Capable of life or normal growth and
development; "viable seeds"; "a viable
fetus"
okay so wouldn't that make them all
viable? Because they are all capable of
normal growth and development....
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-28-05 01:38am
"viability" in pregnancy is when 50% of
the neonates are expected to live for at
least one year.
Sorry, but this term does have an actual
definition and specific meaning. Yes, I
know that you prolifers don't like the
specifics when it interferes with your
pipedreams, delusions and wishful
thinking, but there it is, none the less.
|
FISHX
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004 Posts: 920 Location: UK
Posted: 01-28-05 02:00am
steen
wrote:
"viability" in pregnancy is
when 50% of the neonates are expected to
live for at least one year.
Sorry, but this term does have an actual
definition and specific meaning. Yes, I
know that you prolifers don't like the
specifics when it interferes with your
pipedreams, delusions and wishful
thinking, but there it is, none the
less.
now that is a down right lie viability
occurs when the child is expected to
survive birth not when a child is capable
of living for a year you person,
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-28-05 12:26pm
Well, yes I was wrong. Viability is when
50% of births live for 24 hours. Infant
mortality is the rates are what is based
on one-year mortality numbers. My
mistake.
|
lil_blaze2004
Supporter
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 6492 Location: ,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 01-28-05 13:01pm
steen
wrote:
well, yes I was wrong.
Viability is when 50% of births live for
24 hours. Infant mortality is the rates
are what is based on one-year mortality
numbers. My
mistake.
woohoo!!! Good for u admitting you were
wrong!!!!!!!!!!!
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 01-28-05 13:02pm
steen
wrote:
well, yes I was wrong.
Viability is when 50% of births live for
24 hours. Infant mortality is the rates
are what is based on one-year mortality
numbers. My
mistake.
have sex off person how come it is a
mistake when you do it but lies whenever a
prolifer does it,showing your hypocrisy
there mr racist<sheesh freaking fool
believes himself as well,delusional to the
end hey steen>
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-28-05 13:27pm
foreverblue
wrote:
steen
wrote:
well, yes I was wrong.
Viability is when 50% of births live for
24 hours. Infant mortality is the
rates are what is based on one-year
mortality numbers. My
mistake.
have sex off person how come it is a
mistake when you do it but lies whenever a
prolifer does it,showing your hypocrisy
there mr racist<sheesh freaking fool
believes himself as well,delusional to the
end hey
steen>
stupid nitwit person.
The difference between a mistake and a lie
is that when the liar is confronted with
the mistake, they don't correct it, they
just insist that they are right regardless
of the evidence and persist in telling the
same stupid lie that shows how
untrustworthy they are, just like when you
falsely claim that I support homicide.
That is the difference between us, that I
admit my mistakes, you merely continue
your lies, cowardly refusing to owe up to
your lies.
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 01-28-05 13:32pm
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
steen
wrote:
well, yes I was wrong.
Viability is when 50% of births live for
24 hours. Infant mortality is the
rates are what is based on one-year
mortality numbers. My
mistake.
have sex off person how come it is a
mistake when you do it but lies whenever a
prolifer does it,showing your hypocrisy
there mr racist<sheesh freaking fool
believes himself as well,delusional to the
end hey
steen>
stupid nitwit person.
The difference between a mistake and a lie
is that when the liar is confronted with
the mistake, they don't correct it, they
just insist that they are right regardless
of the evidence and persist in telling the
same stupid lie that shows how
untrustworthy they are, just like when you
falsely claim that I support homicide.
That is the difference between us, that I
admit my mistakes, you merely continue
your lies, cowardly refusing to owe up to
your lies.
another lie steen you fool because I have
never accused you of supporting
homicide,this is too easy
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-28-05 13:51pm
foreverblue
wrote:
another lie steen you fool
because I have never accused you of
supporting not a nice act,this is too
easy
oops, yes. That was
brianbay, I get the two of you mixed up.
My appologies.
|
lil_blaze2004
Supporter
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 6492 Location: ,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 01-28-05 13:53pm
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
another lie steen you fool
because I have never accused you of
supporting not a nice act,this is too
easy
oops, yes. That was
brianbay, I get the two of you mixed up.
My
appologies.
two mistakes in one post steen.....
What's this forum coming to??????? Lol
|
Kourtney08
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 May 2004 Posts: 937 Location: Alaska
Posted: 01-28-05 13:59pm
You guys are all so immature about this
subject.
I don't understand why you can't debate
without calling people names, and telling
them to medical question off. Obviously
you guys arn't grown enough to be
discussing something like this.
|
lil_blaze2004
Supporter
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 6492 Location: ,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 01-28-05 14:06pm
Okay this is what I found when I looked in
the dictionary
1.Capable of living, developing, or
germinating under favorable conditions.
2.Capable of living outside the uterus.
Used of a fetus or newborn.
I don;t see anything about 50 %
also this
is the law in kentucky...
"a viable fetus is a person under the
state's homicide law, so killing a viable
fetus can result in homicide or
manslaughter charges, the kentucky supreme
court ruled yesterday.
In doing so, the court overturned its own
1983 decision requiring a live birth
before homicide charges may be brought.
Modern technology now makes it possible to
determine whether fetuses could have
survived outside the womb, the court
ruled."
this is on various news sites....
Also..Wasn't scott peterson charge with
killing his wife and unborn son??????
|
Kourtney08
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 May 2004 Posts: 937 Location: Alaska
Posted: 01-28-05 19:05pm
Well it seems that everyone who disagrees
with you is a liar sweetie, so no matter
what I am always going to be a "liar" in
your eyes.
This is the internet, I don't sweat over
petty stuff like this. I don't care when
someone thinks im a health forum, or
disagrees with me. It just doesn't
matter. Im never going to meet these
people. Give it a rest honey.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-28-05 20:00pm
lil_blaze2004
wrote:
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
another lie steen you fool
because I have never accused you of
supporting not a nice act,this is too
easy
oops, yes. That was
brianbay, I get the two of you mixed up.
My
appologies.
two mistakes in one post steen.....
What's this forum coming to???????
Lol
well, in one tread,
anyway. Heh, I never claimed that I
don't make mistakes. I just owe up to
them :)
if I never made mistakes, I could have
started medical school many years before I
did and be an independently wealthy
neurosurgeon :)
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-28-05 20:18pm
lil_blaze2004
wrote:
okay this is what I found
when I looked in the dictionary
1.Capable of living, developing, or
germinating under favorable conditions.
2.Capable of living outside the uterus.
Used of a fetus or newborn.
I don;t see anything about 50
%
that is why you are not
looking in the medical dictionaries. I
would suggest that you ask your doctor
during next visit. He/she should know
the definition used in medicine.
Quote:
also this is the
law in
kentucky...
yeah, well. The
legislatures politicing of scientific
terminology is not exactly helpful. In
some states, "fetus" has politically been
defined as "an offspring." as we are all
offsprings from somebody, by those
definitions, we are all fetuses and remain
so until we die. Yes, "legal"
definitions made for the specific purpose
of abortion politics is really not that
helpful for anything but political
rhetorics, just as 'senate hearings" are
not scientific and accurate either.
Quote:
"a viable fetus
is a person under the state's homicide
law, so killing a viable fetus can result
in not a nice act or manslaughter charges,
the kentucky supreme court ruled
yesterday.
and that directly
contradicts the roe vs wade decision, so
it will be struck down eventually, just
like the "pba" laws will be struck down
because they are not designed for their
name but rather to be vague enough to
prosecute all abortions. As long as
these antiabortion laws are designed for
deception, they will keep on being struck
down.
Quote:
also..Wasn't
scott peterson charge with killing his
wife and unborn
son??????
yes, and that still
hasn't been before the us supreme court.
When it does, that will be struck down,
the case will go back to trial when
people's memory is not as fresh about it
anymore, and he will be let off because
there really only was circumstantial
evidence. So thanks to a law designed to
take a shot at abortion, scott peterson
will go free eventually. That's what
deceptive and roundabout politics gets you
