Abortion Debate Forum - Prolife Arson Business As Usual page 4
medical questions | health forums

Prolife Arson Business As Usual

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Prolife Arson Business As Usual
Author Message
Gero

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 44

Posted: 01-26-05 11:50am

kourtney08 wrote:
well then I guess that means they're not pro-life.
does that mean that the people who put murderers to death are cold-blooded murderers themselves? No, they are just giving murderers who, for the most part, take innocent lives their due punishment. In the eyes of people who bomb these clinics, it's a similar concept. If you take the life of a child then your life should be taken too as punishment for doing wrong.
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-26-05 11:54am

gero wrote:
kourtney08 wrote:
well then I guess that means they're not pro-life.
does that mean that the people who put not a nice persons to death are cold-blooded not a nice persons themselves? No, they are just giving not a nice persons who, for the most part, take innocent lives their due punishment. In the eyes of people who bomb these clinics, it's a similar concept. If you take the life of a child then your life should be taken too as punishment for doing wrong.



well said gero my thoughts exactly




please note this is only an opinion.
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-26-05 12:11pm

foreverblue wrote:
gero wrote:
kourtney08 wrote:
well then I guess that means they're not pro-life.
does that mean that the people who put not a nice persons to death are cold-blooded not a nice persons themselves? No, they are just giving not a nice persons who, for the most part, take innocent lives their due punishment. In the eyes of people who bomb these clinics, it's a similar concept. If you take the life of a child then your life should be taken too as punishment for doing wrong.






sorry gero there is one major difference and that is legality,you do have capital punishment for anyone who commits.homicide.There is an old saying two wrongs do not a right make.

So you see its not legally homicide untill the law changes




ahh but were not talking law were talking in the eyes of humanity do you mean that a father cannot take revenge for his child?

Please note this is only an opinion.
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-26-05 12:21pm

fishx wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
gero wrote:
kourtney08 wrote:
well then I guess that means they're not pro-life.
does that mean that the people who put not a nice persons to death are cold-blooded not a nice persons themselves? No, they are just giving not a nice persons who, for the most part, take innocent lives their due punishment. In the eyes of people who bomb these clinics, it's a similar concept. If you take the life of a child then your life should be taken too as punishment for doing wrong.






sorry gero there is one major difference and that is legality,you do have capital punishment for anyone who commits.homicide.There is an old saying two wrongs do not a right make.


So you see its not legally homicide untill the law changes




ahh but were not talking law were talking in the eyes of humanity do you mean that a father cannot take revenge for his child?


Please note this is only an opinion.


humane=characterized by kindness, mercy, or compassion:
how does that sit with you wanting to allow fathers the right to commit homicide if we are talking humanity then no not in the eyes of humanity
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-26-05 12:26pm

foreverblue wrote:
fishx wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
gero wrote:
kourtney08 wrote:
well then I guess that means they're not pro-life.
does that mean that the people who put not a nice persons to death are cold-blooded not a nice persons themselves? No, they are just giving not a nice persons who, for the most part, take innocent lives their due punishment. In the eyes of people who bomb these clinics, it's a similar concept. If you take the life of a child then your life should be taken too as punishment for doing wrong.






sorry gero there is one major difference and that is legality,you do have capital punishment for anyone who commits.homicide.There is an old saying two wrongs do not a right make.





So you see its not legally homicide untill the law changes




ahh but were not talking law were talking in the eyes of humanity do you mean that a father cannot take revenge for his child?





Please note this is only an opinion.


humane=characterized by kindness, mercy, or compassion:
how does that sit with you wanting to allow fathers the right to commit homicide if we are talking humanity then no not in the eyes of humanity





it sits very well with me a father has a right to avenge his potential

child I belive that it is very human for a father to wish revenge the doctors kill his potential child he kills the doctors all egual there

please note this is only an opinion.
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-26-05 12:31pm

fishx wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
fishx wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
gero wrote:
kourtney08 wrote:
well then I guess that means they're not pro-life.
does that mean that the people who put not a nice persons to death are cold-blooded not a nice persons themselves? No, they are just giving not a nice persons who, for the most part, take innocent lives their due punishment. In the eyes of people who bomb these clinics, it's a similar concept. If you take the life of a child then your life should be taken too as punishment for doing wrong.






sorry gero there is one major difference and that is legality,you do have capital punishment for anyone who commits.homicide.There is an old saying two wrongs do not a right make.




So you see its not legally homicide untill the law changes




ahh but were not talking law were talking in the eyes of humanity do you mean that a father cannot take revenge for his child?




Please note this is only an opinion.


humane=characterized by kindness, mercy, or compassion:
how does that sit with you wanting to allow fathers the right to commit homicide if we are talking humanity then no not in the eyes of humanity





it sits very well with me a father has a right to avenge his child I belive that it is very human for a father to wish revenge the doctors kill his child he kills the doctors all egual there

please note this is only an opinion.




an eye for an eye vs thou shalt not kill
an eye for an eye was not a commandment,whereas thou shalt not kill was
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-26-05 12:36pm

foreverblue wrote:
fishx wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
fishx wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
gero wrote:
kourtney08 wrote:
well then I guess that means they're not pro-life.
does that mean that the people who put not a nice persons to death are cold-blooded not a nice persons themselves? No, they are just giving not a nice persons who, for the most part, take innocent lives their due punishment. In the eyes of people who bomb these clinics, it's a similar concept. If you take the life of a child then your life should be taken too as punishment for doing wrong.






sorry gero there is one major difference and that is legality,you do have capital punishment for anyone who commits.homicide.There is an old saying two wrongs do not a right make.





So you see its not legally homicide untill the law changes




ahh but were not talking law were talking in the eyes of humanity do you mean that a father cannot take revenge for his child?





Please note this is only an opinion.


humane=characterized by kindness, mercy, or compassion:
how does that sit with you wanting to allow fathers the right to commit homicide if we are talking humanity then no not in the eyes of humanity





it sits very well with me a father has a right to avenge his child I belive that it is very human for a father to wish revenge the doctors kill his child he kills the doctors all egual there

please note this is only an opinion.




an eye for an eye vs thou shalt not kill
an eye for an eye was not a commandment,whereas thou shalt not kill was



means nothing to me i,m a non beliver

please note this is fact
Did you find this post useful?
|
Kourtney08

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 May 2004
Posts: 937
Location: Alaska

Posted: 01-26-05 12:44pm

An eye for an eye, is such a hypocrtical statement. I can't believe people are even still saying it.

"okay, lets kill someone, who killed someone, for what? To prove that killing people is wrong"

i bet someone would look pretty stupid if they said they killed someone, because that person killed someone and it was wrong.

Hypocrites.
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-26-05 12:45pm

kourtney08 wrote:
an eye for an eye, is such a hypocrtical statement. I can't believe people are even still saying it.

"okay, lets kill someone, who killed someone, for what? To prove that killing people is wrong"

i bet someone would look pretty stupid if they said they killed someone, because that person killed someone and it was wrong.

Hypocrites.


you mean if someone killed your child you would shake their hand and say thanks doctor?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Kourtney08

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 May 2004
Posts: 937
Location: Alaska

Posted: 01-26-05 14:17pm

Yeah, thats what'd i'd do. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

if my daughter, happend to get murdered in the very small town in alaska that we live in, i'd be extremely upset. I'd want to kill someone. But, what would be the point? Then i'd go to jail and be just as bad as the person who killed my daughter. Plus it wouldn't bring her back. Pointless acts
Did you find this post useful?
|
FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-26-05 14:25pm

kourtney08 wrote:
yeah, thats what'd i'd do. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

if my daughter, happend to get not a nice acted in the very small town in alaska that we live in, i'd be extremely upset. I'd want to kill someone. But, what would be the point? Then i'd go to jail and be just as bad as the person who killed my daughter. Plus it wouldn't bring her back. Pointless acts



the point would be avenging your daughter of course but still if you think that people should be able to kill a potential son or daughter then the parents should just forget about it thats your perogative but I still say the father should be entitled to revenge for the death of his potential child.



Please note this is only an opinion.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Kourtney08

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 May 2004
Posts: 937
Location: Alaska

Posted: 01-26-05 14:32pm

Thats ridiculous.

I don't think if a guys daughter was murdered, and he went and killed him, that the cops would say "well hey, he was just avenging his daughter! So its okay!" :roll: :roll:

my daughter is my life, and I would be absolutley devistated if something happend to her. But I wouldn't go ruin my life and kill someone. It wouldn't bring her back, and if it doesn't bring her back, im not doing it.
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-26-05 14:56pm

kourtney08 wrote:
thats ridiculous.

I don't think if a guys daughter was not a nice acted, and he went and killed him, that the cops would say "well hey, he was just avenging his daughter! So its okay!" :roll: :roll:

my daughter is my life, and I would be absolutley devistated if something happend to her. But I wouldn't go ruin my life and kill someone. It wouldn't bring her back, and if it doesn't bring her back, im not doing it.




if your child is killed by someone and you killed them within a certain time frame then you will most certantly *get away* with it,in court due to the emotional state that you are in and in the eyes of the public you have done right and it usually only results in a manslaughter charge and not a homicide charge.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Kourtney08

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 May 2004
Posts: 937
Location: Alaska

Posted: 01-26-05 17:27pm

Sorry, but im not an angry person like that. Are you guys going to debate me on that now too?
Did you find this post useful?
|
bd1012

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 1998

Posted: 01-26-05 20:18pm

Quote:
anyone that lays a hand on my family doesn't deserve to live and I would see to it as exactly that.


how prolife of you

Quote:
honestly, I think you would need to be in this situation before you would say you would not kill this person right back

and I think you need to be in the situation of somebody with an unwanted and unplanned pregnancy before you judge them on their choice about abortion and don't tell me you have been there becuase everybody's different and every pregnancy is different and everybody handles pregnancy a different way..Not all the time is it just being a few extra sizes those nine months.. Some have a whole slew of problems from that pregnancy that you would never even dream of.. Not saying all do.. Just trying to show you why assumptions and generalizations don't cut it.. Everyone is different.
Did you find this post useful?
|
BrianBaby

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 1383

Posted: 01-26-05 20:38pm

Jlee~wasn't your pregnancy unplanned???
Did you find this post useful?
|
bd1012

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 1998

Posted: 01-26-05 20:49pm

I know her pregnancy was unplanned, but like I said.. Everyone is different and no matter what..In this case.. You can never know how everyone with an uwp feels because again.. Every pregnancy is different and every body is different.
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-27-05 00:32am

fishx wrote:
steen wrote:
fishx wrote:
if it is because someone has just killed your potential child then yes as I said an eye for an eye.

Please note this is only an opinion.
yes, we duly note that in your opinion, homicide is a justified response to a legal medical procedure.
so by this comment can I safley take it that you do,nt agree with an eye for an eye?
yes, you can safely assume that murdering somebody because they underwent a legal medical procedure is not valid. You can call that "an eye for an eye" or not, but I disagree with the very idea. You do not, which is your right.
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-27-05 00:34am

fishx wrote:
it sits very well with me a father has a right to avenge his potential
yes, we already know that you support homicide, and that obviously you see the man as having more right than the woman. Nice display of misogyny there.
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-27-05 00:36am

fishx wrote:
but I still say the father should be entitled to revenge for the death of his potential child.
yes, we do understand that your opinion is that homicide is an acceptable response to a legal medical procedure. In that, you don't seem to be very different than the "army of god" domestic terrorists.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
New Topic   Reply



Page 4 of 12
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.