Thanks ingi,
the original doctor didn't see any thing because it was a general ultrasound of low quality. Also the ultrasound tech only looked for a baby not anything out of the ordinary. My specialist explained why the doctor could have missed a twin if the twin never developed. The ultrasound should have shown either a blood clot or twin but showed nothing. Whatever I passed was pretty big and I would think it should have shown up on the ultrasound. From what many of you are also saying, it does seem highly probable that it was a clot. The tech was very quick in her ultrasound and just showed the baby and the fluid. She didn't look around for any suspicious looking things. The specialist, however, has a high level ultrasound and does it herself so she is able to examine everything.
Interesting point about the "twin" miscarriage. I was not dilated when I went into my regular obgyn's (that I know of and I would think they would have told me). So, it does point to the whole blood clot scenerio.
The doctor did say that the blood clots could cause the tearing if the clots are big enough and depending on where they are. Hmmm.....Don't really know. I am just going on what the doctors tell me and what I read from pregnancy complication forums on other forums. I don't even know what I hear anymore. I have gotten so many different answers that everything just runs together. Who knows what I heard anymore. I am one confused jumbled up mess. Perhaps they didn't say that and I am just confused!!
You're right. I never even felt pregnant from the beginning and did expect a miscarriage right away. It is strange.
Luckily, when I am with my child nathan, I don't worry too much about this pregnancy. He keeps my mind constantly occupied that I don't have time to worry. He is going through that difficult independent three year old stage. So fun./