I am 16 years old and uncircumcised and I
recently discovered that my frenulum is
too short (a condition known as Frenulum
Breve). I finally saw a urologist and he
agreed that something needed to be done
about it. He said that I need either a
frenuloplasty, which would leave the
foreskin intact, or a full circumcision.
He asures me that a circumcision at this
age is no problem, and is what he
recomends. I am leaning towards getting a
full circumcision since I figure if I need
do something, instead of going halfway
with a frenuloplasty, why not just get a
full circumcision? Its also slightly a
matter of preference.
Sorry for taking so long, but my actual
question is is there anyone who has
recently been circumcised at my age or a
few years later? My doctor assures me
that it is a simple procedue with at most
a ten day recovery period. Is this true?
Is there any long lasting pain or other
problems? I am a little concerned because
it would be rather late in my life. Are
their any side effects or scarring?
Please, would greatly appreciate a
response soon. I need to make a decision
relatively soon.
|
Haku
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 2
Re: Haha Y Didnt U Get Circumced Wen U Were Born Posted: 07-02-07 13:36pm
jenny1992
wrote:
haha y didnt u get Circumced
wen u were
born
Oh yes, very funny you ignorant little
imbecile. Considering my older brother
almost died and was in the Intensive Care
Unit for two weeks when he was born, he
wasnt circumcized. Since he was not,
neither was I. Thats why. That and the
fact that the U.S. is one of the only
countries in the entire world that
habitually circumcizes babies. Also,
besides at birth, age 15 - 25 is about the
most common age to get a circumcision.
Wow, you are quite the ignorant little
fool. I truly pity you.
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 07-02-07 14:06pm
DOn't let dumb people get under your skin
^^
Sorry for not posting a reply... I don't
know anyone who's been circumcised lately.
