Abortion Debate Forum - Reaction Mixed On Bill Barring ‘morning-after Pill’
medical questions | health forums log in    

Reaction Mixed On Bill Barring ‘morning-after Pill’

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Reaction Mixed On Bill Barring ‘morning-after Pill’
Author Message
trina1

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 528
Location: , Lost in Oz.
Reaction Mixed On Bill Barring ‘morning-after Pill’
Posted: 06-16-05 18:14pm

By cynthia hodnett
chodnett@greenbaypressgazette.Com

a bill scheduled to be debated today by the state assembly that would ban the university of wisconsin system from advertising and prescribing emergency contraceptives or “morning-after pills” is drawing mixed reaction.

Introduced in march by rep. Daniel lemahieu, r-oostburg, the bill prevents health-care providers at student health centers and campuses from advertising, prescribing or dispensing emergency contraception.

Lemahieu said he was outraged at ads taken out in a campus newspaper by the university health services, the clinic for students at uw-madison. The ads, published around spring break, informed students where to call for a prescription for the morning-after pill.

“the morning-after pill is a strong hormonal pill and describing it as casually as they were doing in the ads, I didn’t think it was in the best interest of the students,” he said. “as taxpayers, we should be worried about the universities’ liability. This isn’t aspirin they are giving out. This is a high hormonal pill that they are giving out that has side effects.”

peggy hamill, state director for pro-life wisconsin, said the uw system shouldn’t be involved with family planning.

“universities are charged with educating, not facilitating the promiscuity and the notion of sexual behavior as a recreational sport,” hamill said.

The assembly family law committee hosted a hearing on the bill in may. To become law, the bill would have to clear both the assembly and state senate and be signed by gov. Jim doyle.

“students as a whole should be opposed to this automatically,” said 22-year-old rachel abhold, a may graduate of uw-green bay. Abhold was a member of the student senate that approved a resolution opposing the bill in april.

“i think he (lemahieu) is missing the reality of what goes on college campuses,” abhold said. “often times students who do come in (uwgb) health services for the morning-after pill come in because they were assaulted. By not making that available, they are making it more difficult for students to come forward when they are assaulted and making it more difficult for them to receive the support they need.”

if taken within 72 hours of intercourse, emergency contraception reduces the chances of conception by preventing ovulation or fertilization.

According to the planned parenthood federation of america, the use of emergency contraceptives could prevent 1.7 million unintended pregnancies and 800,000 abortions each year.

Uwgb offers the contraceptives, but they aren’t administered very often, said karen swan, director of the university’s health services. All services and products provided at health services centers on uw campuses are paid for with student segregated fees, but the buildings are paid for with taxpayer dollars, said rep. Carol owens, r-oshkosh who is also chairwoman of the committee.

Planned parenthood of wisconsin and several other agencies throughout the state also provide the contraceptives.

Tanya atkinson, field manager, public affairs for planned parenthood of wisconsin, said the bill discriminates against women, is a misguided attempt to take away emergency contraceptives from college women and will only lead to more unintended pregnancies and abortions.

“i think this bill, if it’s passed, is going to be a barrier,” atkinson said. “where they will go, that’s the problem. There are some campuses that may not have a reproductive health care center. It also restricts access for young women who may be raped on campus and that is the only alternative they have. The other opportunity that is presented when a young woman who is raped goes to the university health center is that there are professionals there who are available to assist her in this time of crisis.”

lemahieu said making the emergency contraceptives available on campuses gives students a false sense of security.

“the students should go to their doctors,” he said. “in case of rape, they should go to the emergency room and to the authorities. Are they being treated for sexually transmitted diseases? Are they bringing the person who has caused the rape to justice? What we should be promoting on our campuses is the seriousness of rape, not the morning-after pill.


Http://www.Greenbaypressgazette.Com/ news/archive/local_21450310.Shtml
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 06-16-05 18:16pm

Another case of some guy thinking that he knows what is best for women and trying to impose his moral views onto them through legislation. Just another anti-choicer.
|
foreverablue

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 17

Posted: 06-23-05 07:10am

Why did you delete my posts,is it because I was telling the truth you are trying to close this board down so they go to your shyte lying forum,and you have just proved that you are not pro life,freaking scumbag liar.
It makes no difference whether you delete all my posts I will just repost them.Now isn't it funny you also deleted the post where you admited that you were biased.All you have posted to me or fish have been accusations and insults.










Are you really that stupid to think that you can stop me posting on here liar,you are the one who adds nothing to this site just pm people to join your forum and if you think lewis won't notice then you really are stupid.
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
New Topic   Reply



We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.