When a woman engaging in PMS, in a
relationship, in a marriage, she has to
be responsible of the actions that comes
her way, I know this is the hardest way to
keep a woman from getting that belly bulge
but the safest is the RHYTHM METHOD,
it's not expensive, no side effects, no
drugs, very natural, and pleasurable.
Last edited by celeste0911 on 05-19-07 10:58am; edited 1 time in total
|
Ingi
Supporter
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 8421 Location: Grinning like a Cheshire Cat,
Thanks: 121
Thanked:153
Posted: 05-19-07 10:05am
This is false.
|
Llewellyn
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jan 2007 Posts: 1743 Location: NY
Posted: 05-19-07 13:48pm
What?
The rhythm method is not very reliable in
part because it is just plain difficult
for most people to do correctly. There
are many non-hormonal methods of birth
control that are very effective, safe,
easy to use, and inexpensive. There are
also places like Planned Parenthood or
Family Planning who give out free or low
cost birth control.
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Re: Rhythm Method Posted: 05-20-07 09:56am
celeste0911
wrote:
When a woman engaging in
PMS, in a relationship, in a marriage,
she has to be responsible of the actions
that comes her way, I know this is the
hardest way to keep a woman from getting
that belly bulge but the safest is the
RHYTHM METHOD, it's not expensive, no side
effects, no drugs, very natural, and
pleasurable.
Rythem is not the safest form of birth
control. I don't have links to statistics,
but I know the sucess rate is under 90%,
even under 80% if I recall.
And it's not necessarily the cheapest
either, since you have to buy calendars
and thermometers and all of the other
supplies needed to keep track of your
ovulation so that you can avoid sex on
those days.
Yes, it's natural, mostly-side-effect free
and drug-free. But many women may not fid
it pleasurable to be slightly uncertain as
to whether or not they are pregnant. They
might also not find it pleasurable to have
to abstain from sex for a week - I say
abstain because you seem to be against
condoms, so a woman following your example
couldn't even use condoms and spermicide
her fertile week.
As for "mostly-side-effect free"... my
natural cycle is not fun. I consider the
extreme pain of my cramps to be more of an
undesired "side-effect" than the relief I
get on the pill.
The site is not a replacement for professional medical opinion, examination, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of your medical doctor or other qualified health professional before starting any new treatment or making any changes to existing treatment. Do not delay seeking or disregard medical advice based on information written by any author on this site. No health questions and information on eHealth Forum is regulated or evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and therefore the information should not be used to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease without the supervision of a medical doctor. Posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author, and not the administrators, moderators, or editorial staff and hence eHealth Forum and its principals will accept no liabilities or responsibilities for the statements made.
Schizophreniahealth
This page was last updated on June 11, 2008
The rhythm method is not very reliable in
part because it is just plain difficult
for most people to do correctly. There
are many non-hormonal methods of birth
control that are very effective, safe,
easy to use, and inexpensive. There are
also places like Planned Parenthood or
Family Planning who give out free or low
cost birth control.