Nataliachick7
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 1535
Location: Wisconsin
|
Is This Okay to Do?
Posted: 01-25-07 18:28pm
|
|
|
|
Okay I have a digi cam and normally send
my pics from my comp to walgreens.Com and
then just pick them up.
I have heard somethings about naked baby
photos-like I have some of trace when he
was a young baby....But would I get in
trouble if I developed those-like child
porn or something? Cause you know how
messed up our society is....Its like I
wonder if ill get in trouble for having
some innocent pics developed? How sad.
What do you guys think?
Second. If someone were to take some
sexy pics of themselves for their bf
lol....Like in lingerie, would that be a
big no no to send to walgreens to get
developed?
Thanks :d
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Idony
Supporter
Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 1611
Location: virginia beach, va usa
Thanks: 11
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 01-25-07 18:39pm
|
|
|
|
|
I dont know if its illegal or not, but
with all the crap ive seen and lived I
would never personally do it
there are a lot of perverts out there and
I wouldnt want anyone to have acess to
naked pictures of my baby, just terrifies
me to think of it...I know im paranoid
lol
i would put them on a flash or sd drive
and take them to those self printing
thingys...Do you know what im talking
about or am I just being retarded?
~alicia~
|
|
|
|
|
|
AyaMiyaki
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 8247
Location: Floating on a cloud, United States
Thanks: 168
Thanked:14
|
Posted: 01-25-07 18:43pm
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't think it'd be child porn if it
was like a buttshot or something. I think
a woman got busted on that when she was
doing photography shots, but if they're
your own personal pictures of your son I
don't see why not.
The lingerie shots? Ummm I personally
wouldn't get those developed. I'd keep
those on a disk or something 
|
|
|
|
|
|
lil_blaze2004
Supporter
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 6492
Location: ,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 01-25-07 19:13pm
|
|
|
|
|
The walmart near my house did not print an
entire body shot (in the bath) of trey, he
was about 2 months old. They did put it
on the cd for me though.
Also my sil took her daughter to see
hilary duff last yr and took pics and they
developped them and when we went and got
them they were all black, and they said
they were not allowed developping pics
from concerts. 
i know loblaws (the grocery store)
developped a semi naked pic of trey
though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tinkinpink84
Supporter
Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Posts: 5065
Location: , Germany
Thanks: 3
Thanked:6
|
Posted: 01-25-07 19:24pm
|
|
|
|
|
You can print them out its fine, I was
photo manager at walgreens so eh we went
through a meetingon that once. Its not
considered child porn unless it was taken
in a certain manner mostly with the older
kids where it looks as they didnt want
ther epicture taken and are naked. If
they suspect pornography they wont put
those pics in your envelope and they will
notify the cops etc. But baby photos are
fine . Hell we develope naked pics of
adults. Soem weirdos actually used todrop
it off for one hour and come back and get
it. We just cover the machine while they
print
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandbox Party
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 7276
|
Posted: 01-25-07 20:40pm
|
|
|
|
|
Lol yeah the lengerie pics r ok.. A
friend of mine had a boyfriend that got
pics of his penis developed so I think its
ok lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nataliachick7
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 1535
Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: 01-25-07 21:24pm
|
|
|
|
|
| rainfire1424
wrote: | | lol yeah the lengerie pics r
ok.. A friend of mine had a boyfriend
that got pics of his penis developed so I
think its ok
lol |
omg! Are you serious?! I thought that
would be illegal or something!
|
|
|
|
|
|
BabyGirlsMami
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 455
Location: Danbury, CT.
|
Posted: 01-26-07 00:38am
|
|
|
|
|
Haha eww...
I bet you see some interesting things
having a job like that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
tinkinpink84
Supporter
Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Posts: 5065
Location: , Germany
Thanks: 3
Thanked:6
|
Posted: 01-26-07 02:27am
|
|
|
|
|
| nataliachick7
wrote: | | rainfire1424
wrote: | | lol yeah the lengerie pics r
ok.. A friend of mine had a boyfriend
that got pics of his penis developed so I
think its ok
lol |
omg! Are you serious?! I thought that
would be illegal or
something! |
none of that is illegal lol, only if it is
taken in a certain manner like someone
forced you to takepics likethat, but also
when u sent them towalgreens they print
out of the machine u print pics from ur
digicam on so they usually never look at
those pictures anyways. It depends on
the manner the pictures were taken wich
urs would be okto print.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kia
Supporter
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 6594
Location: Planet Tampaxia,
|
Posted: 01-26-07 05:25am
|
|
|
|
|
| lil_blaze2004
wrote: | | also my sil took her
daughter to see hilary duff last yr and
took pics and they developped them and
when we went and got them they were all
black, and they said they were not allowed
developping pics from concerts. |
so what was the point of developing them
black instead?
Why didn't they just not do it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
tinkinpink84
Supporter
Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Posts: 5065
Location: , Germany
Thanks: 3
Thanked:6
|
Posted: 01-26-07 06:04am
|
|
|
|
|
| kia_breizzze
wrote: | | lil_blaze2004
wrote: | | also my sil took her
daughter to see hilary duff last yr and
took pics and they developped them and
when we went and got them they were all
black, and they said they were not allowed
developping pics from concerts. |
so what was the point of developing them
black instead?
Why didn't they just not do
it? |
i dont get why a place woildnt develop
them. If you took them with your own
camera they should be no problem, now if u
bought ilke concert pics froma stand there
and attempted to make copies that isnt
allowed but if it was a disposable or
digital camera of your own I dont get why
they wouldnt do it and I dont ge thow they
would develop them black? I dont know how
you would do that on a regular machine
unless the pics came out black on the
film. There isnt a way to make them that
way unless u change the darkness on the
machine but I think the person that did
that is an fool and cant read rules on
developing pics . That on ejust makes no
sense to me. Was it at a walgreens or
another place?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kia
Supporter
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 6594
Location: Planet Tampaxia,
|
Posted: 01-26-07 06:37am
|
|
|
|
|
Not all places just stick them in a
machine, diane.
To make them black you just simply over
expose them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tinkinpink84
Supporter
Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Posts: 5065
Location: , Germany
Thanks: 3
Thanked:6
|
Posted: 01-26-07 06:46am
|
|
|
|
|
| kia_breizzze
wrote: | not all places just stick
them in a machine, diane.
To make them black you just simply over
expose them. |
oh. I didnt know. I stil think it was
stupid of the place not to print concert
pictures unless they were copyrighted.
But certain places and employees follow
different rules too. Some people I worked
with let people make copies of school pics
etc and just erased em off the machin
ewich is abig no no had our district photo
manager found out they woulda lost there
job and we would have gotten fined $1,000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kia
Supporter
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 6594
Location: Planet Tampaxia,
|
Posted: 01-26-07 07:46am
|
|
|
|
|
Yup, it was stupid/petty of them, I
agree.
But then a lot of concerts do say things
like "no flash photography" and photo
development places are told not to develop
them.
But even so it would have made more sense
to just not develop them rather than over
expose them to black - that is just
stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunflower_pie81
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 5041
Location: to hell with this crap
|
Posted: 01-26-07 08:52am
|
|
|
|
|
For the picts of your self why don't you
just get picture paper and print them at
home?
|
|
|
|
|
|
terpamber
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Posts: 430
|
Posted: 01-26-07 09:34am
|
|
|
|
|
Hey just a suggestion there are lots of
places where you can do "mail order pics"
too. I personaly use snapfish.Com but .I
have used shutterfly.Com in the past too.
You send them electronicly and everything
is done by machines (or so I assume) you
do have to click a box saying nothing is
copyrighted and blah blah, but I find it
much eaiser and pretty affordable. I do a
lot with potograpy and photoshop and when
.I started taking them to sams club or
wal-mart they stop printing them because
they thought .I was stealing professional
prints but they were mine. This way .I
don't have to deal with that. Also when
.I do get professional prints I buy the cd
and the rights to them so this way .I
don't have to deal with the hassle of
getting a letter from the photographer and
signing the paperwork.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lil_blaze2004
Supporter
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 6492
Location: ,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 01-26-07 10:19am
|
|
|
|
|
| kia_breizzze
wrote: | yup, it was stupid/petty of
them, I agree.
But then a lot of concerts do say things
like "no flash photography" and photo
development places are told not to develop
them.
But even so it would have made more sense
to just not develop them rather than over
expose them to black - that is just
stupid. |
ya they said it was illegal and did not
want her bringing the disposable
somehwhere else. my sil can be a
b*tch and freaked out. It was quite the
scene 
|
|
|
|
|
