Joined: 07 Jun 2005 Posts: 528 Location: , Lost in Oz.
Sex-ed Begins At Home??? Posted: 05-25-06 15:11pm
This was discussed on another board and I
thought it interesting. Most agree that
education is key to helping prevent
unwanted pregnancy, std's, etc. Actually
though....Shouldn't that education begin
at home? As parents isn't it our
responsibility to talk to our kids about
sex? So many parents just leave that
responsibility to the schools....And then
cry foul when their child comes home
pregnant. Should parents be where kids
get the majority of their sex ed
information? Do you think if parents took
a more active roll in teaching their kids
these things there would be less std's and
abortions? What do you think?
|
Carifairy
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Nov 2005 Posts: 2580 Location: Charlotte n.c.
Thanks: 12
Thanked:0
Posted: 05-25-06 15:49pm
I do think sex ed 'should' start at home.
I had a nurse as a mother, so we had very
detailed sexual education starting at an
early age. I knew about condoms,
birthcontrol, std's, why it is so
important to have a pap smear every year.
The schools more or less just don't give
good info..Some schools do! Some school
systems do give great information to
students, but not all schools do.
Also, some parents are not comfortable
talking about sex with their children,
which is a shame, but I think more
pressure should be on sex education at
home too.
There are plenty of websites that have
great teen health sexual information, and
websites that give honest info about std's
etc..
Would I theoretically want to see a 13
year old having sex? Ummm no. But I
would rather see them having safe sex to
prevent pregnancy and std's, and with safe
sex aboriton rates drop.
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 883 Location: Earth
Posted: 05-25-06 17:17pm
Sex education starts in the home and
remains in the home, why should I have my
kids subjected to perverse sex education
by perverted school teachers and the
likes, the sex ed classes are geared to
sexualise young children make them active
at a younger age, why.... Because those
who are teaching sex ed or compiled the
programmes are all bloody pedo's
|
trina1
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Jun 2005 Posts: 528 Location: , Lost in Oz.
Posted: 05-25-06 17:33pm
izzy
wrote:
sex education starts in the
home and remains in the home, why should I
have my kids subjected to perverse sex
education by perverted school teachers and
the likes, the sex ed classes are geared
to sexualise young children make them
active at a younger age, why.... Because
those who are teaching sex ed or compiled
the programmes are all bloody
pedo's
izzy....I don't agree. I think you are
commendable for teaching sex-ed in your
home and with it your values and morals.
I also...Like you....Believe that is where
children should get the majority of their
sex-ed. However....Many kids don't come
from homes where their parents choose to
teach them or maybe they just don't feel
comfortable doing so. When the parents
shurk that responsibility we have one of
two choices....Sex-ed in the schools....Or
our kids learning from their friends (i.E.
One immature mind teaching another). I
don't believe all those that teach sex-ed
are pedo's....In fact sex-ed is a tough
course to teach....And most teachers are
not thrilled having to be in some
cases.....The first ones to ever approach
the subject with some of these kids. My
opinion....Sex-ed should (in a perfect
world) be first taught at home with the
information that individual parents want
their kids to know. Then when faced with
sex information either at school or from
their friends....The kids have an open
line of communication with their parents
to ask questions. Sex-ed in the schools
should be the secondary information kids
get....Home should be the primary.
|
Carifairy
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Nov 2005 Posts: 2580 Location: Charlotte n.c.
Thanks: 12
Thanked:0
Posted: 05-25-06 17:39pm
Precisely, I do believe home should be
number 1, that and of course maybe the
young woman gynecologist.
By doing birth contro counselling, I am
also kind of teaching sexual education,
and I am in no way a pedo.
Teaching children how to protect
themselves is not pedophilic, it is smart
and common sense.
Women need to know about birth control
pills, condoms, and std's. Young women
also need ot know the importance of their
yearly gyno exam too.
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 883 Location: Earth
Posted: 05-25-06 17:48pm
The sex education should be moved from
"how to put a condom on" to respect for
the opposite sex, teaching about sex in a
loving environment, teaching what love is
would be a good start.
When I was at school we were taught about
the biology of it all using frogs as our
example, from that we knew enough of the
biology to understand that should we have
sex a baby is a possible out come.... A
child does not need to know how to give a
blowjob or stimulate the clitoris or how
to "relations with the same sex"
now if a child knows a baby is possible
from sex and is not allowed contraception,
do you think they are likely to have sex,
they maybe young but they are not stupid,
but if contraception is not only availible
to them but is actually give to them free,
well are we not just promoting the
premiscutiy and sexualisation of
children... I am not saying that all of
the teachers are pedo's but it seems that
those who designed the programmes are.
Parents and teachers and society walks a
fine line, we have to teach children about
sex, it should be done in an apropriate
manor and we should have enough faith and
trust in our children that they although
young are capable of making the correct
choice, giving them contraception only
tempts them to make the incorrect choice
|
Carifairy
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Nov 2005 Posts: 2580 Location: Charlotte n.c.
Thanks: 12
Thanked:0
Posted: 05-25-06 18:53pm
Teens and women are going to have sex, yes
without birth control!
Look at the pregnant teenagers board, how
many of them say "we don't use birth
control, we just take our chances because
I don't want anyone to know"
ummmm you know, I would rather them be on
birth control.And taught how to use
condoms! Yes every 16 year should know
how to put on a condom, I knew when I was
11 years old!!!!!
Yet I wiated until marriage to have sex!!
No showing me how to use a condom did not
make me want to have sex, it made me smart
and informed..
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 883 Location: Earth
Posted: 05-26-06 06:06am
We have to look at how sex is promoted in
society, if the media and other businesses
are continusly bombarding our children
with sex then obviously our children are
going to be encouraged to do it, but the
media and other companies will continue to
use sex as much as they can...Why?
Because its a well known fact in business
that "sex sells"
unless we force our government to put
restraints on how companies can sell a
product, be that a newspaper a tv
programme, magazine or whatever, then our
children will always be at
risk....Contracpetion and perverse sex ed
is not going to elivate the problem only
increase it.
Also we should either make the media
ignore celebrity sex lives or make
examples of the celebrities when they hit
the papers, its not good for our children
to see the media glorifying "elton john"
when he has been having sex with rent boys
in scotland.
|
Cambion
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Posts: 736 Location: Earth
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 05-26-06 09:27am
As far as the original topic, yi'm sort of
on the fence about it. Kids should
definitely be taught about sex, but I know
kids probably get freaked out if their
parents start telling them about it.
Let's face it - kids don't want to hear
about sex from their parents, and this is
why I really wish schools would quit
skimping on sex education. Honestly, my
mom never told me about the "birds and the
bees" and sex education in health class
was basically a repeat of the crap I
learned in biology. We weren't taught how
to put on a condom, where to get emergency
contraception, or how birth control works.
I learned every last thing I know from
the internet, sadly. But I would rather
be as informed as I am than to have found
out the hard way that you can get
pregnant the first time like a lot of dumb
teen girls do.
Quote:
tr>
sex education
starts in the home and remains in the
home, why should I have my kids subjected
to perverse sex education by perverted
school teachers and the likes, the sex ed
classes are geared to sexualise young
children make them active at a younger
age, why.... Because those who are
teaching sex ed or compiled the programmes
are all bloody
pedo's
that's a little judgmental, is it not? To
educate kids about safe and healthy sexual
practices is a lot different from
"sexualizing" them. Kids should be
educated about this stuff by the time they
get into high school, even if it's just a
parent leaving a book about the pros and
cons of teen sex in their kid's room and
hoping they read it.
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 883 Location: Earth
Posted: 05-26-06 10:09am
There is a lot of difference between sex
ed that teaches how to put a vibrator up
your partners anus, how to fist, how to
safely execute s&m ect and teaching
how babies are concieved.
|
Carifairy
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Nov 2005 Posts: 2580 Location: Charlotte n.c.
Thanks: 12
Thanked:0
Posted: 05-26-06 10:32am
Ummm I do not know where you get that
education involves fisting etc....
But sex does not always have to involve
conception and children..Do you not teach
your children that they can get married,
and wait 2-3 years and have babies after
they have had time to enjoy their spouse?
There are birth cotnrol pills..Women are
not solely for baby producing, women have
dreams goals, careers, things they want
before they wants to have kids..Young
couples often want to wait 5 years for
children so that they can buy a house
together etc.. Surely you know that
teaching young women about contraception
is important.
|
nightangel73
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Nov 2005 Posts: 2380 Location: North Carolina
Thanks: 11
Thanked:1
Posted: 05-26-06 20:19pm
More than the education that parents just
need to watch their kids. My mom was one
that whenever I went out asked me who I
was going out with, when I was going to
come back and with whom and so on. My
mom was very bold on telling me very often
to not have sex with guys before married.
I didn't dare to disobey my mother.
Don't want to imagine what would be of me
if she ever found any contraceptives
around. In fact one time my
dermatologist prescribed me bc pills for
the acne. I had to hide them very well
because if my mom saw them the she wasn't
going to believe me I got them for acne.
I was so scared that I only used them for
one month back then lol. As I became
more independant and my parents weren't
near in college and the afterwards
religion played the most important role in
staying out sex.
|
sandyallen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004 Posts: 4580
Posted: 05-26-06 22:24pm
Trina I do agree with you in a lot of ways
but their are some parents that need to be
educated also. Some kids that have been
over to my house and do not even know how
to sit down to a meal and discuss
anything, they say, gosh, we are not used
to this, some parents do not want to be
bothered, some do not know how and it is a
shame. I do believe that sex-ed should
begin at home.
Izzy, sex-ed is not about teaching young
kids to have sex. We do not teach them
how to give blowjobs or rectal sex or any
of that stuff, that was rude and
disgusting they do that on there own,
mainly from others, sometimes the other
places too. We do not tell anyone to go
have sex, we always suggest that they
wait, I teach and I am no pedo.
Cairifairy is very correct too!
|
nightangel73
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Nov 2005 Posts: 2380 Location: North Carolina
Thanks: 11
Thanked:1
Posted: 05-26-06 23:22pm
carifairy
wrote:
ummm I do not know where you
get that education involves fisting
etc....
But sex does not always have to involve
conception and children..Do you not teach
your children that they can get married,
and wait 2-3 years and have babies after
they have had time to enjoy their spouse?
waiting 2-3 years after married is not
only for enjoying the spouse but for
adjusting to being married. We do know
that conception and children doesnt always
happen with sex hence the use of
contraception but if one has sex one has
to be prepared for the what if pregnancy
happens. That was a main question that
me and my bf discussed before ever having
sex. I told him you know i'm going to
use the pill but you know it can fail so
what will happen if it does? He answered
me I am not going to run away, we will
have the baby. Then because I got this
answer I made the choice of going for it
.
|
trina1
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Jun 2005 Posts: 528 Location: , Lost in Oz.
Posted: 05-27-06 00:56am
sandyallen
wrote:
trina I do agree with you in
a lot of ways but their are some parents
that need to be educated also. Some
kids that have been over to my house and
do not even know how to sit down to a meal
and discuss anything, they say, gosh, we
are not used to this, some parents do not
want to be bothered, some do not know how
and it is a shame. I do believe that
sex-ed should begin at home.
Izzy, sex-ed is not about teaching young
kids to have sex. We do not teach them
how to give blowjobs or rectal sex or any
of that stuff, that was rude and
disgusting they do that on there own,
mainly from others, sometimes the other
places too. We do not tell anyone to go
have sex, we always suggest that they
wait, I teach and I am no pedo.
Cairifairy is very correct
too!
sandy....You are right in the fact that
often parents just don't discuss things
with their kids. I think we live in a
world that is so fast paced...That often
parents and kids barely see each
other....Let alone sit down and have a
conversation. Bottom line....No matter
how much we try to sheild our children
from the world....One way or
another....They are going to learn. I
feel it is better to have that open line
of communication, so that at least our
kids know they can come talk to us.
And izzy....As far as sex-ed being taught
in the schools....I have to agree that in
most places....Sex-ed is little more than
a biology class....Where only the very
basics are taught. As most have agreed
here....Bc and birth control methods are
just briefly touched on in the schools, so
common sense tells you that if this is the
case....I doubt they are jumping from
basic biology into kinky sex practices.
Most of that....Like it or not....Our kids
are learning from their friends or sources
outside the school system....Not in a
sex-ed class. Sex-ed is not making these
kids hypersexual....It is just giving them
some basics facts.
I think as parents....If we want our kids
to be smart about sex and safe sex
practices....It is up to us to give them
the information. If we don't want our
kids having sex....Then don't just
say...."don't have sex"....But have a
conversation about pregnancy, aids, and
stds. In the end....It is going to be up
to our kids whether they have sex or
not....As we can't be with them 24/7. But
if they do choose to have sex....At least
they will have the information they need
to make educated choices.
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 535
Posted: 05-27-06 02:52am
I agree sex ed should begin at home but
not stay there, we all have our sexual
hang ups and try as we might those hangups
will be a part of it and they will also
direct how we teach the child about sex.My
children are very clued up about sex, all
aspects my boys have been told you get
someone pregnant then you stand by that
child, whatever becomes of them and the
woman makes no difference they stand by
that child and support it.The girls know
about pregnancy and abortion they also
know that I will support them 110% in
which ever decision they made, I would go
with them and support them through all
appointments wether for keeping the child
or wether to terminate, I would be there
for my girls no matter.They all know about
the different types of contraception
available and also that a condom is the
only contraception to protect against not
just pregnancy but stds as well.Some
people say I do not like/cannot use latex,
well there are other products out there
that you can use, I know in america they
charge for everything but over here in the
uk the charge [ if you have to pay ] is
minimal and it is like saying to a brewery
I cannot drink lager so the price of jack
daniels should be the same as lager.Life
costs if you want to stay safe then you
may have to pay out, does he goverment
subsidise house/personal alarms, does the
goverment run self defence classes free
for all women, no they do not, if you want
to be safe you may have to pay.What if
they cannot afford it I hear you cry [
damn those voices in my head lol ] well
maybe that is where the fight should start
the pro contraception battle and that
could be the first battle both sides can
join forces in fighting, onwards and
upwards I say.
Ps please be civil with your replies I am
feeling a bit fragile this morning, thank
god its saturday.
|
nightangel73
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Nov 2005 Posts: 2380 Location: North Carolina
Thanks: 11
Thanked:1
Posted: 05-27-06 06:14am
cowboys
wrote:
the girls know about
pregnancy and abortion they also know that
I will support them 110% in which ever
decision they made, I would go with them
and support them through all appointments
wether for keeping the child or wether to
terminate, I would be there for my girls
no matter.
let's have this straight here so what you
are saying is that if your girls wants to
have an abortion you will support such
decision? Then you are not pro-life but
pro-choice. If a daugther of mine ever
goes for an abortion that will be against
my will, I will not disowned her of course
or abandon her but no way I would applaud
her. To go with her to an abortion clinic
is evil as doing it. If she does it
would have to be on my back that I don't
know of. I am much surprised to hear ya
cowboys. My mom has me forbidden to have
an abortion, she has been clear on that
topic with me.
|
Carifairy
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Nov 2005 Posts: 2580 Location: Charlotte n.c.
Thanks: 12
Thanked:0
Posted: 05-27-06 11:45am
Your parents can forbid you to eat prok if
they do not believe in eating pork, but
does that mean you cannot have your own
beliefs????
Look, what would you rather have your
daughter do nightangel? All teens pretty
much know you do not need parental cosnent
for an abortion, you get a judicial
bypass. Would you rather them tell you,
and you be informed? Or would you rather
them hide behind your back? Hide behind
your back then later in life say "mom I
wanna be a better parent than you because
you could not be there for me no matter
what"...
|
sandyallen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004 Posts: 4580
Posted: 05-27-06 17:41pm
I agree .Cairyfairy, you can tell a kid
not to do drugs, not to have sex, not to
shoplift and on and on and most kids are a
little rebellious and are going to do what
they want to do, just like you can lead a
horse to water but you cannot make them
drink, they are going to do what they want
and when they want most of the time. You
cannot watch your kids 24/7 about all you
can do is to try and lead them in the
right direction and hope they continue on,
heck, noone is perfect and kids are kids
you just need to be there when they need
you to be there and hope for the best and
keep and open mind and say heck, I might
have done the same thing too, open up a
little. I guess when you have older
children you learn a lot, you are not only
teaching them but they are teaching you as
well, I know this for a fact. We are
always learning.
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 05-27-06 19:08pm
You can tell a child not to do many
things: "don't do drugs" "don't have sex
and/or unprotected sex" "don't drink and
drive" etc...
But what my parents did that worked
wonders is they told me why.
They told me why I shouldn't do drugs,
drink, or have unprotected sex.
"telling" without giving a reason is
useless, because the child has no idea
what the consequences of the action are.
The site is not a replacement for professional medical opinion, examination, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of your medical doctor or other qualified health professional before starting any new treatment or making any changes to existing treatment. Do not delay seeking or disregard medical advice based on information written by any author on this site. No health questions and information on eHealth Forum is regulated or evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and therefore the information should not be used to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease without the supervision of a medical doctor. Posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author, and not the administrators, moderators, or editorial staff and hence eHealth Forum and its principals will accept no liabilities or responsibilities for the statements made.
Schizophreniahealth
This page was last updated on June 11, 2008