Joined: 24 Sep 2004 Posts: 22 Location: san jose, ca
Please Help Asap!! Posted: 09-24-04 16:43pm
Ok. Background info: I have a regular
period, but every 5 or 6 months, I skip a
period entirely. I'll get discharge
during the time I should be having my
period, but never blood. I get all the
pms crankiness and headaches that I
normally do, but I don't bleed. That's
weird enough in itself, but here's my
situation:
i just started on bc (ortho tricyclen lo)
this month. But this month also happened
to be the month I skipped. So I just
started on the sunday that should have
been my starting sunday, and the discharge
was over on wednesday, which is on time
for what my period normally is. My
boyfriend is slightly concerned that,
because I didn't get my period, the pill
isn't doing it's job.
Anyone who has an opinion, it would be
greatly appreciated. Also, on ortho
tricyclen lo has anyone else had excess
energy? It seems like I just get these
bursts of energy about an hour after I
take the pill. It's crazy!!!
|
PattyV
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 May 2004 Posts: 1103 Location: Chicago area
Posted: 09-25-04 08:13am
Hi rachel,
don't know about the energy
thing,but you need to use a back up method
while on the pill.No method is
100%effective and to be absolutely
sure,always use condoms or contraceptive
gel,especially the first three months.I
don't have any experience with the
tri-phasic pills,so I can't tell you what
to expect.Hopefully,someone who does will
respond.Good luck to you!Patty
|
Cassy
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jun 2004 Posts: 103
Posted: 09-25-04 12:40pm
I was on ortho lo awhile. I did get
bursts of energy but I think I was happy
in general. i'd say that you
should sue a back method because you just
started it. But after a week (some say a
month or 3) it should be doing it's job
just fine, even if you don't have a
period. Just make sure you get one next
month of whatever to make sure you're not
pregnant.
Pattyv, I think you are making people
really paranoid saying you need to use a
back-up method when you are on the pill.
It really is (if taken properly) about
99.9% effective. Yes, nothing is perfect,
but its a lot to ask people to take a pill
every single day and then to use condoms
as well! I mean, if you think 1 chance in
1000 is a lot, you probably spend a lot of
money on lotto tickets! The main reason
to use condoms when you are on the pill is
to prevent stds, really. If you have an
upset stomach or take antibiotics, then
you need to be careful for the rest of
that month though.
|
Kia
Supporter
Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 6594 Location: Planet Tampaxia,
Posted: 09-29-04 07:24am
Sorry wendy but patty is right.
Most pills are only 98-99% effective
meaning one or two women will get pregnant
each year even though they have taken the
pill exactly as instructed, also pill
doesn't protect against std's/sti's
either.
Rachel, if you don't take the pill on the
first day of your period, use back up ie
condoms for 7 days and you will be
protected as the b/c will have taken
effect by then.
Ps girls, all this info is included in the
pamphlet that comes in the box with your
birth control.
|
PattyV
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 May 2004 Posts: 1103 Location: Chicago area
Posted: 09-29-04 08:11am
A 1 in 1000 chance is only good if you are
not the 1000th chance.As qouted quite
often by hotsafrick-"the pill is 99%
effective taken correctly 100% of the
time!!!"seeing some of these posts is
proof that this is not the case.Patty
Well, it seems to me that if you believe
that you would be better off not taking
the pill, there is no point in messing up
your body with all those hormones if you
still have to use a condom! Actually 1 in
1000 is really very small odds, that would
mean that if there were 100 women, one of
them would get pregnant every 10 years. I
think the 98 or 99 % is only for the mini
pill, the combined pill is 99.9% I was
always told. And I think a lot of women
who do get pregnant when they are on the
pill probably lie and say they didn't ever
forget to take it, when really they did
forget.
|
Kia
Supporter
Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 6594 Location: Planet Tampaxia,
Posted: 09-29-04 11:30am
Nope 98-99% is for the regular pill - I
had to take the mini pill and that is only
95%.
Birth control pills (or patch or shot) is
really a back for most people in case the
condom falls off or breaks or in case they
have that one night of passion where they
errrrrrrrr forget.
Or in the case of a long term
relationship, where fideltity has been
proved and they no longer want to bother
with condoms all the time.
But for most young people, why take the
risk of using only one method? I mean
what if - typical post- you were having a
cuddle and his willy touched your area, it
might have had pre-cum on it - you run the
risk of getting pregnant small chance but
who knows, now if you were on birth
control too, you really wouldn't have to
worry at all.
The basis is to just ensure you are as wll
protected as possible - what is wrong with
that?
Sorry, I can't see that taking a pill
every single day and all the exrta
hormones is worth it just as a back-up!
But you are right, if you are not in a
monogamous trusting relationship then you
need to use condoms, but to me that is for
stds, not as birth control. I went on the
pill way before aids was invented, for
instance, and I have hardly ever used
condoms. To be honest, I really hate
them! Anytime you have sex it is a tiny
risk of something, but that is just life,
it is like getting on an airplane or
crossing the street, you just need to be
aware that you are taking a risk I guess.
It sounds like i'm advocating risky
behaviour, but that isn't it, just that I
don't think you can wrap yourself in
cotton wool and think that you can be safe
from everything. Personally, I think I
have been lucky in limiting the number of
partners I have had and also to be very
choosy about the sort of men they are.
Anyway, I have always been on the pill,
except when I was celibate or for a year
when my lover had a vasectomy, and I have
never gotten pregnant. I think if I had
to use condoms I would have just stopped
having sex entirely or become a lesbian!
|
Kia
Supporter
Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 6594 Location: Planet Tampaxia,
Posted: 09-29-04 12:21pm
Wendy you can be choosy about your partner
but have they always been choosy about
their past partners?
It is impossible for you to have gone on
the pill before aids was invented - it has
been around for hundreds of years but only
in the last 30 or 40 years has it really
come to light.
I'm glad you have been lucky, but think if
one person avoids condoms because of what
you said and gets infected how would you
feel?
Always advise on the side of caution
unless expressing your own opinion, that
way you can't be held liable.
Me personally I hate condoms plus i'm
allergic to regular ones, but it didn't
stop me from wanting to protect myself.
If your gonna go it do it safe, if your
gonna go rock climbing - then you wear a
safety harness and a back up line as well
as protective gear.
The first case of aids was diagnosed in
1981, but didn't really register in the
general population until about 1986 or so.
And I said that condoms should be used
to avoid diseases. But once you are in a
relationship, or get married, are you
really going to use condoms forever. I am
just being realistic. It's fine to give
advice, but it is like saying, "abstain",
people won't do it if it is too extreme.
What I said is that to use condoms as well
as the pill to avoid pregnancy is
overkill. And i've never seen the point
in rock climbing but you know what? I
drive a 1960s sportscar that doesn't have
any seatbelts. Go figure.
|
Kia
Supporter
Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 6594 Location: Planet Tampaxia,
Posted: 09-29-04 13:23pm
Look I refuse to argue the issue.
The point I am making is if you want to
take risks fine, but don't encourage it in
other people. A vast amount of people who
read these boards are young,
impressionable and not in any longterm
fixed relationship. They have no way of
knowing if their partner has had any other
or how many other partners.
And yes you are totally right, if it is
too extreme people will not do it, they
will not abstain, curiosity is too great,
therefore they should be encouraged to do
it as safely as possible.
I feel you are just being provoking and
trying to find excuses for an arguement,
this isn't the place for it.
I didn't suggest you try rock climbing -
it was an analogy, and as to what car you
drive boo sucks - 50years ago people
didn't care as much about safety nor were
there the same risks - for starters there
weren't as many cars on the road
Hey I don't want to debate this, people
have to make their own decisions. But
there are two things going on, one is
birth control and the other is diseases.
So if people sleep around or if they are
in monogamous relationships they have
different worries. I know you didn't
suggest I try rock climbing, you obviously
didnt get the irony.
|
PattyV
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 May 2004 Posts: 1103 Location: Chicago area
Posted: 09-29-04 19:54pm
Aids has been around for many,many
years.There were other names for it or
people just said that someone died of
consumption or pneumonia or various other
ailments.There wasn't a name for it,but
rather many names.It was in 1981 that the
virus was isolated and identified.I was
working in a hospital in chicago and took
care of many of the first identified aids
patients in chicago.Those were very scary
times and continue to be in light of
complacency on many people's
parts,thinking they are not at risk.This
is not the hiv/aids forum,so,i'll stop
now.Patty
|
Kia
Supporter
Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 6594 Location: Planet Tampaxia,
Posted: 09-30-04 05:44am
True patty it isn't, but it is still a
very real risk to anyone having
unprotected sex.
Thank you for replying
|
rachael909
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Sep 2004 Posts: 22 Location: san jose, ca
Posted: 10-04-04 13:39pm
Wow...Well, thanks everyone for the
debate. It's good to see everyone's view
points. But, even though I am young, I
don't like being seen as an
impressionable, immature youngin who
doesnt have a clue as to what she wants
from life, etc, etc. But anyways! Thanks
again.