Abortion Debate Forum - Physical Health Risks of Termination page 7
medical questions | health forums

Physical Health Risks of Termination

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Physical Health Risks of Termination
Author Message
msrosie

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 369
Location: Ontario, Canada
Thanks: 12
Thanked:2

Posted: 01-27-05 17:32pm

foreverblue wrote:

sorry but as prochoicers like to say that site is biased,end of story.

what site? The charts are statistics from statistics canada and acog. I only put the charts on my persoanal site (which has nothing to do with abortion) to show to you.



Quote:
i believe that any surgery that is not medically required should not be performed,this includes those to posh to push c sections that all the rich and famouse have.

abortion *is* medically required for a woman who does not want to continue her pregnancy. But, do you think bariatric surgery should be banned? Breast implants? Tummy tucks? Facelifts? Circumcision? Etc. Etc.

Rosie
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-27-05 17:40pm

[quote="msrosie]
Quote:
i believe that any surgery that is not medically required should not be performed,this includes those to posh to push c sections that all the rich and famouse have.

abortion *is* medically required for a woman who does not want to continue her pregnancy. But, do you think bariatric surgery should be banned? Breast implants? Tummy tucks? Facelifts? Circumcision? Etc. Etc.


Rosie[/quote]

as a matter of fact ms rosie I think breast implants for anything other than after a masectemy,are unnecessary,facelifts are mainly done for vanity so no it isnt medically required,and as I have said before im not a doctor therefore I cannot say what is medically required or what isnt,all I do is post my opinnion
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-27-05 18:18pm

foreverblue wrote:
you backpedal any quicker steen and you are going to fall over still no apology for calling me a liar when I wasnt lying
ah, but you were. You claimed that medline's information was based on m-w, not stedman's medical dictionary.

Or are you now saying that you were rather grossly mistaken instead? I guess that could be a way out of this for you.
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-27-05 18:23pm

foreverblue wrote:
as a matter of fact ms rosie I think breast implants for anything other than after a masectemy,are unnecessary,
ah, so you are enough of an expert in that woman's life that you without talking with her and exploring the reasons for her seeking the surgery, are able to determine whether it is necessary or not? Amazing ability. The field of medicine can use somebody like you, who can make accurate medical decisions based on only their own personal opinions. Amazing. And here your talents are wasted on a bulletin board. How sad.
Quote:
facelifts are mainly done for vanity so no it isnt medically required,
really? For "vanity"? And your research that proves this is found where exactly?
Quote:
and as I have said before im not a doctor therefore I cannot say what is medically required or what isnt,all I do is post my opinnion
ah, so you are trying to pretend that your personal opinion somehow is a good medical diagnostic tool? Ok, I got it loud and clear now.
Did you find this post useful?
|
sandyallen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 4580
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 01-27-05 21:26pm

Foreverblue.
You think steen is the only Dr., that cannot spell well, you must be out of your tree, lol, and may I ask, how many dr's. Have you worked for, why do you think most of their work is done by dictation.

You pro-lifers here are so unreal, you feel that they should stop alot of these abortions, when education is cutting back, parents cannnot even punish there children when they do wrong, kids tell there parents what to do, their are not a lot of jobs out there, you cannot stop a 12-25y/o female from having sex no matter how much you talk to them and how much education you give them as they will feel that pregnancy will not happen to them. You want more families in the welfare system when it is a strain now. You want more children and baby's that are unfed, unloved, abused, neglected, filthy, more shootings, more crack baby's, more kids drowned and killed, how sad you are, take a good look @ reality. You will probably say that they can be adopted, their are a lot of adoptions that do not go thru and alot of foster homes that are pure hell. Yes there are alot of good children and parents but there are toooo many sad cases now. What little selfish people you are, and then you want to take away womens rights and choices, wow.
Sincerely,
sandy
Did you find this post useful?
|
mom2trevor

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 694
Location: VA

Posted: 01-27-05 23:29pm

sandyallen wrote:
foreverblue.

You think steen is the only Dr., that cannot spell well, you must be out of your tree, lol, and may I ask, how many dr's. Have you worked for, why do you think most of their work is done by dictation.


You pro-lifers here are so unreal, you feel that they should stop alot of these abortions, when education is cutting back, parents cannnot even punish there children when they do wrong, kids tell there parents what to do, their are not a lot of jobs out there, you cannot stop a 12-25y/o female from having sex no matter how much you talk to them and how much education you give them as they will feel that pregnancy will not happen to them. You want more families in the welfare system when it is a strain now. You want more children and baby's that are unfed, unloved, abused, neglected, filthy, more shootings, more crack baby's, more kids drowned and killed, how sad you are, take a good look @ reality. You will probably say that they can be adopted, their are a lot of adoptions that do not go thru and alot of foster homes that are pure hell. Yes there are alot of good children and parents but there are toooo many sad cases now. What little selfish people you are, and then you want to take away womens rights and choices, wow.

Sincerely,
sandy




sandy go look at these "crack babies" and "welfare babies" and tell them that they would be better off if they had been aborted! Go tell those "sad cases" they would be better off dead...As that is what you are saying right?
Did you find this post useful?
|
mom2trevor

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 694
Location: VA

Posted: 01-27-05 23:42pm

I've missed you too :)

had lots of computer problems...I keep getting attacked by a virus everytime I try to come here..
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-28-05 02:10am

mom2trevor wrote:
i've missed you too :)

had lots of computer problems...I keep getting attacked by a virus everytime I try to come here..




wicked description of steen that mom lol
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-28-05 02:21am

Go on you cowardly little racist,run away,theres a man on the forum not just women,they are your favorite target arnt they coward.
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-28-05 02:56am

sandyallen wrote:
foreverblue.

You think steen is the only Dr., that cannot spell well, you must be out of your tree, lol, and may I ask, how many dr's. Have you worked for, why do you think most of their work is done by dictation.
Sincerely,
sandy



sandy what the have sex are you on,steen accused me of being illiterate and I pointed out that he cannot spell,so how can he call anyone illiterate.Do you suffer,like the rest of prochoice,from an inability to read a complete post,if you had you would not of made a fool of yourself with your stupid inane comment,or are you agreeing with me that steen is stupid,thank you
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-28-05 03:05am

steen wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
you backpedal any quicker steen and you are going to fall over still no apology for calling me a liar when I wasnt lying
ah, but you were. You claimed that medline's information was based on m-w, not stedman's medical dictionary.
.




i claimed that medline uses m-w as its medical dictionary,so no steen I did not lie,that is your department,and once again you prove you are incapable of reading posts properly,and what a stinking liar you are steen.It wasnt me who tried to claim that merriam webster wasnt a dictionary but a search engine,how pathetic can you get.
Ahh but then again working on your logic and if it isnt merriam websters but stedmans,then that also proves you a liar,as it has a definition for partial birth abortion,you really must do better steen<snicker>.
Even sandyallen thinks your stupid <snicker snort>
you see steen that is the problem with liars you get caught out,and boy you have been caught out
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-28-05 03:15am

steen wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
as a matter of fact ms rosie I think breast implants for anything other than after a masectemy,are unnecessary,
ah, so you are enough of an expert in that woman's life that you without talking with her and exploring the reasons for her seeking the surgery, are able to determine whether it is necessary or not? Amazing ability. The field of medicine can use somebody like you, who can make accurate medical decisions based on only their own personal opinions. Amazing. And here your talents are wasted on a bulletin board. How sad.

Quote:
facelifts are mainly done for vanity so no it isnt medically required,
really? For "vanity"? And your research that proves this is found where exactly?

Quote:
and as I have said before im not a doctor therefore I cannot say what is medically required or what isnt,all I do is post my opinnion
ah, so you are trying to pretend that your personal opinion somehow is a good medical diagnostic tool? Ok, I got it loud and clear now.




so mr racist you attack peoples oppinion now,you really are scraping the bottom of the barrel,but then again the u s medical system must of been extremely desperate to employ such a person as you.Why are you worried about fanatics,are you an abortionist,ohh whats the use you are incapable of telling the truth.
Now as to the gradient of risk in surgery,i was talking about not having surgery.So you are the delusional one steen,but tell me where I was wrong,or are you saying that if a surgeon performs 3 operations in a week,he will choose to perform abortions,rather than save a life by performing heart surgery?.
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-28-05 12:19pm

foreverblue wrote:
so mr racist you attack peoples oppinion now,
no person nitwit, I merely disagree with you. Oh, but to prolife stinking liars, that's seen as an attack no doubt, as you losers are so narcissistic and paranoid that anybody not agreeing with you must be so wrong and so out to get you.

What a incredibly' loser you are.
Quote:
now as to the gradient of risk in surgery,i was talking about not having surgery.
exactly. You tried to set a justification for surgery based on various consequenses. As I said. What a coward you are that you can't even stand by your word.
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-28-05 12:22pm

foreverblue wrote:
i claimed that medline uses m-w as its medical dictionary,so no steen I did not lie,
yes, you did. Medline's medical dictionary, the one it uses for definitions is stedman's medical dictionary. That is uses m-w as its online search engine doesn't mean that it uses m-w for its medical definition, oh you incredibly imbecille person
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-28-05 13:00pm

steen wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
i claimed that medline uses m-w as its medical dictionary,so no steen I did not lie,
yes, you did. Medline's medical dictionary, the one it uses for definitions is stedman's medical dictionary. That is uses m-w as its online search engine doesn't mean that it uses m-w for its medical definition, oh you incredibly imbecille person




hey the comedian is back and telling jokes again,look person go into medline click on dictionary and tell me what it comes up with.I see you have forgotten to quote all of the post again,but what do you expect from such a devious person such as you steen.Well I will remind you cause I know you have memory problems,if medlines dictionary is stedmans and not m-w then it proves you to be a stupid lying person,if you put partial into the medical dictionary it will come up with a definition of partial birth abortion.So you imbecile not only did you not prove me a liar you proved you were,what an fool<snicker>
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-28-05 13:24pm

foreverblue wrote:
steen wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
i claimed that medline uses m-w as its medical dictionary,so no steen I did not lie,
yes, you did. Medline's medical dictionary, the one it uses for definitions is stedman's medical dictionary. That is uses m-w as its online search engine doesn't mean that it uses m-w for its medical definition, oh you incredibly imbecille person
hey the comedian is back and telling jokes again,look person go into medline click on dictionary and tell me what it comes up with.
what comes up is their on-line tool for searching for terms. That has nothing to do with the use of scientific terminology in the information available through medline
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-28-05 13:30pm

steen wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
steen wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
i claimed that medline uses m-w as its medical dictionary,so no steen I did not lie,
yes, you did. Medline's medical dictionary, the one it uses for definitions is stedman's medical dictionary. That is uses m-w as its online search engine doesn't mean that it uses m-w for its medical definition, oh you incredibly imbecille person
hey the comedian is back and telling jokes again,look person go into medline click on dictionary and tell me what it comes up with.
what comes up is their on-line tool for searching for terms. That has nothing to do with the use of scientific terminology in the information available through medline



you total person wriggle all you want you are well and truley caught you are now saying medline are lying,because if you click a link named dictionary then you expect a dictionary not a search engine,so then medline are lying,or so you say.
This isnt very good steen the site you rely on so much is lying<what a person>
Did you find this post useful?
|
sandyallen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 4580
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 01-29-05 02:56am

I deal w/alot of children in the system that feel they are unnwanted and unloved. I do not tell them they should be aborted, they tell me, they wish they were, I help and understand them. You just want to see more children suffer. Learn to read and understand, please.

Foreverblue, I never said that steen was stupid, so quit twisting words, I mispell words and so do you, steen is smarter than most of the pro-lifers here, obviously. There you go again, judging people that are on things, we have already been there, I am on earth and reality, and fact, you are just on a high horse, it seems.

Again, pro-choice means, choice of continuing pregnancy, choice of adoption, choice of abortion and understanding their choices, so please, get a clue.
Sincerely,
sandy
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-29-05 14:13pm

[quote="foreverblue"]you total person wriggle all you want you are well and truley caught you are now saying medline are lying,[quote]no, I am saying that you are deceptive and lying.
Quote:
because if you click a link named dictionary then you expect a dictionary not a search engine,so then medline are lying,or so you say.
nope, rather you are so incredibly dishonest that you are trying to change your claim without acknowledging it. The issue was what medline used for its medical definitions, and that is stedman's. What you are now talking about is what medline uses for its online search of terms. As stedman's doesn't have an online source, they needed something else, that's all. But the foundation for the terms used in medline and its scientific articles, that is medline and most assuredly not m-w. So that's where it stands. You are lying, and you are continuing to lie and changing your claim without acknowledging it. So you are a dishonest coward, no surprise there. Simply not worth my effort anymore. Go jump in a lake. Or better yet, go take an ethics course in the dishonesty of lying when you debate. You could use it.
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-30-05 06:16am

[quote="steen"][quote="foreverblue"]you total person wriggle all you want you are well and truley caught you are now saying medline are lying,
Quote:
no, I am saying that you are deceptive and lying.

Quote:
because if you click a link named dictionary then you expect a dictionary not a search engine,so then medline are lying,or so you say.
nope, rather you are so incredibly dishonest that you are trying to change your claim without acknowledging it. The issue was what medline used for its medical definitions, and that is stedman's. What you are now talking about is what medline uses for its online search of terms. As stedman's doesn't have an online source, they needed something else, that's all. But the foundation for the terms used in medline and its scientific articles, that is medline and most assuredly not m-w. So that's where it stands. You are lying, and you are continuing to lie and changing your claim without acknowledging it. So you are a dishonest coward, no surprise there. Simply not worth my effort anymore. Go jump in a lake. Or better yet, go take an ethics course in the dishonesty of lying when you debate. You could use it.




i thought we were past the insults stage steen since I was honest and apologized.



Here is what I posted,

well clever clogs what dictionary does med line use,yes you got it merriam websters

no mention of what search engine or anything.Merriam websters is a medical dictionary,not a search engine.
Can you understand what I am saying here,you open medlines home page it has a link for a dictionary,not an online search engine.If you click the link it opens to merriam websters,therefore saying that the medical dictionary they use is merriam websters.
As medline is online what the hell did you think I was talking about,i wasnt talking about what they sit down and read to answer questions,but rather what dictionary med line<on line>used
Did you find this post useful?
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next
New Topic   Reply



Page 7 of 17
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.