Abortion Debate Forum - Proof Thread?


Proof Thread?	Join us now!

Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Proof Thread?

Medical Questions

Author

Message

Birch

Supporter

Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 3829
Location: Bliss,

Thanks: 97

Thanked:11

Proof Thread?
Posted: 11-18-06 18:12pm

diamond splinter wrote:

get you there pagan they whine like biatches about us giving them proof yet where the hell are they when it comes to them providing proof ?

from: http://ehealthfor um.Com/health/topic76595.Html

diamond splinter, I would like (in good faith) to provide you with proof of what you need. I'm not being nasty, I seriously would like to know what you need.

diamond splinter

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 611
Location: ,

Re: Proof Thread?
Posted: 11-19-06 04:59am

birch wrote:

diamond splinter wrote:

get you there pagan they whine like biatches about us giving them proof yet where the hell are they when it comes to them providing proof ?

at the moment I need no proof it was an overall comment because pro life are always houndedfor proof yet pro choice never seem to get back to us if we ask for proof it is just skirted over and forgotten

diamondsz

Extremely EHEALTHy

Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 3173
Location: , Candyland-Canada

Thanks: 74

Thanked:104

Posted: 11-19-06 11:13am


Its funny how I provide a $hitload of urls?? Its funny how alot of us provide urls and yet you say we have no proof thats a laughing stalk.

Birch

Supporter

Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 3829
Location: Bliss,

Thanks: 97

Thanked:11

Re: Proof Thread?
Posted: 11-19-06 14:22pm

diamond splinter wrote:

birch wrote:

diamond splinter wrote:

get you there pagan they whine like biatches about us giving them proof yet where the hell are they when it comes to them providing proof ?

alright, I see. I just didn't like your generalization about pro-choicers or prolifers and wanted to do something about it. We are not all evil people. :d

sandyallen

Extremely EHEALTHy

Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 4580

Diamond Splinter Posted: 11-19-06 16:09pm


I feel that you have judged pro-choice people wrong as we are not whining biatches, at least I am not, and I know of most of the others aren't I feel that being pro-choice makes you more open minded and understanding to each situation and non judgemental I am not 100% ffor abortion I am for choice, my abortions were medically necessary, if someone wants an abortion or needs an abortion then it is there choice, I am not here to judge them as it might be necessary in many ways, I also have 2 grown children which was my choice. Choice does not always mean abortion. I also feel it is wrong for females to have a baby just to get in the welfare system where they can get free housing, free medical, free grceries, free this and free that, I feel if they get it then everyone else should(equal rights, not whining). Their are a lot of pro-choice people that have kids or plan to have kids and their is no abortion that comes easy unless it is a tubular pregnancy and sometimes they are not easy.

DamianaRaven

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy

Joined: 19 Nov 2006
Posts: 21

Posted: 11-19-06 22:17pm


You want proof that having an abortion is sometimes more humane than having a child you can't care for? Here you go:

Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy

Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985

Thanks: 3

Thanked:0

Posted: 11-19-06 23:51pm


Good darn point! Pro-lifers use shock-therapy with images... We can too. I think the saddest and most poigniant one is the first one... That poor child.

EugeniaBrown

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy

Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 94

Posted: 11-20-06 00:43am

damianaraven wrote:

you want proof that having an abortion is sometimes more humane than having a child you can't care for? Here you go:

these images prove nothing in favor of abortion. What it shows that we as human family can do more to help those in need. Abortion will not fix the starvation, food will.

DamianaRaven

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy

Joined: 19 Nov 2006
Posts: 21

Posted: 11-20-06 01:25am


I didn't say that abortion would fix the problem of starvation. I'm just pointing out that there are worse things that can happen to a child than never being born.

Jules

Moderator

Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 3724
Location: Merrie Englande, UK

Thanks: 64

Thanked:60

Posted: 11-20-06 02:52am


It would certainly be better if the ladies in the .Third .World countries stopped getting pregnant in the first place if they can't afford to feed their children. I realise it's not that simple though but then neither is it as simple as saying abortion is the answer.

diamond splinter

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 611
Location: ,

Posted: 11-20-06 08:15am

damianaraven wrote:

you want proof that having an abortion is sometimes more humane than having a child you can't care for? Here you go:

no what would be more humane than abortion in this case would be to spare just £2 a month to help these children£2 a month would cover basic immunisations food and water for one child for only an etra£3 a month you could then educate this race into becoming self efficient in the use of the resources that they have to hand.

But hey to pro choice abortion solves everything doesn't it?

DamianaRaven

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy

Joined: 19 Nov 2006
Posts: 21

Posted: 11-20-06 10:03am

diamond splinter wrote:

apparently, to some, money solves everything. If your answer is so simple, then why hasn't the christian children's fund, or any of the hundred other "pennies a day" organizations made much of a difference? Because it's hard to find anyone who'll manage the money properly without pocketing half of it for "expenses."

the catholic church has done a tremendous amount of short-term good in a lot of these third world countries, but in the long run they perpetuate the problems they're trying to solve. By refusing to provide and teach about birth control, and threatening to cut off aid to villages who allow others to do so, they've ensured that overbreeding will continue to be rampant. You'll probably hear me say this often, but overpopulation is the cause of many of the world's problems.

I don't think abortion solves everything, but I do think it would spare certain children a lifetime of misery. I believe that life is sacred; every aspect of life, not just survival. I'd rather see a child aborted before it's born than suffer like the children in those pictures. The quality of life is more important to me than the quantity.

diamond splinter

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 611
Location: ,

Posted: 11-20-06 10:39am

damianaraven wrote:

diamond splinter wrote:

the catholic church has done diddly shyte for third world countries whats sending a little money if you are not willing to educate them into properly using the resources that they do have?

£5 pound a month to propergate their land and lay water pipes to feed water and immunise them that is all it would cost monetary wise we already have workers set up out there waiting for the funds to put this project into action.

If you consider all life sacred can we count on you to volunter time or finance to give them quality life? Or are you going to stay safely on your high horse and endorse abortion rather than actualy do something to help improve the life that these people have?

Now over population I will argue sorry but we have enough spare agricultural land to re populate the earth 20 times over and still be comfertably of all we need is able bodied volunteers to help educate and lay pipes fopr the third world countries.

Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy

Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985

Thanks: 3

Thanked:0

Posted: 11-20-06 13:09pm

purestgreen wrote:

it would certainly be better if the ladies in the .Third .World countries stopped getting pregnant in the first place if they can't afford to feed their children.

I realise it's not that simple though but then neither is it as simple as saying abortion is the answer.

they don't have a choice, as their oppressive, male-dominant societies sell them off to mates as soon as they hit puberty and they're forced to start popping out babies soon after. It's part of the very fabric of their society.

Even moreso, continuing war and sanctions cause these famines, most importantly the iraq war. Not to mention the in-fighting and civil wars of the areas.

Even if abortion was available and free in these countries, it's very likely the males would not allow it.

But there are starving american children too, so don't think this is isolated to nigeria and elsewhere.

Jules

Moderator

Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 3724
Location: Merrie Englande, UK

Thanks: 64

Thanked:60

Posted: 11-20-06 13:15pm

eiri wrote:

purestgreen wrote:

i realise it's not that simple though but then neither is it as simple as saying abortion is the answer.

my point exactly.

eiri wrote:

but there are starving american children too, so don't think this is isolated to nigeria and elsewhere.

there is no excuse for this in the .Western world and abortion is not the answer. Proper sex education and free access to contraception are better ways to stop women having children they can't cope with. Some women are just stupid though and will continue to play with fire and get knocked up without thinking of the consequences.

DamianaRaven

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy

Joined: 19 Nov 2006
Posts: 21

Posted: 11-20-06 14:53pm

diamond splinter wrote:

now over population I will argue sorry but we have enough spare agricultural land to re populate the earth 20 times over and still be comfertably of all we need is able bodied volunteers to help educate and lay pipes fopr the third world countries.

where do you get these figures? Unpopulated land is not "spare agricultural" land. Countries like nigeria and rwanda are among the most densely populated in the world, with thousands crammed into every square mile. This attitude that "there's plenty for everyone" is wrong, plain and simple. There's barely enough to provide for the people who already exist, but it's hard to convince someone whose kitchen is crammed full of goodies that there's a huge problem out there. Seeds and irrigation pipes aren't going to change that. Until people learn to control their breeding habits, it's only going to get worse.

Eirie made an excellent point about male-dominated societies treating women like brood mares. They fight birth control (including abortion) at every turn because having a crowd of children proves what virile, manly studs they are. Never mind that half of them drop dead from starvation and disease... You can always have more.

jenn_smithson

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 15 Nov 2004
Posts: 808
Location: Texas

Re: Proof Thread?
Posted: 11-20-06 18:55pm

diamond splinter wrote:

when you come from a position of asserting a positive in a discussion, the burden of proof rests upon you.

If "prolife" individuals did not always try to assert their opinions as actual facts, you lot (as a whole) would not be asked for proof of your statements as often as you are.

diamond splinter

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 611
Location: ,

Re: Proof Thread?
Posted: 11-21-06 08:27am

jenn_smithson wrote:

diamond splinter wrote:

the cut goes both ways hun

Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy

Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12985

Thanks: 3

Thanked:0

Re: Proof Thread?
Posted: 11-21-06 08:45am

diamond splinter wrote:

jenn_smithson wrote:

diamond splinter wrote:

the cut goes both ways hun

except that we always provede real proof when asked. You can't even prove your religion, which is the basis off your entire life, morals, and thinking style.

diamond splinter

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 611
Location: ,

Re: Proof Thread?
Posted: 11-21-06 09:43am

eiri wrote:

diamond splinter wrote:

jenn_smithson wrote:

diamond splinter wrote:

the cut goes both ways hun

except that we always provede real proof when asked. You can't even prove your religion, which is the basis off your entire life, morals, and thinking style.

lmao who said I cannot prove my religion?
And most pro choice do not provide proof when asked full stop real or otherwise.