there are numerous cases of
girls becoming pregnant without having
sex. One girl in my school a few
years back had that happen to her.
You see, what they do is "dry hump" with
their boyfriends with their undies on and
the little spermies somehow find a way to
travel through mommy and daddy's undies
into the girl's vagina and .B.O.O.M
there's a virgin pregnancy. It sounds
impossible, but it's happened.
I know this isn't saying whether girls can
become pregnant immaculately, but they can
without technically having
sex.
yes technically without havcing sex
but not without sperm
secondly...
My friend .Jarmaine has lots of bruthas
and sistaz.. All his friends are his
bruthas and sistas.. Including me lol
(and we are sooo obviously not related.
(definate pigment difference lol)
allthough I adore him to death..)
and yeah... Even if the bible *was*
referring to blood siblings... Doesnt
mean it couldnt have been referring to
younger ones.
did I .F.R.E.A.K.I.N.G say without
sperm???!!! I'm not stupid.
|
Sandbox Party
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 7276
Posted: 09-30-06 12:24pm
smoothiesryummy
wrote:
rainfire1424
wrote:
smoothiesryummy
wrote:
there are numerous cases of
girls becoming pregnant without having
sex. One girl in my school a few
years back had that happen to her.
You see, what they do is "dry hump" with
their boyfriends with their undies on and
the little spermies somehow find a way to
travel through mommy and daddy's undies
into the girl's vagina and .B.O.O.M
there's a virgin pregnancy. It
sounds impossible, but it's happened.
I know this isn't saying whether girls can
become pregnant immaculately, but they can
without technically having
sex.
yes technically without havcing sex
but not without sperm
secondly...
My friend .Jarmaine has lots of bruthas
and sistaz.. All his friends are his
bruthas and sistas.. Including me lol
(and we are sooo obviously not related.
(definate pigment difference lol)
allthough I adore him to death..)
and yeah... Even if the bible *was*
referring to blood siblings... Doesnt
mean it couldnt have been referring to
younger ones.
did I .F.R.E.A.K.I.N.G say without
sperm???!!! I'm not
stupid.
hun before u get all stupid with me.. I
was making a point to the thread starter,
not you.
|
Ingi
Moderator
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 8723 Location: Grinning like a Cheshire Cat,
Thanks: 156
Thanked:189
Posted: 09-30-06 13:50pm
dani_robin
wrote:
you know, I was under the
impression that this was a mature forum.
I already said this wasn't meant as a
religious question.
i had heard of cases where a woman gave
birth without sex and was wondering if it
was possible.
Btw, I came across an article today and
while it's not quite the same as what I
was asking, there is a chance that a child
can be created without sperm. If the
chromosomes of two eggs are together it
can produce a female child, but that
requires medical
procedures.
this is the 'pregnancy' forum. Not the
hypothetical pregnancy forum.
you know, I was under the
impression that this was a mature forum.
I already said this wasn't meant as a
religious question.
i had heard of cases where a woman gave
birth without sex and was wondering if it
was possible.
Btw, I came across an article today and
while it's not quite the same as what I
was asking, there is a chance that a child
can be created without sperm. If the
chromosomes of two eggs are together it
can produce a female child, but that
requires medical
procedures.
this is the 'pregnancy' forum. Not the
hypothetical pregnancy
forum.
Well there was a girl at my school who
apparently just .L.O.O.K.E.D at a guy and
she got pregnant
although it might have been all that
unprotected sex they had afterwards that
actually did it..
Wow i'm in a weird mood tonight
|
arcadia
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 May 2006 Posts: 4470 Location: Illinois,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 09-30-06 14:52pm
foxy
wrote:
arcadia
wrote:
i think it's kind of funny
how .Jesus claimed to be the saviour
&the son of .God (.I'm not saying he
wasn't).. But if anyone today said they
were the messiah, they'd be sent straight
to the looney bin.
well it was the same thing back
then.....Except he wasn't sent to the
looney bin, he was sent to his
death.
.Yes. But he had followers. He had
believers. He went on doing his messiah
thing for a lonnnnnng time before he was
killed on the cross. My point is only
that if someone claimed to be the messiah
today, nobody would give him a fighting
chance. Right into a straight jacket he'd
go. Times are veeeery different, now.
i think it's kind of funny
how .Jesus claimed to be the saviour
&the son of .God (.I'm not saying he
wasn't).. But if anyone today said
they were the messiah, they'd be sent
straight to the looney bin.
well it was the same thing back
then.....Except he wasn't sent to the
looney bin, he was sent to his
death.
.Yes. But he had followers. He had
believers. He went on doing his messiah
thing for a lonnnnnng time before he was
killed on the cross. My point is only
that if someone claimed to be the messiah
today, nobody would give him a fighting
chance. Right into a straight jacket
he'd go. Times are veeeery different,
now.
according to the bible, jesus performed
many miracles in public. I am assuming
this is one of the key reasons he had
followers. He didnt just 'claim" to be
the messiah, he had things to back it up
with.
|
arcadia
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 May 2006 Posts: 4470 Location: Illinois,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 09-30-06 15:34pm
nataliachick7
wrote:
arcadia
wrote:
foxy
wrote:
arcadia
wrote:
i think it's kind of funny
how .Jesus claimed to be the saviour
&the son of .God (.I'm not saying he
wasn't).. But if anyone today said
they were the messiah, they'd be sent
straight to the looney bin.
well it was the same thing back
then.....Except he wasn't sent to the
looney bin, he was sent to his
death.
.Yes. But he had followers. He had
believers. He went on doing his messiah
thing for a lonnnnnng time before he was
killed on the cross. My point is only
that if someone claimed to be the messiah
today, nobody would give him a fighting
chance. Right into a straight jacket
he'd go. Times are veeeery different,
now.
according to the bible, jesus performed
many miracles in public. I am assuming
this is one of the key reasons he had
followers. He didnt just 'claim" to be
the messiah, he had things to back it up
with.
.I'm not saying he didn't perform miracles
or anything. We don't really know. I
just think the whole concept is sort of
screwy. Obviously .I'm not a .Christian,
&.I'm not bashing .Christians at all
or anything. It takes a tremendous amount
of faith &devotion to be one. It's
just definitely not for me. We don't know
what really happened back then. All we
have is the bible to go by. &.The
bible was written by a bunch of men who
weren't even around when .Jesus was alive.
i think it's kind of funny
how .Jesus claimed to be the saviour
&the son of .God (.I'm not saying he
wasn't).. But if anyone today said
they were the messiah, they'd be sent
straight to the looney bin.
well it was the same thing back
then.....Except he wasn't sent to the
looney bin, he was sent to his
death.
.Yes. But he had followers. He had
believers. He went on doing his
messiah thing for a lonnnnnng time before
he was killed on the cross. My point
is only that if someone claimed to be the
messiah today, nobody would give him a
fighting chance. Right into a straight
jacket he'd go. Times are veeeery
different,
now.
according to the bible, jesus performed
many miracles in public. I am assuming
this is one of the key reasons he had
followers. He didnt just 'claim" to be
the messiah, he had things to back it up
with.
.I'm not saying he didn't perform miracles
or anything. We don't really know. I
just think the whole concept is sort of
screwy. Obviously .I'm not a .Christian,
&.I'm not bashing .Christians at all
or anything. It takes a tremendous
amount of faith &devotion to be one.
It's just definitely not for me. We
don't know what really happened back then.
All we have is the bible to go by.
&.The bible was written by a bunch of
men who weren't even around when .Jesus
was alive.
thats not true. Most of the new testament
was written by apostles who were in fact
around when jesus was. Not only were they
around, they spent much time with him.
|
arcadia
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 May 2006 Posts: 4470 Location: Illinois,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 09-30-06 16:04pm
nataliachick7
wrote:
arcadia
wrote:
nataliachick7
wrote:
arcadia
wrote:
foxy
wrote:
arcadia
wrote:
i think it's kind of funny
how .Jesus claimed to be the saviour
&the son of .God (.I'm not saying he
wasn't).. But if anyone today said
they were the messiah, they'd be sent
straight to the looney bin.
well it was the same thing back
then.....Except he wasn't sent to the
looney bin, he was sent to his
death.
.Yes. But he had followers. He
had believers. He went on doing his
messiah thing for a lonnnnnng time before
he was killed on the cross. My point
is only that if someone claimed to be the
messiah today, nobody would give him a
fighting chance. Right into a
straight jacket he'd go. Times are
veeeery different,
now.
according to the bible, jesus performed
many miracles in public. I am assuming
this is one of the key reasons he had
followers. He didnt just 'claim" to be
the messiah, he had things to back it up
with.
.I'm not saying he didn't perform miracles
or anything. We don't really know. I
just think the whole concept is sort of
screwy. Obviously .I'm not a
.Christian, &.I'm not bashing
.Christians at all or anything. It
takes a tremendous amount of faith
&devotion to be one. It's just
definitely not for me. We don't know
what really happened back then. All we
have is the bible to go by. &.The
bible was written by a bunch of men who
weren't even around when .Jesus was
alive.
thats not true. Most of the new
testament was written by apostles who were
in fact around when jesus was. Not only
were they around, they spent much time
with him.
.Perhaps some of the bible. But the book
in whole was written over a course of
1,500 years.
|
smoothiesRyummy
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Apr 2006 Posts: 151 Location: Earth
Posted: 09-30-06 19:10pm
rainfire1424
wrote:
smoothiesryummy
wrote:
rainfire1424
wrote:
smoothiesryummy
wrote:
there are numerous cases of
girls becoming pregnant without having
sex. One girl in my school a few
years back had that happen to her.
You see, what they do is "dry hump" with
their boyfriends with their undies on and
the little spermies somehow find a way to
travel through mommy and daddy's undies
into the girl's vagina and .B.O.O.M
there's a virgin pregnancy. It
sounds impossible, but it's happened.
I know this isn't saying whether girls can
become pregnant immaculately, but they can
without technically having
sex.
yes technically without havcing sex
but not without sperm
secondly...
My friend .Jarmaine has lots of bruthas
and sistaz.. All his friends are his
bruthas and sistas.. Including me lol
(and we are sooo obviously not related.
(definate pigment difference lol)
allthough I adore him to death..)
and yeah... Even if the bible *was*
referring to blood siblings... Doesnt
mean it couldnt have been referring to
younger ones.
did I .F.R.E.A.K.I.N.G say without
sperm???!!! I'm not
stupid.
hun before u get all stupid with me.. I
was making a point to the thread starter,
not you.
okay i'm sorry. I'm just really moody
today.
|
BrianBaby
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 Posts: 1383
Posted: 10-10-06 20:47pm
The whole thing about being a christain is
having faith. Faith isn't easy to come
by, and even for the most dedicated
follower it can be tough. The bible is
god words that he has given to man to give
to the rest of the world. If you ever
took the change to read it, you would find
that all scripture comes from him and that
it isn't just some guy from 1500 years ago
making stuff up. I guess if your not a
christian, you wouldn't have the faith to
trust that.
Anyways, people foretold jesus' coming and
new about him before he was ever born.
Scripture tells us of simeon who was told
his whole life by god that he would live
to see the saviour and it wasn't untill
his old age that jesus was born and he saw
him in the temple when mary and joseph
brought him to be circumised.
And to touch on jesus having brothers.
Jesus for a fact had no younger brothers
because god choose mary because of her
faith and purity. I'm not sure of jesus
having older brothers, but it could be
referring to the brother type relationship
that god calls us into.
|
Sandbox Party
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 7276
Posted: 10-10-06 20:57pm
Im sorry I find it difficult to put my
soul and faith on the line and just
believe that a book is real and true.
Christianity is a cult. Churches are all
commercialized.
Thats my opinion.
|
HcoBrunette06
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Posts: 8006 Location: Missouri, United States
Thanks: 2
Thanked:1
Posted: 10-10-06 21:01pm
I don't really know what to believe
anymore, and it really frustrates me.
I was raised in the catholic faith all of
my life, and recently I just have all
these doubts.
|
Sandbox Party
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 7276
Posted: 10-10-06 21:03pm
I mean seriously...
**hey guys!!! Lets all get together,
worship this here book, center our life
choices around what it says, build places
of worship to pray to some guy we've never
seen, spend hundreds of years trying to
find this boat that supposedly carried two
of every animal..**
its rediculous.
|
arcadia
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 May 2006 Posts: 4470 Location: Illinois,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 10-10-06 22:01pm
Sandra .I definitely agree.
Christianity is so overplayed.
I can't stand church or organized
religion.
|
Kia
Supporter
Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 6594 Location: Planet Tampaxia,
Posted: 10-11-06 03:48am
And now for the science bit.
A bit of back ground.
Female eggs (ova) contain an x
chromosome.
Sperm comtain either an x or a y
chromosome.
To have a baby you need at least two bits
of information (typically an ovum and a
spermatazoa) and at least one x
chromosome.
So technically in a lab you could strip
the nucleus out of an ovum and implant it
in another ovum - you have the
requirements of a human embryo.
The thing is you could only produce girls
by this method. (xx = female)
i can't remember why but apparently this
isn't posible to do with 2 sperm. I think
it is to do with the structure of the
ovum.
Obviously this is not a legal procedure as
it is extrememly unethical - but it isn't
impossible.
