i think you know he cannot
get past insulting.
It's his nature.
So instead of trying to make peace with a
tyrant, tell it like it is and don't let
him get to you. He's a laughing matter.
:o)
i agree he is,nt even man enough to accept
an apology with good grace.
I don,t know why I bother :roll:
|
Kourtney08
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 May 2004 Posts: 937 Location: Alaska
Posted: 01-30-05 13:49pm
<<
It's his nature. >>>
haahahaahahahahaahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh please.
Im going to die laughing.
Because this is exactly what you do.
Wow...Can I use your words again? (i mean
come on, they have to be said atleast once
a day, you know, so let me do it today)
pot...........Kettle...............Black!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Blacker then my
boyfriend!
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-30-05 14:47pm
foreverblue
wrote:
no mention of what search
engine or anything.Merriam websters is a
medical dictionary,not a search
engine.
it is the searchengine
for terms used on their site. But the
actual definition of words used in the
science that medline reports is stedman's.
The definitions used to publish the
abstracts available that is stedman's.
The one they would use for their site
would be stedman's if stedman's did have
any kind of online dictionary. It does
not. As such, they are going with m-w.
But medical definitions are not ultimately
found in m-w, they are found in stedman's
medical dictionary.
Quote:
can you
understand what I am saying here,you open
medlines home page it has a link for a
dictionary,not an online search
engine.
it is actually what they
use for searching for terms on their site.
So yes it is a search engine. Actual
medical terminology used on medline is
derived from stedman's, not m-w.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-30-05 14:48pm
fishx
wrote:
i agree he is,nt even man
enough to accept an apology with good
grace.
I don,t know why I bother
:roll:
really? Where did you
appologize for your dishonesty and lies
about methotrexate? If you offered an
apology for that pack of lies, then I
missed it.
|
FISHX
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004 Posts: 920 Location: UK
Posted: 01-30-05 15:10pm
I stand by my post on methotrexate I was
reffering to my apology on another forum
where you still did,nt ven have the grace
to accept the apology. How mature is
that?
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-30-05 15:12pm
fishx
wrote:
i stand by my post on
methotrexate
i have specifically
proven that your claims about mtx are not
true, yet you stand by them? In that
case you are outright lying.
Quote:
i was reffering
to my apology on another forum where you
still did,nt ven have the grace to accept
the apology. How mature is
that?
if you are referring to
the abortion support forum, yes I did
accept your appology and admitted that we
were all at fault for the arguments. Or
was it somewhere else, that I am not aware
off? Please clarify.
|
FISHX
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004 Posts: 920 Location: UK
Posted: 01-30-05 15:21pm
Sorry my mistake was that you accepting it
I thought it was just a comment .
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-30-05 20:43pm
fishx
wrote:
sorry my mistake was that
you accepting it I thought it was just a
comment .
no, I actually found your
post a refreshing change from "the other"
prolifers who is sabotaging the support
forum.
|
Kourtney08
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 May 2004 Posts: 937 Location: Alaska
Posted: 01-30-05 23:56pm
You're one to talk sweety.
|
FISHX
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004 Posts: 920 Location: UK
Posted: 01-31-05 03:16am
steen
wrote:
fishx
wrote:
sorry my mistake was that
you accepting it I thought it was just a
comment .
no, I actually found your
post a refreshing change from "the other"
prolifers who is sabotaging the support
forum.
why thank you steen thats the nicest thing
you,v ever said to me.
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 01-31-05 04:26am
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
no mention of what search
engine or anything.Merriam websters is a
medical dictionary,not a search
engine.
it is the searchengine
for terms used on their site. But the
actual definition of words used in the
science that medline reports is stedman's.
The definitions used to publish the
abstracts available that is stedman's.
The one they would use for their site
would be stedman's if stedman's did have
any kind of online dictionary. It does
not. As such, they are going with m-w.
But medical definitions are not
ultimately found in m-w, they are found in
stedman's medical dictionary.
Quote:
can you
understand what I am saying here,you open
medlines home page it has a link for a
dictionary,not an online search
engine.
it is actually what they
use for searching for terms on their site.
So yes it is a search engine. Actual
medical terminology used on medline is
derived from stedman's, not
m-w.
where does it say on medline that it uses
stedmans because I cannot find it.What I
did find was this
the merriam-webster medical dictionary
allows you to look up definitions and
spellings of medical words.
Look at the home page click on
faqs,general questions,what is medline and
this is what appears.Case closed I think
steen as medline themselves say they use
merriam websters medical dictionary.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-31-05 23:14pm
foreverblue
wrote:
where does it say on
medline that it uses stedmans because I
cannot find it.What I did find was this
the merriam-webster medical dictionary
allows you to look up definitions and
spellings of medical
words.
yes, it is their online
search tool for such, as stedman's doesn't
have an online function.
Quote:
look at the home
page click on faqs,general questions,what
is medline and this is what appears.Case
closed I think steen as medline themselves
say they use merriam websters medical
dictionary.
no, medical terms are not
defined through the m-w dictionary.
|
Gero
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Dec 2004 Posts: 44
Posted: 02-01-05 11:07am
bd1012
wrote:
a woman can do whatever the
fuck she wants with her body
without any permission from you all, her
husband, the president, or whatevery deity
may or may not be out there.. I don't
care what her reasons are.. It's her
body and the fact that she didn't want to
be pregnant is good enough for me.
Selfish selfish selfish.. So fucking
what? It's selfish to ttc when there
are kids out there already waiting to be
adopted..And the only reason that is is
because of ideals like yours so you like
adoption so much.. Put your money where
your mouth is.. I think everyone who
wants abortion illegal should be
sterilized and have no other choice to
adopt if they want a
kid.
if the board
administrator wasn't such a liberal,
left-wing numbskull, he/she would get
his/her head out of the sand and ban
people like bd for using such profanity.
P.S.--if a woman doesn't want to be
pregnant, then she should start taking the
responsibility to use contraception
instead of being lazy and using abortion
as her means of birth control. You people
are always harping about women having
control over their own bodies, but they
don't seem to exercise their control when
it comes to using contraception to prevent
unwanted pregnancies.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 02-01-05 12:08pm
gero
wrote:
p.S.--if a woman doesn't
want to be pregnant, then she should start
taking the responsibility to use
contraception instead of being lazy and
using abortion as her means of birth
control. You people are always harping
about women having control over their own
bodies, but they don't seem to exercise
their control when it comes to using
contraception to prevent unwanted
pregnancies.
as 58% of women who abort
were using contraception, you are clearly
speaking out your as.
|
bd1012
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 31 May 2004 Posts: 1998
Posted: 02-01-05 12:10pm
Gero.. Not everyone who has a upp wasn't
using contraception.. I am on depo and
have sex maybe two, three times a month..
Is that responsible enough for you?
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 02-01-05 13:14pm
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
where does it say on
medline that it uses stedmans because I
cannot find it.What I did find was this
the merriam-webster medical dictionary
allows you to look up definitions and
spellings of medical
words.
yes, it is their online
search tool for such, as stedman's doesn't
have an online function.
Quote:
look at the home
page click on faqs,general questions,what
is medline and this is what appears.Case
closed I think steen as medline themselves
say they use merriam websters medical
dictionary.
no, medical terms are not
defined through the m-w
dictionary.
I emailed medline to ask them what
dictionary they used here is the
email[minus my name and email address]
thank you for your comments on
medlineplus. Your feedback helps us
improve our
products and services.
The dictionary used on medlineplus
consumer health site is merriam
webster.
J.Cunningham
nih contractor
national library of medicine
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 02-01-05 14:16pm
And if you ask them what dictionary is
used for the definition of the medical
terms used on medline? (or did you
forget that this was the original issue?)
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 02-01-05 14:51pm
steen
wrote:
and if you ask them what
dictionary is used for the definition of
the medical terms used on medline? (or
did you forget that this was the original
issue?)
i have sent them an email asking what
dictionary they use for medical
definitions on medline,when it arrives I
will show you what they say,one way or
another ok
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 02-01-05 16:42pm
steen
wrote:
and if you ask them what
dictionary is used for the definition of
the medical terms used on medline? (or
did you forget that this was the original
issue?)
heres my reply steen im surprised it was
so quick but here it is
this is in response to your request for
information from the national library of
medicine (nlm).
The dictionary and all of the definitions
listed on medlineplus are from merriam
webster.
J.Cunningham
nih contractor
national library of medicine
minus my name again
|
Kourtney08
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 May 2004 Posts: 937 Location: Alaska
Posted: 02-01-05 17:17pm
Quote:
p.S.--if a woman
doesn't want to be pregnant, then she
should start taking the responsibility to
use contraception instead of being lazy
and using abortion as her means of birth
control. You people are always harping
about women having control over their own
bodies, but they don't seem to exercise
their control when it comes to using
contraception to prevent unwanted
pregnancies.
so what about the woman that did us bc?
Do you think its okay for them to get one
since they weren't lazy and were taking
precautions? Probably not. But see, bc
fails, everyday, and everyday those woman
are faced with an unplanned, unwanted
pregnancy, and if they were doing
everything they could to prevent it, then
they shouldn't have to go through a
pregnancy they didn't want, didn't plan,
and was doing everything to prevent.
Whether or not a woman uses birth control
or not, she still has control over *her*
body. Its not like "oh well woman who
don't use birth control don't get to
decide what happens to their bodies."
thats ridiculous.
