|
Canonada
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 May 2005 Posts: 6 Location: New York, New York
|
Not a New Way of Looking At It
Posted: 05-13-05 00:18am
|
|
|
|
I just have to state my opinion here - pro
life. Yeah.
Anyway, here's my brilliant movie quote:
minority report:
'why'd you catch that?'
'because it was going to fall.'
'but it didn't. You caught it.'
the fact that you aborted the child
doesn't change the fact that it would have
been a child.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
mom2trevor
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Dec 2004 Posts: 694 Location: VA
|
Posted: 05-13-05 09:06am
|
|
|
|
|
Hello and welcome.
I'm also pro-life and I like your point!!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Kia
Supporter
Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 6594 Location: Planet Tampaxia,
|
Posted: 05-13-05 10:38am
|
|
|
|
|
Hey pro-choice - and why should a violated
woman be forced to carry the spawn of a
monster?
I disagree with abortion as birth control
- end of!
Besides to use your analogy -
"why did you take a birth control pill/use
a condom?"
"to prevent pregnancy"
"yeah but you didn't get pregnant, you
stopped it"
just because you caught those sperm in a
condom/prevented their encounter with the
egg doesn't mean they wouldn't have
conceived.....
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
|
Re: Not a New Way of Looking At It
Posted: 05-14-05 10:54am
|
|
|
|
|
| pcforme
wrote: | | canonada
wrote: | | the fact that you aborted
the child doesn't change the fact that it
would have been a
child. |
really? You can prove this? You can
prove that every aborted zef would have
been carried to term? I would love to
see your proof.
And since I am going to be a senior
citizen one day, I guess I should start
demanding my senior discount now. That
would follow your
logic. |
.
Your proof look in the mirror,you were a
zef once,what else could it grow into
except a child.I don't believe the poster
said they would all live just that it
would be a child.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
|
Re: Not a New Way of Looking At It
Posted: 05-14-05 11:36am
|
|
|
|
|
[quote="pcforme] | foreverblue
wrote: | | i don't believe the poster
said they would all live just that it
would be a
child. |
if it doesn't live, it wouldn't be a
child. So prove every zef will become a
child.[/quote].
So what would it be a puppy of course it
would be a child,it is genetically
programed to become a human child,if it
dies it does'nt become another species all
it becomes is a dead child.Can you prove
that a zef will grow into anything but a
child?.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
|
Re: Not a New Way of Looking At It
Posted: 05-14-05 13:22pm
|
|
|
|
|
| pcforme
wrote: | | foreverblue
wrote: | [quote="pcforme]| foreverblue
wrote: | | i don't believe the poster
said they would all live just that it
would be a
child. |
if it doesn't live, it wouldn't be a
child. So prove every zef will become
a child. |
.
So what would it be a puppy of course it
would be a child,it is genetically
programed to become a human child,if it
dies it does'nt become another species all
it becomes is a dead child.Can you prove
that a zef will grow into anything but a
child?. |
.
Yes. I can. A spontaneous abortion
will not result in a child. An etopic
pregnancy will not result in a child. A
still born will not result in a child.
A blighted ovum will not result in a
child. When are you going to prove that
all terminated pregnancies would have
resulted in a full term baby with no
problems??? Or is the question to hard
for you?[/quote].
So you are telling me that my stillborn
son was not a child,i think he was even if
he was dead,and can you stick to one
question at a time or do you think that
changing the question each time will make
your argument more valid.I cannot prove
the impossible nobody can say that any
child will be born without problems,but if
it is not a child albeit a dead child what
is it, can you prove that every
terminated child would of had problems,or
the woman would of had problems,or is that
question too hard for you?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
|
Re: Not a New Way of Looking At It
Posted: 05-14-05 14:38pm
|
|
|
|
|
| canonada
wrote: | | i just have to state my
opinion here - pro life.
Yeah. |
and you are welcome to
it. :d
| Quote: |
tr> | the fact that you
aborted the
child... |
there is no "child" until
birth, your prolife revisionist
linguistics none withstanding.
| Quote: |
tr> | ..Doesn't change
the fact that it would have been a
child. |
so it **is** a child,
but it **would have been** a child? I
think your vocabulary is a bit confused.
That aside, me not having sex with my
neighbor yesterday also stopped what would
otherwise have been a child. And that
neighborkid going on bcp also prevented
what "would have been a child." and so
on.
So that "fact" seems rather pointless!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
|
Posted: 05-14-05 14:48pm
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, that was priceless. And viewing the
guest book. Absolutely hillarious. I
love it, the irony and all.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
|
Re: Not a New Way of Looking At It
Posted: 05-14-05 15:01pm
|
|
|
|
|
| pcforme
wrote: | | steen
wrote: | | that aside, me not having
sex with my neighbor yesterday also
stopped what would otherwise have been a
child. And that neighborkid going on
bcp also prevented what "would have been a
child." and so
on. |
hey steen... Ever see this?
save the
babies! |
.
Xwoman changing user names will not last
for long.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
leolady
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 5 Location: Western Australia
|
Posted: 05-14-05 18:20pm
|
|
|
|
|
I think that website may be a little too
extreme, to the point of being ridiculous.
They can't be serious, surely
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
2ferano
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Dec 2003 Posts: 3717
|
Posted: 05-15-05 12:11pm
|
|
|
|
|
Omg! The sad thing is that there are
people in the world who believe that crap!
Lol. You can't help but laugh though.
Notice, there was no mention of every time
a man masturbates he is killing
preconceived children (or was it
mentioned? I didn't read the whole
thing.) that's right! It is all the
woman's fault!Lmao.
There are male groups out there who also
"believe" that rape is a feminist
invention. Nice.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
FISHX
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004 Posts: 920 Location: UK
|
Posted: 05-15-05 12:59pm
|
|
|
|
|
Oh dear it looks like I will have to go
get my ovaries removed to stop my self
from killing all them little babies.
:roll:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
2ferano
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Dec 2003 Posts: 3717
|
Posted: 05-18-05 09:23am
|
|
|
|
|
Oh no you can't! Cause that would be
killing all of those babies too! J/k.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
FISHX
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004 Posts: 920 Location: UK
|
Posted: 05-18-05 09:35am
|
|
|
|
|
Damn I didn't think of that lol
|
|
|
|
|