Abortion Debate Forum - Prolife Arson Business As Usual page 3
medical questions | health forums

Prolife Arson Business As Usual

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Prolife Arson Business As Usual
Author Message
Kourtney08

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 May 2004
Posts: 937
Location: Alaska

Posted: 01-25-05 14:13pm
Ahh, isn't that nice?

:roll:
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-25-05 14:14pm
gero wrote:
the reason people who are against abortion bomb clinics and/or kill physicians that perform the abortions is because they want an eye for an eye. If you are a baby killer (both the woman and physician) then you should be punished by having your life taken is their m.O.. It's basically a similar concept to those who commit not a nice act and are subject to the death sentence. Now go ahead and harrass me all you want, steen. I can feel it coming on anyway since you have such strong opinions on everything.





in my eyes anyone who trys to kill or maim any dr for the doctors position on abortion is just has bad as the dr
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-25-05 14:15pm
Much nicer than pro death yes i,m glad you agree


please note this is only an opinion
Did you find this post useful?
|
Kourtney08

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 May 2004
Posts: 937
Location: Alaska

Posted: 01-25-05 14:17pm
Pro-death? Is there even such thing? Well, I guess if you're a serial killer you're pro-death.

But me, im pro-choice. No, that doesn't mean pro-abortions. It means although I wouldn't get an abortion (and didn't) I would never wish a woman to die because she had an abortion, nor would I tell her what to do with her body. Thats absolutley out of line, and not my place, and never will be. A womans body is her, thats it. No one else should get to judge her for that.
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-25-05 14:18pm
foreverblue wrote:
gero wrote:
the reason people who are against abortion bomb clinics and/or kill physicians that perform the abortions is because they want an eye for an eye. If you are a baby killer (both the woman and physician) then you should be punished by having your life taken is their m.O.. It's basically a similar concept to those who commit not a nice act and are subject to the death sentence. Now go ahead and harrass me all you want, steen. I can feel it coming on anyway since you have such strong opinions on everything.





in my eyes anyone who trys to kill or maim any dr for the doctors position on abortion is just has bad as the dr



but are,nt doctors supposed to preserve life not take it?


Please note this is fact
Did you find this post useful?
|
Kourtney08

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 May 2004
Posts: 937
Location: Alaska

Posted: 01-25-05 14:20pm
Okay, after all your messages it says "please note this fact"..Im just wondering is that your signature? Because its even said after things that arn't facts. I just think its ran its course. But who am I to judge..
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-25-05 14:23pm
Like what is.Nt fact because if it is,nt fact I put it down as an opinion if there is something marked down as fact and you can prove it is,nt please let me know and I will amend it


please note this is fact
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-25-05 14:28pm
fishx wrote:
no happy to say i,m not pro life because I do belive in an eye for an eye so no not pro life just anti termination


please note this is fact.


is that in the biblical sense
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-25-05 14:31pm
foreverblue wrote:
fishx wrote:
no happy to say i,m not pro life because I do belive in an eye for an eye so no not pro life just anti termination


please note this is fact.


is that in the biblical sense



no the revenge sense you hurt one of mine I hurt one of yours so to say so yes if it was the fathers of these poor innocent babies/fetuses that are harming the clinic staff then in my eyes they are justified

please note this is only an opinion.
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-25-05 14:34pm
fishx wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
fishx wrote:
no happy to say i,m not pro life because I do belive in an eye for an eye so no not pro life just anti termination


please note this is fact.


is that in the biblical sense



no the revenge sense you hurt one of mine I hurt one of yours so to say so yes if it was the fathers of these poor innocent babies/fetuses that are harming the clinic staff then in my eyes they are justified

please note this is only an opinion.




but how many are fathers can you say they all were if not then are they not as bad
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-25-05 14:37pm
foreverblue wrote:
fishx wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
fishx wrote:
no happy to say i,m not pro life because I do belive in an eye for an eye so no not pro life just anti termination


please note this is fact.


is that in the biblical sense



no the revenge sense you hurt one of mine I hurt one of yours so to say so yes if it was the fathers of these poor innocent babies/fetuses that are harming the clinic staff then in my eyes they are justified

please note this is only an opinion.




but how many are fathers can you say they all were if not then are they not as bad



if they are not the fathers then yes they are just as bad a the said doctors.


Please note that this is only an opinion
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-25-05 14:48pm
fishx wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
fishx wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
fishx wrote:
no happy to say i,m not pro life because I do belive in an eye for an eye so no not pro life just anti termination


please note this is fact.


is that in the biblical sense



no the revenge sense you hurt one of mine I hurt one of yours so to say so yes if it was the fathers of these poor innocent babies/fetuses that are harming the clinic staff then in my eyes they are justified

please note this is only an opinion.




but how many are fathers can you say they all were if not then are they not as bad



if they are not the fathers then yes they are just as bad a the said doctors.



Please note that this is only an opinion



that wasnt hard was it<wink>
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-25-05 14:52pm
foreverblue wrote:
fishx wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
fishx wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
fishx wrote:
no happy to say i,m not pro life because I do belive in an eye for an eye so no not pro life just anti termination


please note this is fact.


is that in the biblical sense



no the revenge sense you hurt one of mine I hurt one of yours so to say so yes if it was the fathers of these poor innocent babies/fetuses that are harming the clinic staff then in my eyes they are justified

please note this is only an opinion.




but how many are fathers can you say they all were if not then are they not as bad



if they are not the fathers then yes they are just as bad a the said doctors.




Please note that this is only an opinion



that wasnt hard was it<wink>



you will never know how hard :p
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-25-05 16:59pm
fishx wrote:
no the revenge sense you hurt one of mine I hurt one of yours so to say so yes if it was the fathers of these poor innocent babies/fetuses that are harming the clinic staff then in my eyes they are justified

please note this is only an opinion.
so in your opinion, the prolife terrorists, are they justified or not? None of them were fathers.
But you are, after all saying, as best I can read, that if a woman aborts, then the man is justified in bombing the clinic? That sure is what it reads like, which would make your opinion that domestic terrorism is a valid response to a legal medical procedure.

That sure sounds wacky!
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-25-05 17:02pm
steen wrote:
fishx wrote:
no the revenge sense you hurt one of mine I hurt one of yours so to say so yes if it was the fathers of these poor innocent babies/fetuses that are harming the clinic staff then in my eyes they are justified

please note this is only an opinion.
so in your opinion, the prolife terrorists, are they justified or not? None of them were fathers.

But you are, after all saying, as best I can read, that if a woman aborts, then the man is justified in bombing the clinic? That sure is what it reads like, which would make your opinion that domestic terrorism is a valid response to a legal medical procedure.


That sure sounds wacky!



no in my opinion terrorist be they prro life pro choice are not justified as none of them were the fathers.
But yes I do belive in an eye for an eye but not the whole clinic just the said doctor.



Please note this is only an opinion.
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-25-05 17:23pm
fishx wrote:
steen wrote:
fishx wrote:
no the revenge sense you hurt one of mine I hurt one of yours so to say so yes if it was the fathers of these poor innocent babies/fetuses that are harming the clinic staff then in my eyes they are justified

please note this is only an opinion.
so in your opinion, the prolife terrorists, are they justified or not? None of them were fathers.

But you are, after all saying, as best I can read, that if a woman aborts, then the man is justified in bombing the clinic? That sure is what it reads like, which would make your opinion that domestic terrorism is a valid response to a legal medical procedure.

That sure sounds wacky!
no in my opinion terrorist be they prro life pro choice are not justified as none of them were the fathers.

But yes I do belive in an eye for an eye but not the whole clinic just the said doctor.

Please note this is only an opinion.
so in your opinion, homicide is justified?
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-25-05 17:25pm
If it is because someone has just killed your potential child then yes as I said an eye for an eye.


Please note this is only an opinion.
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-25-05 17:46pm
fishx wrote:
if it is because someone has just killed your potential child then yes as I said an eye for an eye.

Please note this is only an opinion.
yes, we duly note that in your opinion, homicide is a justified response to a legal medical procedure.
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-25-05 17:48pm
Why thank you doctor much apreciated.


This is fact
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-26-05 09:34am
So by this comment can I safley take it that you do,nt agree with an eye for an eye?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
New Topic   Reply



Page 3 of 12
 about us | contact us | press room | policies | internships | scholarships | sitemap | rss | help
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.

The site is not a replacement for professional medical opinion, examination, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of your medical doctor or other qualified health professional before starting any new treatment or making any changes to existing treatment. Do not delay seeking or disregard medical advice based on information written by any author on this site. No health questions and information on eHealth Forum is regulated or evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and therefore the information should not be used to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease without the supervision of a medical doctor. Posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author, and not the administrators, moderators, or editorial staff and hence eHealth Forum and its principals will accept no liabilities or responsibilities for the statements made. Schizophrenia health This page was last updated on June 11, 2008
© 2008 eForums, Inc.