I would just like to ask why certain
threads that are not pertaining to
abortion are being left on this board, so
much so that when I have mentioned
abortion [ this is abortion debate not
legal debate forum ] I have been pulled
and told that it is not about abortion.I
remember a few months ago a lot of posts
were removed because they did not pertain
to abortion [ which is why there are only
1/2 pro lifers left as it was their
threads that were removed].So why are
these still here.
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 02-07-07 09:06am
A lot of posts a couple of months ago were
removed because they didn't involve
abortion debate, or any constructive
debate at all, and only involved people
"calling out" other people and insulting
them. Literally, that's all those threads
contained. They were completely
useless.
If you feel the current civil discussions
going on are as bad as puerile
name-calling threads, then I suppose that
your response is warrented. There does
seem to be a few people - including you,
self-admittedly - who are unable or
unwilling to stick to the topic of each
thread.
|
diamond splinter
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 611 Location: ,
Posted: 02-07-07 10:44am
The new admin on this site have their
heads so far up their ass they would need
a proctologist to see what a furkin
cesspit of shyte this place has become
come on cowboys you know yourself why
there are no pro lifers left.
What is the use of an abortion debate
between noone but pro choicers thats just
furked your pro life the topic has to be
about abortion yet pro choice can post
what the hell they want
|
Cambion
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Posts: 747
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 02-07-07 11:14am
I notice over on the disaster - I mean
pregnancy boards, about half the topics
have nothing to do with pregnancy. I
guess those boards are more special...
I'm rather happy that most of the
pro-lifers are gone - the conversations
and debates are more civil, and people
aren't throwing childish insults at one
another. I'd rather have a mature debate
that doesn't pertain to abortion with a
bunch of pro-choicers than be bickering
like girls with pro-lifers over stupid
irrelevant crap.
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 535
Posted: 02-07-07 11:24am
cambion
wrote:
i notice over on the
disaster - I mean pregnancy boards, about
half the topics have nothing to do with
pregnancy. I guess those boards are
more special...
I'm rather happy that most of the
pro-lifers are gone - the conversations
and debates are more civil, and people
aren't throwing childish insults at one
another. I'd rather have a mature
debate that doesn't pertain to abortion
with a bunch of pro-choicers than be
bickering like girls with pro-lifers over
stupid irrelevant
crap.
how can you debate when there is only one
side of the debate represented, then again
you do not like opposistion do you.
Ps it takes two to argue, so think about
yourself before calling other people.
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 535
Eiri Posted: 02-07-07 11:42am
tazzy
wrote:
if your post is not
regarding abortion or debate about
abortion it will be deleted or the thread
will be locked..
this is what I am talking about three
threads do not pertain to abortion yet are
still here.This is your extremely mature
response which took that thread into an
argument typical eiri.
eiri
wrote:
regarding all posts... If
they weren't started by a pro-lifer and
have become fights, they will be deleted.
But if a pro-lifer did start it, then it's
ok, it'll stay.
reading through that thread I realize that
some pro choicers [ please note birch I
said some] think it is ok for pro lifers
to be insulted and accused of sleeping
with their children because it is said by
a pro choicer, that sows what scum they
are.
Eiri what does it say at the top of the
forum abortion debate or legal debate, my
bad for trying to stick to the rules.
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4159 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
Oops Posted: 02-07-07 13:37pm
Double post, deleted.
Last edited by Birch on 02-07-07 13:38pm; edited 1 time in total
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4159 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
Re: Eiri Posted: 02-07-07 13:38pm
cowboys
wrote:
reading through that thread I realize that
some pro choicers [ please note birch I
said some] think it is ok for pro lifers
to be insulted and accused of sleeping
with their children because it is said by
a pro choicer, that sows what scum they
are.
in your defense, cowboys, I don't like
censorship, and wish admin would leave it
be on the debate forum. If someone
wishes to look like a prickish,
illiterate, stereotyping person it's their
perogative. I am prochoice, after all.
sows are actually female pigs who have
produced a litter of piglets, cowboys- you
might want to think of a more appropriate
insult.
|
Jules
Moderator
Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 3840 Location: Merrie Englande, UK
Thanks: 91
Thanked:77
Re: Eiri Posted: 02-07-07 13:52pm
birch
wrote:
sows are actually female pigs who have
produced a litter of piglets, cowboys- you
might want to think of a more appropriate
insult.
i think he meant 'shows'...Unless i'm
missing your irony?
|
diamond splinter
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 611 Location: ,
Posted: 02-07-07 13:55pm
Yeah and like the pro deaths don't stereo
type do they furking hypocrites
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4159 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
Re: Eiri Posted: 02-07-07 21:45pm
purestgreen
wrote:
birch
wrote:
sows are actually female pigs who have
produced a litter of piglets, cowboys- you
might want to think of a more appropriate
insult.
i think he meant 'shows'...Unless i'm
missing your irony?
it was weak, I admit.
diamondsplinter
wrote:
yeah and like the pro deaths
don't stereo type do they furking
hypocrites
no, not a one of 'em!
[so, uh, you admit to the prickish,
illiterate, and person statements?]
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 535
Re: Eiri Posted: 02-08-07 07:53am
birch
wrote:
purestgreen
wrote:
birch
wrote:
sows are actually female pigs who have
produced a litter of piglets, cowboys- you
might want to think of a more appropriate
insult.
i think he meant 'shows'...Unless i'm
missing your irony?
it was weak, I admit.
diamondsplinter
wrote:
yeah and like the pro deaths
don't stereo type do they furking
hypocrites
no, not a one of 'em!
[so, uh, you admit to the prickish,
illiterate, and person statements?]
you really are an idiotic liar arn't
you.Why don't you go and read [ if you can
] the pro choice forum where cambion calls
all pro lifers "" fetus humpers "" or read
through the debate boards where eiri has
lumped all pro lifers as religious
fundies, get real you person, if anyone is
illiterate it is you and has for moronic
you just keep decieving yourself that you
have a brain.This thread is being dragged
down again by a pro choicer, yes health
forum sorry birch you started the drama
but being such a liar you will blame
someone else.Your last couple of posts
have shown you up as an hypocriticall
scumbag, you claim because I stereotyped
pro choice you don't like responding to my
posts yet respond to pro choicers who
stereotype pro lifers you are nothing
short of being a prickish, illiterate
person, so think about glass houses.You
cannot even get it right when trying to
insult people, you aimed the prickish
insult at me then ask diamondsplinter if
she admits it what an ass you are.Do you
know what context means, clearly you do
not or you just thought you were being
clever with the sows comment, it was a
typo but you knew that didn't you , yours
was just a pathetic attempt to insult me.
|
lil_blaze2004
Supporter
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 6492 Location: ,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 02-08-07 11:35am
Admin is working on all the forums right
now. There are many changes coming
about. Yes the pregnancy forums are in
disarray right now because there is not
"general chat" forum (which we are working
on) maybe someone could suggest having
just a debate forum, for all the various
debate types.
As i'm not a mod for the abortion forums,
I can't do a heck of a lot to help out
here .In the preg forums, we are trying to
be more vigilant with what we move where.
And untill there is a "chat" forum, the
girls will keep posting where they are
comfortable.
Oh my favorite censor is cocktail =
cocktail.
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4159 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
Re: Eiri Posted: 02-08-07 17:39pm
cowboys
wrote:
birch
wrote:
purestgreen
wrote:
birch
wrote:
sows are actually female pigs who have
produced a litter of piglets, cowboys- you
might want to think of a more appropriate
insult.
i think he meant 'shows'...Unless i'm
missing your irony?
it was weak, I admit.
diamondsplinter
wrote:
yeah and like the pro deaths
don't stereo type do they furking
hypocrites
no, not a one of 'em!
[so, uh, you admit to the prickish,
illiterate, and person statements?]
you really are an idiotic liar arn't
you.Why don't you go and read [ if you can
] the pro choice forum where cambion calls
all pro lifers "" fetus humpers "" or read
through the debate boards where eiri has
lumped all pro lifers as religious
fundies, get real you person, if anyone is
illiterate it is you and has for personic
you just keep decieving yourself that you
have a brain.This thread is being dragged
down again by a pro choicer, yes health
question sorry birch you started the drama
but being such a liar you will blame
someone else.Your last couple of posts
have shown you up as an hypocriticall
scumbag, you claim because I stereotyped
pro choice you don't like responding to my
posts yet respond to pro choicers who
stereotype pro lifers you are nothing
short of being a prickish, illiterate
person, so think about glass houses.You
cannot even get it right when trying to
insult people, you aimed the prickish
insult at me then ask diamondsplinter if
she admits it what an ass you are.Do you
know what context means, clearly you do
not or you just thought you were being
clever with the sows comment, it was a
typo but you knew that didn't you , yours
was just a pathetic attempt to insult
me.
geeeeeeez, methinks you have anger issues.
And a serious lack of buffoonery.
[actually, I thought the "sows" comment
was a little wee better than "pathetic".
I'd give it a "lame" rating at the very
least.]
