now that is just batty,
because I signed in before I posted that.
Does it "time out" or something if you
don't post after
awhile?
yes, it can time out, if the post takes a
long time to write, as i'm sure yours did!
It's quite a compilation of information
i think the major comment I have about the
pakistani woman is that she wasn't even
necessaily pro-lifer herself... It seems
to clearly state that she refused to
perform an illegal act, and the illegal
act happened to be abortion. Making that
"pro-choice violence" is quite a stretch.
Those men were probably trying to force
another woman to abort to hide infidelity
or another rape, which isn't being
pro-choice at all. They could just have
easily been raping that female doctor
because she did perform an abortion on
one of their wives, when they didn't want
her to.
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 535
Posted: 02-14-07 14:53pm
birch
wrote:
so we move on to your final
site, mediaresearch.Org. I like ".Org's"
so I was hopeful. However...I read up on
the author of the report, and guess what,
he's a big ol' biased .Christian who is
vocally prolife and conservative.
(*snicker* and you specifically mentioned
media bias when you posted this site....)
three pro-abortionists were arrested after
attempting to set fire to a los angeles
church filled with 2,500 pro-life
activists. Authorities found grenades
under the speaking platform that, if
detonated, would have seriously injured or
killed anyone standing on it.
From
http://www.
Cwfa.Org/articles/1499/cwa/life/index.Htm<
/a>
three pro-abortionists were arrested after
attempting to set fire to a los angeles
church filled with 2,500 pro-life
activists. Authorities found grenades
under the speaking platform that, if
detonated, would have seriously injured or
killed anyone standing on it.
that's it? That's all you say?
Nothing about the content of my posts,
just some lame attack on my site about the
bias (which is a .Canadian site geared
toward promoting religious tolerance)?
And then you use pregnantpause.Org as a
source? What is wrong with you? I
can guess- you can't find a non-biased
source to support the concept you are
trying to prove.
Geesh, you went on a tirade about how i'm
such a liar, ignorant, and halfwitted.
You must feel sheepish.
i wasn't going to look at the other sites
you posted since you apparently didn't
look at the first batch you posted, but I
pulled up the aclj site, which was just a
compliation of legal issues and lawsuits
regarding abortion.
The cwfa site was an article talking about
how the tv show "law and order" has
"proven itself a purveyor of pro-abortion
propaganda".
The above mentioned incident about setting
fire to an .L.A church came from
california right to life’s abortion
crime report. I wouldn't trust anything
from a right to life group...These are the
same people I see picketing a local clinic
with inaccurate posters of ten week old
fetuses with fully formed body parts.
Look cowboys, you have to do more than
google and just post links. Reading is
usually required.
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 142
Thanked:13
Posted: 02-14-07 15:51pm
eiri
wrote:
birch
wrote:
now that is just batty,
because I signed in before I posted that.
Does it "time out" or something if you
don't post after
awhile?
yes, it can time out, if the post takes a
long time to write, as i'm sure yours did!
It's quite a compilation of information
i think the major comment I have about the
pakistani woman is that she wasn't even
necessaily pro-lifer herself... It seems
to clearly state that she refused to
perform an illegal act, and the illegal
act happened to be abortion. Making that
"pro-choice violence" is quite a stretch.
Those men were probably trying to force
another woman to abort to hide infidelity
or another rape, which isn't being
pro-choice at all. They could just have
easily been raping that female doctor
because she did perform an abortion on
one of their wives, when they didn't want
her to.
well, it didn't take that long...I had to
eat lunch.
yeah, I tried to find more info about the
pakistan incident. That country is so
assbackwards that if a woman is raped,
"pakistan's hudood law outlaws
extramarital sex and forces a rape victim
to field four witnesses to prove her case.
The victim can be considered a guilty
party."
i wouldn't consider any news coming out of
pakistan as "proof" so I only gave cowboys
a 3 out of ten, because he was trying so
hard and I admire zealousness.
|
Moo
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1066 Location: London
Thanks: 21
Thanked:111
Posted: 02-17-07 17:36pm
To the original question I have to say i'm
unsure as to whether or not I would sign
such a petition. The reasoning is that,
whilst I am not ashamed of the fact I have
aborted it's a personal thing, i'm not
sure i'd sign something stating I have a
coil or another medical procedure so i'm
not sure I would.
That being said, if it could help someone
then yes I would....
