Bridget
Moderator
Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 10834 Location: ,
Thanks: 63
Thanked:42
|
Started a Bad Habit And Now I'm Scared
Posted: 01-26-07 16:15pm
|
|
|
|
For a long time now, I don't even know how
long, i've been putting finn down to nap
on his stomach. He goes to sleep on his
own like that and sleeps great, nice long
naps.
Then yesterday I read a really scary
article on sids and now I don't want him
to sleep like that anymore. I always knew
it was "wrong" but did it anyway thinking
as long as I checked on him frequently and
only did it for naps he'd be fine. That
article scared the crap out of me and I
decided he can't nap like that anymore but
he won't nap on his back! I tried putting
him down awake and shushing him and
rubbing his belly, I tried swaddling him
(like I do at night when he sleeps on his
back) but he was getting angry, I tried
transferring him to his crib after he'd
fallen asleep in my arms and he woke up
immediately, I even let him fall asleep on
his tummy and then rolled him over and he
woke up 2 minutes later.
I don't know what to do. Maybe it'll just
take time to get him into a new routine.
Once he starts rolling over on his own is
he "allowed" to sleep on his stomach?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sunflower_pie81
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2006 Posts: 5041 Location: to hell with this crap
|
Posted: 01-26-07 16:22pm
|
|
|
|
|
They didnt' tell you not to sleep him on
his belly before you left the hospital?
Once he starts rolling then you cant'
prevent it.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
tdr
Supporter
Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 1535 Location: Somewhere else...not here., PA USA
Thanks: 6
Thanked:7
|
Posted: 01-26-07 16:22pm
|
|
|
|
|
If .Finn's napping and you go in to check
on him (since you're not asleep) I think
it'd be fine to let him nap on his
stomach. I only slept on my stomach as a
baby, even with the .S.I.D.S risk, because
my mom is a pediatric/neonatal nurse so
she knew what she was doing. And as you
can see, .I'm still here!
But .I'd think once they can roll over on
their own it's okay, because they may roll
themselves into that position anyway...
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bridget
Moderator
Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 10834 Location: ,
Thanks: 63
Thanked:42
|
Posted: 01-26-07 16:25pm
|
|
|
|
|
| gen
wrote: | | they didnt' tell you not to
sleep him on his belly before you left the
hospital? |
no, they did and my doctor even asks at
every appointment if he's sleeping on his
back. I kind of had the "well I slept on
my stomach as a baby and i'm fine"
mentality going on. Now i'm regretting
my cockiness.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bridget
Moderator
Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 10834 Location: ,
Thanks: 63
Thanked:42
|
Posted: 01-26-07 16:29pm
|
|
|
|
|
| nat
wrote: | | if .Finn's napping and you
go in to check on him (since you're not
asleep) I think it'd be fine to let him
nap on his
stomach. |
that's kind of what I figured. I mean,
i'm checking on him a ridiculous amount of
times.
| nat
wrote: | | I only slept on my stomach
as a baby, even with the .S.I.D.S risk,
because my mom is a pediatric/neonatal
nurse so she knew what she was doing.
And as you can see, .I'm still
here! |
i don't think they had the "back-to-sleep"
campaign when you were younger, i'm pretty
sure it's fairly new. They used to tell
parents to put their babies to sleep on
their stomachs.
I just read some really bad statistics
though and i'm regretting it. I wish I
hadn't read it.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
tdr
Supporter
Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 1535 Location: Somewhere else...not here., PA USA
Thanks: 6
Thanked:7
|
Posted: 01-26-07 16:32pm
|
|
|
|
|
| bridget
wrote: |
| nat
wrote: | | I only slept on my stomach
as a baby, even with the .S.I.D.S risk,
because my mom is a pediatric/neonatal
nurse so she knew what she was doing.
And as you can see, .I'm still
here! |
i don't think they had the "back-to-sleep"
campaign when you were younger, i'm pretty
sure it's fairly new. They used to tell
parents to put their babies to sleep on
their stomachs.
I just read some really bad statistics
though and i'm regretting it. I wish I
hadn't read
it. |
they didn't have the campaign, but because
my mom was in the field she was already
informed about the potential risks. She
worked on a study at a hospital in the
.Philadelphia area (don't remember which
one atm) when .S.I.D.S was first really
recognized.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
AyaMiyaki
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jun 2006 Posts: 8535 Location: Floating on a cloud, United States
Thanks: 217
Thanked:15
|
Posted: 01-26-07 16:32pm
|
|
|
|
|
Once he starts rolling over, the risk of
.S.I.D.S plummets. For now, if that's the
only way he'll nap, do it that way. Just
check on him often.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Eyes Wide Shut
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Posts: 7892 Location: *UPTOWN*NEW ORLEANS*, La
|
Posted: 01-26-07 16:33pm
|
|
|
|
|
Ya know .Bridget, .Oni has always
slept on her stomach.
She *refused* to sleep on her back.
In the hospital, they put her on her
belly. When we left, they said I could do
either, as long as nothing could constrict
her air way.
Sids is something that is commonly
mistaken for a deformity the child has in
the brain. 75% of "sids" death is caused
by an underlying problem. Not because
they were on their bellies.
I was sooooo paranoid that she would
suffocate, but if there's nothing around
her, how can she?
They say to give the baby a noonie to
sleep to prevent sids as well. It keeps
them in the .R.E.M state of sleep so that
they remember to breathe.
I asked her Dr. About it. He said, "as
long as nothing is around that can
suffocate her, she's fine."
many people are gonna tell you that it's
"face up, and face up only!" well .Oni
*just* started sleeping face up. It
started when she got .R.S.V and couldn't
sleep on her belly because of her
congestion.
Finn is at the age where his neck is
strong, and he can control it waaay
better.
I don't think it's ok to lie to his Dr.
About it. He might give you some good
tips to help him.
Like, try laying him on his side. (put a
blanket against his back, and put him on
his left or right side.)
i slept on my belly, .Baron slept on his,
so on and so on. And so did .Oni.
Sarah
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Kia
Supporter
Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 6594 Location: Planet Tampaxia,
|
Posted: 01-26-07 16:37pm
|
|
|
|
|
Do you know the most important thing...
Feet to foot!
Baby should be in the crib so his/her feet
are near the bottom of the crib and then
the covers only pulled up to baby's
shoulders.
This is so that if baby wriggles up - no
big deal and they can't wriggle down.
If baby is near the top of the crib he/she
can wriggle down and risks being caught up
under the covers - a sufocation risk.
So long as you have a suitable mattress
(ie one that is "breathable" and won't
suffocate baby) and baby is clear for
breathing, then the risks are greatly
minimised, when baby is sleeping on
his/her belly.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bridget
Moderator
Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 10834 Location: ,
Thanks: 63
Thanked:42
|
Posted: 01-26-07 16:38pm
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I just need to stay away from the
internet and not read scary things.
He sleeps with a binky, he wakes up if he
loses it, he moves his head from side to
side a lot and picks it up if something
startles him, there's nothing in there to
smother him. He's almost rolling over
anyway so maybe I should just go with
it.
Oh, and our neighbor is a pediatric nurse
so if (god forbid) something were to
happen she's right there!
Thanks everyone!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bridget
Moderator
Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 10834 Location: ,
Thanks: 63
Thanked:42
|
Posted: 01-26-07 16:40pm
|
|
|
|
|
| kia_breizzze
wrote: | do you know the most
important thing...
Feet to foot!
|
i have never heard this!
He doesn't have blankets unless he's
swaddled in his velcro blanket (there's no
chance of him getting out, it's like a
baby straight jacket) and then he'll have
another blanket on top but tucked under
him and no higher than his elbows. But
that's only at night when it's freezing.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Kia
Supporter
Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 6594 Location: Planet Tampaxia,
|
Posted: 01-26-07 16:41pm
|
|
|
|
|
*giggles* @ baby strait jacket 
|
|
|
|
|
 |
tinkinpink84
Moderator
Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 5070 Location: , Germany
Thanks: 3
Thanked:6
|
Posted: 01-26-07 16:56pm
|
|
|
|
|
I would think nappin like that is fine if
he sleeps that way since u are able to
check on him often, some babies find it
more comfy. Jordynnes a side sleeper but
I got one of those things with the sides u
can put in a bassinet or crib u can make
it close or farther so like she can sleep
on her side without being able to roll to
her tummy. But eh tummy u cant do much
but keep an eye on em. Also if u put em
in like a playpen with that thin mat its
not as bad as say the couch or on a bed or
something like that. Since playpens dont
have sheets that can bunch up ya know
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sandbox Party
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 7276
|
Posted: 01-26-07 17:08pm
|
|
|
|
|
Jacob always slept on his tummy as a
baby.. Still does to this day.
Caty used to also until she got an allergy
to the fabric and her face started getting
heat rashes really easy.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ThriftyGal
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 2982 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: 01-26-07 17:23pm
|
|
|
|
|
Rowan does not want to sleep on her back!
And i've been wondering if I should give
in and let her sleep on her stomach. I
let her take her naps on my chest and lap
like that becuse i'm watching but I still
try to put her to sleep at night when i'll
be sleeping too on her back because i'm
too scared i'll be asleep and something
will happen. It takes sooo much longer
and she wakes up so much more and she is
more fussy that way.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bridget
Moderator
Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 10834 Location: ,
Thanks: 63
Thanked:42
|
Posted: 01-26-07 17:58pm
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, i'm much too paranoid to put finn on
his stomach for the night. He sleeps
great at night on his back though, as long
as he's swaddled. It just seemed like
when I tried swaddling him for his nap
today he was like "what the hell are you
doing, woman? It's not bedtime! This
isn't right!" and was struggling to get
out and getting mad.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sandbox Party
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 7276
|
Posted: 01-26-07 18:34pm
|
|
|
|
|
Lmao aww cant u just imagine hearing them
actually saying that??
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mommy35
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Sep 2006 Posts: 3165 Location: Vacationland, USA,
|
Posted: 01-26-07 18:53pm
|
|
|
|
|
When my daughter was a baby they didn't
want kids on their back. Then it was a
risk for sids and for them to spit up and
choke. Funny how things change.
I'm sure he's fine. He's getting to an
age where he's at lower risk. I still
understand being paranoid about it. The
internet is the worst for scaring people.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sandbox Party
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 7276
|
Posted: 01-26-07 18:57pm
|
|
|
|
|
The peak for .S.I.D.S is 14 weeks for
full-term babies... He's fairly close to
overcoming that hurdle, so I wouldnt
worry.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Idony
Supporter
Joined: 23 Sep 2006 Posts: 1611 Location: virginia beach, va usa
Thanks: 11
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 01-26-07 19:25pm
|
|
|
|
|
| mommy35
wrote: | | when my daughter was a baby
they didn't want kids on their back.
Then it was a risk for sids and for them
to spit up and
choke. |
i remember that, when they changed it I
was like what? Wasnt it
just the back was bad? Funny thing is I
still remember it and it was like 1995 I
think, somewhere around there when they
changed it lol
im still paranoid about the back, when
ever I use to watch little kids (and I did
a lot, there were a few that were with me
more then their own parents) I always put
them on their side cause I was afraid of
the back but everyone said belly was bad
too
~alicia~
|
|
|
|
|