Abortion Debate Forum - Reverend Run, Wife Open Up About Losing Baby page 3
medical questions | health forums

Reverend Run, Wife Open Up About Losing Baby

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Reverend Run, Wife Open Up About Losing Baby
Author Message
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-09-07 14:46pm

Stupid double post. See below XD


Last edited by Tylanas on 04-09-07 14:56pm; edited 1 time in total
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-09-07 14:53pm

nightangel73 wrote:
Eiri wrote:
Kypros wrote:
As less humane as it may be, if I knew the baby I was carrying had no chance of survival, I would prefer to give birth than abort (given that my health was not in danger, of course) and let the baby die naturally. I would avoid abortion as best I could because it would always be the last solution for me.

Kypros.


That's your choice, just as it is the choice of pet owners to not euthanise their pets and let them slowly and painfully die.


eiri pain and death are sure natural things in life. You can't euthanize your relatives when they are just diagnosed with a terminal cancer so that they don't suffer the cancer. People just go through the cancer with all pain involved until the end, then they die. That's just how it is.


It all depends. If I was in a ton of pain and there was no cure, I would perhaps want to be euthanized. I wish it was legal for a conseting adult in a terminal situation to ask to be euthanised, I really do. I watched a great grandmother starve herself to death because she didn't want to live, but couldn't be euthanised. I strongly believe they should have euthanized .terry .schivo after removing the tube. I'd certainly euthanize a pet that is going to die; what is the point of that kind of suffering?

When one is not christian, suddenly, the point of life is no longer to suffer. Suffering in fact, is viewed as bad, which is what it actually is. Buddhists focus on eliminating suffering, in fact. We don't glorify suffering.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-09-07 14:58pm

jenn_smithson wrote:
Eiri wrote:
You don't understand the concepts here.

You have the right to do what you want. However, this means you have the right to make stupid choices.
.t.h.a.n.k .y.o.u!!


Lol, you're welcome.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-09-07 15:02pm

Birch wrote:
Sunflower_pie81 wrote:
Eiri wrote:
Kypros wrote:
As less humane as it may be, if I knew the baby I was carrying had no chance of survival, I would prefer to give birth than abort (given that my health was not in danger, of course) and let the baby die naturally. I would avoid abortion as best I could because it would always be the last solution for me.

Kypros.


That's your choice, just as it is the choice of pet owners to not euthanise their pets and let them slowly and painfully die.


why would you make a comment like this, .Eiri? I don't think that you can compare humans to cats and dogs. Aborting a wanted child is not an easy decision...but eh, i know you see things very differently.


Not that I need to speak for .Eiri, but perhaps she doesn't subscribe to the egotistical, self centered belief that humans are superior to all other forms of life and that human suffering is "worse" than any other creature suffering.

I hate that attitude.


You're quite right there, birch. I don't know if humans are total equals with animals, but I do know that we are animals. We are mammals; and if it okay to end a dog's suffering out of mercy, then why is it bad to end the life of someone who has gone through every treatment, tried every homeopathic solution, even prayed to the deaf christian god for healing? I don't support giving up the moment you are diagnosed with terminal cancer; I applaud those who try in every way to heal and become better. But I also feel that once someone gives up, they should have the right to die with dignity.
Did you find this post useful?
|
nightangel73

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Nov 2005
Posts: 2765
Location: ,
Thanks: 19
Thanked:18
online

Posted: 04-09-07 17:22pm

Eiri wrote:


When one is not christian, suddenly, the point of life is no longer to suffer. Suffering in fact, is viewed as bad, which is what it actually is. Buddhists focus on eliminating suffering, in fact. We don't glorify suffering.


you are totally wrong as usual. We too focus on not suffering but you just can't eliminate suffering. I guess my mom should kill herself since that will be the only way to eliminate the suffering of loosing my brother. What would buddhist suggest on that. Taking pills to forget the suffering until she dies? She has actually recovered from much of the suffering thanks to much prayer. Without praying she wouldn't make it.
Did you find this post useful?
|
nightangel73

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Nov 2005
Posts: 2765
Location: ,
Thanks: 19
Thanked:18
online

Posted: 04-09-07 17:28pm

Birch wrote:


Not that I need to speak for .Eiri, but perhaps she doesn't subscribe to the egotistical, self centered belief that humans are superior to all other forms of life and that human suffering is "worse" than any other creature suffering.

I hate that attitude.


oh we are far superior than animals as we are made by image of god our Lord. But just because we think we are superior in that sense doesn't mean we believe in animal cruelty birch. Animal cruelty is totally wrong and horrible.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Sunflower_pie81

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 5041
Location: to hell with this crap

Posted: 04-09-07 17:39pm

Eiri wrote:
Birch wrote:
Sunflower_pie81 wrote:
Eiri wrote:
Kypros wrote:
As less humane as it may be, if I knew the baby I was carrying had no chance of survival, I would prefer to give birth than abort (given that my health was not in danger, of course) and let the baby die naturally. I would avoid abortion as best I could because it would always be the last solution for me.

Kypros.


That's your choice, just as it is the choice of pet owners to not euthanise their pets and let them slowly and painfully die.


why would you make a comment like this, .Eiri? I don't think that you can compare humans to cats and dogs. Aborting a wanted child is not an easy decision...but eh, i know you see things very differently.


Not that I need to speak for .Eiri, but perhaps she doesn't subscribe to the egotistical, self centered belief that humans are superior to all other forms of life and that human suffering is "worse" than any other creature suffering.

I hate that attitude.


You're quite right there, birch. I don't know if humans are total equals with animals, but I do know that we are animals. We are mammals; and if it okay to end a dog's suffering out of mercy, then why is it bad to end the life of someone who has gone through every treatment, tried every homeopathic solution, even prayed to the deaf christian god for healing? I don't support giving up the moment you are diagnosed with terminal cancer; I applaud those who try in every way to heal and become better. But I also feel that once someone gives up, they should have the right to die with dignity.


I know that i am more than an equal than other mammals out there. but you know you can't win in this world...My brother lives in pain everyday, so we should kill him? His body can't be fixed...should we end his life? He doesn't want to die, should we make him...should we just end his suffering? Anamals i am sure dont' want to die, but we make the decision for them...is it right? I don't know...but I don't know. I have the attutude that you guys hate apparently, but being able to end a human life just seems....well barbarick...(sp)
Did you find this post useful?
|
nightangel73

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Nov 2005
Posts: 2765
Location: ,
Thanks: 19
Thanked:18
online

Posted: 04-09-07 17:43pm

Eiri wrote:

If I was in a ton of pain and there was no cure, I would perhaps want to be euthanized. I wish it was legal for a conseting adult in a terminal situation to ask to be euthanised, I really do. I watched a great grandmother starve herself to death because she didn't want to live, but couldn't be euthanised. I strongly believe they should have euthanized .terry .schivo after removing the tube. I'd certainly euthanize a pet that is going to die; what is the point of that kind of suffering?


what you can do now eiri is go online and write a living will where you state that if you are so bad that you need to be intubated, you refuse to it. You will need a witness to sign the papers (the witness will have copy of document and bring it to the hospital if you are like that). That's what my brother did and they enforced it. At least that will save you from being intubated.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Birch

Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4159
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16

Posted: 04-09-07 20:09pm

nightangel73 wrote:


oh we are far superior than animals as we are made by image of god our Lord. But just because we think we are superior in that sense doesn't mean we believe in animal cruelty birch. Animal cruelty is totally wrong and horrible.


Sunflowerpie81 wrote:
I know that i am more than an equal than other mammals out there. but you know you can't win in this world...My brother lives in pain everyday, so we should kill him? His body can't be fixed...should we end his life? He doesn't want to die, should we make him...should we just end his suffering? Anamals i am sure dont' want to die, but we make the decision for them...is it right? I don't know...but I don't know. I have the attutude that you guys hate apparently, but being able to end a human life just seems....well barbarick...(sp)


Please provide proof (that we are far superior to animals). I'd really like to read it. New perspectives are refreshing.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-10-07 01:13am

nightangel73 wrote:
Eiri wrote:


When one is not christian, suddenly, the point of life is no longer to suffer. Suffering in fact, is viewed as bad, which is what it actually is. Buddhists focus on eliminating suffering, in fact. We don't glorify suffering.


you are totally wrong as usual. We too focus on not suffering but you just can't eliminate suffering. I guess my mom should kill herself since that will be the only way to eliminate the suffering of loosing my brother. What would buddhist suggest on that. Taking pills to forget the suffering until she dies? She has actually recovered from much of the suffering thanks to much prayer. Without praying she wouldn't make it.


Uh, your mother obviously doesn't understand the concept of moving on. Also, missing someone is not a form of terminal cancer. I bet a whole lot of cancer patients would beat you up for implying that. Besides, you blame your brother's death on the fact that he was gay.

No, your mother needs to learn to move on and learn how to deal with the pain of separation. Not dealing with it means that she is actually not mentally healthy. Is she going to feel sad every now and then? yes. Should she suffer? No. And pills are never the answer.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-10-07 01:22am

Sunflower_pie81 wrote:
Eiri wrote:
Birch wrote:
Sunflower_pie81 wrote:
Eiri wrote:
Kypros wrote:
As less humane as it may be, if I knew the baby I was carrying had no chance of survival, I would prefer to give birth than abort (given that my health was not in danger, of course) and let the baby die naturally. I would avoid abortion as best I could because it would always be the last solution for me.

Kypros.


That's your choice, just as it is the choice of pet owners to not euthanise their pets and let them slowly and painfully die.


why would you make a comment like this, .Eiri? I don't think that you can compare humans to cats and dogs. Aborting a wanted child is not an easy decision...but eh, i know you see things very differently.


Not that I need to speak for .Eiri, but perhaps she doesn't subscribe to the egotistical, self centered belief that humans are superior to all other forms of life and that human suffering is "worse" than any other creature suffering.

I hate that attitude.


You're quite right there, birch. I don't know if humans are total equals with animals, but I do know that we are animals. We are mammals; and if it okay to end a dog's suffering out of mercy, then why is it bad to end the life of someone who has gone through every treatment, tried every homeopathic solution, even prayed to the deaf christian god for healing? I don't support giving up the moment you are diagnosed with terminal cancer; I applaud those who try in every way to heal and become better. But I also feel that once someone gives up, they should have the right to die with dignity.


I know that i am more than an equal than other mammals out there. but you know you can't win in this world...My brother lives in pain everyday, so we should kill him? His body can't be fixed...should we end his life? He doesn't want to die, should we make him...should we just end his suffering? Anamals i am sure dont' want to die, but we make the decision for them...is it right? I don't know...but I don't know. I have the attutude that you guys hate apparently, but being able to end a human life just seems....well barbarick...(sp)


You clearly missed the part where I said it was the suffering person's choice. You have no right to do anything to his body, just as he would never have the right to tell you to give birth if you wanted to abort.

We hate what, exactly? We don't hate life, far from it. And once more, unless the person is a serious comatose patient or is in some other way unable to make the choice themselves, they should have the right to make the desicion.

My grandfather developed an aortic aneuryism over winter break. They took him into surgery, but unfortunately afterwards, his kidneys would not turn back on. They couldn't even wake him up from the anesthesia. He was going to die in a week, or, they could pull the plug and let him go sooner. As my grandmother understood the concept of lessening suffering and how pointless it would be to keep his body alive on machines, and how he never would have wanted that, she had them turn off the medicines. He died an hour later.

SO if any of you try and tell me that lessening suffering is wrong, I will send back at you tale after tale of how it is a humane thing to do.

DOn't give up when there is hope. But when there is none, like in my grandfather's case, then be a strong person and make the kind choice, and let go.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-10-07 01:31am

nightangel73 wrote:
Eiri wrote:

If I was in a ton of pain and there was no cure, I would perhaps want to be euthanized. I wish it was legal for a conseting adult in a terminal situation to ask to be euthanised, I really do. I watched a great grandmother starve herself to death because she didn't want to live, but couldn't be euthanised. I strongly believe they should have euthanized .terry .schivo after removing the tube. I'd certainly euthanize a pet that is going to die; what is the point of that kind of suffering?


what you can do now eiri is go online and write a living will where you state that if you are so bad that you need to be intubated, you refuse to it. You will need a witness to sign the papers (the witness will have copy of document and bring it to the hospital if you are like that). That's what my brother did and they enforced it. At least that will save you from being intubated.


Yes, I know. I just recieved my papers today from the organ donation organization in new york.

It's not that I don't want to be comatose. I'd be fine with it for about 6 months, but if it got past that, it's almost hopeless.
Did you find this post useful?
|
nightangel73

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Nov 2005
Posts: 2765
Location: ,
Thanks: 19
Thanked:18
online

Posted: 04-10-07 06:01am

Eiri wrote:


Uh, your mother obviously doesn't understand the concept of moving on. Also, missing someone is not a form of terminal cancer. I bet a whole lot of cancer patients would beat you up for implying that. Besides, you blame your brother's death on the fact that he was gay.

No, your mother needs to learn to move on and learn how to deal with the pain of separation. Not dealing with it means that she is actually not mentally healthy. Is she going to feel sad every now and then? yes. Should she suffer? No. And pills are never the answer.


seeing your child dies is the worst tragedy a human can suffer in life. It is worse than cancer. My mom would rather take a cancer or being on a wheelchair anyday over seeing my brother die. But you are not a parent yet so you can't understand this. And yes my brother's death was due to his lifestyle of drug abuse and homosexualism.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Moo

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 1066
Location: London
Thanks: 21
Thanked:111

Posted: 04-10-07 07:10am

Sunflower_pie81 wrote:
Aborting a wanted child is not an easy decision...but eh, i know you see things very differently.


HAving any abortion isn't an easy decision
Did you find this post useful?
|
Sunflower_pie81

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 5041
Location: to hell with this crap

Posted: 04-10-07 10:43am

Moo wrote:
Sunflower_pie81 wrote:
Aborting a wanted child is not an easy decision...but eh, i know you see things very differently.


HAving any abortion isn't an easy decision


agree'd!!

I had one, it was the hardest decision of my life!


I am not a debator!!! So I really can't comment on posts like this because my feelings get the better of me. I take back what I said...I don't know that my brother wants to live because he can't tell us if he want's to or not. so making the decision for him would be inhumane. (in my eyes anyway.)

Now my son on the other hand couldn't have made the decision. He was born early and with a heart condition. They advised me that if he could make it to 40 weeks gestational period (born at 27 weeks) they would be able to do surgery on him. well i wanted him to live....and i wanted my baby more than anything, but you know they let him die anyway. they pulled the plug on him and let him die. In this case, I don't know what was right for him. We don't know if he would have made it or not. But i wish he was given the chance....

I can't show you proof that I am any better than shamu I will bow out now.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-10-07 11:59am

nightangel73 wrote:
Eiri wrote:


Uh, your mother obviously doesn't understand the concept of moving on. Also, missing someone is not a form of terminal cancer. I bet a whole lot of cancer patients would beat you up for implying that. Besides, you blame your brother's death on the fact that he was gay.

No, your mother needs to learn to move on and learn how to deal with the pain of separation. Not dealing with it means that she is actually not mentally healthy. Is she going to feel sad every now and then? yes. Should she suffer? No. And pills are never the answer.


seeing your child dies is the worst tragedy a human can suffer in life. It is worse than cancer. My mom would rather take a cancer or being on a wheelchair anyday over seeing my brother die. But you are not a parent yet so you can't understand this. And yes my brother's death was due to his lifestyle of drug abuse and homosexualism.


That's how you feel about it; but I think a sick person might feel differently than you. Many people would sacrifice themselves for others. But being the survivor means you must learn to deal with it. That doesn't mean it's not going to hurt, but the healthiest thing to do is to learn to move on, and so thus to lessen and end your suffering. You turn the pain around, and remember the good things. You don't dwell on the death, and you certainly don't blame the person's life-style. That is only going to make you hate everyone who has that kind of life-style; you will subconsciously blame them for your brother's death.

You're not a parent so you can't understand it either, so don't even try to use that excuse.

And once again, you prove your truly evil nature, your close-mindedness and your stupidity. Your brother needed your love and understadning, not your hate and discrimination; that's really why he died. I don't use the word evil often because people automaticaly associate it with the bible, but when it comes to you, it's the only word that works.
Did you find this post useful?
|
nightangel73

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Nov 2005
Posts: 2765
Location: ,
Thanks: 19
Thanked:18
online

Posted: 04-10-07 18:24pm

Eiri wrote:


And once again, you prove your truly evil nature, your close-mindedness and your stupidity. Your brother needed your love and understadning, not your hate and discrimination; that's really why he died. I don't use the word evil often because people automaticaly associate it with the bible, but when it comes to you, it's the only word that works.


Eiri let me tell you this, you don't know caca about my relationship with my brother so don't assume anything. Learn that the online world is the online world and people don't necessarely project their true selves here nor they are going to say here everything about their lives. Are you smoking drugs? You must be probably putting a joke on me with this posts hehehe.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-10-07 21:06pm

nightangel73 wrote:
Eiri wrote:


And once again, you prove your truly evil nature, your close-mindedness and your stupidity. Your brother needed your love and understadning, not your hate and discrimination; that's really why he died. I don't use the word evil often because people automaticaly associate it with the bible, but when it comes to you, it's the only word that works.


Eiri let me tell you this, you don't know caca about my relationship with my brother so don't assume anything. Learn that the online world is the online world and people don't necessarely project their true selves here nor they are going to say here everything about their lives. Are you smoking drugs? You must be probably putting a joke on me with this posts hehehe.


Then how about you stop assuming things about me and my expereinces, eh? If you could do that for one moment; if you could step into someone else's shoes and see that their way of life is not bad, then we wouldn't be having this debate.

I am dead serious. From everything you have said, even in "frank moments" when you attempted to show us how you are in real life, you have shown yourself to be close-minded, discriminatory, sexist, and homophobic. I'm sorry that you need to face these truths. You are not loving towards your neighboor; if they have different beliefs from you, then you think they are lesser than you, that they have no culture, and that they are blind to the truth.

I do represent who I am in real life online. I am polite until insulted, I am kind to everyone; I do not judge anything except close-minded stupidity, I educate the ignorant with caring, unless they show that they do not want to learn. You have shown you do not want to learn. I do not tolerate that, especially when you say you have the right to tell others how to live.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Birch

Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4159
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16

Posted: 04-10-07 21:31pm

Sunflower_pie81 wrote:
Moo wrote:
Sunflower_pie81 wrote:
Aborting a wanted child is not an easy decision...but eh, i know you see things very differently.


HAving any abortion isn't an easy decision


agree'd!!

I had one, it was the hardest decision of my life!


I am not a debator!!! So I really can't comment on posts like this because my feelings get the better of me. I take back what I said...I don't know that my brother wants to live because he can't tell us if he want's to or not. so making the decision for him would be inhumane. (in my eyes anyway.)

Now my son on the other hand couldn't have made the decision. He was born early and with a heart condition. They advised me that if he could make it to 40 weeks gestational period (born at 27 weeks) they would be able to do surgery on him. well i wanted him to live....and i wanted my baby more than anything, but you know they let him die anyway. they pulled the plug on him and let him die. In this case, I don't know what was right for him. We don't know if he would have made it or not. But i wish he was given the chance....

I can't show you proof that I am any better than shamu I will bow out now.


I'm sorry about your son. Sad That is a really tough situation.

If you don't know how you are "better" than any animal, I would hope you would be introspective and perhaps come to a different understanding. Smile
Did you find this post useful?
|
nightangel73

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Nov 2005
Posts: 2765
Location: ,
Thanks: 19
Thanked:18
online

Posted: 04-11-07 05:51am

Eiri wrote:
nightangel73 wrote:
Eiri wrote:


And once again, you prove your truly evil nature, your close-mindedness and your stupidity. Your brother needed your love and understadning, not your hate and discrimination; that's really why he died. I don't use the word evil often because people automaticaly associate it with the bible, but when it comes to you, it's the only word that works.


Eiri let me tell you this, you don't know caca about my relationship with my brother so don't assume anything. Learn that the online world is the online world and people don't necessarely project their true selves here nor they are going to say here everything about their lives. Are you smoking drugs? You must be probably putting a joke on me with this posts hehehe.


Then how about you stop assuming things about me and my expereinces, eh? If you could do that for one moment; if you could step into someone else's shoes and see that their way of life is not bad, then we wouldn't be having this debate.

I am dead serious. From everything you have said, even in "frank moments" when you attempted to show us how you are in real life, you have shown yourself to be close-minded, discriminatory, sexist, and homophobic. I'm sorry that you need to face these truths. You are not loving towards your neighboor; if they have different beliefs from you, then you think they are lesser than you, that they have no culture, and that they are blind to the truth.

I do represent who I am in real life online. I am polite until insulted, I am kind to everyone; I do not judge anything except close-minded stupidity, I educate the ignorant with caring, unless they show that they do not want to learn. You have shown you do not want to learn. I do not tolerate that, especially when you say you have the right to tell others how to live.


cool eiri just confirming you are totally crazy hehehe
Did you find this post useful?
|
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
New Topic   Reply



Page 3 of 4
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.