Becky
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 6225 Location: London, England
Thanks: 0
Thanked:7
|
Pacifiers/ Dummies
Posted: 06-22-07 11:54am
|
|
|
|
Should they be given to children?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
HcoBrunette06
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Posts: 8005 Location: Missouri, United States
Thanks: 2
Thanked:1
|
|
|
|
|
 |
vanessalouanne
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 2268 Location: ,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 06-22-07 13:25pm
|
|
|
|
|
i went to a breastfeeding class that said
they should never be used because that is
just masking if the child has a need (
i.e. crying is the last sign a baby shows
when they are hungry)
i think there fine to be given i just
cannot stand to see older children with
them in there mouth!! i can just see there
gums and teeth being ruined. i say if you
go with the same rule of thumb as the
bottle, have them off it by 12 months,
then its fine
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bridget
Moderator
Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 10821 Location: ,
Thanks: 62
Thanked:42
|
Posted: 06-22-07 13:30pm
|
|
|
|
|
| vanessalouanne
wrote: | | i went to a breastfeeding
class that said they should never be used
because that is just masking if the child
has a need |
that's weird. it's a fact that babies love
to suck, that's what pacifiers are for
initially. later it becomes a comfort
item.
what you said (and i know *you* didn't say
it) makes it sound like people only use
them if the baby is crying, as if to shut
them up.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
vanessalouanne
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 2268 Location: ,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 06-22-07 13:54pm
|
|
|
|
|
yeah i didnt agree with when they said
that. Plus i was thinking what about when
they teeth and what not. who knows.. i
had to take the class and i think it may
just be a more liberal way of parenting.
that a child cries for attention and there
is always a reason for them needing that
attention. personally, i think sometimes
babies are just fussy.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mommy35
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Sep 2006 Posts: 3165 Location: Vacationland, USA,
|
Posted: 06-22-07 14:16pm
|
|
|
|
|
I have to say that .I was against giving
.Jaylon a binky (we call it the boop) at
first. When my daughter was a baby, she
loved the boop she got from the hospital
and it was the only one she liked. When
it wore out, there was no more boop,
because we couldn't get another one, and
.I remember how she cried and cried,
because she loved it so. I vowed .Jaylon
would never have one.
Well, he loved to suck and suck and suck,
so since he was breastfed, if he didn't
have a boop, guess what he would have been
sucking on? O.U.C.H!!! I was a human
pacifier.
I gave in and agreed to let him have one,
but only if it was one that .I could walk
into any store and buy, so if we lost one
it would be easy to find another.
He loves his boop too. He's a happy baby,
and .I know his hungry whines, so we don't
use it then. He just likes to suck on it.
I know in breast feeding classes they say
don't use one in the beginning because it
confuses them. You want your newborn to
be able to get a good latch on the breast
and know that the breast is the only thing
they are going to get fed from. Once they
have established that, it's fine.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
musikmaker
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 1757 Location: Chicago, US
Thanks: 10
Thanked:2
|
Posted: 06-22-07 18:56pm
|
|
|
|
|
I already bought one for .Luke but I am
going to wait to use it till he has
established breastfeeding first.
I don't know if this is true but I heard
that if you give one of them to the baby
while they sleep then it could reduce the
chance of sids. Again, I can't remember
where I read that so don't take it as
truth 
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bridget
Moderator
Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 10821 Location: ,
Thanks: 62
Thanked:42
|
Posted: 06-22-07 19:04pm
|
|
|
|
|
they do say that about pacifiers and sids.
i think it's something to do with the
sucking keeps them semi-conscious and they
can't fall into that deep deep sleep.
i wanted finn off his by 9 months. well,
that's not going to happen. he's almost 8
months and he's more attached to it than
ever, especially now that he's teething. i
hope to start weaning him off it by a year
and if he can't get off it i'll take it
away cold turkey at 18 months.
he pretty much constantly has one in his
mouth, i don't even know how that
happened. i'll tell you, the happiest day
in my life (ok, i'm exaggerating... a
little) was the day he learned how to put
it in his mouth on his own.
today he did something silly, he had a
binky in his mouth and pulled up on the
coffee table and saw another one. he spit
out the one in his mouth and replaced it
with the new one he found.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
musikmaker
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 1757 Location: Chicago, US
Thanks: 10
Thanked:2
|
Posted: 06-22-07 19:07pm
|
|
|
|
|
Finn is so cute! He just has the cutest
personality! Anyways, I think that it is
okay for babies to have a pacifier it's
just whenever they are 3-4 yrs old and
they still have one. It's kinda sad to see
that.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
lil_blaze2004
Supporter
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 6492 Location: ,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 06-22-07 21:00pm
|
|
|
|
|

Trey still sleeps with his at night (well
3 actually) weird kid. I've tried and
tried and tried but he'll stay up to 2 am
just crying for it. (I put him down at
7.30) I'm here alone and I work so i
can't be up every night like that. It is
only at night and it will be gone in the
next 2 months. It's the only thing that I
hate out of his habits. he didn't have
one for the first 3 months. He would only
suck on my pinky finger (even after I
stopped breast feeding) I needed my
finger back like c needed her boob-lol
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Becky
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 6225 Location: London, England
Thanks: 0
Thanked:7
|
Posted: 06-23-07 03:30am
|
|
|
|
|
jesslayla still has hers on a night to go
to bed with but she sleeps with her mouth
open so it falls out once she's asleeps

|
|
|
|
|
 |
tdr
Supporter
Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 1535 Location: Somewhere else...not here., PA USA
Thanks: 6
Thanked:7
|
Posted: 06-23-07 13:39pm
|
|
|
|
|
I flat-out refused to take one as a baby,
according to my parents. However, I think
if an infant is happy using one, then why
not let them have it? I agree with
.Bridget; weaning should be done before
the kid hits 2 years of age.
When i was in nyc on thursday, the kid
sitting in the row in front of us in the
theatre must have been five years old, and
he was sucking on a pacifier. i was
disgusted. once you have teeth and basic
verbal skills, the pacifier is a no-no.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Dannzibelle
Supporter
Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 3791 Location: South East, England
Thanks: 29
Thanked:11
|
Posted: 06-24-07 04:50am
|
|
|
|
|
I really really don't like dummies. The
way i see it is babies coped perfectly
well when they wern't invented so don't
necesserilly need them. My sister doesn't
like them either but her daughter was
advised to have one because she had very
very bad colic and a dummy was the only
thing that would soothe it for her, for
that reason i don't mind them but i don't
think people should plan to have them
before the baby is born because the baby
might not have needed one and then you
have the problems of getting them to stop
using one when they didn't even need it.
Also the thing that i hate the most about
them is when you see people out with their
children one's crying and she says 'oh
won't you just shut up' and shoves a dummy
in it's mouth
|
|
|
|
|
 |
sick_mama17
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Jun 2007 Posts: 960 Location: , England
|
Posted: 06-24-07 13:20pm
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I think they should be given to babies
for comfort. I was advised not to give jay
one because i decided to breastfeed him
and it can make it difficult as sucking a
nipple and a pacifier are different. But
after a few weeks I thought he was used to
breastfeeding, and he had colic really bad
so I tried to give him a pacifier on a few
occasions. He wouldnt take it, I wish he
had. There were so many times I thought if
only he had one it would comfort him
immediately and he'd stop crying or sleep
longer.
From around 18 months I would only let the
child have it when they sleep, and take it
away completely between 2 and a half -3
yrs. It would have to be one of those
types that dont affect how the teeth grow
also.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
rasuyoung
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2006 Posts: 464 Location: Long Island, NY
Thanks: 0
Thanked:1
|
Posted: 06-24-07 18:23pm
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see any problem with them. If it
comforts them, then that's great. I think
it's silly when people get all up in arms
over babies or toddlers with pacifiers.
Give me a break.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
bernibaby86
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 186 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: 06-24-07 19:51pm
|
|
|
|
|
I have no problem with pacifiers.
Pacifiers are soothing for babies and it
comforts them. At first I didnt want my
daughter to have a pacifier for a while
b/c I was breastfeeding, but the hospital
gave her one night which angered me. But
luckily I was still able to breastfeed
her. Anyways, my daughter isnt always
depending on a pacifier when she sleeps or
naps. I usually give her one when she gets
pretty fussy.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
chels03
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 20 Jun 2005 Posts: 70 Location: Geelong, Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: 07-04-07 09:54am
|
|
|
|
|
my first daughter hated them n wouldnt
ever take them which sucked when she was
sick or teething as she didnt want
anything but mummy n she teethed for 2
months before getting her first teeth
my son loved his dummy he didnt use it all
the time but as he got bigger he used it
as a comfort then he threw it away
himself
n isabella has a dummy as a comfort too
only when she is hugely unsettled do i
give it to her not if she is just having a
little cry i dont see why kids shouldnt be
aloud to cry
babies cry when they r born as a way of
telling u something is wrong or they want
something if ur constantly putting a dummy
in their mouth its pretty much ignoring
what they have to say if u get me :/
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
kaerbear
Most Diplomatic Poster
Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 1557 Location: ,
|
Posted: 07-04-07 10:47am
|
|
|
|
|
i don't have a problem with pacifiers
really. i don't think most pediatricians
have a problem with them either so i'll
use them if they will help buy me a few
seconds here and there when i'm looking
for a place to breastfeed or something
like that. i don't think there is
anything wrong with a baby crying but
sometimes if they get really worked up
it's hard to calm them down. they don't
cry for nothing, but they don't really
understand the concept of waiting for
anything either. i think after they are a
year old it's time to start weaning them
off of it. i wouldn't see them as a first
option either, i would go through the list
of things to check for when baby cries
before just popping it in their mouth.
if there is one thing about them that
really bothers me it is when people clean
them off by putting them in their own
mouth then sticking it in baby's mouth. i
think that's just wrong. adult mouths
have a lot more germs in them than babies
do. babies never have bad breath because
they only eat one thing and their mouths
are always full of saliva. i don't think
they have to be totally sterilised all the
time but just rinse them with water and
clean them with hot soapy water once in a
while. don't stick it in your own mouth.

|
|
|
|
|
 |
OctoberBaby06
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Dec 2006 Posts: 4617 Location: , US
Thanks: 3
Thanked:2
|
Posted: 07-04-07 13:48pm
|
|
|
|
|
I for one would have gone insane by now if
I didn't give .Kaylee her binky! It calms
her right down for bedtime but I plan on
trying to take it away by the time she's
one. Also when she was a newborn up til
she was around 3 months or so it made me
feel a little better knowing she had her
binky & they reduce the risk of sids.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
El
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 31 Mar 2005 Posts: 476 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: 07-05-07 18:54pm
|
|
|
|
|
It's a comfort thing like any other.
(special blanket, special toy etc)
Why not let them have it? what's the
difference between a child having a suck
of a pacifier vs a tddler or even school
aged child dragging a special blanky
around? I've seen parents allow a child to
bring their special thing to school with
them, and even seen schools that encourage
it.
If a child is really hungry or in pain,
then the comfort item will not fix that.
There is no chance of a child being
malnurished just because they suck on a
pacifier- they'll still get hungry and
throw that thing right at you if you keep
trying to give it to them instead of
food!
I had a pacifier, I kept it until I was
about 4, my teeth are perfect. Mys siter
went off hers earlier- preferred her
thumb. Her baby teeth were a bit wonky,
her adult teeth are regular.
My yougest siter was still having a suck
when she was in school. Her teeth are fine
too.
My middle sister used to like rubbing a
piece of materoial between two fingers, or
toes- that was her comfort thing- she
still does it from time to time. I've seen
loads of kids do that- why is nobody
concered about damage to the childrens
finger joints, or bones? Nobody says-
"that child will get arthritis"????
The odds of a soft well sucked (have you
ever noticed kids prefer a pacifier that's
been well "broken in") pacifier causing
permanent damage to a childs teeth are
negligable.
Yet, people get all upset about it.
Do what works for you and the child. No
matter what the comfort thing is, the
child will grow oiut of it themselves
eventually.
Not many people are bringing binky, blanky
or ted on their honeymoon!!!
|
|
|
|
|