Abortion Debate Forum - the Morning After Pill Abortion Or Not?
Medical questions     Health forums     Help     log in    

the Morning After Pill Abortion Or Not?

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> the Morning After Pill Abortion Or Not?
Medical Questions

is taking the morning after pill concidered abortion?
abortion
28%
 28%  [ 12 ]
not abortion
71%
 71%  [ 30 ]
Total Votes : 42

Author Message
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-20-05 23:02pm

sunshine424 wrote:
eiri wrote:
sunshine424 wrote:
carifairy wrote:
partial birth abortion does not exist! Any abortion after 24 weeks is a labor and delivery abortion. They induce labor, and give the fetus an injection of digoxin in the heart to stop it from beating. Other aboritons are d&e. Dialtion and extraction. They use forceps and suction, but all of the contents of the uterus stay inside the uterus, it is not "partially born" if you do not believe me check out www.Drtiller.Com it states how a late term abortion is done. The deliver a stillborn baby after the shot of digoxin, and after labor starts.


indeed it sure does!!! It is talked about everywhere.
Http://e n.Wikipedia.Org/wiki/partial%2dbirth%5fabo rtion

...To just name one. There are a trillion different sites regarding it. "partial birth abortion" is not the medical term, dilation and extraction is ( d&x ).





Description:

intact d&x surgery
after preliminary procedures over a period of 2-3 days, to gradually dilate the cervix, and sometimes the administering of hormones to induce the process of labor, the doctor uses an ultrasound and forceps to take hold of the fetus' leg. The fetus is turned to a breech position, if necessary, and the doctor pulls one or both legs out of the birth canal, causing what is commonly known as the 'partial-birth' of the fetus. The doctor subsequently births the rest of the baby, usually without the aid of forceps, leaving only the head still inside the birth canal. With sufficient force, the doctor inserts scissors into the base of the back of the skull. The doctor spreads the scissors to widen the opening, and then inserts a suction catheter. The brain tissue is removed, killing the fetus, and allowing the rest of the fetus to pass easily.

The collapsing of the brain is the major reason cited by pro-choice advocates who say that physical deformities of the fetus' head, such as hydrocephalus, may make the procedure medically necessary for the safety of the mother. The pro-life opponents say that caesarean section or draining the fetus' excess cerebrospinal fluid before birth can permit a safe live birth even in such cases.

Http ://en.Wikipedia.Org/wiki/intact_dilation_a nd_extraction

i just can't get over this. Woman actually do obtain these for non-medical reasons. Not often but even once a year is too much. Anybody that would claim this ok because it's a "woman's right to choose" is just heartless and must not feel anything emotion-wise. Ugh, it sickens me. And in my eyes, this procedure should never be allowed, even in medical instances. There are several other ways to abort when it comes to medical reasons. This is the most unacceptable legal procedure imaginable. :o(


"oh my god! I'm going to hemmoage to death if theis baby stays inside of me, doctor!"

"i'm sorry ma'am, but sunshine424 says that an abortion at this stage in your pregnancy is horrible and barbaric and sinful. So I guess you'll just have to die. Bye!"

what other way to abort is there, at that stage? Cesarian section? That's a full blown operation, and is far more dangerous because of the risks of anathesia.

Also, how can a baby be alive without any cerebral-spinal fluid?


i can do w/o the sarcasm, thank you.

I've already said before that for medical reasons I see exceptions to abortion. I don't like it but I understand it. And for the record, I would much rather have a c-section and risk myself than deliver half the body and stick a knife into the back of it's head to suck out the brain in order to deliver the baby. And this isn't barbaric? You tell me what it is then eiri.


how can a baby survive without any cerebral-spinal fluid? How is sucking that out any less "barbaric"? You would be willing to risk your life more than necessary just to take an unwanted baby out of your body in one piece? That doesn't make any sense.
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-20-05 23:04pm

sunshine424 wrote:
carifairy wrote:
intact dilation and extraction is very rarely used, and it is used if the woman is labor and delivery aborting, but the stress is too much!

Non-intact d&e is widely used, there is no actual reason why inatct d&e needs to be used. I have helped with a d&e procedure, and all of the contens of the uterus are kept inside, and suctioned out. The baby is dismembered with forceps, and then suctioned out.


rarely....So what? It still is used. Tiller performs illegal abortions all the time, and he is being closely watched, and with any luck they will chop his dirty hands off and throw him in prison for at the very least, a very long time. If not, i'm content with him rotting in hell. "the baby is dismembered withforceps and suctioned out." is this supposed to be "better"? Good god up above. Again....With d&x, the baby is delivered halfway and then it's head is severed with scissors to finish the procedure off. Any doctor doing this is a real piece of work.

I have a question for you. How in the world do you get up in the morning and look at yourself in the mirror knowing that you assist in dismembering innocent babies (don't say it's not a baby at this point considering pc argues it is because it is viable)??? You can honestly say this is no big deal? God help you. Something help you....What your doing is terrible.


i do agree that abortions for non-medical reasons at this stage are bad, and should not be done, except in medical cases of mother-endangerment or fetal deformity/disease.
|
Carifairy

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 2610
Location: Charlotte n.c.
Thanks: 12
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-20-05 23:09pm

I believe that as responsible women we should terminate an unwanted pregnancy asap. I do not think that it is the best decision to wait and have an elective abortion at 20 weeks, but some women do not have access to clinics in a short period of time. Some women have to save up the money, some women have to leave an abusive relationship, so I cannot take away their right to abort just because I think it should be done sooner.
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-20-05 23:18pm

Well, I suppose that there should be considerations for things like that, as long as it's provable.
|
sunshine424

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 397
Location: New York

Posted: 11-21-05 12:48pm

eiri wrote:
well, I suppose that there should be considerations for things like that, as long as it's provable.


and yet another "consideration" and another...And another....What is it next? There is always exceptions with pro-choice. At least you have some dignity as pro-choice by admitting a baby is being killed. Unfortunately, you all think it's ok to do that. Boy oh boy.
|
sunshine424

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 397
Location: New York

Posted: 11-21-05 12:50pm

carifairy wrote:
i believe that as responsible women we should terminate an unwanted pregnancy asap. I do not think that it is the best decision to wait and have an elective abortion at 20 weeks, but some women do not have access to clinics in a short period of time. Some women have to save up the money, some women have to leave an abusive relationship, so I cannot take away their right to abort just because I think it should be done sooner.


oh well. They should have thought of that before putting a bun in the oven. These woman are not our responsibilities. If she cannot afford to kill her baby, chances are, she is not paying rent, buying the right foods, etc...You catch what i'm saying right? Maybe she should take the money she does have and buy birth control. I don't know about you, but last I checked, that was cheaper than an abortion.
|
sandyallen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 4580

Posted: 11-21-05 16:51pm

It is the woman's choice to abort, not ours we just assist and alot of ours are medically necessary or court ordered. Like I said I stopped 2 abortions last week after the pg females signed the paper work to have it done, this is why I communicate w/them to make sure this is what they want.
Work in er during the weekend, you can see alot worse, for example the parents get drunk, drugged or start fighting and take it out on the kid, baby or fetus, the pg woman can be bleeding to death, the child or baby half beaten to death, stabbings, shootings, and at times they bring their fighting in the hospital, it is not a pretty picture there either but it has to be done.
Being pro-choice does not mean that we are 100% for abortion it means that we are understanding.
|
sunshine424

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 397
Location: New York

Posted: 11-21-05 23:13pm

Court ordered to have an abortion? What? Please do explain!

It is terrible when parents get drunk and hurt their child or when parents hurt their children period. But abortion is just as bad, if not worse since your actually killing your child.
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-22-05 02:07am

sunshine424 wrote:
carifairy wrote:
i believe that as responsible women we should terminate an unwanted pregnancy asap. I do not think that it is the best decision to wait and have an elective abortion at 20 weeks, but some women do not have access to clinics in a short period of time. Some women have to save up the money, some women have to leave an abusive relationship, so I cannot take away their right to abort just because I think it should be done sooner.


oh well. They should have thought of that before putting a bun in the oven. These woman are not our responsibilities. If she cannot afford to kill her baby, chances are, she is not paying rent, buying the right foods, etc...You catch what i'm saying right? Maybe she should take the money she does have and buy birth control. I don't know about you, but last I checked, that was cheaper than an abortion.


hey, if I needed an abortion I couldn't pay for it right away... That doesn't mean i'm a bad person, it means i'm in college and 500 bucks doesn't just fall of trees. And pregnancy does occur on birth control, though thankfully very rarely if the pills are taken correctly.

I catch what you're saying. You're saying any woman who gets pregnant and wants an abortion is a dirty slob with no self respect, who just pimps herself out to any man who wants to have sex. That's what you're saying. And it's wrong. I take birth control. I attend college, I live in a house with housemates, and I have only ever had sex with one guy, my bf.

The woman may not have any money of her own because her abusive husband takes it all away. She may be a teenager with no income who needs an abortion. You didn't think about that though, did you?

And have I not mentioned that I feel women's money should be spent on birth control, not abortions? Yes, I did. But if she's already pregnant, all the birth control in the world ain't gonna do her no good.

And if these women aren't our responsibilities, then why is the zef inside their uterus any of yours?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-22-05 02:54am

skar wrote:
i feel that if we want to lower the need for termination these women are the concern of all how can we expect them to continue the pregnancy if they see out attitude as oh well they have nothing to do with us?

Think about it if we are willing to help more then the more women may feel able to keep their babies. :wink:


i'd want you to help me pay for my (hypothetical) abortion, or help me find adoption parents. I absolutely do not want nor cannot have a child at this point in my life. It's nice of you to care, but I don't want the baby. Now what?
|
Carifairy

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 2610
Location: Charlotte n.c.
Thanks: 12
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-22-05 11:52am

What about women who do want to give birth, or even stay pregnant. I don't care about all of the support in the world, I want an abortion. I have money, I have an above average income, a great house, but I still do not want to stay pregnant. Abortion is not just due to lack of good support, it is due to women not wanting to stay pregnant. Pregnancy is not some easy, pefect state of being, there are many risks.
|
lil_blaze2004

Supporter
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 6492
Location: ,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-22-05 11:57am

carifairy wrote:
what about women who do want to give birth, or even stay pregnant. I don't care about all of the support in the world, I want an abortion. I have money, I have an above average income, a great house, but I still do not want to stay pregnant. Abortion is not just due to lack of good support, it is due to women not wanting to stay pregnant. Pregnancy is not some easy, pefect state of being, there are many risks.


if you've had 3 abortions and don't want to be pregnant, then why not get "fixed"??
|
Carifairy

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 2610
Location: Charlotte n.c.
Thanks: 12
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-22-05 16:36pm

Exactly becuase they think I don't "really" want to be fixed. I am only 23, and am too young to make that decision. I have found a place many many miles away that could do it, but the travel would be so difficult.
|
paganangel

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 377
Location: VA

Posted: 11-22-05 22:08pm

carifairy wrote:
i believe that as responsible women we should terminate an unwanted pregnancy asap. I do not think that it is the best decision to wait and have an elective abortion at 20 weeks, but some women do not have access to clinics in a short period of time. Some women have to save up the money, some women have to leave an abusive relationship, so I cannot take away their right to abort just because I think it should be done sooner.


responsibility is owning up to your actions and not killing your child because you don't want it. There is nothing responsible about abortion. It's very cowardly actually.
|
Carifairy

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 2610
Location: Charlotte n.c.
Thanks: 12
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-22-05 23:20pm

I would say that it is more "cowardly" to have a baby just because a few people who are against abortion do not want you to. Secondly I admit that I do not want children, I like them, but my life is great just the way it is. I believe it takes a strong woman to know what is right for her.
|
sandyallen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 4580

Posted: 11-22-05 23:55pm

Abortion is being responsible more than you will ever know, maybe you do not see it but others do. Just because you can get pregnant and accidents do happen, it still does not make you a good mother.
Thank goodness for choice!
|
Tazzy D

Advanced Support Team
Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 3718
Location: , va

Posted: 11-23-05 11:02am

So I guess everytime a "women" makes a mistake there is an easy way out of everything "i dont think so".. Ex. You forget to pay a bill do they forgive the debt... Nope they add interest or late penalty fees and etc.. If a "women" forgets to wear a condom should she be allowed to get an abortion.. Yes maybe, but come on 2 and 3 and 4 xxxxxxxxxx... That is just out right irresponsibilityof her.. Like I said before it isnt the mans responsibility to bring the condoms.. It isnt the mans responsibility to go to the doctors and get birth control.. It is the "womens" if the women doesnt want children then the women need to do something to further prevent her body from producing...........
|
Carifairy

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 2610
Location: Charlotte n.c.
Thanks: 12
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-23-05 15:19pm

Umm I think that you should not be so mean towrds women who have had more than 1 abortion. I cannot use hormones.... Paragard iud expelled after 1 week, and mirena expelled and displaced after 1.5 years. I use fertility awareness and the today sponge. I have become pregnant 3 times on birth control, I am okay with this. I have been ovulating since I was 13, when I started my period. I have been sexually active since I was 17, to my soon to be exhusband....We divorced because eventually he began to mistreat me, and I don't put up with abuse. So in the 6 years that I have been sexually active, I have only been pregnant 4 times, 3 abortions. I think thats okay. I am personally happy with that. I took precautions.
|
sandyallen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 4580

Posted: 11-23-05 17:13pm

Good for you cairyfairy, do not put up with no man's abuse whether it be physical or mental, you are tooo darn good and too darn smart for that b/s, I know, I have been there! That is why I have always said , no one is walking in the pregnant woman's shoes and it is not our right to judge her that is why it is her choice if she wants to have 2, 3, or 4 abortions as we do not know the whole story. If someone else does not want to abort, that is there choice, as long as they are happy, I am happy for them.
I get so sick of the saying, will you made your bed, you lay in it, but I figured out when the sheets get dirty, you need to change them.
|
Carifairy

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 2610
Location: Charlotte n.c.
Thanks: 12
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-23-05 17:34pm

That is so true.. I am considering having another try at having a paragard inserted, one more try, and if it expells, then i'll continue fertility awareness. It has been working so well for me though, but I have once had an ooops. The mirena all of a sudden caused severe bleeding patterns, and I found out through ultrasound that it had partially expelled and displaced. I did tolerate the hormones somewhat.... They just caused constant spotting everyday. I liked it though, it's so effective.
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
New Topic   Reply
Medical Questions -> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> the Morning After Pill Abortion Or Not?



Page 5 of 7
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.