortion Debate Forum - Experience of Abortion (australia)
Medical questions     Health forums     Help     log in    

Experience of Abortion (australia)

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Experience of Abortion (australia)
Medical Questions
Author Message
oopoopoop

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 1255
Location: ,
Thanks: 44
Thanked:2
Experience of Abortion (australia)
Posted: 05-22-04 01:12am

Abortion - emotional issues
despite the fact that most australians support safe and legal abortion, there is considerable social stigma attached to the procedure. Around 80,000 abortions are performed every year, making it one of the most common operations in the country, but the experiences of women are generally under-reported. As a result, it is commonly supposed that all women who undergo abortion experience guilt, grief and shame. Studies undertaken internationally since the 1960s consistently show that most women who have an abortion don't suffer any subsequent psychological or emotional problems. A major australian study, funded by the commonwealth department of human services and health, extensively researched the experiences of women seeking abortion in queensland, south australia and tasmania. The study - we women decide - found that the current delivery of abortion services, including restrictive and sometimes punitive legislation, is the most significant cause of negative emotional outcomes for women.

Making the decision to abort
most women who decide to abort an unwanted pregnancy consider much the same factors as women who contemplate motherhood prior to conception, including:

the state and stability of the relationship with their partner
whether or not they feel ready to take on a parenting role
the needs of children they may already have
career and financial considerations
their state of physical health
their moral, emotional and religious beliefs regarding pregnancy, abortion and motherhood.
Ending a potential life
women who seek abortion appreciate that if the pregnancy wasn't terminated, they would eventually give birth to a child and become a parent. Some women see the pregnancy as part of their own body, while others acknowledge the growing foetus as a separate human life. Thinking of abortion as ending a potential life doesn't tend to compound a woman's distress, influence her decision-making, or raise spiritual and metaphysical dilemmas. Studies indicate that, instead, a woman who sees the pregnancy as a separate life is more likely to view the abortion as a momentous decision, compared to a woman who views early pregnancy as indistinguishable from her own life and body.

Most women feel they made the right decision
studies show that the vast majority of women who have abortions (around 98 per cent) feel they made the right decision. Typically, emotional distress peaks before the operation and resolves soon after.

The final decision rests with the medical profession
australian research indicates that a woman is more likely to suffer emotionally if she feels the decision to terminate was, in some way, not fully hers to make. The current legislation that requires a woman to 'convince' the doctor of her eligibility for the procedure can cause distress, since the final decision rests with the medical profession and not the woman herself. Some women assert they were initially given misleading or incorrect information about abortion, apparently to influence their decision-making. Others found that some doctors, counsellors and related health professionals were judgemental, and tended to push their own moral views.

Pressure to abort
women who experience subsequent emotional problems tend to be those who were coerced into the operation. Some women, particularly young and older women, are pressured by partners, family and the medical profession to have an abortion. If a woman wants to have the child, or feels ambivalent about her pregnancy, a coerced abortion can result in a negative emotional outcome for her, including long-lasting grief, depression, anxiety and guilt.

Women who are denied abortion
women who are denied abortion and keep their subsequent children suffer greater emotional distress than those who undergo the procedure. In one study, more than half of the women interviewed had experienced mental disturbances. Guilt and anxiety levels were also higher in this group. However, around one in four were reportedly coping well.

Recommendations from women
women who have experienced abortion tend to want changes to the current system, including:
the final decision to abort should rest solely with the woman.
Clear and unequivocal abortion legislation throughout the country.
The removal of abortion from the various state and territory crimes acts.
The genuine experiences of abortion should be reported.

Things to remember
most women who have an abortion don't suffer any subsequent psychological or emotional problems.
It is not true that all women who undergo abortion experience guilt, grief and shame.
Studies show that the vast majority of women who have abortions (around 98 per cent) feel they made the right decision.


Source:
http://www.B etterhealth.Vic.Gov.Au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.N sf/pages/abortion_emotional_issues?Open
|
SleepyJen

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 41
Location: NYC

Posted: 06-10-04 00:50am

My experience supports everything you say. I wrote about it in a post on the other abortion forum.

I get very tired of hearing all the closed-minded anti-choice arguments. Expressing opinions is fine. There's nothing wrong with feeling that abortion is wrong--that's a belief that should be respected. But how about those who believe that abortion is wrong simply don't have abortions? That makes sense to me. And then they can just leave the pro-choice people alone. We can all follow our own beliefs (like freedom of religion). I'm a good person who happens to be pro-choice.
|
purple333

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Dec 2003
Posts: 1420
Location: Sydney

Posted: 06-13-04 04:06am

Poopy,

just how much do you know about my (note my!!) country & what makes you think you have the right to post something specifically australian (with which I basically agree) as opposed to finding something specifically british - assuming you are actually in the uk!!(note uk sort of like yuk!! - at least with you there - as I personally love the united kingdom. It's just people like you - wherever they're from that I have a problem with)
|
sparklypixie12

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Sep 2003
Posts: 3099

Posted: 06-13-04 08:09am

I was thinking that myself actually about her not being australian.
Not sure about your comparison to 'uk' and 'yuk' though purple but since you mentioned you love the u.K. I dont suppose you meant that comment to be nasty Confused
|
purple333

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Dec 2003
Posts: 1420
Location: Sydney

Posted: 06-13-04 10:23am

Pixie,

you're right sort of, I do love the u.K. But I was feeling so bugged at her for using australian research that I saw red hence the uk & yuk bit.


Especially since the 3 states mentioned in the research are hardly typical for so many reasons & in so many ways that it made me mad too because, well would she or you think much of research done in mid-wales, essex & cornwall?? Or americans of research done in say utah, montana & arizona??
|
sparklypixie12

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Sep 2003
Posts: 3099

Posted: 06-13-04 11:16am

Ok I see well the uk isnt yuk for a start! :d its pretty nice :d and no I wouldnt think much about research done in those areas of the u.K. That you mentioned because well....They're kinda quiet! But I would say that because I live in the second city of england which isnt so quiet!
|
purple333

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Dec 2003
Posts: 1420
Location: Sydney

Posted: 06-13-04 11:23am

Exactly for research to be relevant it needs to be done in relevant places & places which are indicative of the country/state not places that are just different to the rest of the country/state.
|
oopoopoop

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 1255
Location: ,
Thanks: 44
Thanked:2

Posted: 06-14-04 09:14am

Purple, I didn't intend to step on your territory. That was simply a summary which countered some of the ludicrous psychological statements being made by others about the negative effects. The pro-choice side is, unfortunately, not as dedicated to carrying out this sort of research as the anti-choice side, so there isn't that much to choose from. I provided the reference so that its provenance and applicability could be assessed by the reader. I'm interested that you see it as unrepresentative.

Interestingly, that post was up there for about three weeks, and you have only just taken offence.
|
purple333

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Dec 2003
Posts: 1420
Location: Sydney

Posted: 06-14-04 09:48am

I took offence as soon as I read it>>> having been absent from this forum due to a) drivelbottom, b) my family & I have all had flu, c) daughter's uni & stage show work requiring my driving her all over the place & d) computer being ill & "hospitalized" !!!!

Tasmania is our "in-bred" state - also our "apple isle" & truly delightful but out of step with the times in many ways & somewhat different for being separate to the rest of the country. South australia is a state of vast differences desert to ocean, vineyards to shipwrecks etc. Many say it's most like england, people are very laid back & it isn't really heard from alot. Queensland, is where wild youth & old age retirees come together in the sun, it is also where aborigines (natives) are treated worst by any state government. It is also a state with high tourism all year round which of itself leads people to behave differently at times.

I went to the site just to check & as you say it says it was funded by the commonwealth gov't >> but>>> the site is for the victorian state government which I find a little strange >>> yet another state mentioned despite not being involved in the research & yet victoria would have been like my own state of new south wales far more representative.
|
oopoopoop

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 1255
Location: ,
Thanks: 44
Thanked:2

Posted: 06-14-04 10:06am

So in that sense, the women they interviewed (let's maybe leave aside the in-bred ones!), you feel would not be representative of women who have abortions? So it is where someone lives which would affect how they feel?

This wasn't an opinion poll, so i'm not sure why their location would affect how they feel, except in the sense that those who are living where the vast majority are opposed to abortion might feel more isolated, depressed, etc.
|
purple333

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Dec 2003
Posts: 1420
Location: Sydney

Posted: 06-14-04 10:24am

Location can affect how they feel, as can what they say be affected by location, form of question, means of being wuestioned, who else is present, who else may have access to the answers etc etc. Plus answers/feelings etc are affected by access. Access to services, counselling, education, alternatives to what family/community "decide" is right etc etc.

The site you referred to re the research gave no indication as to how many women were interviewed, what areas they came from, their cultural, social, religious, educational backgrounds, how many in total in each area etc etc etc. Thus the research techniques may be totally flawed & given the states chosen I would tend to think the results are at least inaccurate & quite possibly skewed towards what the government wanted >> not unheard of in government research!!
|
oopoopoop

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 1255
Location: ,
Thanks: 44
Thanked:2

Posted: 06-14-04 10:27am

I understand that you term yourself "anti-abortion" but "pro-choice".

So it seems you would like abortion to be available, but women who have one should suffer for it.
|
purple333

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Dec 2003
Posts: 1420
Location: Sydney

Posted: 06-14-04 10:52am

Poopoopoo,

i know I live upside down but I have to wonder if you read upside down at times or maybe right to left or something?? Where on earth (or anywhere else) did you get the idea that i'm anti-abortion???? I am pro-choice.

I would prefer that women not rush into abortions, I think they should consider all options & consequences etc first & I would like to see more babies being put up for adoption etc. Also I don't think abortion should be used just because someone is too lazy to use protection etc. But I am totally pro-choice.

Abortion should be available & women should not suffer for it. They may suffer simply because either they made the wrong decision (wrong for them) or because they weren't counselled beforehand to understand what they were doing & then couldn't deal afterwards or because of what others (like samie) say but I don't think they should suffer & I do not believe that any god would cause them to suffer. Unless of course a woman chose to fall pregnant just for the "fun" of having an abortion - & there are some weirdos out there!!
|
oopoopoop

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 1255
Location: ,
Thanks: 44
Thanked:2

Posted: 06-14-04 11:51am

purple333 wrote:
i am a woman & I am basically anti-abotion but I beleive strongly in pro choice


i guess that was where I got the idea.

It rather seemed that your reaction to the study results implied your disagreed with them. I take your point that they may not be representative of australia or anywhere else, but in that sense no woman/group of women is representative. You can say that unless a random sample was taken of all women everywhere that it isn't worth publishing the results? Actually, the study itself did not claim to generalize to the population. The conclusions and recommendations also refer to other research, and "the australian study" is only one part. On the other hand, the next post, from ny, agreed with them.
|
purple333

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Dec 2003
Posts: 1420
Location: Sydney
Context & Read It All
Posted: 06-14-04 14:17pm

Poopoopoo,

again you show your inability to comprehend a post in its totality, possibly because you seem unwilling? Incapable? Of reading the entire post. In fact I doubt your ability to comprehend even in small doses - now had you read the 2nd line of my initial reply to your post you would have seen "with which I basically agree" - hm let me try to explain what that means>>> it means that while I object to you posting from that source without the appropriate background knowledge to understand it that I nevertheless agree with the content of the research in terms of arguments for pro-choice. Why am I bothering that is way beyond your ability to understand.

As to your taking a part of a post from me from another thread - so out of context totally >> I am a woman: fact; I am pro-choice: fact; I am basically anti-abortion: fact. I don't see a problem. I don't think abortion is something to do lightly, or for just any reason or without care, caution, thought & counselling but there are times (& those times differ for different people) when it is the best option under the circumstances, maybe the only option & regardless of my views I believe that others have a right to make their own choices not the choices anyone else would make for them. Note too that I am also pro-choice for myself since I terminated a pregnancy.
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
New Topic   Reply
Medical Questions -> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Experience of Abortion (australia)



We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.