Abortion Debate Forum - Why?? page 5
medical questions | health forums

Why??

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Why??
Author Message
jenn_smithson

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Nov 2004
Posts: 808
Location: Texas

Posted: 05-10-07 17:22pm

nightangel73 wrote:

it has been said here before of women who have aborted and then they get pregnant and see the first ultrasound they have felt pretty bad to think that was how their fetus looked like when they aborted it. Seems to happen often.
Sweet merciful effing christ!

I have responded to this recently!

When do most abortions occur in gestation? 8 .w.e.e.k.s!

At 8 weeks, the fetus is the size of a small kidney bean, most .women (and even some professionals) cannot find it on an ultrasound, and if a spontaneous abortion occurs, the .woman will not be able to recognize it from the large blood clots present. In fact, .I cannot always pick it out on the screen when we do pre-abortion ultrasounds. At 8 weeks, the fetus just looks like a thickening of the yoke sac along either the right or left side.

When do most first ultrasounds occur in wanted pregnancy? Between 16 and 20 weeks! That's four to five months along! There is going to be a vast difference between an 8 week fetus and a 20 week fetus. If a woman sees her 20 week fetus and thinks her previous 8 week abortion looked anything .a.t .a.l.l like it, she's either grossly uninformed or ignorant of human development!

There's no reason for any .woman to look at a later ultrasound and feel badly because the two visually look nothing like one another!

At 8 weeks, the fetus looks like a dot on the screen that most people can't even find. At 20 weeks, halfway through a pregnancy, the image is vastly different. And, there's also no gaurantee that had the woman kept her previous pregnancy that it would have progressed to 20 weeks. A little over half of all pregnancies end in a miscarriage and miscarriage rates have only decreased since the 1970s because some women end the pregnancy before it is spontaneously aborted.
Did you find this post useful?
|
milletics

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 204

Posted: 06-29-07 12:16pm

Eiri wrote:
In this modern day and age, not everyone is christian nor do they adhere to christian-like philosophies.

Women, in this day and age, finally have freedom over their body.

We ladies have the right to have sex when we want it and as often as we want.

We have the right to control our bodies too; and this includes removing unwanted parasites from our wombs.

Women these days know about life, and they do not all adhere to the ancient mythic traditions of spiritual christianity. They are not held down by false, ancient, science-less interpretations of procreation and human development.

Just as we no longer believe the globe is flat; just as we no longer think the sun revolves around us; so now we also know that there is not a fully grown little person inside the womb.

As science develops, we learn more and more about the development of a fetus. We learn when it feels pain for the first time; we learn how it develops and what it is capable of at each stage.

When this fetus is a wanted child, then it is the miracle of biology. It is the wonder of evolution.

When this child is unwanted, it can be a noose on a young woman's neck. It can be the tolling of the death bell; it can earn her a social stigma; it can ruin her life.


But there is a light: she has control over her body. She can chose to give birth and give the child up for adoption... but if she knows about the horrors of adoption, if she knows that preventing pain is more important than soothing it; if she believes that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure... if she knows these things, then she has the human right to chose abortion.

Human rights... yes, abortion is a human right.

And I am thankful for it.


Ho-hum. Its been done so many times before. Thats the problem with the pro-abortion side; They only go by their own loose moral opinions.
Sooooo here is a little fact for you (so i will assume you will not use the word parasite again):

The fetus is not a parasite.
A parasite, by biological definition, must be a different species. No thinking person would consider apples as parasites of an apple tree. (However a worm in the apple is indeed a parasite). The biological defintion of parasite can be found at http://www.thefreedi ctionary.com/parasit... . Some committed abortion supporters cling to the etymological definition of "one who is sustained by another without benefit to the host". Taken in that sense, a 6 month old baby is as much of a parasite as a fetus. Only the most despicable monsters in world history killed the very young.

So look up the definition of parasite. And stop using it and perhaps read a book.


Last edited by milletics on 06-29-07 12:36pm; edited 1 time in total
Did you find this post useful?
|
stacybaby

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 196
Location: scotland

Posted: 06-29-07 12:31pm

abortions are too easy these days... just go to your doctor and say im pregnant and i dont want to be no questions and they make you the appt


and this i know for a fact!


people having abortions past 4months is absolutely terrible.... an abortion can seem like a good thing to do at the time but after can cause alot of emotional problems after the realisation of whats been done
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 06-29-07 13:15pm

milletics wrote:

Ho-hum. Its been done so many times before. Thats the problem with the pro-abortion side; They only go by their own loose moral opinions.
Sooooo here is a little fact for you (so i will assume you will not use the word parasite again):

The fetus is not a parasite.
A parasite, by biological definition, must be a different species. No thinking person would consider apples as parasites of an apple tree. (However a worm in the apple is indeed a parasite). The biological defintion of parasite can be found at http://www.thefreedi ctionary.com/parasit... . Some committed abortion supporters cling to the etymological definition of "one who is sustained by another without benefit to the host". Taken in that sense, a 6 month old baby is as much of a parasite as a fetus. Only the most despicable monsters in world history killed the very young.

So look up the definition of parasite. And stop using it and perhaps read a book.


I do understand the fact that a parasite in most cases must be of another species, but I ask you to look at the parasitic male of the anglerfish. He latches onto the female and then the only thing he does is produce sperm. His bloodstream and hers merge. He is considered, scientifically, to be a parasite even though he does actually benefit the female host.

A fetus doesn't even benefit the host in any way... yet for some reason isn't considered a parasite by pro-life. It's odd.

A born baby is not attached to one being, surely you can understand that concept. Yet it's a concept every uninformed pro-lifer tries to fight back with. But it doesn't work. A fetus is solely dependent on the mother's body, and only her body. No one else can care for that fetus. Once it is born, any human being capable of changing a diaper and feeding it a bottle and (ideally) giving love and knowledge can care for the baby. The mother can go do whatever the hell she wants.
Did you find this post useful?
|
milletics

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 204

Posted: 06-29-07 13:34pm

A fetus is not a parasite. Find a doctor who says such or a scientist for that matter.
How does it benefit the mom?
By carrying on her genes. They call it reproduction.

Is an apple a parasite?
It gets its nutrients off the tree. It doesnt benefit the tree. If anything it can hurt it (the apples on my tree get so big late summer that at times it breaks a limb).

Fact: Scientifically and medically, the fetus is NOT a parasite. I deal with facts. Use a different term for your argument. It makes you look silly and makes it hard to take you serious.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 06-29-07 13:39pm

stacybaby wrote:
abortions are too easy these days... just go to your doctor and say im pregnant and i dont want to be no questions and they make you the appt


and this i know for a fact!


people having abortions past 4months is absolutely terrible.... an abortion can seem like a good thing to do at the time but after can cause alot of emotional problems after the realisation of whats been done


DOn't lump all women into one category. Aside from that, abortions past 4 months hardly happen anyway. There's a great topic on the pro-choice forum about the timings of abortions. I advise everyone to read that first before debating.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 06-29-07 14:15pm

milletics wrote:
A fetus is not a parasite. Find a doctor who says such or a scientist for that matter.
How does it benefit the mom?
By carrying on her genes. They call it reproduction.

Is an apple a parasite?
It gets its nutrients off the tree. It doesnt benefit the tree. If anything it can hurt it (the apples on my tree get so big late summer that at times it breaks a limb).

Fact: Scientifically and medically, the fetus is NOT a parasite. I deal with facts. Use a different term for your argument. It makes you look silly and makes it hard to take you serious.


For the record, the debate of the parisitic nature of the fetus is not my main argument for abortion anyway, so I don't really care.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Birch

Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4159
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16

Posted: 06-29-07 14:39pm

stacybaby wrote:
abortions are too easy these days... just go to your doctor and say im pregnant and i dont want to be no questions and they make you the appt


Why should they be more difficult?

milletics, I like your spunk. Hope you stick around.
Did you find this post useful?
|
stacybaby

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 196
Location: scotland

Posted: 06-30-07 03:04am

doctors should find out why the person wants an abortion,they should allow the person to have a proper think about it rather than those people that have rushed to the doctors and not really thought about it
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 06-30-07 11:59am

stacybaby wrote:
doctors should find out why the person wants an abortion,they should allow the person to have a proper think about it rather than those people that have rushed to the doctors and not really thought about it


Well aren't you in luck? Women have to go through a screening process. They are asked multiple times if they want to go through with the abortion. They are given pamphlets, and some are forced to watch videos of an abortion. They go through mandatory counseling.

So guess what? Aside from prying into the woman's personal life, doctors do give her plenty of time to think about the procedure. It's not an in-and-out process.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Jude-Love

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jun 2007
Posts: 727
Location: Williamstown, Kentucky USA

Posted: 06-30-07 12:21pm

Some women do not want to be parents, in this day and age. In this day and age, we accept that some people aren't meant to be parents and if they admit this, then they probably wouldn't be good parents either and they shouldn't have a child. In this day and age, we know more about things like ectopic pregnancy and know that we can allow women to have the option to save their lives.

It doesn't matter what a woman's reasons are, what matters is that she is in a situation and she's taking a look at her life and making a decision based on what she sees. No one can make a better decision for her life than her because no one will have to deal with her individual consequences.

Personally, I don't agree with the fetus-parasite comparison. A fetus may live in a parasitic fashion, but that doesn't mean it actually is a parasite. Parasitism is a type of symbiosis and symbiosis occurs between two organisms of a different species. That isn't so with pregnancy.
Did you find this post useful?
|
stacybaby

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 196
Location: scotland

Posted: 06-30-07 12:25pm

eiri that may be the process where you are from or america etc but CERTAINLY NOT IN SCOTLAND
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 06-30-07 15:03pm

stacybaby wrote:
eiri that may be the process where you are from or america etc but CERTAINLY NOT IN SCOTLAND


No need to yell darling.

Okay fine, that's now how it is in scotland. Many people who are debaters on this forum are from england and america though, and in those nations - especially conservative america - counseling is a forced requirement. It's not "oh here, counseling is available if you need it", no, it's "here, we are forcing you through counseling."
Did you find this post useful?
|
msrosie

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 369
Location: Ontario, Canada
Thanks: 12
Thanked:2
Re: Why??
Posted: 06-30-07 16:11pm

chick1978 wrote:
Why, in this day and age, are we so readily able to accept the ending of a life in the womb??



I don't see anything wrong with ending the life of a z/e/f in the womb. We end life all the time - we slaughter animals for our own consumption and fashion, some countries kill those who commit certain crimes, we allow people to kill in self defense etc. Ending life is not always a bad or wrong thing to do.

It is far better to abort a pregnancy in the first trimester than to have a child one is not willing/able to care for or to foist it off on others to raise, in my opinion.
Did you find this post useful?
|
jenn_smithson

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Nov 2004
Posts: 808
Location: Texas

Posted: 06-30-07 20:30pm

stacybaby wrote:
doctors should find out why the person wants an abortion,they should allow the person to have a proper think about it rather than those people that have rushed to the doctors and not really thought about it
The implications of this belief are that .women are not able to make this deeply profound personal decision themselves, that .women are somehow either morally or intellectually inferior to men and thus need a good talking to and a waiting period to think it over.

I am all in favor of giving important decisions time to think but legislating it, when it only affects .women, is another issue entirely. It is disrespectful and patronizing, to say the very least, and it does pave the way for people to believe that .women are in some way so inferior that the government has to make them talk about their decision or wait until they can implement their decision. Basically it is an old belief, painted in a new, fresh coat, that we .women don't really know right from wrong and that we have to be told, typically by a man. Further, .women also are irrational and make decisions without thinking them through.

I find these assumptions degrading and disgusting.
Did you find this post useful?
|
milletics

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 204
Re: Why??
Posted: 06-30-07 20:34pm

msrosie wrote:
chick1978 wrote:
Why, in this day and age, are we so readily able to accept the ending of a life in the womb??



I don't see anything wrong with ending the life of a z/e/f in the womb. We end life all the time - we slaughter animals for our own consumption and fashion, some countries kill those who commit certain crimes, we allow people to kill in self defense etc. Ending life is not always a bad or wrong thing to do.

It is far better to abort a pregnancy in the first trimester than to have a child one is not willing/able to care for or to foist it off on others to raise, in my opinion.


Nice mentality.
1. you compare humans with animals.
and 2. You compare people who commited horrible crimes that are worthy of death to an innocent human in the womb.

Man is that twisted.

If a woman as I have seen said on here doesnt want to become a parent then she should A) not have sex or B)get fixed or C) use multiple types of contraceptives.
And in the impossibe senario that she gets pregnant, she should step up to the responsibility or put it up for adoption.
Did you find this post useful?
|
jenn_smithson

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Nov 2004
Posts: 808
Location: Texas
Re: Why??
Posted: 06-30-07 20:48pm

milletics wrote:
msrosie wrote:
chick1978 wrote:
Why, in this day and age, are we so readily able to accept the ending of a life in the womb??



I don't see anything wrong with ending the life of a z/e/f in the womb. We end life all the time - we slaughter animals for our own consumption and fashion, some countries kill those who commit certain crimes, we allow people to kill in self defense etc. Ending life is not always a bad or wrong thing to do.

It is far better to abort a pregnancy in the first trimester than to have a child one is not willing/able to care for or to foist it off on others to raise, in my opinion.


Nice mentality.
1. you compare humans with animals.
Humans are animals.
Quote:
and 2. You compare people who commited horrible crimes that are worthy of death to an innocent human in the womb.
Who made you the arbiter of those "worthy" of death? Talk about twisted.

Quote:
If a woman as I have seen said on here doesnt want to become a parent then she should A) not have sex
Nice to see it's all down to the .woman, as if there aren't two people involved.
Quote:
or B)get fixed
Speaking of animals...
Quote:
or C) use multiple types of contraceptives.
And if she does and still becomes pregnant?
Quote:
And in the impossibe senario that she gets pregnant, she should step up to the responsibility or put it up for adoption.
Who are you to decide what a "responsible" response to an unintended pregnancy is? You do not have to live with an unintended pregnancy, you do not have to sacrifice your body, you do not have to go through childbirth. Since it will never be your responsibility, it is not your decision that matters but that of the .woman who will have to live with it.

Abortion can be a responsible decision regardless of if you believe that or not. I see no reason why your opinion should override the thoughts, feelings, or beliefs of the .woman who is actually pregnant.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 06-30-07 20:51pm

1. Humans are animals. I really hate it when people forget that fact. We're sentient, that's the only difference.

2. Both types of humans are worthless. At least a fetus is technically "innocent", but neither a murderer or a fetus is worth more than the mother carrying it.

Abortion is stepping up to the responsibility and it is doing something about it.

Not stepping up and not taking responsibility is what teens who give birth and put the babies in dumpsters do. Actually, even then at least they're disposing of the body.

Truly not taking responsibility would be to not change any of your behaviors during pregnancy and pretend you're not pregnant, and then push out the baby and not even say anything to it, maybe in the middle of the street or wherever you happen to be when you go into labor. Then stand back up and wander off, and push out the placenta whenever that happens too. Maybe someone will take you to the .e.r if you're bleeding...
Did you find this post useful?
|
Jude-Love

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jun 2007
Posts: 727
Location: Williamstown, Kentucky USA

Posted: 06-30-07 23:40pm

milletics wrote:
nice mentality.
1. You compare humans with animals.
And 2. You compare people who commited horrible crimes that are worthy of death to an innocent human in the womb.


She isn't comparing humans to animals, she's comparing killing to killing. The ending of a living being doesn't change according to how you feel about that particular being. Killing is killing.


milletics wrote:
If a woman as I have seen said on here doesnt want to become a parent then she should a) not have sex or b)get fixed or c) use multiple types of contraceptives.
And in the impossibe senario that she gets pregnant, she should step up to the responsibility or put it up for adoption.


1. Sex is a healthy part of life, not a tool. I will always have sex with my husband and not wanting a child will not change that. That is a ridiculous idea and wholly unrealistic.

2. If you're going to educate people on biology, I'd assume you'd at least know that doctors will not sterilize a woman before she has a number of children or is at a certain age. It goes against the ethics of any good obsetrician.

3. You speak of the option to give a baby up for adoption as if it's nothing. You can't just expect that of any woman, just like you can't expect any woman to just be able to have a child or terminate a pregnancy. It isn't that easy. Personally, I would have a much harder time parting with a child than I would an embryo.

Taking responsibility for a situation means assessing it and making a decision based on what you see. Abortion falls into that category. Not taking responsibility is hiding the pregnancy and then getting rid of the baby once it's born, like so many "pro-life" women have been known to do, actually.
Did you find this post useful?
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 07-02-07 06:53am

Eiri wrote:
1. Humans are animals. I really hate it when people forget that fact. We're , that's the only difference.

2. Both types of humans are worthless. At least a fetus is technically "innocent", but neither a not a nice person or a fetus is worth more than the mother carrying it.

Abortion is stepping up to the responsibility and it is doing something about it.

Not stepping up and not taking responsibility is what teens who give birth and put the babies in dumpsters do. Actually, even then at least they're disposing of the body.

Truly not taking responsibility would be to not change any of your behaviors during pregnancy and pretend you're not pregnant, and then push out the baby and not even say anything to it, maybe in the middle of the street or wherever you happen to be when you go into labor. Then stand back up and wander off, and push out the placenta whenever that happens too. Maybe someone will take you to the .e.r if you're bleeding...

I think I would rather be tossed into a dumpster and have a chance, even if it is slight one then to have my body parts ripped off me and no chance of life. sentient= Having sense perception; conscious. I think that make us very much non-animals! Set a part, different! "non-monkey!"
Did you find this post useful?
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
New Topic   Reply



Page 5 of 8
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.