paganangel
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 377
Location: VA
|
Judge Rules Planned Parenthood Broke the Law
Posted: 10-18-05 09:17am
|
|
|
|
Http://wcc
o.Com/topstories/local_story_286073957.Htm
l
summary: planned parenthood failed to
follow the parental notification law.
What a shock (sarcasm)....For the whole
story read the link. Don't forget to
decap..
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 535
|
Re: Judge Rules Planned Parenthood Broke the Law
Posted: 10-18-05 10:19am
|
|
|
|
|
| paganangel
wrote: | http://wcco.Com/topstories/l
ocal_story_286073957.Html
summary: planned parenthood failed to
follow the parental notification law.
What a shock (sarcasm)....For the whole
story read the link. Don't forget to
decap.. |
just another example of planned
parenthoods unusual take on what is legal
and what law they have to stick to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 883
Location: Earth
|
Posted: 10-18-05 10:22am
|
|
|
|
|
"we are really committed to making sure
this young woman's rights are protected."
"clearly our definition is that she was a
legal adult,"
first of all she isnt a "young woman" good
use of language she is a "minor"
second you can protect her rights all you
like, the fact of the matter is you
infringed on the rights of the parents to
be notified, the rights of the minor does
not over ride the rights of the parents
and legally she is defined as a minor, so
no matter what your own personal
deffiniton of this child you by giving
this girl an abortion and failing to
notify the parents have.
1. Broke the law
2. Violated the rights of the parents
if I were judge I would grant open
compensation to the parents and imprison
the head of the local and international pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 883
Location: Earth
|
Posted: 10-18-05 12:14pm
|
|
|
|
|
Your correct I am using the legal
deffination since it helps my "cause" -
but you do too, however, I rearly use
"person" any more and when I do I usually
refer to person a human being with full
moral (not legal) status or importance -
however I usually use the term "child"
this should be accpetable to all since a
child is the offspring of a member of the
human species and since the z,e,f is the
offspring of a member of the human
species, it is a child.
The dictionary deffinition of child is all
of these
1. A person between birth and puberty.
2. An unborn infant, zygote, embryo,
fetus
3. A born infant; a baby.
4. One who is childish or immature.
5. A son or daughter; an offspring.
You see a fetus is a child
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 883
Location: Earth
|
Posted: 10-18-05 12:39pm
|
|
|
|
|
So?
It is still a child by deffinition that
includes legally - and more importanty
biologically.
If the law says its not a child (which
they do not) and biology says it is...
Well
a rose by any other name - is still a
rose!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 883
Location: Earth
|
Posted: 10-18-05 17:01pm
|
|
|
|
|
"biologically, it is a fetus."
agreed
child: an unborn infant, zygote, embryo,
fetus
a fetus is a child
biologically it is a child
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 883
Location: Earth
|
Posted: 10-18-05 17:36pm
|
|
|
|
|
Child is a social term... All countries
define childhood differently.
No they dont, child is a social term but
it is also a biological term used to
describe human offspring, child is a
globally accepted deffinition of a
"fetus"
"biological facts don't change."
biological fact of the matter is, from
conception there is a living growing human
being, call that human being a "baby" a
"fetus" (medically correct) or a "child"
(socially and biologically correct) it is
still a human being just like you or me
and all other human beings, the only
differences are
1. Age
2. Growth
3. The current law that has remove their
right to life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 883
Location: Earth
|
Posted: 10-18-05 17:42pm
|
|
|
|
|
True it lives off a food supply eaten and
provided by the mother through the
umbilical cord.
A child lives because it is aided by the
mother, not by "living off" the mother.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 535
|
Posted: 10-19-05 04:24am
|
|
|
|
|
Stop responding to someone who will always
be deleted,it makes the posts look
disjointed and out of context
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 535
|
Posted: 10-19-05 08:37am
|
|
|
|
|
Planned parenthood are just a bunch of
lying cheating pathetic money
grabbers,they have no real intrest in the
woman just how much money they can squeeze
out of her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tazzy D
Advanced Support Team
Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 3717
Location: , va
|
Posted: 10-19-05 09:38am
|
|
|
|
|
| tazzydd
wrote: | | cowboys
wrote: | | they have no real intrest in
the woman just how much money they can
squeeze out of her. |
and yet the same loser that are lying now
will be the first ones to whine when pp
gives services away for free.
@@ |
well then I guess you will be the first
one there...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 10-19-05 19:07pm
|
|
|
|
|
| izzy
wrote: | your correct I am using the
legal deffination since it helps my
"cause" - but you do too, however, I
rearly use "person" any more and when I do
I usually refer to person a human being
with full moral (not legal) status or
importance - however I usually use the
term "child" this should be accpetable to
all since a child is the offspring of a
member of the human species and since the
z,e,f is the offspring of a member of the
human species, it is a child.
The dictionary deffinition of child is all
of these
1. A person between birth and puberty.
2. An unborn infant, zygote, embryo,
fetus
3. A born infant; a baby.
4. One who is childish or immature.
5. A son or daughter; an offspring.
You see a fetus is a
child |
only according to a dictionary. That
sounds retarded but think for a moment...
It means child in the sense that it is
offspring of two people. It does not mean
child in the sense that it is a thinking,
cognicent creature. It lists that
definition seperately!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 10-19-05 19:12pm
|
|
|
|
|
| cowboys
wrote: | | planned parenthood are just
a bunch of lying cheating pathetic money
grabbers,they have no real intrest in the
woman just how much money they can squeeze
out of her. |
i don't pay pp anything, and they still
help me... How odd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 10-20-05 11:00am
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, and I clarified myself. I relates to
the post higher up that mentions "child"
as a social and cultural term. That's
what I was trying to say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 883
Location: Earth
|
Posted: 10-20-05 14:40pm
|
|
|
|
|
"only according to a dictionary. That
sounds retarded but think for a moment...
It means child in the sense that it is
offspring of two people. It does not mean
child in the sense that it is a thinking,
cognicent creature. It lists that
definition seperately! "
but it does mean it is a living growing
member of the homo sapien species - a
living growing human being, a child.
Thinking, cogniecnt creature, what about
someone in a coma kill them too?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 10-24-05 22:42pm
|
|
|
|
|
| izzy
wrote: | "only according to a
dictionary. That sounds retarded but
think for a moment... It means child in
the sense that it is offspring of two
people. It does not mean child in the
sense that it is a thinking, cognicent
creature. It lists that definition
seperately! "
but it does mean it is a living growing
member of the homo sapien species - a
living growing human being, a child.
Thinking, cogniecnt creature, what about
someone in a coma kill them
too? |
yeah, after several months. Did you know
that the longer someone is in a coma, the
less chance they have of ever coming out
of it? After a couple of months, your
chances are near astronomicaly impossible.
I'd want someone to pull the plug on me,
after 6 months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sandyallen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 4580
|
Posted: 10-24-05 23:36pm
|
|
|
|
|
No, you do not kill them, you release them
into a better world, you pull the plug, my
limit would be less than 6 mo. I do not
even want a feeding tube, no sort of life
support, let me go, I have seen enough of
that!!!!!!
Dr. K'vorkian is still innocent in my
eyes!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tazzy D
Advanced Support Team
Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 3717
Location: , va
|
Posted: 10-25-05 07:55am
|
|
|
|
|
I still think that parents have the right
to know what is going on with there
child....
|
|
|
|
|
