but not being a .Mother,
pro-choice would not know that.
pardon me for actually reading what you
wrote.
what I meant are the woman who killed
their child over becoming a .Mother.
Duh.
it didn't seem like you meant what you
think you meant to me either, but I can
see how it's possible we misinterpreted
you when you wrote one thing and meant
another.
Look, women do not need to be giving birth
to every child they become impregnated
with! Humans are not on the endangered
list of species! And also, the woman who
thinks child #3 would be "too much" (like
my mother) normally gets a hysterectomy
(like my mother did) which dooms all of
her remaining eggs basically to "death"
without actually killing them, because now
they will never have the chance to become
people. Isn't that "horrible"?
I'm not saing I don 't like
hysterectomies, that last bit was sarcasm.
Can't you see how hysterectoies and
abprtions do the same thng? They prevent
a life. True, a fertilized egg is one
step closer than an unfertilized one, but
in my book, conception just isn't enough.
